Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red)
Runeblade Action
Reveal the top 3 cards of your deck. Create a Runechant token for each Runeblade attack action card revealed this way, then put the cards on top of your deck in any order.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.152.154477309
Average Defense Value:
2.592.588707820
Hero
living legend - Blitz
Viserai
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Viserai that play both.
Vynnset, Iron Maiden
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vynnset, Iron Maiden that play both.
Viserai, Rune Blood
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Viserai, Rune Blood that play both.
Vynnset
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vynnset that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Chane
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Chane that play both.
Equipment
Vexing Quillhand
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Aether Ironweave
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Sutcliffe's Suede Hides
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sutcliffe's Suede Hides that play both.
Bloodied Oval
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodied Oval that play both.
Crown of Providence
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Ebon Fold
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ebon Fold that play both.
Grimoire of the Haunt
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Grimoire of the Haunt that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Balance of Justice
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Carrion Husk
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Carrion Husk that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Dance of Darkness
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Dance of Darkness that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Mage Master Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Arcane Lantern
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Ironrot Helm
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ironrot Helm that play both.
Hope Merchant's Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Hope Merchant's Hood that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Grasp of Darkness
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Grasp of Darkness that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Amethyst Tiara
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Amethyst Tiara that play both.
Weapon
Flail of Agony
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Flail of Agony that play both.
Scepter of Pain
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Scepter of Pain that play both.
Rosetta Thorn
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Nebula Blade
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nebula Blade that play both.
Reaping Blade
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Reaping Blade that play both.
Annals of Sutcliffe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Annals of Sutcliffe that play both.
Action
Read the Runes (Red)
Avg. played:
2.402.400432900
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Read the Runes (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.669642857
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.753731343
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Red) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.632.634980989
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Blue) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Red) that play both.
Mordred Tide
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mordred Tide that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.452.449704142
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Blue) that play both.
Sonata Fantasmia
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sonata Fantasmia that play both.
Become the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Become the Arknight that play both.
Funeral Moon
Avg. played:
2.642.639097744
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Funeral Moon that play both.
Runic Reaping (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reaping (Red) that play both.
Envelop in Darkness (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.382.378787879
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Envelop in Darkness (Yellow) that play both.
Mauvrion Skies (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.692.686746988
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Mauvrion Skies (Yellow) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodspill Invocation (Red) that play both.
Revel in Runeblood
Avg. played:
2.542.543589744
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Revel in Runeblood that play both.
Sonata Galaxia
Avg. played:
2.192.190476190
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sonata Galaxia that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Red)
Avg. played:
2.312.308510638
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Putrid Stirrings (Red) that play both.
Runic Reckoning
Avg. played:
2.702.701149425
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reckoning that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Read the Runes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.312.310344828
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Read the Runes (Yellow) that play both.
Blessing of Occult (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Blessing of Occult (Red) that play both.
Shadow Puppetry
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shadow Puppetry that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Putrid Stirrings (Blue) that play both.
Tome of the Arknight
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Tome of the Arknight that play both.
Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Yellow) that play both.
Beseech the Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Beseech the Demigon (Red) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Lead the Charge (Blue) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Oath of the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Lead the Charge (Red) that play both.
Runeblood Incantation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runeblood Incantation (Yellow) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Sky Fire Lanterns (Red)
Avg. played:
2.402.397435897
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sky Fire Lanterns (Red) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Seeds of Agony (Red) that play both.
Runic Reaping (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reaping (Blue) that play both.
Lead the Charge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Lead the Charge (Yellow) that play both.
Oath of the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Oath of the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Blue) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Requiem for the Damned
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Requiem for the Damned that play both.
Looming Doom
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Looming Doom that play both.
Come to Fight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Come to Fight (Red) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodspill Invocation (Yellow) that play both.
Bloodspill Invocation (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bloodspill Invocation (Blue) that play both.
Read the Runes (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Read the Runes (Blue) that play both.
Runic Reaping (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reaping (Yellow) that play both.
Bequest the Vast Beyond
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bequest the Vast Beyond that play both.
Rattle Bones
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rattle Bones that play both.
Putrid Stirrings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Putrid Stirrings (Yellow) that play both.
suspended - Blitz
Seeds of Agony (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Seeds of Agony (Yellow) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Tear Through the Portal (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Tear Through the Portal (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Vantom Wraith (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.377777778
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Wraith (Red) that play both.
Widespread Ruin
Avg. played:
2.562.559633028
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Widespread Ruin that play both.
Deathly Wail (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.552511416
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Wail (Red) that play both.
Widespread Annihilation
Avg. played:
2.572.565853659
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Widespread Annihilation that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.332.325581395
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Wraith (Blue) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Red)
Avg. played:
2.252.254901961
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Banshee (Red) that play both.
Widespread Destruction
Avg. played:
2.582.579487179
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Widespread Destruction that play both.
Meat and Greet (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.386617100
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Meat and Greet (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.692.694267516
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Wail (Blue) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.578313253
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Delight (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Red) that play both.
Deathly Wail (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.652.654135338
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Wail (Yellow) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.342.338983051
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Blue) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.466666667
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Amplify the Arknight (Red) that play both.
Rune Flash (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.447916667
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rune Flash (Red) that play both.
Dread Triptych
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Dread Triptych that play both.
Vantom Wraith (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Wraith (Yellow) that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.322.322834646
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Strike (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.512.512195122
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Blue) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Banshee (Blue) that play both.
Consuming Volition (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.389705882
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Consuming Volition (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.496644295
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Red) that play both.
Amplify the Arknight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.432.430894309
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Amplify the Arknight (Blue) that play both.
Vexing Malice
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vexing Malice that play both.
Arknight Ascendancy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arknight Ascendancy that play both.
Shadow of Ursur
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shadow of Ursur that play both.
Meat and Greet (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Meat and Greet (Blue) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Spellblade Strike (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Strike (Blue) that play both.
Vantom Banshee (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Vantom Banshee (Yellow) that play both.
Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ninth Blade of the Blood Oath that play both.
Bounding Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Bounding Demigon (Red) that play both.
Rift Skitter (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rift Skitter (Red) that play both.
Meat and Greet (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Meat and Greet (Yellow) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arcanic Crackle (Blue) that play both.
Drowning Dire (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Drowning Dire (Red) that play both.
Shrill of Skullform (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Shrill of Skullform (Yellow) that play both.
Runic Reclamation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Runic Reclamation that play both.
Spellblade Assault (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Spellblade Assault (Yellow) that play both.
Soul Reaping
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Soul Reaping that play both.
Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.488372093
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Drawn to the Dark Dimension (Red) that play both.
Deathly Duet (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Duet (Red) that play both.
Reek of Corruption (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Reek of Corruption (Red) that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Rip Through Reality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rip Through Reality (Red) that play both.
Rift Bind (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rift Bind (Red) that play both.
Piercing Shadow Vise (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Piercing Shadow Vise (Red) that play both.
Rune Flash (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Rune Flash (Blue) that play both.
Deathly Duet (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Duet (Blue) that play both.
Deathly Delight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Deathly Delight (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reduce to Runechant (Red)
Avg. played:
2.802.796226415
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.542857143
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Reduce to Runechant (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Reduce to Runechant (Yellow) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.452.448717949
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Oblivion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Oblivion that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Art of War that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Arknight Shard
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sutcliffe's Research Notes (Red) and Arknight Shard that play both.