Kindle
Wizard Instant
Amp 1 (The next time you would deal arcane damage this turn, instead deal that much plus 1. This happens before prevention effects.)
If you have no cards in hand, draw a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
0.8930.8928010599
Average Defense Value:
2.612.611487978
Hero
Kano, Dracai of Aether
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
Blaze, Firemind
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Blaze, Firemind that play both.
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Equipment
Storm Striders
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Storm Striders that play both.
Metacarpus Node
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Spellfire Cloak
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Spellfire Cloak that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ragamuffin's Hat
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Ragamuffin's Hat that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Talismanic Lens
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Talismanic Lens that play both.
Lightning Greaves
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Balance of Justice
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Balance of Justice that play both.
Flash of Brilliance
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Crown of Providence
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Crown of Providence that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Threadbare Tunic
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Threadbare Tunic that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Weapon
Waning Moon
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Waning Moon that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
Action
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played:
2.862.861148198
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Blazing Aether
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Blazing Aether that play both.
Aether Wildfire
Avg. played:
2.912.909638554
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Wildfire that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
2.882.881239243
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Energy Potion that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played:
2.732.728412653
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Aether Spindle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.692413038
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Spindle (Red) that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Aether Arc
Avg. played:
2.722.721273517
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Arc that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Open the Flood Gates (Blue) that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue) that play both.
Aether Flare (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Flare (Blue) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Open the Flood Gates (Red) that play both.
Prognosticate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.832.830217474
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Prognosticate (Blue) that play both.
Cindering Foresight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.002277040
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Cindering Foresight (Red) that play both.
Aether Flare (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.821458508
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Flare (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.822.815352697
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Open the Flood Gates (Yellow) that play both.
Scour
Avg. played:
2.412.414951989
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Scour that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Sonic Boom
Avg. played:
2.462.464205817
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sonic Boom that play both.
Aether Quickening (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.794183445
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Quickening (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Aether Dart (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Dart (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.475829005
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Sap (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sap (Blue) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.776287932
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Scalding Rain (Blue) that play both.
Pop the Bubble (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.754385965
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Pop the Bubble (Blue) that play both.
Swell Tidings
Avg. played:
2.442.440000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Swell Tidings that play both.
Potion of Déjà Vu
Avg. played:
2.082.082687339
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Potion of Déjà Vu that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.382.375076359
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Eternal Inferno
Avg. played:
2.332.330626450
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Eternal Inferno that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
Zap (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Zap (Blue) that play both.
Cindering Foresight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Cindering Foresight (Yellow) that play both.
Aether Spindle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.452.446491850
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Spindle (Blue) that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Overflow the Aetherwell (Red) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Snapback (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Snapback (Red) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
Foreboding Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Foreboding Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Whisper of the Oracle (Red) that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Glyph Overlay (Red) that play both.
Exploding Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Exploding Aether (Red) that play both.
Reverberate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Reverberate (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.622.616541353
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
Mind Warp
Avg. played:
2.632.633995037
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Mind Warp that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.652.650406504
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Trailblazing Aether (Blue) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Voltic Bolt (Red) that play both.
Chain Lightning
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Chain Lightning that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.410852713
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Cindering Foresight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Cindering Foresight (Blue) that play both.
Forked Lightning
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Forked Lightning that play both.
Stir the Aetherwinds (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Stir the Aetherwinds (Red) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Voltic Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Etchings of Arcana (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Prognosticate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Prognosticate (Red) that play both.
Clarity Potion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Clarity Potion that play both.
Aetherize
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aetherize that play both.
Aether Spindle (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Spindle (Yellow) that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Trailblazing Aether (Red) that play both.
Foreboding Bolt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Foreboding Bolt (Red) that play both.
Chorus of the Amphitheater (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Chorus of the Amphitheater (Blue) that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Attack Action
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Eclectic Magnetism
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Eclectic Magnetism that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Current Funnel
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Current Funnel that play both.
Wounded Bull (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Wounded Bull (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Command and Conquer that play both.
Fry (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Fry (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.707702436
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.402.399867812
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Absorb in Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Absorb in Aether (Red) that play both.
Absorb in Aether (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Absorb in Aether (Blue) that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Sigil of Aether
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Aether that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
1.731.733529990
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
High Voltage
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and High Voltage that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Sigil of Temporal Manipulation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Temporal Manipulation that play both.
Blink
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Blink that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Rewind
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Rewind that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Forethought
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Forethought that play both.
