Standing Order
Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this attacks or defends, you may put a card from your arsenal on the bottom of your deck. If you do, this gets +2{p} and +2{d}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.982.980607529
Average Defense Value:
2.662.662307281
Hero
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Dromai, Ash Artist
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Dromai, Ash Artist that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Arakni, Huntsman
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Providence
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Balance of Justice
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Boots
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Arcane Lantern
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Nullrune Hood
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Flick Knives
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Flick Knives that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Refraction Bolters
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Crown of Dominion
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Ironsong Versus
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Mask of Momentum
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Mask of Perdition
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Tide Flippers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Tide Flippers that play both.
Storm Striders
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Storm Striders that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Breaking Scales
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Breaking Scales that play both.
Achilles Accelerator
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Achilles Accelerator that play both.
Prized Galea
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Prized Galea that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Silken Form
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Silken Form that play both.
Mage Master Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Viziertronic Model i
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Viziertronic Model i that play both.
Civic Steps
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Civic Steps that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Teklo Base Arms
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Teklo Base Arms that play both.
Teklo Base Legs
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Teklo Base Legs that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Storm of Sandikai
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Graven Call
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Graven Call that play both.
Scale Peeler
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Scale Peeler that play both.
Waning Moon
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Waning Moon that play both.
Teklo Plasma Pistol
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Teklo Plasma Pistol that play both.
Orbitoclast
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Orbitoclast that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.712.706314244
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.502.496674058
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Controller
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Evo Steel Soul Controller that play both.
Evo Steel Soul Tower
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Evo Steel Soul Tower that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Passing Mirage that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Spoils of War that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and This Round's on Me that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Invoke Themai that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Spark of Genius
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Spark of Genius that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Burn Them All that play both.
Swell Tidings
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Swell Tidings that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Commanding Performance that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.782.775253746
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.722.717001056
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.410863510
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.392405063
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Already Dead that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Shake Down that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Eradicate that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.342.343137255
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Ripple Away that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Dishonor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Dishonor that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Cranial Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Give and Take that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Lord of Wind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Lord of Wind that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Bonds of Ancestry (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Up the Ante that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.759784076
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.742.741717791
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Unmovable (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.579896907
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Unmovable (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Inertia Trap that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played:
2.552.545205479
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Hold the Line that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and That All You Got? that play both.
Block
Test of Strength
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Test of Strength that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.557660626
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.498019802
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.501.503759398
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Remembrance that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Art of War that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Standing Order and Heart of Fyendal that play both.