Lost in Thought
Illusionist Action
Look at target hero's hand and choose an attack action card. If you do, they put that card on the bottom of their deck and they create a Ponder token.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.372.373577154
Average Defense Value:
2.622.622600100
Hero
Dromai, Ash Artist
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Dromai, Ash Artist that play both.
Dromai
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Dromai that play both.
Prism, Awakener of Sol
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Prism, Awakener of Sol that play both.
Equipment
Flamescale Furnace
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Crown of Providence that play both.
Balance of Justice
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Balance of Justice that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Wave of Reality
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Wave of Reality that play both.
Crown of Dominion
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Ghostly Touch
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Silken Form
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Silken Form that play both.
Crown of Reflection
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Mage Master Boots
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Silent Stilettos
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Empyrean Rapture
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Empyrean Rapture that play both.
Halo of Illumination
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Halo of Illumination that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Dream Weavers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Dream Weavers that play both.
Seeker's Leggings
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Seeker's Leggings that play both.
Time Skippers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Time Skippers that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Diadem of Dreamstate
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Diadem of Dreamstate that play both.
Weapon
Storm of Sandikai
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Luminaris, Angel's Glow
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Luminaris, Angel's Glow that play both.
Luminaris, Celestial Fury
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Luminaris, Celestial Fury that play both.
Iris of Reality
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Iris of Reality that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Luminaris
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Luminaris that play both.
Action
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.922.924885696
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.852.852614468
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Passing Mirage that play both.
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
2.922.922291022
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
2.922.922001243
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
2.922.921928460
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
2.922.919375000
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
2.912.914973429
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
2.912.905648057
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
2.802.796401515
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Burn Them All that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played:
1.891.887562189
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played:
2.672.667211107
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Invoke Themai that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played:
2.022.018829308
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played:
2.582.582799634
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Pierce Reality that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.672.667560322
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Dissolve Reality
Avg. played:
2.632.626506024
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Dissolve Reality that play both.
Skittering Sands (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Skittering Sands (Red) that play both.
Haze Bending
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Haze Bending that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played:
2.602.604234528
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
Invoke Suraya
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Invoke Suraya that play both.
Shimmers of Silver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Shimmers of Silver that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and This Round's on Me that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.902.902350814
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Command and Conquer that play both.
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.872.873440285
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.912.908426318
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
2.852.849454545
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.832.832874197
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.832.829186603
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.842.836170213
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.764788732
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
2.632.633840053
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
2.622.618393960
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Herald of Erudition
Avg. played:
2.742.738011696
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Herald of Erudition that play both.
Wartune Herald (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Wartune Herald (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Herald of Protection (Blue) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Wartune Herald (Red) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Embermaw Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Herald of Triumph (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Herald of Triumph (Red) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Herald of Protection (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Wartune Herald (Yellow) that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Sweeping Blow (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Herald of Triumph (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Herald of Protection (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Herald of Ravages (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Herald of Rebirth (Blue) that play both.
Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Dunebreaker Cenipai (Red) that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played:
2.462.456140351
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Standing Order that play both.
Breaking Point
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Breaking Point that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.892.890580936
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.742.740123751
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Flicker Trick
Avg. played:
2.362.358050847
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Flicker Trick that play both.
Soul Shield
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Soul Shield that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.802.797967956
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sand Cover (Red)
Avg. played:
2.022.024816924
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Sand Cover (Red) that play both.
Figment of Protection
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Figment of Protection that play both.
Figment of Erudition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Figment of Erudition that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.761.759429154
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Remembrance that play both.
Figment of Triumph
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Figment of Triumph that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.462.463235294
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Figment of Ravages
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Figment of Ravages that play both.
Figment of Rebirth
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Figment of Rebirth that play both.
Arc Light Sentinel
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Arc Light Sentinel that play both.
Genesis
Avg. played:
2.602.603896104
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Genesis that play both.
Figment of Judgment
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Figment of Judgment that play both.
Figment of War
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Figment of War that play both.
Figment of Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Figment of Tenacity that play both.
Merciful Retribution
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Merciful Retribution that play both.
Parable of Humility
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Parable of Humility that play both.
Ode to Wrath
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Lost in Thought and Ode to Wrath that play both.