banner
Nimblism (Red)
20926 decks (3.171%)
Price History
Nimblism (Red)
Generic Action
The next attack action card with cost [1 Resource] or less you play this turn gains +3 [Power]. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.622.622520170
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.482.476852558
Hero
living legend - Blitz
Briar
Briar
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Briar that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Briar, Warden of Thorns
Briar, Warden of Thorns
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Briar, Warden of Thorns that play both.
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
Riptide
Riptide
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Riptide that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Aurora
Aurora
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Aurora that play both.
Equipment
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
Grasp of the Arknight
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
Dyadic Carapace
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Aether Ironweave
Aether Ironweave
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
Crown of Dichotomy
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
Vexing Quillhand
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Bull's Eye Bracers
Bull's Eye Bracers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bull's Eye Bracers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
Trench of Sunken Treasure
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Face Purgatory
Face Purgatory
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Runehold Release
Runehold Release
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Runehold Release that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
Helm of Halo's Grace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Quiver of Abyssal Depths that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
Warpath of Winged Grace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Shock Charmers
Shock Charmers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shock Charmers that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
Swiftstrike Bracers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Perch Grapplers
Perch Grapplers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
Spellbound Creepers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Danger Digits
Danger Digits
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Danger Digits that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Enchanted Quiver
Enchanted Quiver
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Enchanted Quiver that play both.
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
Mask of Malicious Manifestations
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mask of Malicious Manifestations that play both.
Driftwood Quiver
Driftwood Quiver
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Driftwood Quiver that play both.
Blade Beckoner Plating
Blade Beckoner Plating
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Metacarpus Node
Metacarpus Node
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Rosetta Thorn
Rosetta Thorn
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Death Dealer
Death Dealer
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Death Dealer that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Graven Call that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Star Fall
Star Fall
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Star Fall that play both.
Waning Moon
Waning Moon
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.733606557
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.574069998
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Force of Nature
Force of Nature
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.564022346
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Force of Nature that play both.
Anthem of Spring
Anthem of Spring
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.372127872
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Anthem of Spring that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.604938272
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.578617867
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.540522134
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.584838533
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Dual Threat
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Dual Threat that play both.
Pulse of Candlehold
Pulse of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pulse of Candlehold that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Red) that play both.
Premeditate
Premeditate
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.617757009
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Premeditate that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Scout the Periphery (Red)
Scout the Periphery (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scout the Periphery (Red) that play both.
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Kiss of Death that play both.
Sizzle (Red)
Sizzle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sizzle (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Swell Tidings
Swell Tidings
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Swell Tidings that play both.
Lace with Bloodrot
Lace with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lace with Bloodrot that play both.
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Malefic Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Malefic Incantation (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
This Round's on Me
This Round's on Me
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and This Round's on Me that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Nimby (Red)
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.804416404
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.679245283
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.472912366
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.580453695
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.371371084
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.622706670
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.773310358
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.679729730
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.461352657
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.669724771
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.735439901
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.640488193
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.715492958
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.556449948
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.572085475
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.520285935
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.540157480
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Nimble Strike (Red)
Nimble Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.381.382261411
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nimble Strike (Red) that play both.
Standing Order
Standing Order
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Standing Order that play both.
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Runerager Swarm (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.377005348
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Runerager Swarm (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Hit the High Notes (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Blue) that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Nimby (Yellow)
Nimby (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nimby (Yellow) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Exude Confidence
Exude Confidence
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.476965517
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Exude Confidence that play both.
Give and Take
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.373593074
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Give and Take that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.516053707
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Infecting Shot (Red)
Infecting Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.402207506
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Infecting Shot (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
Fry (Red)
Fry (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fry (Red) that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Swift Shot
Swift Shot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Swift Shot that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Red)
Bolt'n' Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bolt'n' Shot (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Yellow)
Hit the High Notes (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Yellow) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Wither (Red) that play both.
Virulent Touch (Red)
Virulent Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Virulent Touch (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Sedate (Red)
Sedate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sedate (Red) that play both.
Falcon Wing (Red)
Falcon Wing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Falcon Wing (Red) that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Searing Shot (Red)
Searing Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Searing Shot (Red) that play both.
Drill Shot (Red)
Drill Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Drill Shot (Red) that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Slay the Scholars (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Slay the Scholars (Red) that play both.
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Arcanic Crackle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcanic Crackle (Red) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.721142857
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.372450053
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.510850942
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.619584361
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.612052731
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
1.541.539180073
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.529884527
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.478538183
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.438709677
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Saving Grace
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Saving Grace that play both.
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Sigil of Suffering (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sigil of Suffering (Red) that play both.
Instant
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Lightning Press (Red)
Lightning Press (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lightning Press (Red) that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Kindle
Kindle
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Kindle that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pass Over that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.