Herald of Victoria
Light Illusionist Attack Action - Attack
Instant - Discard this: Until end of turn, attack action cards your opponents control get -1{p} while attacking and defending.
Phantasm
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
4.794.791869384
Average Defense Value:
2.862.856821455
Hero
Prism, Awakener of Sol
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Prism, Awakener of Sol that play both.
Equipment
Halo of Illumination
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Halo of Illumination that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Empyrean Rapture
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Empyrean Rapture that play both.
Vestige of Sol
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Vestige of Sol that play both.
Calming Gesture
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Calming Gesture that play both.
Dream Weavers
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Dream Weavers that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Crown of Reflection
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Silent Stilettos
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Luminaris, Angel's Glow
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Luminaris, Angel's Glow that play both.
Action
Angelic Attendant
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Angelic Attendant that play both.
Great Library of Solana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Great Library of Solana that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.452.454545455
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Passing Mirage that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
2.402.400000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Pierce Reality that play both.
Invoke Suraya
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Invoke Suraya that play both.
Dissolve Reality
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Dissolve Reality that play both.
Soul Food
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Soul Food that play both.
Attack Action
Herald of Erudition
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Herald of Erudition that play both.
Herald of Protection (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Herald of Protection (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Herald of Triumph (Yellow) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Wartune Herald (Yellow) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Wartune Herald (Blue) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Wartune Herald (Red) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Red)
Avg. played:
2.922.916666667
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Herald of Triumph (Red) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Herald of Triumph (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.912.909090909
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Herald of Protection (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Herald of Protection (Red) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.732.727272727
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Herald of Rebirth (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.732.727272727
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Herald of Ravages (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Judgment
Avg. played:
2.802.800000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Herald of Judgment that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Herald of Tenacity (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Red)
Avg. played:
1.671.666666667
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Herald of Tenacity (Red) that play both.
Celestial Cataclysm
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Celestial Cataclysm that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Herald of Ravages (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Herald of Ravages (Red) that play both.
Call for Backup
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Call for Backup that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Soul Shield
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Soul Shield that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and That All You Got? that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Figment of Erudition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Figment of Erudition that play both.
Figment of Judgment
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Figment of Judgment that play both.
Figment of Protection
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Figment of Protection that play both.
Figment of Ravages
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Figment of Ravages that play both.
Figment of Rebirth
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Figment of Rebirth that play both.
Figment of Triumph
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Figment of Triumph that play both.
Figment of War
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Figment of War that play both.
Arc Light Sentinel
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Arc Light Sentinel that play both.
Merciful Retribution
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Merciful Retribution that play both.
Genesis
Avg. played:
2.832.833333333
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Genesis that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Angelic Wrath (Yellow) that play both.
Figment of Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Figment of Tenacity that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.801.800000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Angelic Wrath (Blue) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Celestial Reprimand (Yellow) that play both.
Ode to Wrath
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Ode to Wrath that play both.
Resource
Light of Sol
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Light of Sol that play both.
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Herald of Victoria and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.