banner
Searing Gaze
12914 decks (1.700%)
Price History
Searing Gaze
Draconic Warrior Attack Reaction
Target dagger attack gets +2{p}. If you control 2 or more Draconic chain links, it gets "When this hits a hero, mark them."
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.032.033261123
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.692.685464517
Hero
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Fang
Fang
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Fang that play both.
Equipment
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Balance of Justice that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
Dragonscaler Flight Path
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
Spell Fray Leggings
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
Arcanite Fortress
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Weapon
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
97% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Action
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.884490182
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.854661558
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
New
Phoenix Bannerman: Head
Phoenix Bannerman: Head
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Phoenix Bannerman: Head that play both.
New
Phoenix Bannerman: Arms
Phoenix Bannerman: Arms
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Phoenix Bannerman: Arms that play both.
New
Phoenix Bannerman: Legs
Phoenix Bannerman: Legs
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Phoenix Bannerman: Legs that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.665822202
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.679798222
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Twist and Turn (Yellow) that play both.
New
Phoenix Bannerman: Chest
Phoenix Bannerman: Chest
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Phoenix Bannerman: Chest that play both.
Twist and Turn (Red)
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.744912791
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Power Stance
Power Stance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Power Stance that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Sworn Vengeance (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.852904821
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Overcrowded that play both.
For the Dracai
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.812702528
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and For the Dracai that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.866480926
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.753065960
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.735365361
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
New
Fire That Burns Within
Fire That Burns Within
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Fire That Burns Within that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.620000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
New
Four Feathers One Crown
Four Feathers One Crown
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Four Feathers One Crown that play both.
March of Loyalty
March of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.715709729
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and March of Loyalty that play both.
Tip-Off (Blue)
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.515460295
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Affirm Loyalty
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.932.925862210
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.932.934664861
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Blistering Blade
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.861766271
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Blistering Blade that play both.
Hunt's End
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.891698079
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Hunt's End that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.881786340
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.914306203
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
New
Smoldering Steel
Smoldering Steel
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.300000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Smoldering Steel that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.761853941
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Blade Flurry that play both.
Endear Devotion
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.763033920
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Endear Devotion that play both.
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.813562673
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Scar Tissue (Yellow) that play both.
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.803329370
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Provoke that play both.
Imperial Intent
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.627487796
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Imperial Intent that play both.
Perforate
Perforate
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.738353196
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Perforate that play both.
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.749308756
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Jagged Edge that play both.
Incision (Blue)
Incision (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Incision (Blue) that play both.
Sisters of Fire
Sisters of Fire
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.501718213
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Sisters of Fire that play both.
Stabbing Pain
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.563286945
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Stabbing Pain that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.893775624
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Smoke Out
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.728440820
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Smoke Out that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.829019608
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.776245032
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.753527752
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and That All You Got? that play both.
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.680532446
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Den of the Spider that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Block
New
Blunten
Blunten
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Blunten that play both.
Instant
Tooth of the Dragon
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.821003248
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Pledge Fealty
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.757830335
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Parched Terrain
Parched Terrain
Avg. played: Β 
1.771.773420479
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Parched Terrain that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.706302021
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Proclaim Vengeance
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played: Β 
2.122.120786517
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Snag
Snag
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Searing Gaze and Snag that play both.