banner
Nimblism (Red)
19715 decks (3.694%)
Price History
Nimblism (Red)
Generic Action
The next attack action card with cost [1 Resource] or less you play this turn gains +3 [Power]. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.622.621584126
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.472.472679133
Hero
Briar
Briar
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Briar that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Briar, Warden of Thorns
Briar, Warden of Thorns
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Briar, Warden of Thorns that play both.
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
New
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Riptide
Riptide
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Riptide that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Jarl VetreiΓ°i
Jarl VetreiΓ°i
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Jarl VetreiΓ°i that play both.
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
New
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Aurora, Shooting Star
Aurora, Shooting Star
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Aurora
Aurora
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Aurora that play both.
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
Florian, Rotwood Harbinger
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Florian, Rotwood Harbinger that play both.
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
New
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Equipment
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
Grasp of the Arknight
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
Dyadic Carapace
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Aether Ironweave
Aether Ironweave
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
Crown of Dichotomy
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
Vexing Quillhand
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
New
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Face Purgatory
Face Purgatory
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Runehold Release
Runehold Release
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Runehold Release that play both.
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Bull's Eye Bracers
Bull's Eye Bracers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bull's Eye Bracers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
Trench of Sunken Treasure
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
New
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mask of Deceit that play both.
New
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Flash of Brilliance
Flash of Brilliance
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Shock Charmers
Shock Charmers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shock Charmers that play both.
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Quiver of Abyssal Depths that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
Spellbound Creepers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Perch Grapplers
Perch Grapplers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Bloodtorn Bodice
Bloodtorn Bodice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bloodtorn Bodice that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Lightning Greaves
Lightning Greaves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arousing Wave that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Metacarpus Node
Metacarpus Node
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Driftwood Quiver
Driftwood Quiver
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Driftwood Quiver that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Weapon
Rosetta Thorn
Rosetta Thorn
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Star Fall
Star Fall
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Star Fall that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Death Dealer
Death Dealer
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Death Dealer that play both.
New
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Graven Call that play both.
Waning Moon
Waning Moon
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
New
Kunai of Retribution
Kunai of Retribution
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Kunai of Retribution that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.728302650
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
New
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Anthem of Spring
Anthem of Spring
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.369215292
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Anthem of Spring that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.570000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Force of Nature
Force of Nature
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.562682216
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Force of Nature that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.601992528
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Sizzle (Red)
Sizzle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sizzle (Red) that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.576660156
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.539747995
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Crumble to Eternity
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.582484164
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Pulse of Candlehold
Pulse of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pulse of Candlehold that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Premeditate
Premeditate
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.609467456
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Premeditate that play both.
New
Blessing of Vynserakai
Blessing of Vynserakai
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blessing of Vynserakai that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Scout the Periphery (Red)
Scout the Periphery (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scout the Periphery (Red) that play both.
Swell Tidings
Swell Tidings
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Swell Tidings that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Arcane Cussing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcane Cussing (Red) that play both.
Arc Lightning
Arc Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arc Lightning that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Lace with Bloodrot
Lace with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lace with Bloodrot that play both.
This Round's on Me
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.504983389
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
New
Trot Along
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Trot Along that play both.
New
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
New
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
New
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Arcane Seeds - Life
Arcane Seeds - Life
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcane Seeds - Life that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Cash In that play both.
Germinate
Germinate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Germinate that play both.
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Sow Tomorrow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sow Tomorrow (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.472281686
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.573744196
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.369910973
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.619882392
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.769442262
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.681093842
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.451930759
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.733876018
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.367132867
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.639978506
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.683523654
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Blue) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.552615128
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.521696638
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.568960713
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
New
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Standing Order
Standing Order
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Standing Order that play both.
Fry (Red)
Fry (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fry (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.537235254
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.637795276
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Nimble Strike (Red)
Nimble Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.371.374400000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nimble Strike (Red) that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.333333333
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
New
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Exude Confidence
Exude Confidence
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.474509804
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Exude Confidence that play both.
Give and Take
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.370013152
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Give and Take that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Yellow)
Hit the High Notes (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Yellow) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.514631983
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Infecting Shot (Red)
Infecting Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.414761905
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Infecting Shot (Red) that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
New
Outed
Outed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Outed that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
Photon Rush (Red)
Photon Rush (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Photon Rush (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.436708861
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.446784291
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Red)
Bolt'n' Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bolt'n' Shot (Red) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Desires of Flesh (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Desires of Flesh (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
New
Wrath of Retribution
Wrath of Retribution
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Wrath of Retribution that play both.
New
For the Dracai
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and For the Dracai that play both.
New
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue) that play both.
New
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
New
Sound the Alarm
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sound the Alarm that play both.
New
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red) that play both.
New
Tag the Target (Red)
Tag the Target (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Tag the Target (Red) that play both.
New
Plunge the Prospect (Red)
Plunge the Prospect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Plunge the Prospect (Red) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Falcon Wing (Red)
Falcon Wing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Falcon Wing (Red) that play both.
Drill Shot (Red)
Drill Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Drill Shot (Red) that play both.
Searing Shot (Red)
Searing Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Searing Shot (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Current Funnel
Current Funnel
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Current Funnel that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Attack Reaction
New
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.720251983
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.366725900
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
New
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.593684211
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.506908463
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.620406707
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
1.541.538702929
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
New
Exposed
Exposed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Exposed that play both.
New
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.529234361
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.483446066
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.438282043
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
New
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
New
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Den of the Spider that play both.
New
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Instant
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
New
Tooth of the Dragon
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
Kindle
Kindle
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Kindle that play both.
New
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Lightning Press (Red)
Lightning Press (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lightning Press (Red) that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Preserve Tradition that play both.
New
Pledge Fealty
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.