banner
Angelic Descent (Red)
658 decks (0.09693%)
Price History
Angelic Descent (Red)
Light Illusionist Instant
Target attack action card with Herald in its name gets go again. Your next angel attack this turn gets +3{p}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value: 
4.924.922152569
Average Defense Value:  
2.822.821605441
Hero
Prism, Awakener of Sol
Prism, Awakener of Sol
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Prism, Awakener of Sol that play both.
Prism
Prism
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Prism that play both.
Prism, Advent of Thrones
Prism, Advent of Thrones
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Prism, Advent of Thrones that play both.
Equipment
Empyrean Rapture
Empyrean Rapture
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Empyrean Rapture that play both.
Halo of Illumination
Halo of Illumination
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Halo of Illumination that play both.
Phantasmal Footsteps
Phantasmal Footsteps
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Phantasmal Footsteps that play both.
Calming Gesture
Calming Gesture
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Calming Gesture that play both.
Dream Weavers
Dream Weavers
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Dream Weavers that play both.
Wave of Reality
Wave of Reality
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Wave of Reality that play both.
Silent Stilettos
Silent Stilettos
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Old Knocker that play both.
Ghostly Touch
Ghostly Touch
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Crown of Reflection
Crown of Reflection
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Crown of Reflection that play both.
Fluttersteps
Fluttersteps
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Fluttersteps that play both.
Calming Cloak
Calming Cloak
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Calming Cloak that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Diadem of Dreamstate
Diadem of Dreamstate
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Diadem of Dreamstate that play both.
Vestige of Sol
Vestige of Sol
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Vestige of Sol that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Bunker Beard
Bunker Beard
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Bunker Beard that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Solar Plexus
Solar Plexus
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Solar Plexus that play both.
Radiant Flow
Radiant Flow
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Radiant Flow that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
Heartened Cross Strap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Weapon
Luminaris, Angel's Glow
Luminaris, Angel's Glow
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Luminaris, Angel's Glow that play both.
Luminaris, Celestial Fury
Luminaris, Celestial Fury
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Luminaris, Celestial Fury that play both.
Iris of Reality
Iris of Reality
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Iris of Reality that play both.
Reality Refractor
Reality Refractor
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Reality Refractor that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Luminaris
Luminaris
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Luminaris that play both.
Action
Passing Mirage
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:  
2.832.829729730
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Passing Mirage that play both.
Pierce Reality
Pierce Reality
Avg. played:  
2.812.811808118
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Pierce Reality that play both.
War Cry of Themis
War Cry of Themis
Avg. played:  
2.582.583333333
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and War Cry of Themis that play both.
Invoke Suraya
Invoke Suraya
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Invoke Suraya that play both.
Onyx Amulet
Onyx Amulet
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Onyx Amulet that play both.
Sapphire Amulet
Sapphire Amulet
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Sapphire Amulet that play both.
Haze Bending
Haze Bending
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Haze Bending that play both.
Lost in Thought
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Lost in Thought that play both.
Shimmers of Silver
Shimmers of Silver
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Shimmers of Silver that play both.
Great Library of Solana
Great Library of Solana
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Great Library of Solana that play both.
Attack Action
Herald of Erudition
Herald of Erudition
Avg. played:  
2.822.817248460
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Erudition that play both.
Wartune Herald (Red)
Wartune Herald (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.712.711574953
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Wartune Herald (Red) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Blue)
Herald of Protection (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.752.745652174
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Protection (Blue) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Blue)
Wartune Herald (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.752.752192982
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Wartune Herald (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Red)
Herald of Triumph (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.832.826405868
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Triumph (Red) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Red)
Herald of Protection (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.672.671314741
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Protection (Red) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Blue)
Herald of Triumph (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.892.893491124
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Triumph (Blue) that play both.
Wartune Herald (Yellow)
Wartune Herald (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.682.678391960
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Wartune Herald (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Triumph (Yellow)
Herald of Triumph (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.792.794212219
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Triumph (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Protection (Yellow)
Herald of Protection (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.652.650137741
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Protection (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Blue)
Herald of Ravages (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.692.687296417
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Ravages (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Blue)
Herald of Rebirth (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.712.711191336
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Rebirth (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Red)
Herald of Ravages (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.582.583870968
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Ravages (Red) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Red)
Herald of Tenacity (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.562.555555556
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Tenacity (Red) that play both.
