banner
Sisters of Fire
2232 decks (0.3116%)
Price History
Sisters of Fire
Draconic Warrior Attack Reaction
Play this only if you control 2 or more Draconic chain links. Target dagger attack gets +3{p}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.002.000022100
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.692.689195397
Hero
Fang
Fang
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fang that play both.
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Equipment
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Crown of Providence that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Old Knocker that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
Dragonscaler Flight Path
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Base of the Mountain
Base of the Mountain
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
Helm of Sharp Eye
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Coat of Allegiance
Coat of Allegiance
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Coat of Allegiance that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Weapon
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
97% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Claw of Vynserakai
Claw of Vynserakai
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Action
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.817359855
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.810362694
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.571608040
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.736607143
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Red)
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.506616257
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sworn Vengeance (Blue) that play both.
Power Stance
Power Stance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Power Stance that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Cut Deep (Red)
Cut Deep (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Cut Deep (Red) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Twist and Turn (Yellow) that play both.
Cut Deep (Blue)
Cut Deep (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Cut Deep (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Flurry Stance
Flurry Stance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Flurry Stance that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Hunt a Killer (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.857142857
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Overcrowded that play both.
For the Dracai
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.674937965
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and For the Dracai that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.838736492
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.670629371
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.770642202
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
March of Loyalty
March of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.748400853
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and March of Loyalty that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.522796353
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.656160458
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion that play both.
Tip-Off (Blue)
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.495594714
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
For the Emperor
For the Emperor
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and For the Emperor that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.536585366
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Affirm Loyalty
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.874385582
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Searing Gaze
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.727490421
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Searing Gaze that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.886591849
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Blistering Blade
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.695272354
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Blistering Blade that play both.
Hunt's End
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.836720867
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Hunt's End that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.717893218
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.878914405
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Endear Devotion
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.770852429
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Endear Devotion that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.797101449
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Blade Flurry that play both.
Imperial Intent
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.563152896
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Imperial Intent that play both.
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.834522111
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Provoke that play both.
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.761523046
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Jagged Edge that play both.
Perforate
Perforate
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.719191919
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Perforate that play both.
Stabbing Pain
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.454231434
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Stabbing Pain that play both.
Dynastic Dedication
Dynastic Dedication
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.462406015
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Dynastic Dedication that play both.
Sizzling Steel
Sizzling Steel
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.371287129
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sizzling Steel that play both.
Scalding Iron
Scalding Iron
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.472103004
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Scalding Iron that play both.
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.639037433
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Scar Tissue (Yellow) that play both.
Incision (Blue)
Incision (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.445876289
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Incision (Blue) that play both.
Brothers of Flame
Brothers of Flame
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.437299035
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Brothers of Flame that play both.
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.450199203
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Scar Tissue (Blue) that play both.
Diced (Red)
Diced (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Diced (Red) that play both.
Incision (Red)
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Incision (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Smoke Out
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.660633484
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Smoke Out that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.701675978
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.757037037
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.562613430
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Den of the Spider that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and That All You Got? that play both.
Instant
Pledge Fealty
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.643564356
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.664161850
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
New
Parched Terrain
Parched Terrain
Avg. played: Β 
2.112.111111111
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Parched Terrain that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Proclaim Vengeance
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.475609756
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
1.361.357142857
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.619047619
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Escalate Bloodshed
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Snag
Snag
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Snag that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Resource
New
Authority of Ataya
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Authority of Ataya that play both.