banner
Sisters of Fire
2178 decks (0.3169%)
Price History
Sisters of Fire
Draconic Warrior Attack Reaction
Play this only if you control 2 or more Draconic chain links. Target dagger attack gets +3{p}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.001.997183149
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.692.691006554
Hero
Fang
Fang
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fang that play both.
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Equipment
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Old Knocker that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Crown of Providence that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
Dragonscaler Flight Path
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
Helm of Sharp Eye
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Coat of Allegiance
Coat of Allegiance
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Coat of Allegiance that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Weapon
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
97% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Claw of Vynserakai
Claw of Vynserakai
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Action
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.818348624
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.814498934
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.573091850
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Red)
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.512333966
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sworn Vengeance (Blue) that play both.
Power Stance
Power Stance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Power Stance that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Cut Deep (Red)
Cut Deep (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Cut Deep (Red) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Twist and Turn (Yellow) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Cut Deep (Blue)
Cut Deep (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Cut Deep (Blue) that play both.
Flurry Stance
Flurry Stance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Flurry Stance that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Hunt a Killer (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
For the Dracai
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.674078780
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and For the Dracai that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.841432225
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.672426206
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.777602524
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
March of Loyalty
March of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.748373102
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and March of Loyalty that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.517996870
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.663817664
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion that play both.
Tip-Off (Blue)
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.488738739
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
For the Emperor
For the Emperor
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and For the Emperor that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Rally the Coast Guard (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Affirm Loyalty
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.877939530
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Searing Gaze
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.728388998
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Searing Gaze that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.889225182
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Blistering Blade
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.696777602
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Blistering Blade that play both.
Hunt's End
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.836918806
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Hunt's End that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.723655122
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Endear Devotion
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.773109244
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Endear Devotion that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.881410256
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.799202128
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Blade Flurry that play both.
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.838108883
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Provoke that play both.
Imperial Intent
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.569049951
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Imperial Intent that play both.
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.760479042
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Jagged Edge that play both.
Perforate
Perforate
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.711340206
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Perforate that play both.
Stabbing Pain
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.450805009
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Stabbing Pain that play both.
Dynastic Dedication
Dynastic Dedication
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.462282398
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Dynastic Dedication that play both.
Sizzling Steel
Sizzling Steel
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.365979381
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sizzling Steel that play both.
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.653846154
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Scar Tissue (Yellow) that play both.
Scalding Iron
Scalding Iron
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.472283814
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Scalding Iron that play both.
Incision (Blue)
Incision (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.447368421
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Incision (Blue) that play both.
Brothers of Flame
Brothers of Flame
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.439344262
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Brothers of Flame that play both.
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Scar Tissue (Blue) that play both.
Diced (Red)
Diced (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Diced (Red) that play both.
Incision (Red)
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Incision (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Smoke Out
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.657120743
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Smoke Out that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.700913242
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.765506808
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.563636364
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Den of the Spider that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and That All You Got? that play both.
Instant
Pledge Fealty
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.645669291
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666468490
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Proclaim Vengeance
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.477718360
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
Escalate Bloodshed
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
1.751.750000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.623762376
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Snag
Snag
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Snag that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.