banner
New
Sisters of Fire
1730 decks (0.2869%)
Price History
Sisters of Fire
Draconic Warrior Attack Reaction
Play this only if you control 2 or more Draconic chain links. Target dagger attack gets +3{p}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
1.941.943702816
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.702.704597422
Hero
New
Fang
Fang
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fang that play both.
New
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Equipment
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
New
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Crown of Providence that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Gallantry Gold that play both.
New
Dragonscaler Flight Path
Dragonscaler Flight Path
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
Helm of Sharp Eye
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Nullrune Robe that play both.
New
Coat of Allegiance
Coat of Allegiance
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Coat of Allegiance that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Weapon
New
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
97% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Action
New
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.807522124
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
New
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.811141304
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
New
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.619439868
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
New
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
New
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
New
Power Stance
Power Stance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Power Stance that play both.
New
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.551252847
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sworn Vengeance (Blue) that play both.
New
Twist and Turn (Red)
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
New
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
New
Flurry Stance
Flurry Stance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Flurry Stance that play both.
New
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
New
Cut Deep (Red)
Cut Deep (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Cut Deep (Red) that play both.
New
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Twist and Turn (Yellow) that play both.
New
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Hunt a Killer (Blue) that play both.
New
Cut Deep (Blue)
Cut Deep (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Cut Deep (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
New
For the Dracai
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.691673537
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and For the Dracai that play both.
New
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.855384615
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.698669202
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Blaze Headlong that play both.
New
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.795366795
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
New
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.530841121
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
New
March of Loyalty
March of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and March of Loyalty that play both.
New
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.657232704
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion that play both.
New
Tip-Off (Blue)
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.567049808
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
New
For the Emperor
For the Emperor
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and For the Emperor that play both.
Attack Reaction
New
Affirm Loyalty
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.886285320
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
New
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
New
Long Whisker Loyalty
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.890198968
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
New
Searing Gaze
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.747524752
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Searing Gaze that play both.
New
Blistering Blade
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.710115411
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Blistering Blade that play both.
New
Hunt's End
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.826923077
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Hunt's End that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.730844794
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
New
Endear Devotion
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.799323563
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Endear Devotion that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
New
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Provoke that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.796800000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Blade Flurry that play both.
New
Imperial Intent
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.613580247
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Imperial Intent that play both.
New
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.765591398
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Jagged Edge that play both.
New
Perforate
Perforate
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.713936430
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Perforate that play both.
New
Stabbing Pain
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.487804878
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Stabbing Pain that play both.
New
Dynastic Dedication
Dynastic Dedication
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.480198020
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Dynastic Dedication that play both.
New
Sizzling Steel
Sizzling Steel
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.399305556
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sizzling Steel that play both.
New
Incision (Blue)
Incision (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.472.474006116
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Incision (Blue) that play both.
New
Scalding Iron
Scalding Iron
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.495601173
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Scalding Iron that play both.
New
Brothers of Flame
Brothers of Flame
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.449781659
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Brothers of Flame that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Scar Tissue (Yellow) that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Scar Tissue (Blue) that play both.
New
Diced (Red)
Diced (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Diced (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
New
Smoke Out
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.700764818
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Smoke Out that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.689291101
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.776752768
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
New
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.573440644
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Den of the Spider that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and That All You Got? that play both.
Instant
New
Pledge Fealty
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.653313911
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Pledge Fealty that play both.
New
Tooth of the Dragon
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.671317829
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
New
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
New
Proclaim Vengeance
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.475789474
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
New
Rake Over the Coals
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.620967742
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Snag
Snag
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sisters of Fire and Snag that play both.