banner
Kindle
3588 decks (0.8267%)
Price History
Kindle
Wizard Instant
Amp 1 (The next time you would deal arcane damage this turn, instead deal that much plus 1. This happens before prevention effects.) If you have no cards in hand, draw a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
0.8840.8838119463
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.612.605137789
Hero
Blaze, Firemind
Blaze, Firemind
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Blaze, Firemind that play both.
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
New
Oscilio
Oscilio
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Oscilio that play both.
New
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
New
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Equipment
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Storm Striders that play both.
Metacarpus Node
Metacarpus Node
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
Alluvion Constellas
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Spellfire Cloak
Spellfire Cloak
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Spellfire Cloak that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ragamuffin's Hat
Ragamuffin's Hat
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Ragamuffin's Hat that play both.
New
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
New
Lightning Greaves
Lightning Greaves
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Talismanic Lens
Talismanic Lens
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Talismanic Lens that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Balance of Justice that play both.
New
Flash of Brilliance
Flash of Brilliance
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Threadbare Tunic
Threadbare Tunic
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Threadbare Tunic that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Crown of Providence that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
New
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
New
Hold Focus
Hold Focus
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Hold Focus that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Weapon
Waning Moon
Waning Moon
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Waning Moon that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
Crucible of Aetherweave
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
New
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
New
Staff of Verdant Shoots
Staff of Verdant Shoots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Staff of Verdant Shoots that play both.
Action
New
Destructive Aethertide
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.888257576
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Blazing Aether
Blazing Aether
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Blazing Aether that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.678812923
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Aether Wildfire
Aether Wildfire
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.876459144
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Wildfire that play both.
Energy Potion
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.853053435
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Energy Potion that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Aether Arc
Aether Arc
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.681959565
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Arc that play both.
Aether Spindle (Red)
Aether Spindle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.650463822
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Spindle (Red) that play both.
Aether Flare (Blue)
Aether Flare (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Flare (Blue) that play both.
Cindering Foresight (Red)
Cindering Foresight (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.991.993844697
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Cindering Foresight (Red) that play both.
Aether Flare (Red)
Aether Flare (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.797007481
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Flare (Red) that play both.
Prognosticate (Blue)
Prognosticate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.790977444
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Prognosticate (Blue) that play both.
New
Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue)
Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Aether Quickening (Blue)
Aether Quickening (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.803623612
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Quickening (Blue) that play both.
Aether Dart (Blue)
Aether Dart (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Dart (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
New
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Open the Flood Gates (Blue) that play both.
Sonic Boom
Sonic Boom
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.323110624
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sonic Boom that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
New
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.854037267
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
New
Open the Flood Gates (Red)
Open the Flood Gates (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.846405229
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Open the Flood Gates (Red) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Blue)
Scalding Rain (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.789736279
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Scalding Rain (Blue) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.388150609
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Sap (Blue)
Sap (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.857698289
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sap (Blue) that play both.
Scour
Scour
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.378284581
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Scour that play both.
New
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
Potion of DΓ©jΓ  Vu
Potion of DΓ©jΓ  Vu
Avg. played: Β 
1.851.852886406
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Potion of DΓ©jΓ  Vu that play both.
Swell Tidings
Swell Tidings
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.323239970
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Swell Tidings that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.393771626
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Zap (Blue)
Zap (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Zap (Blue) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
New
Exploding Aether (Red)
Exploding Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.782978723
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Exploding Aether (Red) that play both.
New
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Overflow the Aetherwell (Red) that play both.
New
Eternal Inferno
Eternal Inferno
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.673306773
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Eternal Inferno that play both.
Aether Spindle (Blue)
Aether Spindle (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.459293395
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Spindle (Blue) that play both.
Cindering Foresight (Yellow)
Cindering Foresight (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Cindering Foresight (Yellow) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
New
Comet Storm - Shock
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
New
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.771573604
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Glyph Overlay (Red) that play both.
