Conqueror of the High Seas
Pirate Attack Action - Attack
When this hits a hero, destroy all cards in their arsenal. Create a Gold token for each card destroyed this way.
High Tide - If there are 2 or more blue cards in your pitch zone, this gets +1{p} and go again.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.702.702028319
Average Defense Value:
2.142.142556870
Hero
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Marlynn, Treasure Hunter that play both.
Equipment
Gold-Baited Hook
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Nullrune Boots
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Dead Threads
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Dead Threads that play both.
Mage Master Boots
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Crown of Dominion
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Hood
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Balance of Justice
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Providence
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Base of the Mountain
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Sealace Sarong
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Sealace Sarong that play both.
Nullrune Robe
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Quiver of Rustling Leaves
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Quiver of Rustling Leaves that play both.
Enchanted Quiver
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Enchanted Quiver that play both.
Skullbone Crosswrap
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Skullbone Crosswrap that play both.
Tricorn of Saltwater Death
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Tricorn of Saltwater Death that play both.
Bull's Eye Bracers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Bull's Eye Bracers that play both.
Weapon
Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon that play both.
Action
Portside Exchange
Avg. played:
2.942.938341751
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Portside Exchange that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Chart the High Seas
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Chart the High Seas that play both.
Riggermortis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Riggermortis that play both.
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Chum, Friendly First Mate that play both.
Avast Ye!
Avg. played:
2.922.918289474
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Avast Ye! that play both.
Call to the Grave
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Call to the Grave that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played:
2.732.727848101
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Loot the Hold
Avg. played:
2.812.808420746
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Loot the Hold that play both.
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Avg. played:
1.321.322204834
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Oysten, Heart of Gold that play both.
Swabbie
Avg. played:
2.182.179310345
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Swabbie that play both.
Wailer Humperdinck
Avg. played:
1.631.626121488
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Wailer Humperdinck that play both.
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Diamond Amulet that play both.
Anka, Drag Under
Avg. played:
2.492.490699555
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Anka, Drag Under that play both.
Give No Quarter
Avg. played:
2.302.301536345
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Give No Quarter that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Avg. played:
2.222.224074433
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Limpit, Hop-a-long that play both.
Scooba, Salty Sea Dog
Avg. played:
1.781.783345615
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Scooba, Salty Sea Dog that play both.
Three of a Kind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Three of a Kind that play both.
Big Game Trophy Shot
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Big Game Trophy Shot that play both.
Prismatic Leyline
Avg. played:
2.572.572543917
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Prismatic Leyline that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played:
2.712.705882353
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
Loan Shark
Avg. played:
2.001.999018967
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Loan Shark that play both.
Premeditate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Premeditate that play both.
Gold the Tip
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Gold the Tip that play both.
Take Aim (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Take Aim (Red) that play both.
Cutty Shark, Quick Clip
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Cutty Shark, Quick Clip that play both.
Pearl Amulet
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Pearl Amulet that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played:
2.932.932118653
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.912.913316583
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played:
2.262.258966245
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Back Alley Breakline (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.341.339776835
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Back Alley Breakline (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.872.870170710
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.657100654
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Saltwater Swell (Red) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played:
2.032.029025299
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Sea Legs that play both.
Red Fin Harpoon
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Red Fin Harpoon that play both.
Blue Fin Harpoon
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Blue Fin Harpoon that play both.
Jittery Bones (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.772.769846564
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Jittery Bones (Blue) that play both.
King Shark Harpoon
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and King Shark Harpoon that play both.
King Kraken Harpoon
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and King Kraken Harpoon that play both.
Yellow Fin Harpoon
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Yellow Fin Harpoon that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.410419314
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.622.622338569
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Command and Conquer that play both.
Drill Shot (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Drill Shot (Blue) that play both.
Battering Bolt
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Battering Bolt that play both.
Endless Arrow
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Endless Arrow that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Bolt'n' Shot (Blue) that play both.
Infecting Shot (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Infecting Shot (Blue) that play both.
Searing Shot (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Searing Shot (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Swiftwater Sloop (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Blood in the Water
Avg. played:
2.652.647223863
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Blood in the Water that play both.
Tarpit Trap
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Tarpit Trap that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.458563536
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played:
2.742.740409817
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Return Fire
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Return Fire that play both.
Instant
Snag
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Snag that play both.
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Eye of Ophidia that play both.
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Conqueror of the High Seas and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.
