Figment of Tenacity
Light Illusionist Instant - Figment
Legendary (You may only have 1 Figment of Tenacity in your deck.)
When this enters the arena, your next attack this turn gets dominate. // Once per Turn Action -- {r}{r}: Attack
When Metis attacks, you may banish a card from your hero's soul. If you do, your attacks this turn get dominate.
Ward 4 (If your hero would be dealt damage, destroy this to prevent 4 of that damage.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
4.814.807220424
Average Defense Value:
2.812.810493040
Hero
Equipment
Phantasmal Footsteps
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Empyrean Rapture
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Empyrean Rapture that play both.
Calming Gesture
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Calming Gesture that play both.
Halo of Illumination
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Halo of Illumination that play both.
Dream Weavers
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Dream Weavers that play both.
Wave of Reality
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Wave of Reality that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Vestige of Sol
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Vestige of Sol that play both.
Silent Stilettos
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Reflection
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Ghostly Touch
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Crown of Providence
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Crown of Providence that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Diadem of Dreamstate
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Diadem of Dreamstate that play both.
Weapon
Luminaris, Angel's Glow
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Luminaris, Angel's Glow that play both.
Luminaris, Celestial Fury
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Luminaris, Celestial Fury that play both.
Iris of Reality
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Iris of Reality that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Luminaris
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Luminaris that play both.
Action
Angelic Attendant
Avg. played:
2.902.900552486
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Angelic Attendant that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.822.819336444
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Passing Mirage that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
2.722.722349852
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Pierce Reality that play both.
Invoke Suraya
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Invoke Suraya that play both.
Great Library of Solana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Great Library of Solana that play both.
War Cry of Themis
Avg. played:
2.462.463087248
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and War Cry of Themis that play both.
Haze Bending
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Haze Bending that play both.
Shimmers of Silver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Shimmers of Silver that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Lost in Thought that play both.
Dissolve Reality
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Dissolve Reality that play both.
Attack Action
Herald of Erudition
Avg. played:
2.862.861969327
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Erudition that play both.
Wartune Herald (Red)
Avg. played:
2.872.873211643
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Wartune Herald (Red) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.862.864441072
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Wartune Herald (Yellow) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.892.890349724
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Wartune Herald (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Red)
Avg. played:
2.882.880387931
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Triumph (Red) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.862.861030383
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Triumph (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.902.901234568
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Triumph (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.842.841162096
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Protection (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.872.865591398
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Protection (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.818507463
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Protection (Red) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.792.787571617
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Ravages (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Judgment
Avg. played:
2.772.773502405
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Judgment that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.762.756410256
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Tenacity (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.742.740331492
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Rebirth (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Sekem
Avg. played:
2.362.363984674
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Sekem that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.822.821947674
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Ravages (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Rebirth (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.717703349
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Tenacity (Red) that play both.
Celestial Cataclysm
Avg. played:
2.762.757042254
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Celestial Cataclysm that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.711312217
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Ravages (Red) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Tenacity (Blue) that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
2.672.672634271
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Herald of Rebirth (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Command and Conquer that play both.
Attack Reaction
Lumina Lance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Lumina Lance that play both.
Defense Reaction
Soul Shield
Avg. played:
2.812.809377617
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Soul Shield that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
2.602.604685212
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and That All You Got? that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Flicker Trick
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Flicker Trick that play both.
Instant
Figment of Erudition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
97% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Figment of Erudition that play both.
Figment of Protection
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
97% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Figment of Protection that play both.
Figment of Ravages
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Figment of Ravages that play both.
Figment of Triumph
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Figment of Triumph that play both.
Figment of Rebirth
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Figment of Rebirth that play both.
Figment of War
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Figment of War that play both.
Figment of Judgment
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Figment of Judgment that play both.
Genesis
Avg. played:
2.792.791742013
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Genesis that play both.
Arc Light Sentinel
Avg. played:
2.822.817802057
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Arc Light Sentinel that play both.
Merciful Retribution
Avg. played:
2.782.783852281
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Merciful Retribution that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.772.774647887
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Angelic Wrath (Yellow) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.712.706497797
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Celestial Reprimand (Yellow) that play both.
Parable of Humility
Avg. played:
2.602.604057971
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Parable of Humility that play both.
Ode to Wrath
Avg. played:
2.672.666400638
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Ode to Wrath that play both.
Tome of Divinity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Tome of Divinity that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.657754011
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Angelic Wrath (Red) that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.582.584745763
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Angelic Wrath (Blue) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Celestial Reprimand (Red) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Celestial Reprimand (Blue) that play both.
Angelic Descent (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Angelic Descent (Yellow) that play both.
Resource
Light of Sol
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Light of Sol that play both.
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Figment of Tenacity and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.