Metacarpus Node
Wizard Equipment - Arms
Whenever you play a card with an effect that deals arcane damage, you may pay [1 Resource]. If you do, that effect deals that much arcane damage plus 1 and at the beginning of the end phase, destroy Metamarpus Node.
Arcane Barrier 1 (If your hero would be dealt arcane damage, you may pay [1 Resource] instead. If you do, prevent 1 arcane damage that source would deal.)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.311.311767937
Average Defense Value:
2.572.568679496
Hero
Kano, Dracai of Aether
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
Blaze, Firemind
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Blaze, Firemind that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Iyslander, Stormbind
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Iyslander, Stormbind that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Kano
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Kano that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
Verdance
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Verdance that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Equipment
Storm Striders
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Storm Striders that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Ragamuffin's Hat
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Ragamuffin's Hat that play both.
Spellfire Cloak
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Spellfire Cloak that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Well Grounded
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Well Grounded that play both.
Crown of Providence
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Crown of Providence that play both.
Coronet Peak
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Coronet Peak that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Ironhide Gauntlet
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Ironhide Gauntlet that play both.
Balance of Justice
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Hood
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Lightning Greaves
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Plume of Evergrowth
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Plume of Evergrowth that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Talismanic Lens
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Talismanic Lens that play both.
Flash of Brilliance
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Threadbare Tunic
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Threadbare Tunic that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Hold Focus
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Hold Focus that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Weapon
Waning Moon
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Waning Moon that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
Surgent Aethertide
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Surgent Aethertide that play both.
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
Staff of Verdant Shoots
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Staff of Verdant Shoots that play both.
Action
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played:
2.882.877745941
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played:
2.902.898881751
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Aether Arc
Avg. played:
2.782.784480569
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Aether Arc that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
2.662.662685956
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Energy Potion that play both.
Channel the Millennium Tree
Avg. played:
2.842.843161857
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Channel the Millennium Tree that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.632.628338787
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Blazing Aether
Avg. played:
2.802.800156204
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Blazing Aether that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played:
2.702.704756935
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played:
2.802.798036466
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Prognosticate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.784383954
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Prognosticate (Blue) that play both.
Aether Wildfire
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Aether Wildfire that play both.
Aether Spindle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.695603784
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Aether Spindle (Red) that play both.
Aether Flare (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.822.815315315
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Aether Flare (Blue) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.682.681460272
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Aether Quickening (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played:
2.772.765169695
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Aether Flare (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.754102123
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Aether Flare (Red) that play both.
Aether Dart (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.772.772069009
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Aether Dart (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
2.742.738831615
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played:
2.372.372197309
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Sonic Boom
Avg. played:
2.592.591600131
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Sonic Boom that play both.
Sap (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.751120303
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Sap (Blue) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.787323206
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Scour
Avg. played:
2.612.608661926
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Scour that play both.
Swell Tidings
Avg. played:
2.502.504452593
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Swell Tidings that play both.
Aether Hail (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Aether Hail (Blue) that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Frost Hex
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Frost Hex that play both.
Aether Icevein (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Aether Icevein (Red) that play both.
Cold Snap (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Cold Snap (Blue) that play both.
Frosting (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Frosting (Blue) that play both.
Insidious Chill
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Insidious Chill that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue) that play both.
Ice Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Ice Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Ice Eternal
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Ice Eternal that play both.
Scalding Rain (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.612.610526316
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Scalding Rain (Blue) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Open the Flood Gates (Blue) that play both.
banned - Blitz
Snapback (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Snapback (Red) that play both.
Mind Warp
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Mind Warp that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Open the Flood Gates (Red) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
Aether Icevein (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Aether Icevein (Blue) that play both.
Zap (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Zap (Blue) that play both.
Brain Freeze (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Brain Freeze (Blue) that play both.
Polar Blast (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Polar Blast (Blue) that play both.
Potion of Déjà Vu
Avg. played:
1.511.507332247
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Potion of Déjà Vu that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.702.697602740
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Cindering Foresight (Red)
Avg. played:
1.711.714046473
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Cindering Foresight (Red) that play both.
Pop the Bubble (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Pop the Bubble (Blue) that play both.
Harvest Season (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Harvest Season (Red) that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Open the Flood Gates (Yellow) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.632.627647196
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Voltic Bolt (Blue) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Chain Lightning
Avg. played:
1.381.381508289
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Chain Lightning that play both.
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
Healing Potion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Healing Potion that play both.
Aether Dart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.484389140
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Aether Dart (Red) that play both.
Aether Icevein (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.592.594291811
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Aether Icevein (Yellow) that play both.
Aether Spindle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.582.577538704
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Aether Spindle (Blue) that play both.
Eternal Inferno
Avg. played:
2.582.581566820
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Eternal Inferno that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Glyph Overlay (Red) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Voltic Bolt (Red) that play both.
Reverberate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Reverberate (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and The Weakest Link that play both.
Reverberate (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.552.545535981
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Reverberate (Blue) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Photon Splicing (Blue) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.493697479
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Whisper of the Oracle (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Whisper of the Oracle (Blue) that play both.
Prognosticate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Prognosticate (Red) that play both.
Earth's Embrace
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Earth's Embrace that play both.
Forked Lightning
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Forked Lightning that play both.
Imperial Edict
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Imperial Edict that play both.
Winter's Bite (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Winter's Bite (Blue) that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Overflow the Aetherwell (Red) that play both.
Encase
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Encase that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Trailblazing Aether (Red) that play both.
Exploding Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Exploding Aether (Red) that play both.
Singe (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Singe (Blue) that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Trailblazing Aether (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Plow Under that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.882.877361073
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Summer's Fall (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Cadaverous Tilling (Red) that play both.
Summer's Fall (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.761778719
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Summer's Fall (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.622.622702563
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.743605936
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Fyendal's Fighting Spirit (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.632.632059079
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Command and Conquer that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Wounded Bull (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Wounded Bull (Red) that play both.
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.563639521
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Fruits of the Forest (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Blossoming Decay (Red) that play both.
Current Funnel
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Current Funnel that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Eclectic Magnetism
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Eclectic Magnetism that play both.
Fry (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Fry (Red) that play both.
Cadaverous Tilling (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Cadaverous Tilling (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Blossoming Decay (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Blossoming Decay (Blue) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Defense Reaction
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.902.896068796
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.779256461
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.442.444366690
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Absorb in Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Absorb in Aether (Red) that play both.
Instant
Rampant Growth - Life
Avg. played:
2.862.856890905
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Rampant Growth - Life that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played:
2.622.621093750
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Kindle that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Blizzard
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Blizzard that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.537795608
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.389884606
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played:
2.092.089932127
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Aether
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Sigil of Aether that play both.
High Voltage
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and High Voltage that play both.
Fertile Ground (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Fertile Ground (Red) that play both.
Resource
Will of Arcana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Will of Arcana that play both.
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Eye of Ophidia that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Metacarpus Node and Heart of Fyendal that play both.