Herald of Tenacity (Blue)
Light Illusionist Attack Action - Attack
Dominate (The defending hero can't defend Herald of Tenacity with more than 1 card from their hand.)
If Herald of Tenacity hits, put it into your hero's soul. (Put this card face up under your hero card.)
Phantasm (If Herald of Tenacity is defended by a non-Illusionist attack action card with 6 or more [Power], destroy Herald of Tenacity and close the combat chain.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
4.574.571457743
Average Defense Value:
2.802.795587467
Hero
Prism, Awakener of Sol
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Prism, Awakener of Sol that play both.
Prism
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Prism that play both.
Prism, Advent of Thrones
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Prism, Advent of Thrones that play both.
Equipment
Halo of Illumination
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Halo of Illumination that play both.
Calming Gesture
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Wave of Reality
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Wave of Reality that play both.
Empyrean Rapture
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Empyrean Rapture that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Silent Stilettos
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Dream Weavers
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Dream Weavers that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Vestige of Sol
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Vestige of Sol that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Crown of Reflection
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Mage Master Boots
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Crown of Providence
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Ghostly Touch
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Ghostly Touch that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Nullrune Robe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Calming Cloak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Calming Cloak that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Boots
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Hood
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Ironhide Legs
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Ironhide Legs that play both.
Weapon
Luminaris, Angel's Glow
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Luminaris, Angel's Glow that play both.
Iris of Reality
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Iris of Reality that play both.
Luminaris, Celestial Fury
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Luminaris, Celestial Fury that play both.
Reality Refractor
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Reality Refractor that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Luminaris
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Luminaris that play both.
Action
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.832.833143724
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Passing Mirage that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
2.792.793658088
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Pierce Reality that play both.
Haze Bending
Avg. played:
2.882.883987915
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Haze Bending that play both.
Shimmers of Silver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Shimmers of Silver that play both.
Invoke Suraya
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Invoke Suraya that play both.
War Cry of Themis
Avg. played:
2.212.211538462
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and War Cry of Themis that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Sapphire Amulet
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Sapphire Amulet that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Great Library of Solana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Great Library of Solana that play both.
Vengeful Apparition (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Vengeful Apparition (Blue) that play both.
Dissolve Reality
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Dissolve Reality that play both.
Attack Action
Wartune Herald (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.756756757
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Wartune Herald (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.892.889617109
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Triumph (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.732.730924855
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Protection (Blue) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.719458545
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Wartune Herald (Red) that play both.
Herald of Erudition
Avg. played:
2.832.830882353
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Erudition that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Red)
Avg. played:
2.882.877727273
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Triumph (Red) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.704441041
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Ravages (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.722.717741935
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Rebirth (Blue) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.722.724910394
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Wartune Herald (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Sekem
Avg. played:
2.222.222222222
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Sekem that play both.
Herald of Protection (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.601099831
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Protection (Red) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.812.813487242
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Triumph (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.582.578824898
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Protection (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.471956224
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Tenacity (Red) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.572.568164509
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Tenacity (Yellow) that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
2.742.741648107
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.447659574
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Ravages (Red) that play both.
Herald of Judgment
Avg. played:
2.712.706145251
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Judgment that play both.
Celestial Cataclysm
Avg. played:
2.752.746012270
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Celestial Cataclysm that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Red)
Avg. played:
2.342.342952275
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Rebirth (Red) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.472.468322981
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Ravages (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.432.428109855
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Rebirth (Yellow) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Enigma Chimera (Blue) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Brothers in Arms (Blue) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Illuminate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Illuminate (Red) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Blue) that play both.
Illuminate (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Illuminate (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Soul Shield
Avg. played:
2.872.870648734
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Soul Shield that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.812.812883436
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.762.755555556
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Flicker Trick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Flicker Trick that play both.
Instant
Figment of Protection
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Figment of Protection that play both.
Figment of Erudition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Figment of Erudition that play both.
Figment of Triumph
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Figment of Triumph that play both.
Figment of Ravages
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Figment of Ravages that play both.
Figment of Rebirth
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Figment of Rebirth that play both.
Genesis
Avg. played:
2.822.822259136
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Genesis that play both.
Arc Light Sentinel
Avg. played:
2.812.805726872
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Arc Light Sentinel that play both.
Figment of Judgment
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Figment of Judgment that play both.
Figment of War
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Figment of War that play both.
Merciful Retribution
Avg. played:
2.542.540408526
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Merciful Retribution that play both.
Figment of Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Figment of Tenacity that play both.
Parable of Humility
Avg. played:
2.612.612666667
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Parable of Humility that play both.
Ode to Wrath
Avg. played:
2.462.461235217
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Ode to Wrath that play both.
Tome of Divinity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Tome of Divinity that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.562.558080808
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Angelic Wrath (Yellow) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.522.521145975
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Celestial Reprimand (Yellow) that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Red)
Avg. played:
2.382.379496403
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Angelic Wrath (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.563535912
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Phantom Tidemaw
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Phantom Tidemaw that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.482.481060606
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Angelic Wrath (Blue) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.512.513698630
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Celestial Reprimand (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Light of Sol
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Light of Sol that play both.
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.