Soul Food
Light Generic Action
Put Soul Food and all cards in your hand into your hero's soul. (Put the cards face up under your hero card.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.833.827206358
Average Defense Value:
2.762.757527977
Hero
Prism, Awakener of Sol
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Prism, Awakener of Sol that play both.
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn that play both.
Prism, Advent of Thrones
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Prism, Advent of Thrones that play both.
Equipment
Halo of Illumination
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Halo of Illumination that play both.
Calming Gesture
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Calming Gesture that play both.
Empyrean Rapture
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Empyrean Rapture that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Dream Weavers
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Dream Weavers that play both.
Vestige of Sol
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Vestige of Sol that play both.
Wave of Reality
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Wave of Reality that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Bracers of Bellona's Grace that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Silent Stilettos
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Warband of Bellona
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Warband of Bellona that play both.
Soulbond Resolve
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Soulbond Resolve that play both.
Crown of Providence
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Crown of Providence that play both.
Gallantry Gold
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Ironsong Versus
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Nullrune Hood
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Solar Plexus
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Solar Plexus that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Crown of Reflection
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Ghostly Touch
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Radiant Flow
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Radiant Flow that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Calming Cloak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Calming Cloak that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Refraction Bolters
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Weapon
Luminaris, Angel's Glow
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Luminaris, Angel's Glow that play both.
Raydn, Duskbane
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Raydn, Duskbane that play both.
Luminaris, Celestial Fury
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Luminaris, Celestial Fury that play both.
Cintari Saber
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Cintari Saber that play both.
Iris of Reality
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Iris of Reality that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Luminaris
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Luminaris that play both.
Action
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.842.837423313
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Passing Mirage that play both.
Invoke Suraya
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Invoke Suraya that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
2.712.705050505
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Pierce Reality that play both.
Lumina Ascension
Avg. played:
2.782.776470588
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Lumina Ascension that play both.
Spirit of Eirina
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Spirit of Eirina that play both.
Great Library of Solana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Great Library of Solana that play both.
War Cry of Themis
Avg. played:
2.532.527777778
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and War Cry of Themis that play both.
Prayer of Bellona
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Prayer of Bellona that play both.
Haze Bending
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Haze Bending that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Shimmers of Silver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Shimmers of Silver that play both.
Attack Action
Herald of Erudition
Avg. played:
2.832.830930537
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Erudition that play both.
Wartune Herald (Red)
Avg. played:
2.872.873475610
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Wartune Herald (Red) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Wartune Herald (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.852.846497765
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Triumph (Yellow) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.832.829629630
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Wartune Herald (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Triumph (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Red)
Avg. played:
2.882.883138564
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Triumph (Red) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.842.839797639
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Protection (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.782.784000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Protection (Yellow) that play both.
Celestial Cataclysm
Avg. played:
2.682.683582090
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Celestial Cataclysm that play both.
Herald of Sekem
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Sekem that play both.
Herald of Protection (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.775628627
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Protection (Red) that play both.
Herald of Judgment
Avg. played:
2.752.748826291
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Judgment that play both.
V of the Vanguard
Avg. played:
2.782.776960784
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and V of the Vanguard that play both.
Bolt of Courage (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Bolt of Courage (Red) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Ravages (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.712.707386364
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Ravages (Yellow) that play both.
Take Flight (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Take Flight (Red) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.712.708708709
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Tenacity (Yellow) that play both.
Take Flight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.752.749174917
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Take Flight (Yellow) that play both.
Bolt of Courage (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Bolt of Courage (Yellow) that play both.
Engulfing Light (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Engulfing Light (Red) that play both.
Illuminate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.697761194
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Illuminate (Red) that play both.
Banneret of Courage
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Banneret of Courage that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Rebirth (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.662.661596958
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Rebirth (Yellow) that play both.
Banneret of Gallantry
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Banneret of Gallantry that play both.
Bolting Blade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Bolting Blade that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Tenacity (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Command and Conquer that play both.
Express Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Express Lightning (Red) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.672897196
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Ravages (Red) that play both.
Take Flight (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Take Flight (Blue) that play both.
Beaming Bravado (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Beaming Bravado (Yellow) that play both.
Bolt of Courage (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Bolt of Courage (Blue) that play both.
Engulfing Light (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Engulfing Light (Yellow) that play both.
Beaming Bravado (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Beaming Bravado (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Herald of Tenacity (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Nimby (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Nimby (Yellow) that play both.
Engulfing Light (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Engulfing Light (Blue) that play both.
Spirit of War
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Spirit of War that play both.
Banneret of Vigor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Banneret of Vigor that play both.
Light the Way (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Light the Way (Red) that play both.
Valiant Thrust (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Valiant Thrust (Yellow) that play both.
Valiant Thrust (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Valiant Thrust (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Beacon of Victory
Avg. played:
2.792.786407767
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Beacon of Victory that play both.
War Cry of Bellona
Avg. played:
2.702.700000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and War Cry of Bellona that play both.
Lumina Lance
Avg. played:
2.532.530612245
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Lumina Lance that play both.
Courageous Steelhand (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Courageous Steelhand (Red) that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Provoke that play both.
Defense Reaction
Soul Shield
Avg. played:
2.782.775784753
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Soul Shield that play both.
Saving Grace
Avg. played:
2.862.861386139
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Saving Grace that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.786259542
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Fate Foreseen that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and That All You Got? that play both.
Instant
Figment of Protection
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Figment of Protection that play both.
Figment of Erudition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Figment of Erudition that play both.
Figment of Ravages
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Figment of Ravages that play both.
Figment of Triumph
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Figment of Triumph that play both.
Figment of Rebirth
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Figment of Rebirth that play both.
Figment of War
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Figment of War that play both.
Figment of Judgment
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Figment of Judgment that play both.
Arc Light Sentinel
Avg. played:
2.792.792027730
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Arc Light Sentinel that play both.
Genesis
Avg. played:
2.772.768566494
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Genesis that play both.
Figment of Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Figment of Tenacity that play both.
Merciful Retribution
Avg. played:
2.722.723926380
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Merciful Retribution that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.732.726072607
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Angelic Wrath (Yellow) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.682.676470588
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Celestial Reprimand (Yellow) that play both.
Tome of Divinity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Tome of Divinity that play both.
Parable of Humility
Avg. played:
2.512.513307985
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Parable of Humility that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.612.608695652
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Angelic Wrath (Blue) that play both.
Ode to Wrath
Avg. played:
2.512.509803922
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Ode to Wrath that play both.
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Angelic Wrath (Red) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Celestial Reprimand (Blue) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Celestial Reprimand (Red) that play both.
Resource
Light of Sol
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Light of Sol that play both.
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Soul Food and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.