Command and Conquer
Generic Attack Action - Attack
Defense reactions can't be played to Command and Conquers chain link.
If Command and Conquer hits a hero, destroy all cards in theirΒ arsenal.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.273.273423861
Average Defense Value: Β
2.672.666657658
Hero
Uzuri, Switchblade
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Nuu, Alluring Desire
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Arakni, Marionette
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
New
Valda, Seismic Impact
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Valda, Seismic Impact that play both.
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Marlynn, Treasure Hunter
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Marlynn, Treasure Hunter that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Crown of Providence that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
Nullrune Boots
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Dead Threads
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Dead Threads that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Flick Knives
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Flick Knives that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Traverse the Universe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Balance of Justice
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Balance of Justice that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Mask of Deceit
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Tide Flippers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Tide Flippers that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Civic Steps
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Civic Steps that play both.
Mask of Momentum
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Well Grounded
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Well Grounded that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Skullhorn
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Skullhorn that play both.
Sealace Sarong
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Sealace Sarong that play both.
Savage Sash
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Savage Sash that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Face Purgatory
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Face Purgatory that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Arousing Wave
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Arousing Wave that play both.
Crown of Dominion
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Calming Gesture
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Calming Gesture that play both.
Tectonic Plating
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Aurum Aegis
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Meridian Pathway
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Meridian Pathway that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Mask of Perdition
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Pouncing Paws
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Crater Fist
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Crater Fist that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Weapon
Hunter's Klaive
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Spider's Bite
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Spider's Bite that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Scale Peeler
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Scale Peeler that play both.
Titan's Fist
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Titan's Fist that play both.
Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Hammerhead, Harpoon Cannon that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Beckoning Mistblade
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Anothos
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Anothos that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Tiger Taming Khakkara
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Mandible Claw
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Mandible Claw that play both.
Action
Portside Exchange
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Portside Exchange that play both.
Tip the Barkeep
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Tip the Barkeep that play both.
Avast Ye!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Avast Ye! that play both.
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Kiss of Death that play both.
Sawbones, Dock Hand
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Sawbones, Dock Hand that play both.
Chart the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Chart the High Seas that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Chum, Friendly First Mate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Chum, Friendly First Mate that play both.
Riggermortis
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Riggermortis that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.752.747011432
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666696871
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and The Weakest Link that play both.
Loot the Hold
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Loot the Hold that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Diamond Amulet that play both.
Swabbie
Avg. played: Β
2.312.310780669
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Swabbie that play both.
Oysten, Heart of Gold
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Oysten, Heart of Gold that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Limpit, Hop-a-long
Avg. played: Β
2.552.548991354
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Limpit, Hop-a-long that play both.
Give No Quarter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Give No Quarter that play both.
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Dual Threat that play both.
Wailer Humperdinck
Avg. played: Β
1.411.405042017
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Wailer Humperdinck that play both.
Channel the Millennium Tree
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Channel the Millennium Tree that play both.
Anka, Drag Under
Avg. played: Β
2.482.483870968
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Anka, Drag Under that play both.
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Tear Asunder that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Rage Specter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Rage Specter that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Germinate that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Trot Along that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Sea Floor Salvage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Sea Floor Salvage that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and This Round's on Me that play both.
Big Game Trophy Shot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Big Game Trophy Shot that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Ring of Roses
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Ring of Roses that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.802.797358969
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Conqueror of the High Seas
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Conqueror of the High Seas that play both.
Murderous Rabble
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Murderous Rabble that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Golden Tipple (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β
2.582.584245077
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Sea Legs that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Plow Under that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Saltwater Swell (Blue) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Golden Tipple (Yellow) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Spinal Crush that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Swing Big that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Cranial Crush that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Beast Within that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Erase Face that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Send Packing that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Blue Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Blue Fin Harpoon that play both.
Red Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Red Fin Harpoon that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
King Shark Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and King Shark Harpoon that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
King Kraken Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and King Kraken Harpoon that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Yellow Fin Harpoon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Yellow Fin Harpoon that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Swiftwater Sloop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.425196850
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Swiftwater Sloop (Red) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Saltwater Swell (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.515699334
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Saltwater Swell (Red) that play both.
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Chase the Tail that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Sound the Alarm that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and The Golden Son that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Shake Down that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Just a Nick that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.663927808
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Siren's Call
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Siren's Call that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Blade Flurry that play both.
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Throw Dagger that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.842.841331791
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.842.835376652
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.742.741977394
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Blood in the Water
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Blood in the Water that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and That All You Got? that play both.
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Reckless Swing that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played: Β
2.632.629149378
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Trounce that play both.
Instant
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Pass Over that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Preserve Tradition that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Stir the Pot that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666401045
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.469147789
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Art of War that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Remembrance that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Rampant Growth - Life
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Rampant Growth - Life that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Command and Conquer and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.