banner
New
Attention Grabbers
1120 decks (0.1537%)
Price History

No price data yet.

Attention Grabbers
Guardian Equipment - Arms
When this defends, you may remove a suspense counter from an aura you control. If you do, this gets +2{d} this chain link. Blade Break
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.611.608372615
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.762.756323599
Hero
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
Equipment
Rampart of the Ram's Head
Rampart of the Ram's Head
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Craterhoof
Craterhoof
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Craterhoof that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Quelling Slippers
Quelling Slippers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Quelling Slippers that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
Blade Beckoner Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Crown of Providence that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
Helm of Isen's Peak
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
New
Virtuoso Bodice
Virtuoso Bodice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Virtuoso Bodice that play both.
New
Horns of the Despised
Horns of the Despised
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Horns of the Despised that play both.
New
Stand Strong
Stand Strong
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Stand Strong that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
97% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Titan's Fist that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.942.935579782
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Tear Asunder that play both.
New
Cruel Ambition
Cruel Ambition
Avg. played: Β 
2.932.934734513
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Cruel Ambition that play both.
New
Two Steps Ahead
Two Steps Ahead
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.618705036
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Two Steps Ahead that play both.
New
Booze!
Booze!
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.908713693
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Booze! that play both.
Imposing Visage
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.873177843
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Imposing Visage that play both.
New
Villainous Pose (Red)
Villainous Pose (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.696721311
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Villainous Pose (Red) that play both.
Buckle
Buckle
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.857442348
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Buckle that play both.
New
Sadistic Scowl
Sadistic Scowl
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.435008666
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Sadistic Scowl that play both.
New
Revolting Gesture
Revolting Gesture
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Revolting Gesture that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Midas Touch
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Midas Touch that play both.
Embolden (Blue)
Embolden (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Embolden (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
New
Short Shrift
Short Shrift
Avg. played: Β 
2.932.932835821
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Short Shrift that play both.
New
Escalate Violence
Escalate Violence
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.909190372
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Escalate Violence that play both.
New
Power Play (Blue)
Power Play (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.907429963
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Power Play (Blue) that play both.
New
Cut a Long Story Short
Cut a Long Story Short
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.847090663
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Cut a Long Story Short that play both.
New
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.870056497
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Battered, Beaten, and Broken that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Red)
Mocking Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.899186992
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Mocking Blow (Red) that play both.
New
Bully Tactics
Bully Tactics
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.693721286
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Bully Tactics that play both.
New
Wee Wrecking Ball
Wee Wrecking Ball
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.802521008
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Wee Wrecking Ball that play both.
New
Goon Beatdown
Goon Beatdown
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Goon Beatdown that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Thump (Blue) that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.809018568
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Overcrowded that play both.
New
Fix the Match
Fix the Match
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.659090909
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Fix the Match that play both.
New
Spew Obscenities
Spew Obscenities
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.712500000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Spew Obscenities that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
New
Overturn the Results
Overturn the Results
Avg. played: Β 
2.082.080275229
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Overturn the Results that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Mocking Blow (Blue) that play both.
New
No Tall Tales
No Tall Tales
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.628959276
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and No Tall Tales that play both.
New
Full of Bravado (Blue)
Full of Bravado (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Full of Bravado (Blue) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Boulder Drop that play both.
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Little Big Foot (Blue) that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Mocking Blow (Yellow) that play both.
New
Bask in Your Own Greatness (Blue)
Bask in Your Own Greatness (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Bask in Your Own Greatness (Blue) that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.792569659
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.886164623
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
New
Truth or Trickery
Truth or Trickery
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.723905724
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Truth or Trickery that play both.
Instant
New
Leave Them Hanging
Leave Them Hanging
Avg. played: Β 
2.942.944756554
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Leave Them Hanging that play both.
New
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.913404508
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Edge of Their Seats (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.848529412
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
New
Tension in the Air (Red)
Tension in the Air (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.855361596
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Tension in the Air (Red) that play both.
New
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Edge of Their Seats (Blue) that play both.
New
Act of Glory (Red)
Act of Glory (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.754658385
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Act of Glory (Red) that play both.
Steadfast (Red)
Steadfast (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.450000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Steadfast (Red) that play both.
New
Concealed Object
Concealed Object
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.689189189
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Concealed Object that play both.
Withstand (Red)
Withstand (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.726829268
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Withstand (Red) that play both.
Calming Breeze
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.352422907
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Calming Breeze that play both.
New
In the Palm of Your Hand
In the Palm of Your Hand
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.449612403
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and In the Palm of Your Hand that play both.
Peace of Mind (Red)
Peace of Mind (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.316062176
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Peace of Mind (Red) that play both.
New
Act of Glory (Blue)
Act of Glory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Act of Glory (Blue) that play both.
New
Liar's Charm
Liar's Charm
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.524324324
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Liar's Charm that play both.
Blessing of Serenity (Red)
Blessing of Serenity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.497109827
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Blessing of Serenity (Red) that play both.
Battered Not Broken
Battered Not Broken
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Battered Not Broken that play both.
New
What Happens Next?
What Happens Next?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and What Happens Next? that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Heart of Fyendal that play both.