Attention Grabbers
Guardian Equipment - Arms
When this defends, you may remove a suspense counter from an aura you control. If you do, this gets +2{d} this chain link.
Blade Break
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.831.825146733
Average Defense Value: Β
2.742.743742657
Hero
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Boots
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Arcane Lantern
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Craterhoof
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Craterhoof that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Hood
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Balance of Justice
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Balance of Justice that play both.
Base of the Mountain
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Civic Steps
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Civic Steps that play both.
Tectonic Plating
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Weapon
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Tear Asunder that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Imposing Visage that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Buckle that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Embolden (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Embolden (Blue) that play both.
Surface Shaking
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Surface Shaking that play both.
Tectonic Instability
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Tectonic Instability that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Trot Along that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Midas Touch that play both.
Bigger Than Big (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Bigger Than Big (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Boulder Drop that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Bet Big that play both.
Last Ditch Effort
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Last Ditch Effort that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Command and Conquer that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Cranial Crush that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Command Respect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Command Respect (Blue) that play both.
Over the Top (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Over the Top (Blue) that play both.
Overload (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Overload (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.872.866666667
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Steadfast (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.911.909090909
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Steadfast (Red) that play both.
Withstand (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.332.333333333
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Withstand (Red) that play both.
Blessing of Serenity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Blessing of Serenity (Red) that play both.
Battered Not Broken
Avg. played: Β
2.402.400000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Battered Not Broken that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Calming Breeze that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.