Adaptive Plating
Mechanologist Equipment
Modular (This may be equipped to any equipment zone. It has the subtype of the zone it's equipped to.)
Action -- 0: Equip this to another equipment zone.
Galvanize - When this defends, you may destroy an item you control. If you do, this gets +2{d} until end of turn.
Blade Break (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.492.491160805
Average Defense Value:
2.172.166343037
Hero
Dash I/O
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Dash I/O that play both.
Data Doll MKII
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Data Doll MKII that play both.
Dash, Database
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Dash, Database that play both.
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire that play both.
Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro that play both.
Equipment
Teklo Foundry Heart
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Teklo Foundry Heart that play both.
Achilles Accelerator
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Achilles Accelerator that play both.
Heavy Industry Gear Shift
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Heavy Industry Gear Shift that play both.
Viziertronic Model i
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Viziertronic Model i that play both.
Crown of Providence
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Crown of Providence that play both.
Balance of Justice
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Balance of Justice that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Heavy Industry Power Plant
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Heavy Industry Power Plant that play both.
Heavy Industry Surveillance
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Heavy Industry Surveillance that play both.
Adaptive Dissolver
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Adaptive Dissolver that play both.
Galvanic Bender
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Galvanic Bender that play both.
Hyper-X3
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Hyper-X3 that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Cogwerx Base Legs
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Cogwerx Base Legs that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Weapon
Symbiosis Shot
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Symbiosis Shot that play both.
Teklo Plasma Pistol
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Teklo Plasma Pistol that play both.
Banksy
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Banksy that play both.
Hanabi Blaster
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Hanabi Blaster that play both.
Action
Cerebellum Processor
Avg. played:
2.732.728458314
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Cerebellum Processor that play both.
Spark of Genius
Avg. played:
2.872.866091600
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Spark of Genius that play both.
Teklo Core
Avg. played:
2.822.818228210
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Teklo Core that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
High Octane
Avg. played:
2.842.843344710
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and High Octane that play both.
Boom Grenade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.725208945
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Boom Grenade (Red) that play both.
Boom Grenade (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.712.711486963
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Boom Grenade (Yellow) that play both.
Backup Protocol: RED
Avg. played:
2.282.283980583
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Backup Protocol: RED that play both.
Teklo Pounder
Avg. played:
2.252.247892556
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Teklo Pounder that play both.
Bios Update
Avg. played:
2.712.714578121
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Bios Update that play both.
Dissolving Shield (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.594656055
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Dissolving Shield (Red) that play both.
Convection Amplifier
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Convection Amplifier that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
2.672.670789164
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Boom Grenade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.622.618549747
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Boom Grenade (Blue) that play both.
Penetration Script
Avg. played:
1.871.871116226
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Penetration Script that play both.
Plasma Mainline
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Plasma Mainline that play both.
Induction Chamber
Avg. played:
1.671.667722952
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Induction Chamber that play both.
Plasma Purifier
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Plasma Purifier that play both.
Optekal Monocle
Avg. played:
1.581.583815029
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Optekal Monocle that play both.
Micro-processor
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Micro-processor that play both.
Signal Jammer
Avg. played:
1.521.515923567
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Signal Jammer that play both.
Backup Protocol: BLU
Avg. played:
2.072.068618481
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Backup Protocol: BLU that play both.
Mini Forcefield (Red)
Avg. played:
2.372.368726889
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Mini Forcefield (Red) that play both.
Supercell
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Supercell that play both.
Dissipation Shield
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Dissipation Shield that play both.
banned - Blitz
Hadron Collider (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Hadron Collider (Red) that play both.
Hyper Driver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Hyper Driver that play both.
Construct Nitro Mechanoid
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Construct Nitro Mechanoid that play both.
Re-Charge! (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Re-Charge! (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Fast and Furious
Avg. played:
2.762.760589319
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Fast and Furious that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.768808653
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Zero to Sixty (Red) that play both.
Zipper Hit (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.778578009
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Zipper Hit (Red) that play both.
Pulsewave Harpoon
Avg. played:
2.852.848126429
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Pulsewave Harpoon that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.788899522
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Zero to Sixty (Blue) that play both.
T-Bone (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.812.808950860
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and T-Bone (Blue) that play both.
Zipper Hit (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.792.792253112
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Zipper Hit (Yellow) that play both.
T-Bone (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.768199886
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and T-Bone (Red) that play both.
Throttle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.802.801233225
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Throttle (Red) that play both.
Zipper Hit (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.802.796610169
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Zipper Hit (Blue) that play both.
Twin Drive
Avg. played:
2.742.742212955
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Twin Drive that play both.
Throttle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.756953007
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Throttle (Blue) that play both.
Maximum Velocity
Avg. played:
2.612.614362049
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Maximum Velocity that play both.
Heist
Avg. played:
2.712.712258703
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Heist that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.702.700000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Zero to Sixty (Yellow) that play both.
Out Pace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.607532957
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Out Pace (Red) that play both.
Dive Through Data (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.635843115
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Dive Through Data (Red) that play both.
Sprocket Rocket (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.492889647
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Sprocket Rocket (Red) that play both.
Expedite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.667852906
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Expedite (Red) that play both.
Meganetic Shockwave
Avg. played:
2.662.662145991
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Meganetic Shockwave that play both.
Expedite (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.698977323
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Expedite (Blue) that play both.
MetEx (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and MetEx (Red) that play both.
Fender Bender (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.587398374
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Fender Bender (Red) that play both.
Payload (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.393646409
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Payload (Red) that play both.
Under Loop (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.615130024
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Under Loop (Red) that play both.
Data Link (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.470588235
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Data Link (Red) that play both.
Soup Up (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Soup Up (Red) that play both.
Hyper Scrapper
Avg. played:
1.981.976545842
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Hyper Scrapper that play both.
Big Bertha (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Big Bertha (Blue) that play both.
Crankshaft (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Crankshaft (Blue) that play both.
Jump Start (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Jump Start (Red) that play both.
T-Bone (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and T-Bone (Yellow) that play both.
Data Link (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.582.577686916
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Data Link (Blue) that play both.
Out Pace (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Out Pace (Blue) that play both.
Dumpster Dive (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Dumpster Dive (Red) that play both.
Rev Up (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Rev Up (Red) that play both.
Scramble Pulse (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Scramble Pulse (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Block
Firewall (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Firewall (Red) that play both.
Resource
Master Cog
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Master Cog that play both.