banner
Sisters of Fire
2211 decks (0.3151%)
Price History
Sisters of Fire
Draconic Warrior Attack Reaction
Play this only if you control 2 or more Draconic chain links. Target dagger attack gets +3{p}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.001.999853393
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.692.690310830
Hero
Fang
Fang
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fang that play both.
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Equipment
Base of the Mountain
Base of the Mountain
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Old Knocker
Old Knocker
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Old Knocker that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Crown of Providence that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
Dragonscaler Flight Path
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
Helm of Sharp Eye
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Coat of Allegiance
Coat of Allegiance
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Coat of Allegiance that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Weapon
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
97% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Claw of Vynserakai
Claw of Vynserakai
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Action
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.816196542
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.811777077
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.574144487
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.743764172
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Red)
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.510436433
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sworn Vengeance (Blue) that play both.
Power Stance
Power Stance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Power Stance that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Cut Deep (Red)
Cut Deep (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Cut Deep (Red) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Twist and Turn (Yellow) that play both.
Cut Deep (Blue)
Cut Deep (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Cut Deep (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Flurry Stance
Flurry Stance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Flurry Stance that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Hunt a Killer (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Fearless Confrontation
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
For the Dracai
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.673981191
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and For the Dracai that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.840336134
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.671145686
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.768633540
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
March of Loyalty
March of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and March of Loyalty that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.519201229
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.657142857
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion that play both.
Tip-Off (Blue)
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.493333333
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
For the Emperor
For the Emperor
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and For the Emperor that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.543209877
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Affirm Loyalty
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.874793161
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Searing Gaze
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.727624577
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Searing Gaze that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.886038186
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Blistering Blade
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.695381422
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Blistering Blade that play both.
Hunt's End
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.835044490
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Hunt's End that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.718135470
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Endear Devotion
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.772727273
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Endear Devotion that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.878563886
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.798140770
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Blade Flurry that play both.
Imperial Intent
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.565384615
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Imperial Intent that play both.
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.836909871
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Provoke that play both.
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.760080645
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Jagged Edge that play both.
Perforate
Perforate
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.718052738
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Perforate that play both.
Stabbing Pain
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.455497382
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Stabbing Pain that play both.
Dynastic Dedication
Dynastic Dedication
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.458015267
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Dynastic Dedication that play both.
Sizzling Steel
Sizzling Steel
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.369346734
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sizzling Steel that play both.
Scalding Iron
Scalding Iron
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.468409586
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Scalding Iron that play both.
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.652291105
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Scar Tissue (Yellow) that play both.
Incision (Blue)
Incision (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.447916667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Incision (Blue) that play both.
Brothers of Flame
Brothers of Flame
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.439102564
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Brothers of Flame that play both.
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.453815261
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Scar Tissue (Blue) that play both.
Diced (Red)
Diced (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Diced (Red) that play both.
Incision (Red)
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Incision (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Smoke Out
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.658276125
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Smoke Out that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.702247191
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.757894737
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.560218978
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Den of the Spider that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and That All You Got? that play both.
Instant
Pledge Fealty
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.643333333
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.663939217
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Proclaim Vengeance
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.474694590
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
1.331.333333333
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.622580645
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Escalate Bloodshed
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.
Snag
Snag
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Snag that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.