banner
Aurum Aegis
6833 decks (2.140%)
Price History
Aurum Aegis
Guardian Equipment - Off Hand
Victor Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Victor.) This counts as a Gold. Temper (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, put a -1{d} counter on it, then if it has 0{d}, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
6.266.257323103
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.872.874508513
Hero
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Victor Goldmane
Victor Goldmane
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Victor Goldmane that play both.
Equipment
Civic Steps
Civic Steps
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Civic Steps that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
Gauntlets of Iron Will
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Tectonic Plating
Tectonic Plating
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crown of Providence that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Balance of Justice that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Golden Glare
Golden Glare
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Golden Glare that play both.
Time Skippers
Time Skippers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Time Skippers that play both.
Crater Fist
Crater Fist
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Crater Fist that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
Rampart of the Ram's Head
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Miller's Grindstone
Miller's Grindstone
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Anothos
Anothos
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Anothos that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Titan's Fist that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
Sledge of Anvilheim
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Flail of Agony
Flail of Agony
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Flail of Agony that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.740276035
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Tear Asunder that play both.
Attack Action
The Golden Son
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.823793827
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and The Golden Son that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.870548057
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.873851706
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.868238786
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.872447272
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.872959184
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.865138233
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.868838028
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.873655424
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.871617618
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.849102773
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.911841172
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.854340474
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.825648084
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Clash of Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.829043684
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.830985915
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.809392265
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Wallop (Blue)
Wallop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.827859570
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Wallop (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Blue)
Clash of Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.757498171
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Might (Blue) that play both.
Primed to Fight
Primed to Fight
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.766730402
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Primed to Fight that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.687916976
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.747716895
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Pulverize
Pulverize
Avg. played: Β 
1.871.866805411
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Pulverize that play both.
Disable (Red)
Disable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.614025400
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Disable (Red) that play both.
Macho Grande (Red)
Macho Grande (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.447089947
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Macho Grande (Red) that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Clash of Vigor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Vigor (Red) that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Boulder Drop that play both.
Clash of Vigor (Yellow)
Clash of Vigor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Clash of Vigor (Yellow) that play both.
Thunk (Yellow)
Thunk (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Thunk (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.577004968
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Up the Ante that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750328947
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Staunch Response (Red)
Staunch Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.644349223
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Staunch Response (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.859385113
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Trounce
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.852536908
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Trounce that play both.
Test of Vigor
Test of Vigor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Test of Vigor that play both.
Test of Might
Test of Might
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Test of Might that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Aurum Aegis and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.