banner
Nimblism (Red)
23030 decks (3.149%)
Price History
Nimblism (Red)
Generic Action
The next attack action card with cost [1 Resource] or less you play this turn gains +3 [Power]. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.602.596782891
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.492.485442694
Hero
living legend - Blitz
Briar
Briar
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Briar that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Briar, Warden of Thorns
Briar, Warden of Thorns
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Briar, Warden of Thorns that play both.
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
Riptide
Riptide
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Riptide that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
New
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
Kayo, Underhanded Cheat
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Kayo, Underhanded Cheat that play both.
Aurora
Aurora
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Aurora that play both.
Equipment
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
New
Attention Grabbers
Attention Grabbers
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Attention Grabbers that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
Grasp of the Arknight
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
Dyadic Carapace
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Craterhoof
Craterhoof
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Craterhoof that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Aether Ironweave
Aether Ironweave
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
Crown of Dichotomy
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
Vexing Quillhand
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Bull's Eye Bracers
Bull's Eye Bracers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bull's Eye Bracers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
Helm of Halo's Grace
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
Warpath of Winged Grace
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
Trench of Sunken Treasure
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
Swiftstrike Bracers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
New
Horns of the Despised
Horns of the Despised
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Horns of the Despised that play both.
Enchanted Quiver
Enchanted Quiver
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Enchanted Quiver that play both.
Face Purgatory
Face Purgatory
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Quiver of Abyssal Depths that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Shock Charmers
Shock Charmers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shock Charmers that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Perch Grapplers
Perch Grapplers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Okana Scar Wraps
Okana Scar Wraps
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Okana Scar Wraps that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
Spellbound Creepers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Runehold Release
Runehold Release
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Runehold Release that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Driftwood Quiver
Driftwood Quiver
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Driftwood Quiver that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Rosetta Thorn
Rosetta Thorn
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Death Dealer
Death Dealer
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Death Dealer that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Redspine Manta
Redspine Manta
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Redspine Manta that play both.
Waning Moon
Waning Moon
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Star Fall
Star Fall
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Star Fall that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Graven Call that play both.
Action
New
Cruel Ambition
Cruel Ambition
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Cruel Ambition that play both.
New
Booze!
Booze!
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.900000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Booze! that play both.
New
Villainous Pose (Red)
Villainous Pose (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.606796117
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Villainous Pose (Red) that play both.
New
Two Steps Ahead
Two Steps Ahead
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.606879607
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Two Steps Ahead that play both.
New
Revolting Gesture
Revolting Gesture
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.800000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Revolting Gesture that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.742343664
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
New
Sadistic Scowl
Sadistic Scowl
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.726829268
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sadistic Scowl that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.574444689
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Force of Nature
Force of Nature
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.563810799
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Force of Nature that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.605425401
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.579086538
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.540920426
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Anthem of Spring
Anthem of Spring
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.373067332
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Anthem of Spring that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.585585586
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Premeditate
Premeditate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Premeditate that play both.
Pulse of Candlehold
Pulse of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pulse of Candlehold that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Red) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Scout the Periphery (Red)
Scout the Periphery (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scout the Periphery (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Lace with Bloodrot
Lace with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lace with Bloodrot that play both.
Swell Tidings
Swell Tidings
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Swell Tidings that play both.
Dual Threat
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Dual Threat that play both.
This Round's on Me
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Attack Action
New
Short Shrift
Short Shrift
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Short Shrift that play both.
New
Escalate Violence
Escalate Violence
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Escalate Violence that play both.
New
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.875318066
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Battered, Beaten, and Broken that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Red)
Mocking Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.851116625
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mocking Blow (Red) that play both.
New
Cut a Long Story Short
Cut a Long Story Short
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.866847826
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Cut a Long Story Short that play both.
New
Power Play (Blue)
Power Play (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Power Play (Blue) that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.668016194
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.475508255
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.586400307
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
New
Goon Beatdown
Goon Beatdown
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.844765343
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Goon Beatdown that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.373899486
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.626340448
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
New
Bully Tactics
Bully Tactics
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.430420712
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bully Tactics that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.519249753
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.777985075
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
New
Wee Wrecking Ball
Wee Wrecking Ball
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.729857820
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Wee Wrecking Ball that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.469411765
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.675931178
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mocking Blow (Blue) that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.759562842
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Overcrowded that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
New
Spew Obscenities
Spew Obscenities
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.769230769
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spew Obscenities that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.639895013
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.553602812
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Jack Be Quick that play both.
New
Fix the Match
Fix the Match
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.647058824
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fix the Match that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.557589469
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
New
Full of Bravado (Blue)
Full of Bravado (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Full of Bravado (Blue) that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mocking Blow (Yellow) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.576659642
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.509548119
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
New
Battlefield Beacon
Battlefield Beacon
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Battlefield Beacon that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.540449438
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Nimble Strike (Red)
Nimble Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.391.390280942
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nimble Strike (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
New
No Tall Tales
No Tall Tales
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.625000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and No Tall Tales that play both.
Swift Shot
Swift Shot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Swift Shot that play both.
Exude Confidence
Exude Confidence
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.472096128
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Exude Confidence that play both.
Standing Order
Standing Order
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Standing Order that play both.
New
Overturn the Results
Overturn the Results
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Overturn the Results that play both.
Give and Take
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Give and Take that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.515960534
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Infecting Shot (Red)
Infecting Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.403246476
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Infecting Shot (Red) that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Dry Powder Shot
Dry Powder Shot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Dry Powder Shot that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Red) that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Red)
Bolt'n' Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bolt'n' Shot (Red) that play both.
New
Outside Interference
Outside Interference
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Outside Interference that play both.
New
Bask in Your Own Greatness (Blue)
Bask in Your Own Greatness (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bask in Your Own Greatness (Blue) that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Seek Vengeance (Red)
Seek Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Seek Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Nimby (Blue)
Nimby (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nimby (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Seek Vengeance
Seek Vengeance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Seek Vengeance that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Blue) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Vengeance Never Rests
Vengeance Never Rests
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Vengeance Never Rests that play both.
Drill Shot (Red)
Drill Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Drill Shot (Red) that play both.
Searing Shot (Red)
Searing Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Searing Shot (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.721024259
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.409004919
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.510348738
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.622175878
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Legacy of Ikaru
Legacy of Ikaru
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Legacy of Ikaru that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.541125541
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.482258871
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Saving Grace
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Saving Grace that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.439069198
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
New
Truth or Trickery
Truth or Trickery
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Truth or Trickery that play both.
Return Fire
Return Fire
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Return Fire that play both.
Instant
New
Leave Them Hanging
Leave Them Hanging
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Leave Them Hanging that play both.
New
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.870769231
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Edge of Their Seats (Red) that play both.
New
Concealed Object
Concealed Object
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.714285714
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Concealed Object that play both.
New
In the Palm of Your Hand
In the Palm of Your Hand
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.367469880
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and In the Palm of Your Hand that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.289551503
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
New
Tension in the Air (Red)
Tension in the Air (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Tension in the Air (Red) that play both.
New
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Edge of Their Seats (Blue) that play both.
Lightning Press (Red)
Lightning Press (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lightning Press (Red) that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.