Herald of Sekem
Herald of Sekem
Avg. played:  
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Sekem that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Blue)
Herald of Tenacity (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.592.586956522
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Tenacity (Blue) that play both.
Herald of Judgment
Herald of Judgment
Avg. played:  
2.642.640625000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Judgment that play both.
Herald of Ravages (Yellow)
Herald of Ravages (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.562.559633028
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Ravages (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Tenacity (Yellow)
Herald of Tenacity (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.552.546296296
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Tenacity (Yellow) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Red)
Herald of Rebirth (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.542.536363636
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Rebirth (Red) that play both.
Herald of Rebirth (Yellow)
Herald of Rebirth (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.572.565445026
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Herald of Rebirth (Yellow) that play both.
Celestial Cataclysm
Celestial Cataclysm
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Celestial Cataclysm that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Spears of Surreality (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.462.458333333
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Spears of Surreality (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Exposed
Exposed
Avg. played:  
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Exposed that play both.
Lumina Lance
Lumina Lance
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Lumina Lance that play both.
Defense Reaction
Soul Shield
Soul Shield
Avg. played:  
2.802.795454545
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Soul Shield that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.722.724137931
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Flicker Trick
Flicker Trick
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Flicker Trick that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Block
On the Horizon (Red)
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
On the Horizon (Yellow)
On the Horizon (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.002.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and On the Horizon (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
Figment of Protection
Figment of Protection
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Figment of Protection that play both.
Figment of Erudition
Figment of Erudition
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Figment of Erudition that play both.
Figment of Ravages
Figment of Ravages
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Figment of Ravages that play both.
Figment of Triumph
Figment of Triumph
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Figment of Triumph that play both.
Figment of Rebirth
Figment of Rebirth
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Figment of Rebirth that play both.
Figment of War
Figment of War
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Figment of War that play both.
Figment of Tenacity
Figment of Tenacity
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Figment of Tenacity that play both.
Figment of Judgment
Figment of Judgment
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Figment of Judgment that play both.
Arc Light Sentinel
Arc Light Sentinel
Avg. played:  
2.682.683823529
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Arc Light Sentinel that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Red)
Angelic Wrath (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.532.534883721
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Angelic Wrath (Red) that play both.
Angelic Descent (Yellow)
Angelic Descent (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.562.560810811
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Angelic Descent (Yellow) that play both.
Genesis
Genesis
Avg. played:  
2.632.625000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Genesis that play both.
Angelic Descent (Blue)
Angelic Descent (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.632.632231405
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Angelic Descent (Blue) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Red)
Celestial Reprimand (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.692.686274510
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Celestial Reprimand (Red) that play both.
Ode to Wrath
Ode to Wrath
Avg. played:  
2.652.645631068
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Ode to Wrath that play both.
Merciful Retribution
Merciful Retribution
Avg. played:  
2.662.659685864
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Merciful Retribution that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Yellow)
Celestial Reprimand (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.622.618090452
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Celestial Reprimand (Yellow) that play both.
Celestial Reprimand (Blue)
Celestial Reprimand (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.702.702857143
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Celestial Reprimand (Blue) that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Yellow)
Angelic Wrath (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.462.459330144
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Angelic Wrath (Yellow) that play both.
Parable of Humility
Parable of Humility
Avg. played:  
2.612.605882353
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Parable of Humility that play both.
Celestial Resolve (Red)
Celestial Resolve (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.602.597315436
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Celestial Resolve (Red) that play both.
Angelic Wrath (Blue)
Angelic Wrath (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.572.566929134
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Angelic Wrath (Blue) that play both.
Celestial Resolve (Yellow)
Celestial Resolve (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.412.406250000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Celestial Resolve (Yellow) that play both.
Phantom Tidemaw
Phantom Tidemaw
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Phantom Tidemaw that play both.
Resource
Light of Sol
Light of Sol
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Angelic Descent (Red) and Light of Sol that play both.