banner
Nimblism (Red)
24249 decks (3.210%)
Price History
Nimblism (Red)
Generic Action
The next attack action card with cost [1 Resource] or less you play this turn gains +3 [Power]. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.552.545627505
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.502.495115248
Hero
living legend - Blitz
Briar
Briar
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Briar that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Briar, Warden of Thorns
Briar, Warden of Thorns
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Briar, Warden of Thorns that play both.
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
Riptide
Riptide
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Riptide that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
Riptide, Lurker of the Deep
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Riptide, Lurker of the Deep that play both.
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Aurora
Aurora
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Aurora that play both.
Equipment
New
Attention Grabbers
Attention Grabbers
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Attention Grabbers that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
Grasp of the Arknight
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Balance of Justice that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
Dyadic Carapace
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Aether Ironweave
Aether Ironweave
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Aether Ironweave that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Crown of Dichotomy
Crown of Dichotomy
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Crown of Dichotomy that play both.
Vexing Quillhand
Vexing Quillhand
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Vexing Quillhand that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Bull's Eye Bracers
Bull's Eye Bracers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bull's Eye Bracers that play both.
Craterhoof
Craterhoof
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Craterhoof that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
Helm of Halo's Grace
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
Warpath of Winged Grace
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Trench of Sunken Treasure
Trench of Sunken Treasure
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Trench of Sunken Treasure that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Blossom of Spring
Blossom of Spring
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blossom of Spring that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Storm Striders that play both.
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
Quiver of Abyssal Depths
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Quiver of Abyssal Depths that play both.
Shock Charmers
Shock Charmers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shock Charmers that play both.
Toxic Tips
Toxic Tips
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Toxic Tips that play both.
Face Purgatory
Face Purgatory
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Face Purgatory that play both.
Enchanted Quiver
Enchanted Quiver
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Enchanted Quiver that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
Rampart of the Ram's Head
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
New
Horns of the Despised
Horns of the Despised
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Horns of the Despised that play both.
Swiftstrike Bracers
Swiftstrike Bracers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Swiftstrike Bracers that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Perch Grapplers
Perch Grapplers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Perch Grapplers that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Redback Shroud that play both.
Spellbound Creepers
Spellbound Creepers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spellbound Creepers that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Blitzliving legend - Classic Constructed
Rosetta Thorn
Rosetta Thorn
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Rosetta Thorn that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spider's Bite that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scale Peeler that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Death Dealer
Death Dealer
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Death Dealer that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Orbitoclast that play both.
Waning Moon
Waning Moon
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Waning Moon that play both.
Redspine Manta
Redspine Manta
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Redspine Manta that play both.
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Star Fall
Star Fall
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Star Fall that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Graven Call that play both.
Action
New
Cruel Ambition
Cruel Ambition
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Cruel Ambition that play both.
New
Booze!
Booze!
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.923897582
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Booze! that play both.
New
Villainous Pose (Red)
Villainous Pose (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.421335380
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Villainous Pose (Red) that play both.
New
Two Steps Ahead
Two Steps Ahead
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.496503497
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Two Steps Ahead that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.743174372
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Codex of Frailty that play both.
New
Revolting Gesture
Revolting Gesture
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.755784062
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Revolting Gesture that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Gorganian Tome that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Channel Mount Heroic
Channel Mount Heroic
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.574631787
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Channel Mount Heroic that play both.
Midas Touch
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.660472973
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Midas Touch that play both.
Force of Nature
Force of Nature
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.563810799
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Force of Nature that play both.
Tome of Harvests
Tome of Harvests
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.605522682
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Tome of Harvests that play both.
New
Sadistic Scowl
Sadistic Scowl
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.638513514
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sadistic Scowl that play both.
Bramble Spark (Red)
Bramble Spark (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.579086538
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bramble Spark (Red) that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Earthlore Surge (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.541024479
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Blue) that play both.
Anthem of Spring
Anthem of Spring
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.373067332
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Anthem of Spring that play both.
Sonata Arcanix
Sonata Arcanix
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.585425764
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sonata Arcanix that play both.
Premeditate
Premeditate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Premeditate that play both.
Pulse of Candlehold
Pulse of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pulse of Candlehold that play both.
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Earthlore Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Earthlore Surge (Red) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Scout the Periphery (Red)
Scout the Periphery (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scout the Periphery (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Lace with Bloodrot
Lace with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lace with Bloodrot that play both.
