Sift (Red)
Generic Action
Put up to 4 cards from your hand on the bottom of your deck, then draw that many cards.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.793.793728020
Average Defense Value:
2.652.650977908
Hero
Valda Brightaxe
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Valda Brightaxe that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Kassai
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kassai that play both.
Bravo, Showstopper
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bravo, Showstopper that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Kano, Dracai of Aether
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Equipment
Earthlore Bounty
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Crater Fist
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crater Fist that play both.
Mage Master Boots
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Civic Steps
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Civic Steps that play both.
Arcane Lantern
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Dominion
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Hood
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Crown of Providence
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Storm Striders
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Metacarpus Node
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Civic Peak
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Civic Peak that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Ironrot Legs
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Ironrot Legs that play both.
Balance of Justice
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Bastion of Duty
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Time Skippers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Time Skippers that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Aurum Aegis
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Robe of Rapture
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Robe of Rapture that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
Anothos
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Anothos that play both.
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Kraken's Aethervein
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Kraken's Aethervein that play both.
High Riser
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and High Riser that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
Hot Streak
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Hot Streak that play both.
Miller's Grindstone
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Waning Moon
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Sift (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.472.467889908
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sift (Blue) that play both.
Sift (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.442.437806874
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sift (Yellow) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played:
2.252.247524752
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Tectonic Rift
Avg. played:
1.841.835616438
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tectonic Rift that play both.
Potion of Luck
Avg. played:
2.212.213403880
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Potion of Luck that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
2.622.623978202
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cash In that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
2.502.501901141
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
2.742.738938053
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Energy Potion that play both.
Blazing Aether
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blazing Aether that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Cash Out
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cash Out that play both.
Talisman of Tithes
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Tithes that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Amulet of Echoes
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Amulet of Echoes that play both.
Talisman of Balance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Balance that play both.
Pry (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pry (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.480769231
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blessing of Deliverance (Red) that play both.
Starting Stake
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Starting Stake that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played:
2.422.421052632
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Raise an Army that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blessing of Deliverance (Blue) that play both.
Show Time!
Avg. played:
2.582.583333333
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Show Time! that play both.
Tempest Aurora (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tempest Aurora (Blue) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckle that play both.
Aether Arc
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Aether Arc that play both.
Talisman of Cremation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Talisman of Cremation that play both.
Amulet of Intervention
Avg. played:
2.452.447058824
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Amulet of Intervention that play both.
Mind Warp
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mind Warp that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played:
2.522.519148936
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Imposing Visage that play both.
Earthlore Empowerment (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Earthlore Empowerment (Red) that play both.
Chain Lightning
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Chain Lightning that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Seismic Stir (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Seismic Stir (Red) that play both.
Aether Dart (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Aether Dart (Red) that play both.
Embolden (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Embolden (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Spinal Crush
Avg. played:
2.222.221748401
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Spinal Crush that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played:
2.232.228132388
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cranial Crush that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.212.211352657
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.232.230769231
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.242.235653236
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Pulverize
Avg. played:
1.951.945666235
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pulverize that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.172.173076923
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
2.102.100750268
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played:
2.252.245243129
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Righteous Cleansing
Avg. played:
1.651.652083333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Righteous Cleansing that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.272.271186441
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Disable (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played:
2.312.308045977
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Mangle
Avg. played:
1.701.702857143
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Mangle that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Thunder Quake (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Thunder Quake (Red) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played:
2.322.320916905
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Crippling Crush
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crippling Crush that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Boulder Drop that play both.
Crush Confidence (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Crush Confidence (Red) that play both.
Debilitate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Debilitate (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Red) that play both.
Star Struck
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Star Struck that play both.
Cartilage Crush (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Cartilage Crush (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Bet Big that play both.
Buckling Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Buckling Blow (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.192.186495177
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.352.351648352
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Blade Flurry that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.402.400386847
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.402.401433692
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Staunch Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Staunch Response (Blue) that play both.
Unmovable (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Unmovable (Blue) that play both.
Instant
Brainstorm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Brainstorm that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Grandeur of Valahai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sift (Red) and Grandeur of Valahai that play both.