Sand Cover (Red)
Draconic Illusionist Instant
Target ash you control gains ward 4 until end of turn. (If your hero would be dealt damage, prevent 4 of that damage and destroy this.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.951.947640463
Average Defense Value:
2.642.636909365
Hero
Equipment
Flamescale Furnace
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Balance of Justice
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Dominion
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Silken Form
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Silken Form that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Wave of Reality
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Wave of Reality that play both.
Ghostly Touch
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Mage Master Boots
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Reflection
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Silent Stilettos
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Seeker's Leggings
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Seeker's Leggings that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ironhide Helm
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Ironhide Helm that play both.
Glory Seeker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Glory Seeker that play both.
Weapon
Action
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.912.906348750
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
2.842.842832470
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
2.812.811602271
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
2.842.839091120
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
2.842.842590432
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
2.842.842425661
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
2.852.845312893
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.842.842831122
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Passing Mirage that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played:
1.901.900686314
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
2.542.542152314
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Burn Them All that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played:
2.462.457344855
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Themai that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played:
1.991.994009144
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:
2.552.553786575
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Lost in Thought that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played:
2.172.165079365
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played:
2.652.645988420
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Skittering Sands (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Skittering Sands (Red) that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
1.351.349273608
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.542.542446043
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Pierce Reality that play both.
Haze Bending
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Haze Bending that play both.
Shimmers of Silver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Shimmers of Silver that play both.
Attack Action
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.743693635
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.862.861863847
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.762503656
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.663988724
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.792.789779809
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.663741664
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.766778149
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.742.736025553
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.802.801436154
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Sweeping Blow (Blue) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.781643472
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Embermaw Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.585423729
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
2.302.297260274
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played:
2.352.352657005
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Standing Order that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
2.602.603485839
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
2.372.368480090
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Embermaw Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.542.540596095
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Dustup (Blue) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.411428571
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.583920188
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
2.472.469165659
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Billowing Mirage (Blue) that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.521392313
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Ripple Away that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.812.813431999
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.722.716730038
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Flicker Trick
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Flicker Trick that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.704453441
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.671.674180756
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Remembrance that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.202.204646797
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sand Cover (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.