Garland of Spring
Generic Equipment - Chest
Action - Destroy this: Gain {r}. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.522.519179582
Average Defense Value:
2.562.562552792
Hero
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
New
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster that play both.
New
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Kayo, Underhanded Cheat that play both.
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Gloves
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Nullrune Hood
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Arcane Lantern
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Skullhorn
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Skullhorn that play both.
Craterhoof
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Craterhoof that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Steelbraid Buckler
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Steelbraid Buckler that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Danger Digits
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Danger Digits that play both.
Halo of Illumination
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Halo of Illumination that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Aurum Aegis
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Gauntlet of Boulderhold
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Gauntlet of Boulderhold that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Savage Sash
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Savage Sash that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Starting Point
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Starting Point that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Titan's Fist that play both.
Rok
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Rok that play both.
Mandible Claw
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Mandible Claw that play both.
Raydn, Duskbane
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Raydn, Duskbane that play both.
Flail of Agony
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Flail of Agony that play both.
Spider's Bite
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Spider's Bite that play both.
Action
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Germinate that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Lumina Ascension
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Lumina Ascension that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Arc Lightning that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Argh... Smash!
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Argh... Smash! that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Nimblism (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Beaming Bravado (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Beaming Bravado (Yellow) that play both.
Bolt of Courage (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Bolt of Courage (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Nimby (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Nimby (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Brothers in Arms (Blue) that play both.
Beaming Bravado (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Beaming Bravado (Red) that play both.
Engulfing Light (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Engulfing Light (Red) that play both.
Light the Way (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Light the Way (Red) that play both.
V of the Vanguard
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and V of the Vanguard that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Bolt of Courage (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Bolt of Courage (Yellow) that play both.
Engulfing Light (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Engulfing Light (Yellow) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Enlightened Strike that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and The Golden Son that play both.
Overload (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Overload (Blue) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Humble (Red) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Courageous Steelhand (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Courageous Steelhand (Red) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Up the Ante that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.583333333
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.571428571
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Serenity (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Blessing of Serenity (Red) that play both.