Nimblism (Red)
Generic Action
The next attack action card with cost [1 Resource] or less you play this turn gains +3 [Power].
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.622.622972895
Average Defense Value: Β
2.472.472582423
Hero
Briar
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Briar that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Briar, Warden of Thorns
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Briar, Warden of Thorns that play both.
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
Jarl VetreiΔi
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Jarl VetreiΔi that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Riptide
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Riptide that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Arakni, Huntsman
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
Aurora, Shooting Star
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Nuu, Alluring Desire
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Aurora
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Aurora that play both.
Equipment
Snapdragon Scalers
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Crown of Providence
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Balance of Justice
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Flick Knives
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Aether Ironweave
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Arcane Lantern
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Ollin Ice Cap
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Ollin Ice Cap that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Nullrune Boots
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Face Purgatory
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Nullrune Hood
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Bull's Eye Bracers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bull's Eye Bracers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Runehold Release
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Runehold Release that play both.
Mask of Perdition
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Nullrune Robe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Crown of Dominion
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Storm Striders
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Toxic Tips
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Shock Charmers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shock Charmers that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Quiver of Abyssal Depths that play both.
Redback Shroud
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Lightning Greaves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Perch Grapplers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Arousing Wave
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Flash of Brilliance
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Ironsong Versus
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Bloodtorn Bodice
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bloodtorn Bodice that play both.
Metacarpus Node
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Driftwood Quiver
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Driftwood Quiver that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Hornet's Sting
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hornet's Sting that play both.
Weapon
Rosetta Thorn
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Spider's Bite
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Scale Peeler
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Star Fall
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Star Fall that play both.
Orbitoclast
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Death Dealer
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Death Dealer that play both.
Graven Call
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Graven Call that play both.
Waning Moon
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Action
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
2.732.727439024
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Anthem of Spring
Avg. played: Β
2.372.368394565
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Anthem of Spring that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played: Β
2.572.569138277
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Force of Nature
Avg. played: Β
2.562.562387792
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Force of Nature that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played: Β
2.602.601197904
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.578792342
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.541149425
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Sizzle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sizzle (Red) that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played: Β
2.582.581607291
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Pulse of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pulse of Candlehold that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Red) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Premeditate
Avg. played: Β
2.612.608370703
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Premeditate that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Scout the Periphery (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scout the Periphery (Red) that play both.
Swell Tidings
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Swell Tidings that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arc Lightning that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Lace with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lace with Bloodrot that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.522.515570934
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Germinate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Germinate that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Revel in Runeblood
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Revel in Runeblood that play both.
Attack Action
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.472.473185649
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.572.573681533
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.369939271
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.622.619944290
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
2.772.768684678
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.680830040
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.450990894
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β
2.732.734424166
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.392.387096774
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.765717860
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β
2.682.675084175
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.642.640367468
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Blue) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played: Β
2.552.551983299
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.523677979
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.569421023
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Standing Order that play both.
Fry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fry (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β
2.632.628048780
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.542.538355851
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Nimble Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.371.371089536
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nimble Strike (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β
2.372.369000440
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Give and Take that play both.
Exude Confidence
Avg. played: Β
2.472.474290531
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Exude Confidence that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Yellow) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β
2.512.514353359
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Infecting Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.422.418199419
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Infecting Shot (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β
2.422.421052632
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bolt'n' Shot (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.447140381
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Photon Rush (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Photon Rush (Red) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Current Funnel
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Current Funnel that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.481.478484265
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Falcon Wing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Falcon Wing (Red) that play both.
Drill Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Drill Shot (Red) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Searing Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Searing Shot (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.719812427
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.372.367374605
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β
2.582.584245077
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.506358382
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.622.620157819
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β
1.541.538542213
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.531822660
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.492.485127096
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.442.438799864
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Block
Unforgetting Unforgiving
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Unforgetting Unforgiving that play both.
Instant
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Kindle that play both.
Lightning Press (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lightning Press (Red) that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.