Cut a Long Story Short
Guardian Attack Action - Attack
If this has {p} greater than its base, it gets +1{p}.
Tower - If this has 13 or more {p}, it gets "When this hits a hero, they discard their hand."
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.671.674420112
Average Defense Value: Β
2.722.716949993
Hero
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
Betsy, Skin in the Game
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Betsy, Skin in the Game that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Boots
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Craterhoof
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Craterhoof that play both.
Arcane Lantern
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Gauntlet of Boulderhold
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Gauntlet of Boulderhold that play both.
Balance of Justice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Balance of Justice that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Nullrune Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Weapon
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Tear Asunder that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Imposing Visage that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Buckle that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Trot Along that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Big Bop (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Big Bop (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Yellow) that play both.
Embolden (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Embolden (Blue) that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Double Down that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Midas Touch that play both.
Big Bop (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Big Bop (Blue) that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Bigger Than Big (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Heart (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Lead with Heart (Blue) that play both.
Pint of Strong and Stout
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Pint of Strong and Stout that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Stacked in Your Favor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Stacked in Your Favor (Blue) that play both.
Starting Stake
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Starting Stake that play both.
Attack Action
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Bet Big that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Boulder Drop that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Overload (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Overload (Blue) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Overload (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Overload (Red) that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Over the Top (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Over the Top (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Performance Bonus (Blue) that play both.
Vigorous Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Vigorous Windup (Blue) that play both.
Wage Might (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Wage Might (Blue) that play both.
Wage Vigor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Wage Vigor (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Withstand (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.428571429
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Withstand (Red) that play both.
Steadfast (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Steadfast (Red) that play both.
Battered Not Broken
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Battered Not Broken that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Calming Breeze that play both.
Blessing of Serenity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Blessing of Serenity (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut a Long Story Short and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.