Adaptive Plating
Mechanologist Equipment
Modular (This may be equipped to any equipment zone. It has the subtype of the zone it's equipped to.)
Action -- 0: Equip this to another equipment zone.
Galvanize - When this defends, you may destroy an item you control. If you do, this gets +2{d} until end of turn.
Blade Break (When the combat chain closes, if this defended, destroy it.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.482.482864980
Average Defense Value:
2.142.143725018
Hero
Dash I/O
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Dash I/O that play both.
Data Doll MKII
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Data Doll MKII that play both.
Dash, Database
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Dash, Database that play both.
Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Dash, Inventor Extraordinaire that play both.
Puffin, Hightail
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Puffin, Hightail that play both.
Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro that play both.
Equipment
Heavy Industry Gear Shift
26185% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Heavy Industry Gear Shift that play both.
Heavy Industry Surveillance
6870% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Heavy Industry Surveillance that play both.
Heavy Industry Power Plant
5510% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Heavy Industry Power Plant that play both.
Teklo Foundry Heart
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Teklo Foundry Heart that play both.
Cogwerx Tinker Rings
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Cogwerx Tinker Rings that play both.
Achilles Accelerator
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Achilles Accelerator that play both.
Viziertronic Model i
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Viziertronic Model i that play both.
Crown of Providence
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Crown of Providence that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Misfire Dampener
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Misfire Dampener that play both.
Balance of Justice
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Balance of Justice that play both.
Adaptive Dissolver
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Adaptive Dissolver that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Unicycle
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Unicycle that play both.
Bracers of Belief
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Bracers of Belief that play both.
Adaptive Alpha Mold
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Adaptive Alpha Mold that play both.
Galvanic Bender
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Galvanic Bender that play both.
Hyper-X3
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Hyper-X3 that play both.
Weapon
Symbiosis Shot
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Symbiosis Shot that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Teklo Plasma Pistol
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Teklo Plasma Pistol that play both.
Hanabi Blaster
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Hanabi Blaster that play both.
Banksy
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Banksy that play both.
Spitfire
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Spitfire that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Action
Cerebellum Processor
Avg. played:
2.812.812867561
34695% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Cerebellum Processor that play both.
Spark of Genius
Avg. played:
2.892.888867488
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Spark of Genius that play both.
Teklo Core
Avg. played:
2.842.843729904
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Teklo Core that play both.
Boom Grenade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.779850499
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Boom Grenade (Red) that play both.
Boom Grenade (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.772.769018193
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Boom Grenade (Yellow) that play both.
Null Time Zone
Avg. played:
1.811.806135492
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Null Time Zone that play both.
Backup Protocol: RED
Avg. played:
2.402.401643208
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Backup Protocol: RED that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
High Octane
Avg. played:
2.812.812132044
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and High Octane that play both.
Hit the Gas
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Hit the Gas that play both.
Convection Amplifier
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Convection Amplifier that play both.
Teklo Pounder
Avg. played:
2.302.302637967
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Teklo Pounder that play both.
Bios Update
Avg. played:
2.662.658078086
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Bios Update that play both.
Dissolving Shield (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.556306678
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Dissolving Shield (Red) that play both.
Cog in the Machine
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Cog in the Machine that play both.
Penetration Script
Avg. played:
1.821.816781109
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Penetration Script that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
2.662.663860983
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Plasma Mainline
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Plasma Mainline that play both.
Boom Grenade (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.612.605255801
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Boom Grenade (Blue) that play both.
Signal Jammer
Avg. played:
1.411.409417169
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Signal Jammer that play both.
Optekal Monocle
Avg. played:
1.591.585631815
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Optekal Monocle that play both.
Micro-processor
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Micro-processor that play both.
Cogwerx Workshop
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Cogwerx Workshop that play both.
Induction Chamber
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Induction Chamber that play both.
Stasis Cell
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Stasis Cell that play both.
Plasma Purifier
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Plasma Purifier that play both.
Tick Tock Clock
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Tick Tock Clock that play both.
Dissipation Shield
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Dissipation Shield that play both.
Backup Protocol: BLU
Avg. played:
1.991.992853216
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Backup Protocol: BLU that play both.
Mini Forcefield (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Mini Forcefield (Red) that play both.
Hyper Driver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Hyper Driver that play both.
Copper Cog
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Copper Cog that play both.
Attack Action
Fast and Furious
Avg. played:
2.842.835854852
36800% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Fast and Furious that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Red)
Avg. played:
2.802.802323772
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Zero to Sixty (Red) that play both.
Zipper Hit (Red)
Avg. played:
2.812.810014569
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Zipper Hit (Red) that play both.
Pulsewave Harpoon
Avg. played:
2.872.873983996
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Pulsewave Harpoon that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.832.828702271
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Zero to Sixty (Blue) that play both.
T-Bone (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.832.831626210
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and T-Bone (Blue) that play both.
T-Bone (Red)
Avg. played:
2.812.805632823
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and T-Bone (Red) that play both.
Zipper Hit (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.812.811767244
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Zipper Hit (Yellow) that play both.
Throttle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.812.806085449
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Throttle (Red) that play both.
Zipper Hit (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.822.819179266
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Zipper Hit (Blue) that play both.
Maximum Velocity
Avg. played:
2.662.664349707
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Maximum Velocity that play both.
Throttle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.776351351
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Throttle (Blue) that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.772.765840220
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Zero to Sixty (Yellow) that play both.
Out Pace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.709203036
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Out Pace (Red) that play both.
Twin Drive
Avg. played:
2.722.720588235
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Twin Drive that play both.
Heist
Avg. played:
2.652.645675266
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Heist that play both.
Backspin Thrust
Avg. played:
2.792.788461538
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Backspin Thrust that play both.
Sprocket Rocket (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.585225680
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Sprocket Rocket (Red) that play both.
Expedite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.705137892
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Expedite (Red) that play both.
Dive Through Data (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.621854958
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Dive Through Data (Red) that play both.
Fender Bender (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.589550154
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Fender Bender (Red) that play both.
Expedite (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Expedite (Blue) that play both.
Soup Up (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Soup Up (Red) that play both.
MetEx (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and MetEx (Red) that play both.
Meganetic Shockwave
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Meganetic Shockwave that play both.
Data Link (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.464462299
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Data Link (Red) that play both.
Under Loop (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.615840118
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Under Loop (Red) that play both.
Cogwerx Dovetail
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Cogwerx Dovetail that play both.
Palantir Aeronought
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Palantir Aeronought that play both.
T-Bone (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and T-Bone (Yellow) that play both.
Out Pace (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Out Pace (Blue) that play both.
Big Bertha (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Big Bertha (Blue) that play both.
Golden Skywarden
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Golden Skywarden that play both.
Jump Start (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Jump Start (Red) that play both.
Crankshaft (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Crankshaft (Blue) that play both.
Cogwerx Zeppelin (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Cogwerx Zeppelin (Red) that play both.
Payload (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Payload (Red) that play both.
Hyper Scrapper
Avg. played:
2.022.015945330
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Hyper Scrapper that play both.
Dumpster Dive (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Dumpster Dive (Red) that play both.
Sky Skimmer (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Sky Skimmer (Red) that play both.
Data Link (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Data Link (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Block
Sunken Treasure
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Sunken Treasure that play both.
Pinion Sentry
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Pinion Sentry that play both.
Resource
Master Cog
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Adaptive Plating and Master Cog that play both.