Limpit, Hop-a-long
Necromancer,pirate Action - Ally
Action - {r}, {t}: Attack. Go again
Watery Grave
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.752.747488519
Average Defense Value: Β
1.851.850986337
Hero
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Equipment
Compass of Sunken Depths
99% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Mage Master Boots
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Dead Threads
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Dead Threads that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Nullrune Boots
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Dominion
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Hood
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Balance of Justice
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Providence
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Robe
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Tricorn of Saltwater Death that play both.
Washed Up Wave
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Washed Up Wave that play both.
Graven Justaucorpse
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Graven Justaucorpse that play both.
Breakwater Undertow
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Breakwater Undertow that play both.
Head Stone
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Head Stone that play both.
Action
Avast Ye!
Avg. played: Β
2.932.933486718
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Avast Ye! that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Portside Exchange that play both.
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β
2.912.913043478
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Riggermortis that play both.
Chart the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Chart the High Seas that play both.
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Avg. played: Β
2.932.932901989
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Chum, Friendly First Mate that play both.
Call to the Grave
Avg. played: Β
2.752.753224044
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Call to the Grave that play both.
Loot the Hold
Avg. played: Β
2.842.844864735
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Loot the Hold that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
2.742.741753063
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Swabbie
Avg. played: Β
2.302.297635934
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Swabbie that play both.
Anka, Drag Under
Avg. played: Β
2.582.578630549
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Anka, Drag Under that play both.
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Avg. played: Β
1.561.557416997
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Oysten, Heart of Gold that play both.
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Diamond Amulet that play both.
Give No Quarter
Avg. played: Β
2.432.433781764
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Give No Quarter that play both.
Wailer Humperdinck
Avg. played: Β
1.741.742239186
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Wailer Humperdinck that play both.
Scooba, Salty Sea Dog
Avg. played: Β
1.271.267485822
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Scooba, Salty Sea Dog that play both.
Loot the Arsenal
Avg. played: Β
2.712.705471478
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Loot the Arsenal that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.670915411
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Prismatic Leyline
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Prismatic Leyline that play both.
Ruby Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Ruby Amulet that play both.
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Lead the Charge (Blue) that play both.
Blanch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Blanch (Red) that play both.
Pearl Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Pearl Amulet that play both.
Cutty Shark, Quick Clip
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Cutty Shark, Quick Clip that play both.
Chowder, Hearty Cook
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Chowder, Hearty Cook that play both.
Moray le Fay
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Moray le Fay that play both.
Attack Action
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
2.932.925588627
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.932.933083762
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.892.888259109
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.912.907130535
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Back Alley Breakline (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.251.245566166
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Back Alley Breakline (Blue) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
2.212.214022140
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Sea Legs that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.676784249
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Saltwater Swell (Red) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.406691800
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.572.567060459
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Command and Conquer that play both.
Jittery Bones (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.262.263698630
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Jittery Bones (Blue) that play both.
Restless Bones (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Restless Bones (Blue) that play both.
Jittery Bones (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Jittery Bones (Red) that play both.
Restless Bones (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Restless Bones (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Blood in the Water
Avg. played: Β
2.562.563535912
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Blood in the Water that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
2.582.577224199
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Snag
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Snag that play both.
Throw Caution to the Wind
Avg. played: Β
2.622.616835994
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Throw Caution to the Wind that play both.
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Eye of Ophidia that play both.
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.