Herald of Tenacity (Red)
Light Illusionist Attack Action - Attack
Dominate (The defending hero can't defend Herald of Tenacity with more than 1 card from their hand.)
If Herald of Tenacity hits, put it into your hero's soul. (Put this card face up under your hero card.)
Phantasm (If Herald of Tenacity is defended by a non-Illusionist attack action card with 6 or more [Power], destroy Herald of Tenacity and close the combat chain.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
4.994.994048093
Average Defense Value:
2.842.840427367
Hero
Prism
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Prism that play both.
Prism, Advent of Thrones
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Prism, Advent of Thrones that play both.
Prism, Awakener of Sol
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Prism, Awakener of Sol that play both.
Equipment
Calming Gesture
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Halo of Illumination
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Halo of Illumination that play both.
Empyrean Rapture
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Empyrean Rapture that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Dream Weavers
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Dream Weavers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Vestige of Sol
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Vestige of Sol that play both.
Silent Stilettos
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Wave of Reality
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Wave of Reality that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Reflection
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Crown of Reflection that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Crown of Providence
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Ghostly Touch
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Weapon
Luminaris, Angel's Glow
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Luminaris, Angel's Glow that play both.
Luminaris, Celestial Fury
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Luminaris, Celestial Fury that play both.
Iris of Reality
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Iris of Reality that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Luminaris
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Luminaris that play both.
Reality Refractor
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Reality Refractor that play both.
Action
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.742.743498818
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Passing Mirage that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
2.342.344444444
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Pierce Reality that play both.
Great Library of Solana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Great Library of Solana that play both.
Invoke Suraya
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Invoke Suraya that play both.
War Cry of Themis
Avg. played:
2.272.269662921
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and War Cry of Themis that play both.
Haze Bending
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Haze Bending that play both.
Shimmers of Silver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Shimmers of Silver that play both.
Attack Action
Herald of Erudition
Avg. played:
2.812.809663641
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Erudition that play both.
Wartune Herald (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.710600375
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Wartune Herald (Red) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.837008094
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Triumph (Red) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.742.743622778
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Wartune Herald (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.892.892800000
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Triumph (Blue) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.732.734408602
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Wartune Herald (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.722.718943681
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Protection (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.812.813653137
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Triumph (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.692.689075630
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Protection (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.600060459
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Protection (Red) that play both.
Herald of Sekem
Avg. played:
2.232.229357798
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Sekem that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.622.624667932
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Tenacity (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Judgment
Avg. played:
2.712.705011933
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Judgment that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.592.585539715
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Ravages (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.582.577678071
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Ravages (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.386246787
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Ravages (Red) that play both.
Celestial Cataclysm
Avg. played:
2.762.762794476
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Celestial Cataclysm that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.532.528965517
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Tenacity (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.357397504
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Rebirth (Red) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.462.460644007
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Rebirth (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.422.421052632
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Rebirth (Yellow) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Enigma Chimera (Blue) that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Soul Shield
Avg. played:
2.762.759155394
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Soul Shield that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
2.352.351851852
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.608745685
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Figment of Protection
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Figment of Protection that play both.
Figment of Erudition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Figment of Erudition that play both.
Figment of Triumph
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Figment of Triumph that play both.
Figment of Ravages
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Figment of Ravages that play both.
Figment of Rebirth
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Figment of Rebirth that play both.
Figment of War
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Figment of War that play both.
Figment of Judgment
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Figment of Judgment that play both.
Genesis
Avg. played:
2.822.824393577
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Genesis that play both.
Arc Light Sentinel
Avg. played:
2.832.825379993
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Arc Light Sentinel that play both.
Merciful Retribution
Avg. played:
2.662.660390516
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Merciful Retribution that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.702.702258727
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Angelic Wrath (Yellow) that play both.
Figment of Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Figment of Tenacity that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.562.555273834
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Celestial Reprimand (Yellow) that play both.
Tome of Divinity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Tome of Divinity that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.382.380316931
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Angelic Wrath (Blue) that play both.
Parable of Humility
Avg. played:
2.432.426022305
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Parable of Humility that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Red)
Avg. played:
2.432.433794466
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Angelic Wrath (Red) that play both.
Ode to Wrath
Avg. played:
2.572.567827131
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Ode to Wrath that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.553571429
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Celestial Reprimand (Red) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Celestial Reprimand (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Light of Sol
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Light of Sol that play both.
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.