banner
New
Attention Grabbers
2096 decks (0.2814%)
Price History

No price data yet.

Attention Grabbers
Guardian Equipment - Arms
When this defends, you may remove a suspense counter from an aura you control. If you do, this gets +2{d} this chain link. Blade Break
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.501.496367309
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.752.753644760
Hero
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
New
Lyath Goldmane
Lyath Goldmane
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Lyath Goldmane that play both.
Equipment
Rampart of the Ram's Head
Rampart of the Ram's Head
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Craterhoof
Craterhoof
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Craterhoof that play both.
Quelling Slippers
Quelling Slippers
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Quelling Slippers that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nullrune Hood that play both.
New
Virtuoso Bodice
Virtuoso Bodice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Virtuoso Bodice that play both.
New
Horns of the Despised
Horns of the Despised
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Horns of the Despised that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
Helm of Isen's Peak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
Blade Beckoner Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Crown of Providence that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
97% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Titan's Fist that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.932.925906736
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Tear Asunder that play both.
New
Cruel Ambition
Cruel Ambition
Avg. played: Β 
2.932.925742574
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Cruel Ambition that play both.
New
Booze!
Booze!
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.908865468
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Booze! that play both.
Imposing Visage
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.841509434
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Imposing Visage that play both.
New
Two Steps Ahead
Two Steps Ahead
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.602355580
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Two Steps Ahead that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
New
Villainous Pose (Red)
Villainous Pose (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500694444
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Villainous Pose (Red) that play both.
Buckle
Buckle
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.779479326
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Buckle that play both.
New
Revolting Gesture
Revolting Gesture
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Revolting Gesture that play both.
Midas Touch
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.718400000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Midas Touch that play both.
New
Sadistic Scowl
Sadistic Scowl
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.408355795
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Sadistic Scowl that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
New
Short Shrift
Short Shrift
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.918729817
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Short Shrift that play both.
New
Escalate Violence
Escalate Violence
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.916072408
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Escalate Violence that play both.
New
Power Play (Blue)
Power Play (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.896291640
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Power Play (Blue) that play both.
New
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.892608970
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Battered, Beaten, and Broken that play both.
New
Cut a Long Story Short
Cut a Long Story Short
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.859616574
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Cut a Long Story Short that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Red)
Mocking Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.900277008
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Mocking Blow (Red) that play both.
New
Goon Beatdown
Goon Beatdown
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.889956332
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Goon Beatdown that play both.
New
Bully Tactics
Bully Tactics
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.635011442
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Bully Tactics that play both.
New
Wee Wrecking Ball
Wee Wrecking Ball
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.731044349
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Wee Wrecking Ball that play both.
New
Spew Obscenities
Spew Obscenities
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.710843373
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Spew Obscenities that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Thump (Blue) that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.703832753
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Overcrowded that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
New
Full of Bravado (Blue)
Full of Bravado (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Full of Bravado (Blue) that play both.
New
Fix the Match
Fix the Match
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.625461255
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Fix the Match that play both.
New
Overturn the Results
Overturn the Results
Avg. played: Β 
1.921.918960245
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Overturn the Results that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Mocking Blow (Blue) that play both.
New
No Tall Tales
No Tall Tales
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.623333333
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and No Tall Tales that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Mocking Blow (Yellow) that play both.
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Little Big Foot (Blue) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Boulder Drop that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.733089580
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.819759680
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
New
Truth or Trickery
Truth or Trickery
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.690417690
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Truth or Trickery that play both.
Instant
New
Leave Them Hanging
Leave Them Hanging
Avg. played: Β 
2.932.929772502
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Leave Them Hanging that play both.
New
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.897284534
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Edge of Their Seats (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.790448343
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
New
Concealed Object
Concealed Object
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.711297071
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Concealed Object that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.528301887
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
New
In the Palm of Your Hand
In the Palm of Your Hand
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.292343387
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and In the Palm of Your Hand that play both.
Peace of Mind (Red)
Peace of Mind (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.272.265806452
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Peace of Mind (Red) that play both.
Calming Breeze
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β 
2.222.222701149
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Calming Breeze that play both.
New
Tension in the Air (Red)
Tension in the Air (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.797853309
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Tension in the Air (Red) that play both.
New
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Edge of Their Seats (Blue) that play both.
New
Act of Glory (Red)
Act of Glory (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.730964467
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Act of Glory (Red) that play both.
Steadfast (Red)
Steadfast (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.685421995
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Steadfast (Red) that play both.
Withstand (Red)
Withstand (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Withstand (Red) that play both.
New
Liar's Charm
Liar's Charm
Avg. played: Β 
2.062.063981043
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Liar's Charm that play both.
New
Act of Glory (Blue)
Act of Glory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Act of Glory (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Heart of Fyendal that play both.