banner
Coercive Tendency
6320 decks (0.9507%)
Price History
Coercive Tendency
Assassin Attack Reaction
Arakni Specialization (You may only have this in your deck if your hero is Arakni.) Look at the top 3 cards of the defending hero's deck. Put them back in any order, then banish the top card of their deck. If you complete a contract this way, your Assassin attacks get go again this combat chain.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.473.473357134
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.832.829112623
Hero
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Arakni
Arakni
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni that play both.
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Mentor
The Hand that Pulls the Strings
The Hand that Pulls the Strings
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and The Hand that Pulls the Strings that play both.
Equipment
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Flick Knives that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Redback Shroud that play both.
Shriek Razors
Shriek Razors
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shriek Razors that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Balance of Justice that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Crown of Providence that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Scale Peeler that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Graven Call that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Orbitoclast that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.835768677
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Flying High (Red)
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.777777778
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Kiss of Death that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and The Weakest Link that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Pay Day
Pay Day
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.554568528
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pay Day that play both.
Midas Touch
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Midas Touch that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.840579710
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.846409807
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.839466767
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.838672986
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Eradicate that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.843389700
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.840606339
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.816311887
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Already Dead that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.868233430
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Command and Conquer that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.801996672
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.772031205
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.860617761
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Regicide
Regicide
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Regicide that play both.
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Sack the Shifty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.766544118
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sack the Shifty (Red) that play both.
Rob the Rich (Red)
Rob the Rich (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.749904834
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Rob the Rich (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Annihilate the Armed (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.778565102
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Blue) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Blue)
Plunder the Poor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.762234305
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plunder the Poor (Blue) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.821345708
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Fleece the Frail (Red)
Fleece the Frail (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.745205479
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fleece the Frail (Red) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.631.627807487
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.738724728
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.733564014
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Under the Trap-Door
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.694158076
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.686725664
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Nix the Nimble (Red)
Nix the Nimble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Nix the Nimble (Red) that play both.
Undercover Acquisition
Undercover Acquisition
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.636363636
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Undercover Acquisition that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Yellow)
Annihilate the Armed (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Annihilate the Armed (Yellow) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Blue)
Slay the Scholars (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Slay the Scholars (Blue) that play both.
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Rob the Rich (Blue)
Rob the Rich (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Rob the Rich (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.840699273
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.786155203
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.677663438
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.733243968
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Just a Nick that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.643192488
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.252.246964967
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Concealed Blade that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.092.085800301
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Spreading Plague that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.595744681
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shred (Red) that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Blue)
Cut to the Chase (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Blue) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Yellow)
Cut to the Chase (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.651385928
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Cut to the Chase (Yellow) that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Throw Dagger that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.850600448
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.834254144
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.787167449
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.594611145
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Frailty Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.508535490
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Inertia Trap that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.512488437
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.620241411
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.708406820
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
1.331.333333333
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Coercive Tendency and Plague Hive that play both.