Kindle
Wizard Instant
Amp 1 (The next time you would deal arcane damage this turn, instead deal that much plus 1. This happens before prevention effects.)
If you have no cards in hand, draw a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
0.8740.8742914370
Average Defense Value:
2.622.615351533
Hero
Kano, Dracai of Aether
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
Blaze, Firemind
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Blaze, Firemind that play both.
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Equipment
Storm Striders
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Storm Striders that play both.
Metacarpus Node
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Spellfire Cloak
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Spellfire Cloak that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Ragamuffin's Hat
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Ragamuffin's Hat that play both.
Talismanic Lens
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Talismanic Lens that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Lightning Greaves
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Balance of Justice
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Providence
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Crown of Providence that play both.
Flash of Brilliance
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Threadbare Tunic
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Threadbare Tunic that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Weapon
Waning Moon
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Waning Moon that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
Surgent Aethertide
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Surgent Aethertide that play both.
Action
Blazing Aether
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Blazing Aether that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played:
2.852.850842021
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Aether Wildfire
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Wildfire that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
2.902.903645833
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Energy Potion that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played:
2.762.763338499
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Open the Flood Gates (Blue) that play both.
Aether Spindle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.709746215
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Spindle (Red) that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue) that play both.
Aether Arc
Avg. played:
2.742.737745652
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Arc that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Open the Flood Gates (Red) that play both.
Aether Flare (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Flare (Blue) that play both.
Prognosticate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.862.857620931
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Prognosticate (Blue) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Open the Flood Gates (Yellow) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.780590717
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Aether Flare (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.840964698
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Flare (Red) that play both.
Cindering Foresight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.022.015320779
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Cindering Foresight (Red) that play both.
Sonic Boom
Avg. played:
2.552.547970976
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sonic Boom that play both.
Scour
Avg. played:
2.452.445789474
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Scour that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.518437500
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.776947705
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Quickening (Blue) that play both.
Aether Dart (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Dart (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Pop the Bubble (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.698145025
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Pop the Bubble (Blue) that play both.
Potion of Déjà Vu
Avg. played:
2.232.233448384
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Potion of Déjà Vu that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Swell Tidings
Avg. played:
2.512.512901945
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Swell Tidings that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.372.373239437
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Sap (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sap (Blue) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Eternal Inferno
Avg. played:
2.332.325162221
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Eternal Inferno that play both.
Scalding Rain (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.759528760
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Scalding Rain (Blue) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Snapback (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Snapback (Red) that play both.
Cindering Foresight (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Cindering Foresight (Yellow) that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.682648402
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Overflow the Aetherwell (Red) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
Aether Spindle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.432.432098765
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Spindle (Blue) that play both.
Zap (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Zap (Blue) that play both.
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.472190692
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Foreboding Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Foreboding Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Whisper of the Oracle (Red) that play both.
Mind Warp
Avg. played:
2.652.650613787
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Mind Warp that play both.
Clarity Potion
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Clarity Potion that play both.
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.532.525575448
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
Reverberate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Reverberate (Red) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Voltic Bolt (Red) that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Trailblazing Aether (Blue) that play both.
Cindering Foresight (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Cindering Foresight (Blue) that play both.
Chain Lightning
Avg. played:
1.571.574247144
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Chain Lightning that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Glyph Overlay (Red) that play both.
Exploding Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Exploding Aether (Red) that play both.
Forked Lightning
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Forked Lightning that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Voltic Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Aetherize
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aetherize that play both.
Prognosticate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Prognosticate (Red) that play both.
Stir the Aetherwinds (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Stir the Aetherwinds (Red) that play both.
Chorus of the Amphitheater (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Chorus of the Amphitheater (Blue) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Etchings of Arcana (Blue) that play both.
Foreboding Bolt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Foreboding Bolt (Red) that play both.
Aether Spindle (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Aether Spindle (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Eclectic Magnetism
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Eclectic Magnetism that play both.
Wounded Bull (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Wounded Bull (Red) that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Current Funnel
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Current Funnel that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Fry (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Fry (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.674871208
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.392.386338186
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Absorb in Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Absorb in Aether (Red) that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Sigil of Aether
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Aether that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
High Voltage
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and High Voltage that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Blink
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Blink that play both.
Sigil of Temporal Manipulation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Temporal Manipulation that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Kindle and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
