banner
New
Attention Grabbers
1692 decks (0.2295%)
Price History

No price data yet.

Attention Grabbers
Guardian Equipment - Arms
When this defends, you may remove a suspense counter from an aura you control. If you do, this gets +2{d} this chain link. Blade Break
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.511.512439714
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.762.755628550
Hero
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
New
Lyath Goldmane
Lyath Goldmane
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Lyath Goldmane that play both.
Equipment
Rampart of the Ram's Head
Rampart of the Ram's Head
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Craterhoof
Craterhoof
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Craterhoof that play both.
Quelling Slippers
Quelling Slippers
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Quelling Slippers that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
Blade Beckoner Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
New
Horns of the Despised
Horns of the Despised
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Horns of the Despised that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Crown of Providence that play both.
New
Virtuoso Bodice
Virtuoso Bodice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Virtuoso Bodice that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
Helm of Isen's Peak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
Titan's Fist
97% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Titan's Fist that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.910621762
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Tear Asunder that play both.
New
Cruel Ambition
Cruel Ambition
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.908141962
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Cruel Ambition that play both.
New
Booze!
Booze!
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.889959839
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Booze! that play both.
Imposing Visage
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.853345555
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Imposing Visage that play both.
New
Two Steps Ahead
Two Steps Ahead
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.639608118
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Two Steps Ahead that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
New
Villainous Pose (Red)
Villainous Pose (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.553133515
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Villainous Pose (Red) that play both.
Buckle
Buckle
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.815742397
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Buckle that play both.
New
Sadistic Scowl
Sadistic Scowl
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.408759124
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Sadistic Scowl that play both.
New
Revolting Gesture
Revolting Gesture
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.821946170
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Revolting Gesture that play both.
Midas Touch
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.763033175
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Midas Touch that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
New
Short Shrift
Short Shrift
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.901694915
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Short Shrift that play both.
New
Escalate Violence
Escalate Violence
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.899930987
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Escalate Violence that play both.
New
Power Play (Blue)
Power Play (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.887547170
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Power Play (Blue) that play both.
New
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.869812856
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Battered, Beaten, and Broken that play both.
New
Cut a Long Story Short
Cut a Long Story Short
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.846522782
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Cut a Long Story Short that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Red)
Mocking Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.883824844
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Mocking Blow (Red) that play both.
New
Goon Beatdown
Goon Beatdown
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.864066194
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Goon Beatdown that play both.
New
Bully Tactics
Bully Tactics
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.642409034
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Bully Tactics that play both.
New
Wee Wrecking Ball
Wee Wrecking Ball
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.777580071
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Wee Wrecking Ball that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Thump (Blue) that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.756410256
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Overcrowded that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
New
Fix the Match
Fix the Match
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.660831510
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Fix the Match that play both.
New
Spew Obscenities
Spew Obscenities
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.686460808
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Spew Obscenities that play both.
New
Full of Bravado (Blue)
Full of Bravado (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Full of Bravado (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Mocking Blow (Blue) that play both.
New
Overturn the Results
Overturn the Results
Avg. played: Β 
1.981.982269504
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Overturn the Results that play both.
New
No Tall Tales
No Tall Tales
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.627376426
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and No Tall Tales that play both.
New
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Mocking Blow (Yellow) that play both.
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Little Big Foot (Blue) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Boulder Drop that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.757381258
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.840840841
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
New
Truth or Trickery
Truth or Trickery
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.701949861
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Truth or Trickery that play both.
Instant
New
Leave Them Hanging
Leave Them Hanging
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.915492958
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Leave Them Hanging that play both.
New
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.890694239
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Edge of Their Seats (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.802071346
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.567264574
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
New
Concealed Object
Concealed Object
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.728376328
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Concealed Object that play both.
New
In the Palm of Your Hand
In the Palm of Your Hand
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.331230284
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and In the Palm of Your Hand that play both.
Calming Breeze
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β 
2.262.257092199
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Calming Breeze that play both.
New
Tension in the Air (Red)
Tension in the Air (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.820247934
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Tension in the Air (Red) that play both.
Peace of Mind (Red)
Peace of Mind (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.242.242187500
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Peace of Mind (Red) that play both.
New
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Edge of Their Seats (Blue) that play both.
New
Act of Glory (Red)
Act of Glory (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.743869210
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Act of Glory (Red) that play both.
Steadfast (Red)
Steadfast (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.701897019
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Steadfast (Red) that play both.
Withstand (Red)
Withstand (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Withstand (Red) that play both.
New
Act of Glory (Blue)
Act of Glory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Act of Glory (Blue) that play both.
New
Liar's Charm
Liar's Charm
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.527896996
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Liar's Charm that play both.
Blessing of Serenity (Red)
Blessing of Serenity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Blessing of Serenity (Red) that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Attention Grabbers and Heart of Fyendal that play both.