Swell Tidings
Swell Tidings
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Swell Tidings that play both.
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Deadwood Dirge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Deadwood Dirge (Red) that play both.
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Tear Asunder that play both.
Attack Action
New
Short Shrift
Short Shrift
Avg. played: Β 
2.932.930835735
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Short Shrift that play both.
New
Escalate Violence
Escalate Violence
Avg. played: Β 
2.932.930678466
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Escalate Violence that play both.
New
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.901081917
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Battered, Beaten, and Broken that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Red)
Mocking Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.892439595
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mocking Blow (Red) that play both.
New
Cut a Long Story Short
Cut a Long Story Short
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.886435331
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Cut a Long Story Short that play both.
New
Goon Beatdown
Goon Beatdown
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.891205802
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Goon Beatdown that play both.
New
Power Play (Blue)
Power Play (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.888170055
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Power Play (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.476435536
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.587085488
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.375602218
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.627394140
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.655498908
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.425913163
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
New
Spew Obscenities
Spew Obscenities
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.713798978
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spew Obscenities that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.778232558
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.471590909
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
New
Full of Bravado (Blue)
Full of Bravado (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Full of Bravado (Blue) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.676093514
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Surgical Extraction that play both.
New
Wee Wrecking Ball
Wee Wrecking Ball
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.641025641
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Wee Wrecking Ball that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shake Down that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mocking Blow (Blue) that play both.
New
Bully Tactics
Bully Tactics
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.269784173
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bully Tactics that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.276391555
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Overcrowded that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Isolate (Red)
Isolate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.640157480
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Isolate (Red) that play both.
Swarming Gloomveil
Swarming Gloomveil
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.557589469
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Swarming Gloomveil that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.577660972
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Infect (Red) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.506674187
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
New
Overturn the Results
Overturn the Results
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Overturn the Results that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Already Dead that play both.
Nimble Strike (Red)
Nimble Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.391.389616935
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Nimble Strike (Red) that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.540655885
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
New
Fix the Match
Fix the Match
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.550458716
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fix the Match that play both.
Jack Be Quick
Jack Be Quick
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.535060976
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Jack Be Quick that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Exude Confidence
Exude Confidence
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.467995803
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Exude Confidence that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Mocking Blow (Yellow) that play both.
Give and Take
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Give and Take that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.516362583
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Infecting Shot (Red)
Infecting Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Infecting Shot (Red) that play both.
Standing Order
Standing Order
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Standing Order that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Back Stab (Blue)
Back Stab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Back Stab (Blue) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Eradicate that play both.
New
Battlefield Beacon
Battlefield Beacon
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Battlefield Beacon that play both.
Swift Shot
Swift Shot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Swift Shot that play both.
Bolt'n' Shot (Red)
Bolt'n' Shot (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bolt'n' Shot (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
New
No Tall Tales
No Tall Tales
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and No Tall Tales that play both.
Dry Powder Shot
Dry Powder Shot
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Dry Powder Shot that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Hit the High Notes (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Hit the High Notes (Red) that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.720977140
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.451716911
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.510192525
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.622438347
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shred (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spreading Plague that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Just a Nick that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.544107571
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.483678542
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Collapsing Trap
Collapsing Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Collapsing Trap that play both.
Buzzsaw Trap
Buzzsaw Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Buzzsaw Trap that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.439939024
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Frailty Trap that play both.
Saving Grace
Saving Grace
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Saving Grace that play both.
Spike Pit Trap
Spike Pit Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Spike Pit Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Inertia Trap that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
New
Leave Them Hanging
Leave Them Hanging
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Leave Them Hanging that play both.
New
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.881222707
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Edge of Their Seats (Red) that play both.
New
Concealed Object
Concealed Object
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.715005035
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Concealed Object that play both.
New
In the Palm of Your Hand
In the Palm of Your Hand
Avg. played: Β 
2.222.216710183
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and In the Palm of Your Hand that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.298560401
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Calming Breeze
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Calming Breeze that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.336302294
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
New
Tension in the Air (Red)
Tension in the Air (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Tension in the Air (Red) that play both.
Lightning Press (Red)
Lightning Press (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Lightning Press (Red) that play both.
New
Liar's Charm
Liar's Charm
Avg. played: Β 
1.451.447826087
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Liar's Charm that play both.
New
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Edge of Their Seats (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nimblism (Red) and Plague Hive that play both.