Soul Food
Light Generic Action
Put Soul Food and all cards in your hand into your hero's soul. (Put the cards face up under your hero card.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.833.834185460
Average Defense Value:
2.762.757296058
Hero
Prism, Awakener of Sol
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Prism, Awakener of Sol that play both.
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn that play both.
Prism, Advent of Thrones
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Prism, Advent of Thrones that play both.
Equipment
Halo of Illumination
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Halo of Illumination that play both.
Calming Gesture
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Calming Gesture that play both.
Empyrean Rapture
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Empyrean Rapture that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Dream Weavers
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Dream Weavers that play both.
Vestige of Sol
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Vestige of Sol that play both.
Wave of Reality
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Wave of Reality that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Bracers of Bellona's Grace that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Silent Stilettos
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Warband of Bellona
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Warband of Bellona that play both.
Soulbond Resolve
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Soulbond Resolve that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Crown of Providence
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Crown of Providence that play both.
Gallantry Gold
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Ironsong Versus
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Nullrune Hood
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Solar Plexus
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Solar Plexus that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Crown of Reflection
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Ghostly Touch
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Calming Cloak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Calming Cloak that play both.
Radiant Flow
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Radiant Flow that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Refraction Bolters
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Weapon
Luminaris, Angel's Glow
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Luminaris, Angel's Glow that play both.
Raydn, Duskbane
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Raydn, Duskbane that play both.
Luminaris, Celestial Fury
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Luminaris, Celestial Fury that play both.
Cintari Saber
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Cintari Saber that play both.
Iris of Reality
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Iris of Reality that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Luminaris
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Luminaris that play both.
Action
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.842.838212635
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Passing Mirage that play both.
Invoke Suraya
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Invoke Suraya that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
2.702.703853955
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Pierce Reality that play both.
Spirit of Eirina
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Spirit of Eirina that play both.
War Cry of Themis
Avg. played:
2.552.552631579
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and War Cry of Themis that play both.
Lumina Ascension
Avg. played:
2.772.772182254
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Lumina Ascension that play both.
Great Library of Solana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Great Library of Solana that play both.
Prayer of Bellona
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Prayer of Bellona that play both.
Haze Bending
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Haze Bending that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Shimmers of Silver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Shimmers of Silver that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Energy Potion that play both.
Attack Action
Herald of Erudition
Avg. played:
2.832.831578947
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Erudition that play both.
Wartune Herald (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Wartune Herald (Blue) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Red)
Avg. played:
2.872.872894334
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Wartune Herald (Red) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.852.846268657
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Triumph (Yellow) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.832.830357143
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Wartune Herald (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Sekem
Avg. played:
2.382.375000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Sekem that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Triumph (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Red)
Avg. played:
2.882.882943144
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Triumph (Red) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.842.842639594
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Protection (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.782.784565916
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Protection (Yellow) that play both.
Celestial Cataclysm
Avg. played:
2.682.682228916
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Celestial Cataclysm that play both.
Herald of Protection (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.778210117
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Protection (Red) that play both.
Herald of Judgment
Avg. played:
2.752.748826291
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Judgment that play both.
V of the Vanguard
Avg. played:
2.772.774436090
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and V of the Vanguard that play both.
Bolt of Courage (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Bolt of Courage (Red) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Ravages (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.712.706896552
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Ravages (Yellow) that play both.
Take Flight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Take Flight (Red) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.712.713855422
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Tenacity (Yellow) that play both.
Take Flight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.752.746666667
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Take Flight (Yellow) that play both.
Bolt of Courage (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.772.765734266
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Bolt of Courage (Yellow) that play both.
Engulfing Light (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Engulfing Light (Red) that play both.
Illuminate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.700374532
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Illuminate (Red) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Rebirth (Blue) that play both.
Banneret of Courage
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Banneret of Courage that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.662.660231660
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Rebirth (Yellow) that play both.
Banneret of Gallantry
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Banneret of Gallantry that play both.
Bolting Blade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Bolting Blade that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Tenacity (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Command and Conquer that play both.
Express Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Express Lightning (Red) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.682464455
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Ravages (Red) that play both.
Take Flight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Take Flight (Blue) that play both.
Bolt of Courage (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Bolt of Courage (Blue) that play both.
Beaming Bravado (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Beaming Bravado (Yellow) that play both.
Engulfing Light (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Engulfing Light (Yellow) that play both.
Beaming Bravado (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Beaming Bravado (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Tenacity (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Engulfing Light (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Engulfing Light (Blue) that play both.
Spirit of War
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Spirit of War that play both.
Banneret of Vigor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Banneret of Vigor that play both.
Light the Way (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Light the Way (Red) that play both.
Valiant Thrust (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Valiant Thrust (Red) that play both.
Valiant Thrust (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Valiant Thrust (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Beacon of Victory
Avg. played:
2.792.785185185
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Beacon of Victory that play both.
War Cry of Bellona
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and War Cry of Bellona that play both.
Lumina Lance
Avg. played:
2.532.528925620
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Lumina Lance that play both.
Courageous Steelhand (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Courageous Steelhand (Red) that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Provoke that play both.
Defense Reaction
Soul Shield
Avg. played:
2.772.774864376
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Soul Shield that play both.
Saving Grace
Avg. played:
2.852.851063830
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Saving Grace that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.785166240
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Fate Foreseen that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and That All You Got? that play both.
Instant
Figment of Protection
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Figment of Protection that play both.
Figment of Erudition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Figment of Erudition that play both.
Figment of Ravages
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Figment of Ravages that play both.
Figment of Triumph
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Figment of Triumph that play both.
Figment of Rebirth
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Figment of Rebirth that play both.
Figment of War
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Figment of War that play both.
Figment of Judgment
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Figment of Judgment that play both.
Arc Light Sentinel
Avg. played:
2.792.793760832
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Arc Light Sentinel that play both.
Genesis
Avg. played:
2.772.767361111
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Genesis that play both.
Figment of Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Figment of Tenacity that play both.
Merciful Retribution
Avg. played:
2.722.724279835
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Merciful Retribution that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.732.726666667
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Angelic Wrath (Yellow) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.682.678966790
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Celestial Reprimand (Yellow) that play both.
Tome of Divinity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Tome of Divinity that play both.
Parable of Humility
Avg. played:
2.522.517241379
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Parable of Humility that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.612.614906832
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Angelic Wrath (Blue) that play both.
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Ode to Wrath
Avg. played:
2.512.507389163
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Ode to Wrath that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Angelic Wrath (Red) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Celestial Reprimand (Blue) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Celestial Reprimand (Red) that play both.
Resource
Light of Sol
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Light of Sol that play both.
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.