banner
New
Chart the High Seas
1512 decks (0.2340%)
Price History

No price data yet.

Chart the High Seas
Pirate,necromancer Action
Look at the top 2 cards of your deck. You may pitch a blue card from among them. Put the rest into your graveyard. Create a Gold token for each yellow card put into your graveyard this way. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.742.735705055
Average Defense Value: Β 
1.811.806367818
Hero
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Equipment
Compass of Sunken Depths
Compass of Sunken Depths
99% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
New
Dead Threads
Dead Threads
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Dead Threads that play both.
New
Gold-Baited Hook
Gold-Baited Hook
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Mage Master Boots
Mage Master Boots
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Crown of Providence that play both.
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Tricorn of Saltwater Death that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Balance of Justice that play both.
Breakwater Undertow
Breakwater Undertow
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Breakwater Undertow that play both.
New
Head Stone
Head Stone
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Head Stone that play both.
Washed Up Wave
Washed Up Wave
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Washed Up Wave that play both.
Graven Justaucorpse
Graven Justaucorpse
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Graven Justaucorpse that play both.
Action
Avast Ye!
Avast Ye!
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Avast Ye! that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Portside Exchange
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Portside Exchange that play both.
Call to the Grave
Call to the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Call to the Grave that play both.
New
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Avg. played: Β 
2.932.932314410
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Chum, Friendly First Mate that play both.
Riggermortis
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.887681159
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Riggermortis that play both.
Loot the Hold
Loot the Hold
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.918083462
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Loot the Hold that play both.
New
Give No Quarter
Give No Quarter
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.875739645
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Give No Quarter that play both.
New
Tip the Barkeep
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.887369268
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.824261275
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Limpit, Hop-a-long that play both.
New
Diamond Amulet
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Diamond Amulet that play both.
Anka, Drag Under
Anka, Drag Under
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.770866142
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Anka, Drag Under that play both.
New
Wailer Humperdinck
Wailer Humperdinck
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.302008608
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Wailer Humperdinck that play both.
New
Swabbie
Swabbie
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.423144876
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Swabbie that play both.
New
Flying High (Blue)
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.769083969
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Avg. played: Β 
2.052.053164557
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Oysten, Heart of Gold that play both.
New
Ruby Amulet
Ruby Amulet
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Ruby Amulet that play both.
Loot the Arsenal
Loot the Arsenal
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.719879518
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Loot the Arsenal that play both.
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Lead the Charge (Blue) that play both.
New
Cutty Shark, Quick Clip
Cutty Shark, Quick Clip
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.400778210
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Cutty Shark, Quick Clip that play both.
New
Scooba, Salty Sea Dog
Scooba, Salty Sea Dog
Avg. played: Β 
1.411.413223140
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Scooba, Salty Sea Dog that play both.
New
Chowder, Hearty Cook
Chowder, Hearty Cook
Avg. played: Β 
2.042.042666667
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Chowder, Hearty Cook that play both.
New
Amethyst Amulet
Amethyst Amulet
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Amethyst Amulet that play both.
New
Moray le Fay
Moray le Fay
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Moray le Fay that play both.
Prismatic Leyline
Prismatic Leyline
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Prismatic Leyline that play both.
Attack Action
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
New
Conqueror of the High Seas
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Murderous Rabble that play both.
New
Golden Tipple (Red)
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Back Alley Breakline (Blue)
Back Alley Breakline (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.341.341013825
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Back Alley Breakline (Blue) that play both.
New
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.861372813
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
New
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.866952790
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Command and Conquer that play both.
New
Sea Legs
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.518703242
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Sea Legs that play both.
New
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Jittery Bones (Blue)
Jittery Bones (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Jittery Bones (Blue) that play both.
New
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Saltwater Swell (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Restless Bones (Blue)
Restless Bones (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Restless Bones (Blue) that play both.
Restless Bones (Red)
Restless Bones (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Restless Bones (Red) that play both.
Jittery Bones (Red)
Jittery Bones (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Jittery Bones (Red) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
New
Blood in the Water
Blood in the Water
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.911497105
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Blood in the Water that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.643835616
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Block
New
Sunken Treasure
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.729357798
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Instant
New
Throw Caution to the Wind
Throw Caution to the Wind
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.709486166
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Throw Caution to the Wind that play both.
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Eye of Ophidia that play both.
New
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.