banner
Limpit, Hop-a-long
1493 decks (0.2311%)
Price History

No price data yet.

Limpit, Hop-a-long
Pirate,necromancer Action - Ally
Action - {r}, {t}: Attack. Go again Watery Grave
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.742.742404399
Average Defense Value: Β 
1.791.790988211
Hero
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Equipment
Compass of Sunken Depths
Compass of Sunken Depths
99% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Mage Master Boots
Mage Master Boots
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Mage Master Boots that play both.
New
Dead Threads
Dead Threads
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Dead Threads that play both.
New
Gold-Baited Hook
Gold-Baited Hook
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Crown of Providence that play both.
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Tricorn of Saltwater Death that play both.
Washed Up Wave
Washed Up Wave
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Washed Up Wave that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Balance of Justice that play both.
Breakwater Undertow
Breakwater Undertow
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Breakwater Undertow that play both.
New
Head Stone
Head Stone
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Head Stone that play both.
Graven Justaucorpse
Graven Justaucorpse
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Graven Justaucorpse that play both.
Action
Avast Ye!
Avast Ye!
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Avast Ye! that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Portside Exchange
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Portside Exchange that play both.
New
Chart the High Seas
Chart the High Seas
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Chart the High Seas that play both.
Riggermortis
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.895149786
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Riggermortis that play both.
Call to the Grave
Call to the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.828402367
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Call to the Grave that play both.
New
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Avg. played: Β 
2.932.930107527
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Chum, Friendly First Mate that play both.
Loot the Hold
Loot the Hold
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.915188897
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Loot the Hold that play both.
New
Give No Quarter
Give No Quarter
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.864177919
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Give No Quarter that play both.
New
Tip the Barkeep
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.887166236
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Anka, Drag Under
Anka, Drag Under
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.779446640
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Anka, Drag Under that play both.
New
Diamond Amulet
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Diamond Amulet that play both.
New
Wailer Humperdinck
Wailer Humperdinck
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.285064443
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Wailer Humperdinck that play both.
New
Swabbie
Swabbie
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.413309982
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Swabbie that play both.
New
Flying High (Blue)
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.779245283
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Avg. played: Β 
2.082.079905993
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Oysten, Heart of Gold that play both.
Loot the Arsenal
Loot the Arsenal
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.766756032
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Loot the Arsenal that play both.
New
Ruby Amulet
Ruby Amulet
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Ruby Amulet that play both.
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Lead the Charge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Lead the Charge (Blue) that play both.
New
Scooba, Salty Sea Dog
Scooba, Salty Sea Dog
Avg. played: Β 
1.371.373913043
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Scooba, Salty Sea Dog that play both.
New
Cutty Shark, Quick Clip
Cutty Shark, Quick Clip
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.410788382
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Cutty Shark, Quick Clip that play both.
New
Chowder, Hearty Cook
Chowder, Hearty Cook
Avg. played: Β 
2.042.038251366
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Chowder, Hearty Cook that play both.
New
Amethyst Amulet
Amethyst Amulet
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Amethyst Amulet that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Timesnap Potion that play both.
New
Moray le Fay
Moray le Fay
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Moray le Fay that play both.
Attack Action
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β 
2.942.936896808
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Murderous Rabble that play both.
New
Conqueror of the High Seas
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
New
Golden Tipple (Red)
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Back Alley Breakline (Blue)
Back Alley Breakline (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.311.312900274
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Back Alley Breakline (Blue) that play both.
New
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.865047233
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
New
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.871287129
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
New
Sea Legs
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.513853904
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Sea Legs that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Command and Conquer that play both.
New
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Jittery Bones (Blue)
Jittery Bones (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Jittery Bones (Blue) that play both.
New
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Saltwater Swell (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Restless Bones (Blue)
Restless Bones (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Restless Bones (Blue) that play both.
Restless Bones (Red)
Restless Bones (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Restless Bones (Red) that play both.
Jittery Bones (Red)
Jittery Bones (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Jittery Bones (Red) that play both.
Battalion Barque (Red)
Battalion Barque (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Battalion Barque (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
New
Blood in the Water
Blood in the Water
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.916740478
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Blood in the Water that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.663265306
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Block
New
Sunken Treasure
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.720095694
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Instant
New
Throw Caution to the Wind
Throw Caution to the Wind
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.711934156
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Throw Caution to the Wind that play both.
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Eye of Ophidia that play both.
New
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Limpit, Hop-a-long and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.