Foreboding Bolt (Blue)
Foreboding Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Foreboding Bolt (Blue) that play both.
New
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
New
Trailblazing Aether (Blue)
Trailblazing Aether (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Trailblazing Aether (Blue) that play both.
New
Open the Flood Gates (Yellow)
Open the Flood Gates (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Open the Flood Gates (Yellow) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Red)
Whisper of the Oracle (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Whisper of the Oracle (Red) that play both.
Reverberate (Red)
Reverberate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Reverberate (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Snapback (Red)
Snapback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Snapback (Red) that play both.
Chain Lightning
Chain Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
1.671.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Chain Lightning that play both.
New
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Trailblazing Aether (Red) that play both.
Forked Lightning
Forked Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Forked Lightning that play both.
Cindering Foresight (Blue)
Cindering Foresight (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Cindering Foresight (Blue) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Blue)
Voltic Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Voltic Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Stir the Aetherwinds (Red)
Stir the Aetherwinds (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Stir the Aetherwinds (Red) that play both.
New
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Etchings of Arcana (Blue) that play both.
New
Pop the Bubble (Blue)
Pop the Bubble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Pop the Bubble (Blue) that play both.
Prognosticate (Red)
Prognosticate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Prognosticate (Red) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Voltic Bolt (Red) that play both.
New
Chorus of the Amphitheater (Blue)
Chorus of the Amphitheater (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Chorus of the Amphitheater (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Aether Spindle (Yellow)
Aether Spindle (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.405622490
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Spindle (Yellow) that play both.
Foreboding Bolt (Red)
Foreboding Bolt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Foreboding Bolt (Red) that play both.
New
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
New
Photon Splicing (Red)
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.554621849
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Aetherize
Aetherize
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aetherize that play both.
Mind Warp
Mind Warp
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.542094456
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Mind Warp that play both.
New
Arcane Twining (Red)
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
New
Glyph Overlay (Blue)
Glyph Overlay (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Glyph Overlay (Blue) that play both.
New
Channel the Millennium Tree
Channel the Millennium Tree
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Channel the Millennium Tree that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Aether Dart (Red)
Aether Dart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Dart (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
New
Eclectic Magnetism
Eclectic Magnetism
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Eclectic Magnetism that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
New
Gone in a Flash
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Gone in a Flash that play both.
New
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.797101449
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
New
Flittering Charge (Red)
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
New
Current Funnel
Current Funnel
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Current Funnel that play both.
Fry (Red)
Fry (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Fry (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Command and Conquer that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
New
Felling of the Crown
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Wounded Bull (Red)
Wounded Bull (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Wounded Bull (Red) that play both.
New
Plow Under
Plow Under
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Plow Under that play both.
New
Blast to Oblivion (Blue)
Blast to Oblivion (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Blast to Oblivion (Blue) that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
New
Second Strike (Red)
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.725899281
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.422.416604893
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Absorb in Aether (Red)
Absorb in Aether (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Absorb in Aether (Red) that play both.
Absorb in Aether (Blue)
Absorb in Aether (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Absorb in Aether (Blue) that play both.
New
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Instant
New
Sigil of Brilliance
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.866242038
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
New
Sigil of Aether
Sigil of Aether
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.835766423
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Aether that play both.
New
Channel Lightning Valley
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
New
Sigil of Lightning
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.731.727272727
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
New
High Voltage
High Voltage
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and High Voltage that play both.
New
Sigil of Conductivity
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
New
Sigil of Temporal Manipulation
Sigil of Temporal Manipulation
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Temporal Manipulation that play both.
New
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
New
Sigil of Forethought
Sigil of Forethought
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Forethought that play both.
New
Rampant Growth - Life
Rampant Growth - Life
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Rampant Growth - Life that play both.
New
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Rewind
Rewind
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Rewind that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Blink
Blink
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Blink that play both.
Resource
New
Will of Arcana
Will of Arcana
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Will of Arcana that play both.
Eye of Ophidia
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Eye of Ophidia that play both.