Garland of Spring
Generic Equipment - Chest
Action - Destroy this: Gain {r}. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.772.771585572
Average Defense Value: Β
2.512.506491917
Hero
Betsy, Skin in the Game
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Shiyana, Diamond Gemini
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Shiyana, Diamond Gemini that play both.
Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro that play both.
New
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster that play both.
New
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Kayo, Underhanded Cheat that play both.
Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Gloves
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Craterhoof
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Craterhoof that play both.
Gauntlet of Boulderhold
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Gauntlet of Boulderhold that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Bracers of Belief
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Bracers of Belief that play both.
Bracers of Bellona's Grace
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Bracers of Bellona's Grace that play both.
Halo of Illumination
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Halo of Illumination that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Nullrune Robe
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Crown of Providence
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Crown of Providence that play both.
Hood of Red Sand
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Hood of Red Sand that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Savage Sash
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Savage Sash that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Skullhorn
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Skullhorn that play both.
Weapon
Sledge of Anvilheim
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Raydn, Duskbane
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Raydn, Duskbane that play both.
Talishar, the Lost Prince
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Talishar, the Lost Prince that play both.
Banksy
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Banksy that play both.
Rok
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Rok that play both.
Mandible Claw
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Mandible Claw that play both.
Action
Big Bop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Big Bop (Blue) that play both.
Big Bop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Big Bop (Red) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Bigger Than Big (Blue) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Double Down that play both.
Lead with Heart (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Lead with Heart (Blue) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Stacked in Your Favor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Stacked in Your Favor (Blue) that play both.
Starting Stake
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Starting Stake that play both.
Lumina Ascension
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Lumina Ascension that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Arc Lightning that play both.
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Diamond Amulet that play both.
Flying High (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Flying High (Blue) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Germinate
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Germinate that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Raise an Army that play both.
Reckless Charge
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Reckless Charge that play both.
Teklo Core
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Teklo Core that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Dissolving Shield (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Dissolving Shield (Red) that play both.
Gas Up (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Gas Up (Blue) that play both.
Gas Up (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Gas Up (Yellow) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Hadron Collider (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Hadron Collider (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Hadron Collider (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Hadron Collider (Yellow) that play both.
Hyper Driver
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Hyper Driver that play both.
MHz Script
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and MHz Script that play both.
Overload Script
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Overload Script that play both.
Polarity Reversal Script
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Polarity Reversal Script that play both.
Quickfire (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Quickfire (Blue) that play both.
Quickfire (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Quickfire (Red) that play both.
Quickfire (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Quickfire (Yellow) that play both.
Re-Charge! (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Re-Charge! (Blue) that play both.
Re-Charge! (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Re-Charge! (Yellow) that play both.
Dig Up Dinner
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Dig Up Dinner that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Cash In that play both.
Nimblism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Nimblism (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Bet Big that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Performance Bonus (Blue) that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Vigorous Windup (Blue) that play both.
Wage Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Wage Might (Blue) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Beaming Bravado (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Beaming Bravado (Red) that play both.
Beaming Bravado (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Beaming Bravado (Yellow) that play both.
Bolt of Courage (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Bolt of Courage (Red) that play both.
Bolt of Courage (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Bolt of Courage (Yellow) that play both.
Engulfing Light (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Engulfing Light (Red) that play both.
Engulfing Light (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Engulfing Light (Yellow) that play both.
Express Lightning (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Express Lightning (Red) that play both.
Illuminate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Illuminate (Red) that play both.
Light the Way (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Light the Way (Red) that play both.
Rising Solartide (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Rising Solartide (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Snatch (Red) that play both.
V of the Vanguard
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and V of the Vanguard that play both.
Valiant Thrust (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Valiant Thrust (Red) that play both.
Alluring Inducement
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Alluring Inducement that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Strike Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Strike Gold (Red) that play both.
Whirling Mist Blossom
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Whirling Mist Blossom that play both.
Big Bertha (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Big Bertha (Blue) that play both.
Big Bertha (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Big Bertha (Yellow) that play both.
Bull Bar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Bull Bar (Red) that play both.
Burn Rubber
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Burn Rubber that play both.
Crankshaft (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Crankshaft (Yellow) that play both.
Expedite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Expedite (Blue) that play both.
Full Tilt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Full Tilt (Blue) that play both.
Full Tilt (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Full Tilt (Yellow) that play both.
Gas Guzzler (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Gas Guzzler (Red) that play both.
Gas Guzzler (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Gas Guzzler (Yellow) that play both.
High Speed Impact (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and High Speed Impact (Red) that play both.
Jump Start (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Jump Start (Blue) that play both.
Jump Start (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Jump Start (Red) that play both.
Jump Start (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Jump Start (Yellow) that play both.
Lay Waste (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Lay Waste (Red) that play both.
Out Pace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Out Pace (Red) that play both.
Over Loop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Over Loop (Red) that play both.
Over Loop (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Over Loop (Yellow) that play both.
Razzle Dazzle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Razzle Dazzle (Blue) that play both.
Razzle Dazzle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Razzle Dazzle (Red) that play both.
Razzle Dazzle (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Razzle Dazzle (Yellow) that play both.
Rev Up (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Rev Up (Red) that play both.
Rev Up (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Rev Up (Yellow) that play both.
T-Bone (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and T-Bone (Red) that play both.
Throttle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Throttle (Blue) that play both.
Twin Drive
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Twin Drive that play both.
Under Loop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Under Loop (Red) that play both.
Under Loop (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Under Loop (Yellow) that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Zero to Sixty (Blue) that play both.
Zero to Sixty (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Zero to Sixty (Red) that play both.
Zipper Hit (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Zipper Hit (Blue) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Send Packing that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Swing Big that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Nimby (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Nimby (Blue) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Courageous Steelhand (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Courageous Steelhand (Red) that play both.
Courageous Steelhand (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Courageous Steelhand (Yellow) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Resounding Courage (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Resounding Courage (Red) that play both.
Resounding Courage (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Resounding Courage (Yellow) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Up the Ante that play both.
Defense Reaction
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Saving Grace that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Block
Test of Vigor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Test of Vigor that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Slap-Happy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Slap-Happy that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Garland of Spring and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.