banner
Imperial Intent
4888 decks (0.6836%)
Price History
Imperial Intent
Draconic Warrior Attack Reaction
This costs {r} less to play for each Draconic chain link you control. Target dagger attack gets +2{p}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.941.936018699
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.702.701353604
Hero
Fang
Fang
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Fang that play both.
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Equipment
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Balance of Justice that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Old Knocker that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
Dragonscaler Flight Path
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
Spell Fray Leggings
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
Spell Fray Gloves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
Helm of Sharp Eye
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Weapon
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Action
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.867647059
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.825446082
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Twist and Turn (Yellow) that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.618615210
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Red)
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.768676868
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.508005822
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.550865801
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Sworn Vengeance (Blue) that play both.
Power Stance
Power Stance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Power Stance that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Cut Deep (Red)
Cut Deep (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Cut Deep (Red) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.527724665
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Flurry Stance
Flurry Stance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Flurry Stance that play both.
Attack Action
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.867021277
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Overcrowded that play both.
For the Dracai
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.753287743
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and For the Dracai that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.862404448
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.636737275
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.722700199
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.535285285
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Tip-Off (Blue)
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.518367347
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Rally the Coast Guard (Red) that play both.
March of Loyalty
March of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and March of Loyalty that play both.
For the Emperor
For the Emperor
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and For the Emperor that play both.
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion that play both.
Attack Reaction
Affirm Loyalty
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.902841430
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Searing Gaze
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.816634759
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Searing Gaze that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.915650902
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Blistering Blade
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.812390543
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Blistering Blade that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Hunt's End
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.872163807
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Hunt's End that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.810247748
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Endear Devotion
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.774058577
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Endear Devotion that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.719626168
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Blade Flurry that play both.
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.826809015
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Scar Tissue (Yellow) that play both.
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Provoke that play both.
Perforate
Perforate
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.800936768
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Perforate that play both.
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.805205047
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Jagged Edge that play both.
Sisters of Fire
Sisters of Fire
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.479723046
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Sisters of Fire that play both.
Dynastic Dedication
Dynastic Dedication
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.468599034
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Dynastic Dedication that play both.
Stabbing Pain
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.475000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Stabbing Pain that play both.
Incision (Blue)
Incision (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.582972583
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Incision (Blue) that play both.
Scalding Iron
Scalding Iron
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.451564829
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Scalding Iron that play both.
Sizzling Steel
Sizzling Steel
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Sizzling Steel that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.856617647
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Smoke Out
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.616523236
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Smoke Out that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.800953516
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.735588009
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.712121212
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and That All You Got? that play both.
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.625766871
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Den of the Spider that play both.
Sink Below (Yellow)
Sink Below (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Sink Below (Yellow) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Tooth of the Dragon
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.767527675
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Pledge Fealty
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.723549488
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Pledge Fealty that play both.
New
Parched Terrain
Parched Terrain
Avg. played: Β 
1.741.737373737
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Parched Terrain that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Proclaim Vengeance
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.438325991
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
1.471.470588235
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Snag
Snag
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Imperial Intent and Snag that play both.