Chart the High Seas
Pirate,necromancer Action
Look at the top 2 cards of your deck. You may pitch a blue card from among them. Put the rest into your graveyard.
Create a Gold token for each yellow card put into your graveyard this way.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.752.754092452
Average Defense Value: Β
1.861.864524528
Hero
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Equipment
Compass of Sunken Depths
99% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Dead Threads
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Dead Threads that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Mage Master Boots
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Nullrune Boots
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Dominion
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Hood
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Balance of Justice
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Providence
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Robe
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Tricorn of Saltwater Death that play both.
Washed Up Wave
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Washed Up Wave that play both.
Head Stone
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Head Stone that play both.
Breakwater Undertow
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Breakwater Undertow that play both.
Graven Justaucorpse
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Graven Justaucorpse that play both.
Action
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Avast Ye!
Avg. played: Β
2.932.929627970
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Avast Ye! that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Portside Exchange that play both.
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β
2.922.917129630
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Riggermortis that play both.
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Avg. played: Β
2.942.936409276
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Chum, Friendly First Mate that play both.
Call to the Grave
Avg. played: Β
2.942.939021451
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Call to the Grave that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
2.832.832447482
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Loot the Hold
Avg. played: Β
2.842.842713955
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Loot the Hold that play both.
Swabbie
Avg. played: Β
2.322.322637696
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Swabbie that play both.
Anka, Drag Under
Avg. played: Β
2.492.491891892
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Anka, Drag Under that play both.
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Diamond Amulet that play both.
Give No Quarter
Avg. played: Β
2.482.477442486
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Give No Quarter that play both.
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Avg. played: Β
1.501.499137634
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Oysten, Heart of Gold that play both.
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333165323
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Limpit, Hop-a-long that play both.
Wailer Humperdinck
Avg. played: Β
1.791.792211120
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Wailer Humperdinck that play both.
Scooba, Salty Sea Dog
Avg. played: Β
1.281.281376518
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Scooba, Salty Sea Dog that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.694087404
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Loot the Arsenal
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Loot the Arsenal that play both.
Prismatic Leyline
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Prismatic Leyline that play both.
Ruby Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Ruby Amulet that play both.
Pearl Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Pearl Amulet that play both.
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Lead the Charge (Blue) that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Cutty Shark, Quick Clip
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Cutty Shark, Quick Clip that play both.
Chowder, Hearty Cook
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Chowder, Hearty Cook that play both.
Moray le Fay
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Moray le Fay that play both.
Attack Action
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
2.952.945626478
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.942.937735375
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.902.896652965
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.912.911035338
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Back Alley Breakline (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.281.280152225
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Back Alley Breakline (Blue) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
2.232.230043997
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Sea Legs that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.723655444
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Saltwater Swell (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.272.267690875
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.612.608695652
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Command and Conquer that play both.
Jittery Bones (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.112.107635695
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Jittery Bones (Blue) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Swiftwater Sloop (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Restless Bones (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Restless Bones (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Blood in the Water
Avg. played: Β
2.652.650368752
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Blood in the Water that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
2.622.622533190
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Snag
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Snag that play both.
Throw Caution to the Wind
Avg. played: Β
2.632.630057803
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Throw Caution to the Wind that play both.
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Eye of Ophidia that play both.
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Chart the High Seas and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.