Herald of Tenacity (Blue)
Light Illusionist Attack Action - Attack
Dominate (The defending hero can't defend Herald of Tenacity with more than 1 card from their hand.)
If Herald of Tenacity hits, put it into your hero's soul. (Put this card face up under your hero card.)
Phantasm (If Herald of Tenacity is defended by a non-Illusionist attack action card with 6 or more [Power], destroy Herald of Tenacity and close the combat chain.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
4.524.517802388
Average Defense Value:
2.782.781881465
Hero
Prism, Awakener of Sol
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Prism, Awakener of Sol that play both.
Prism
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Prism that play both.
Prism, Advent of Thrones
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Prism, Advent of Thrones that play both.
Equipment
Halo of Illumination
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Halo of Illumination that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Wave of Reality
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Wave of Reality that play both.
Empyrean Rapture
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Empyrean Rapture that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Silent Stilettos
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Dream Weavers
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Dream Weavers that play both.
Crown of Reflection
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Mage Master Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Vestige of Sol
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Vestige of Sol that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Crown of Providence
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Ghostly Touch
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Robe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Diadem of Dreamstate
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Diadem of Dreamstate that play both.
Nullrune Hood
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Weapon
Luminaris, Angel's Glow
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Luminaris, Angel's Glow that play both.
Iris of Reality
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Iris of Reality that play both.
Luminaris, Celestial Fury
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Luminaris, Celestial Fury that play both.
Reality Refractor
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Reality Refractor that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Luminaris
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Luminaris that play both.
Action
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.842.844509232
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Passing Mirage that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
2.842.836858006
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Pierce Reality that play both.
Haze Bending
Avg. played:
2.892.894919972
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Haze Bending that play both.
Shimmers of Silver
Avg. played:
2.872.871559633
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Shimmers of Silver that play both.
Invoke Suraya
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Invoke Suraya that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Lost in Thought that play both.
Great Library of Solana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Great Library of Solana that play both.
Dissolve Reality
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Dissolve Reality that play both.
Attack Action
Herald of Protection (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.778813875
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Protection (Blue) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.793394777
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Wartune Herald (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.902.897367247
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Triumph (Blue) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.758291686
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Wartune Herald (Red) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.781738281
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Rebirth (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.762817441
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Ravages (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Erudition
Avg. played:
2.842.835829174
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Erudition that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Red)
Avg. played:
2.892.887173397
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Triumph (Red) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.674138874
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Protection (Red) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.752.754270696
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Wartune Herald (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.812.807195572
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Triumph (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.592.591368228
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Protection (Yellow) that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
2.742.744389027
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Celestial Cataclysm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Celestial Cataclysm that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.522419187
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Tenacity (Red) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.550173010
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Ravages (Red) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.410606061
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Rebirth (Red) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.542.541258741
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Tenacity (Yellow) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Brothers in Arms (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Judgment
Avg. played:
2.592.590909091
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Judgment that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.472.470852018
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Ravages (Yellow) that play both.
Enigma Chimera (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.472.474226804
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Enigma Chimera (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.482.481865285
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Herald of Rebirth (Yellow) that play both.
Illuminate (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Illuminate (Blue) that play both.
Phantasmaclasm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Phantasmaclasm that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Soul Shield
Avg. played:
2.882.877738156
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Soul Shield that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.837031900
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.782.775139665
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Flicker Trick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Flicker Trick that play both.
Instant
Figment of Protection
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Figment of Protection that play both.
Figment of Erudition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Figment of Erudition that play both.
Figment of Triumph
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Figment of Triumph that play both.
Figment of Ravages
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Figment of Ravages that play both.
Figment of Rebirth
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Figment of Rebirth that play both.
Genesis
Avg. played:
2.822.817931793
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Genesis that play both.
Arc Light Sentinel
Avg. played:
2.792.786650775
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Arc Light Sentinel that play both.
Figment of Judgment
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Figment of Judgment that play both.
Figment of War
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Figment of War that play both.
Merciful Retribution
Avg. played:
2.502.501889169
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Merciful Retribution that play both.
Figment of Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Figment of Tenacity that play both.
Ode to Wrath
Avg. played:
2.712.708333333
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Ode to Wrath that play both.
Parable of Humility
Avg. played:
2.632.627004219
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Parable of Humility that play both.
Tome of Divinity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Tome of Divinity that play both.
Phantom Tidemaw
Avg. played:
2.532.532786885
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Phantom Tidemaw that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.610062893
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.582.576704545
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Celestial Reprimand (Yellow) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Celestial Reprimand (Blue) that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Red)
Avg. played:
2.452.454545455
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Angelic Wrath (Red) that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.542.542483660
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Angelic Wrath (Blue) that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.482.484076433
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Angelic Wrath (Yellow) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Celestial Reprimand (Red) that play both.
Angelic Descent (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Angelic Descent (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Heart of Fyendal that play both.
Light of Sol
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Tenacity (Blue) and Light of Sol that play both.