Glint the Quicksilver
Warrior Attack Reaction
Target weapon attack gains go again.
Reprise - If the defending hero has defended with a card from their hand this chain link, draw a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.071.071973138
Average Defense Value: Β
2.802.795537092
Hero
Dorinthea Ironsong
97% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Dorinthea
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Dorinthea that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Fang, Dracai of Blades
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Equipment
Braveforge Bracers
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Crown of Providence
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Refraction Bolters
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Nullrune Boots
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Balance of Justice
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Balance of Justice that play both.
Ironsong Versus
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Crown of Dominion
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Prized Galea
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Prized Galea that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Gallantry Gold
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Helm of Sharp Eye
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Helm of Sharp Eye that play both.
Weapon
Obsidian Fire Vein
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Dawnblade
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Dawnblade that play both.
Hot Streak
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Hot Streak that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Cintari Saber
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Cintari Saber that play both.
Hatchet of Body
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Action
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.739218581
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played: Β
2.732.733361022
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Spoils of War that play both.
Unsheathed
Avg. played: Β
2.862.859131443
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Unsheathed that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
2.862.857142857
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Trot Along that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β
2.842.835740072
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played: Β
2.712.709312758
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.762.759254646
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.736244308
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played: Β
2.622.616687373
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.652.646543754
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.672773393
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.602574702
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.712687585
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Blood on Her Hands
Avg. played: Β
2.682.676644646
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Blood on Her Hands that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.606355140
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played: Β
2.532.533228470
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.627623561
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
2.622.615702769
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Spill Blood that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played: Β
2.522.523938152
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Raise an Army that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played: Β
2.622.615513206
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Commanding Performance that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.152.153437816
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.606964622
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played: Β
2.632.627970859
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Cash In that play both.
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Twist and Turn (Yellow) that play both.
Felling Swing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Felling Swing (Blue) that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Cleave
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Cleave that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.570341698
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Warrior's Valor (Yellow) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Lead with Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.568257883
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Lead with Speed (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Double Down
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Double Down that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Hold 'em (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and For the Dracai that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.792.791026816
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Command and Conquer that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β
1.661.664438275
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Attack Reaction
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β
2.832.827241427
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Blade Flurry that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
2.782.783305166
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Provoke that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.773848684
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Searing Gaze that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.765405577
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.625585722
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Blistering Blade that play both.
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Hunt's End that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β
2.692.693674799
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Jagged Edge that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.731018219
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.553530185
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played: Β
2.692.686791918
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Rout
Avg. played: Β
1.241.240496921
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Rout that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played: Β
2.562.560122112
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Run Through that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.602.598029653
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Endear Devotion that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.642.635712736
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Twinning Blade that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played: Β
2.552.549946995
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.552.547563183
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Scar Tissue (Yellow) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.583423118
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Perforate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Perforate that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Up the Ante that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β
2.622.621878122
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.491348642
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Imperial Intent that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.452.452321015
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Overpower (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.431.426784318
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Overpower (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.492.494177215
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Take the Upper Hand (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Take the Upper Hand (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.791514861
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
2.802.797916869
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
2.722.717775130
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.732.729606279
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β
2.762.755837771
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Smoke Out that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.567781345
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β
2.602.602391629
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and That All You Got? that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β
2.822.817907293
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β
2.532.532975931
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.432.426058237
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Glint the Quicksilver and Heart of Fyendal that play both.