Herald of Tenacity (Red)
Light Illusionist Attack Action - Attack
Dominate (The defending hero can't defend Herald of Tenacity with more than 1 card from their hand.)
If Herald of Tenacity hits, put it into your hero's soul. (Put this card face up under your hero card.)
Phantasm (If Herald of Tenacity is defended by a non-Illusionist attack action card with 6 or more [Power], destroy Herald of Tenacity and close the combat chain.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
4.984.984277098
Average Defense Value:
2.842.839956740
Hero
Prism
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Prism that play both.
Prism, Advent of Thrones
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Prism, Advent of Thrones that play both.
Prism, Awakener of Sol
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Prism, Awakener of Sol that play both.
Equipment
Calming Gesture
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Halo of Illumination
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Halo of Illumination that play both.
Empyrean Rapture
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Empyrean Rapture that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Dream Weavers
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Dream Weavers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Wave of Reality
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Wave of Reality that play both.
Silent Stilettos
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Vestige of Sol
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Vestige of Sol that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Reflection
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Crown of Reflection that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Crown of Providence
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Ghostly Touch
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Robe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Hood
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Weapon
Luminaris, Angel's Glow
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Luminaris, Angel's Glow that play both.
Luminaris, Celestial Fury
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Luminaris, Celestial Fury that play both.
Iris of Reality
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Iris of Reality that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Luminaris
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Luminaris that play both.
Reality Refractor
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Reality Refractor that play both.
Action
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.732.729553265
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Passing Mirage that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
2.322.323089046
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Pierce Reality that play both.
Invoke Suraya
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Invoke Suraya that play both.
Great Library of Solana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Great Library of Solana that play both.
Haze Bending
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Haze Bending that play both.
Shimmers of Silver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Shimmers of Silver that play both.
Attack Action
Wartune Herald (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.681967213
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Wartune Herald (Red) that play both.
Herald of Erudition
Avg. played:
2.792.786052382
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Erudition that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.819780949
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Triumph (Red) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.722.719733656
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Wartune Herald (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.882.878858025
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Triumph (Blue) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.712.705411463
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Wartune Herald (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.692.688477498
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Protection (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.792.790298507
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Triumph (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.652.648191957
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Protection (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.552836485
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Protection (Red) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.612.613684658
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Tenacity (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Judgment
Avg. played:
2.652.651162791
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Judgment that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.590029326
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Ravages (Blue) that play both.
Celestial Cataclysm
Avg. played:
2.772.773697694
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Celestial Cataclysm that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.387165021
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Ravages (Red) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.522.523841504
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Ravages (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.532.533667622
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Tenacity (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.357894737
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Rebirth (Red) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.472.474833808
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Rebirth (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.412.410456062
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Herald of Rebirth (Yellow) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Enigma Chimera (Blue) that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Enigma Chimera (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Soul Shield
Avg. played:
2.792.786827747
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Soul Shield that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.611638955
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Figment of Protection
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Figment of Protection that play both.
Figment of Erudition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Figment of Erudition that play both.
Figment of Triumph
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Figment of Triumph that play both.
Figment of Ravages
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Figment of Ravages that play both.
Figment of Rebirth
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Figment of Rebirth that play both.
Figment of War
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Figment of War that play both.
Figment of Judgment
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Figment of Judgment that play both.
Genesis
Avg. played:
2.802.802202284
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Genesis that play both.
Arc Light Sentinel
Avg. played:
2.822.816072196
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Arc Light Sentinel that play both.
Merciful Retribution
Avg. played:
2.622.624415142
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Merciful Retribution that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.652.649604222
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Angelic Wrath (Yellow) that play both.
Figment of Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Figment of Tenacity that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.572.572904707
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Celestial Reprimand (Yellow) that play both.
Tome of Divinity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Tome of Divinity that play both.
Parable of Humility
Avg. played:
2.472.472888889
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Parable of Humility that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.407909605
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Angelic Wrath (Red) that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.462.462829736
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Angelic Wrath (Blue) that play both.
Ode to Wrath
Avg. played:
2.572.570164349
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Ode to Wrath that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.564393939
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Celestial Reprimand (Red) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.492.485260771
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Celestial Reprimand (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Light of Sol
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Red) and Light of Sol that play both.