Attention Grabbers
Guardian Equipment - Arms
When this defends, you may remove a suspense counter from an aura you control. If you do, this gets +2{d} this chain link.
Blade Break
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.491.488530524
Average Defense Value:
2.752.747447702
Hero
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
Lyath Goldmane
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Lyath Goldmane that play both.
Jarl Vetreiði
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Jarl Vetreiði that play both.
Equipment
Rampart of the Ram's Head
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Arcane Lantern
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Boots
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Quelling Slippers
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Quelling Slippers that play both.
Craterhoof
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Craterhoof that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Balance of Justice
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Hood
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Crown of Providence
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Crown of Providence that play both.
Virtuoso Bodice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Virtuoso Bodice that play both.
Horns of the Despised
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Horns of the Despised that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
97% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Titan's Fist that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played:
2.942.936134454
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Tear Asunder that play both.
Cruel Ambition
Avg. played:
2.942.936283186
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Cruel Ambition that play both.
Booze!
Avg. played:
2.922.921692607
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Booze! that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played:
2.832.833964646
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Imposing Visage that play both.
Two Steps Ahead
Avg. played:
2.592.588074647
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Two Steps Ahead that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Villainous Pose (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.507389163
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Villainous Pose (Red) that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Revolting Gesture
Avg. played:
2.812.813559322
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Revolting Gesture that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played:
2.772.765645806
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Buckle that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played:
2.632.633128834
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Midas Touch that play both.
Sadistic Scowl
Avg. played:
2.382.383371824
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Sadistic Scowl that play both.
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Attack Action
Short Shrift
Avg. played:
2.932.928976035
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Short Shrift that play both.
Escalate Violence
Avg. played:
2.932.927775301
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Escalate Violence that play both.
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Avg. played:
2.902.895674300
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Battered, Beaten, and Broken that play both.
Cut a Long Story Short
Avg. played:
2.862.860476663
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Cut a Long Story Short that play both.
Power Play (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.892.893892340
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Power Play (Blue) that play both.
Mocking Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.912.914032169
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Mocking Blow (Red) that play both.
Goon Beatdown
Avg. played:
2.902.897750511
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Goon Beatdown that play both.
Spew Obscenities
Avg. played:
2.712.714285714
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Spew Obscenities that play both.
Wee Wrecking Ball
Avg. played:
2.692.692393736
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Wee Wrecking Ball that play both.
Bully Tactics
Avg. played:
2.612.610069102
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Bully Tactics that play both.
Overcrowded
Avg. played:
2.382.383594692
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Overcrowded that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Full of Bravado (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Full of Bravado (Blue) that play both.
Fix the Match
Avg. played:
2.602.602040816
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Fix the Match that play both.
Overturn the Results
Avg. played:
1.821.821515892
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Overturn the Results that play both.
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Mocking Blow (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
No Tall Tales
Avg. played:
2.612.609890110
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and No Tall Tales that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Little Big Foot (Blue) that play both.
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Mocking Blow (Yellow) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Boulder Drop that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.686980609
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played:
2.832.825433526
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Truth or Trickery
Avg. played:
2.652.646123260
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Truth or Trickery that play both.
Instant
Leave Them Hanging
Avg. played:
2.942.937800963
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Leave Them Hanging that play both.
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Avg. played:
2.892.889163780
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Edge of Their Seats (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.752800000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Concealed Object
Avg. played:
2.692.687692308
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Concealed Object that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.525000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
In the Palm of Your Hand
Avg. played:
2.292.294228950
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and In the Palm of Your Hand that play both.
Peace of Mind (Red)
Avg. played:
2.262.263645726
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Peace of Mind (Red) that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played:
2.202.202127660
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Calming Breeze that play both.
Tension in the Air (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.778097983
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Tension in the Air (Red) that play both.
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Edge of Their Seats (Blue) that play both.
Act of Glory (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Act of Glory (Red) that play both.
Steadfast (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.680555556
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Steadfast (Red) that play both.
Liar's Charm
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Liar's Charm that play both.
Withstand (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Withstand (Red) that play both.
Act of Glory (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Act of Glory (Blue) that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Heart of Fyendal that play both.