banner
Nourishing Emptiness
24718 decks (6.372%)
Price History
Nourishing Emptiness
Generic Attack Action - Attack
While there are no attack action cards in your graveyard, Nourishing Emptiness has dominate and "If this hits, your hero gains +1 [Intellect] until end of turn."
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value: 
1.061.057970320
Average Defense Value:  
2.722.718059710
Hero
New
Florian
Florian
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Florian that play both.
Kassai of the Golden Sand
Kassai of the Golden Sand
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Terra
Terra
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Terra that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Kassai, Cintari Sellsword
Kassai, Cintari Sellsword
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Kassai, Cintari Sellsword that play both.
Dorinthea
Dorinthea
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Dorinthea that play both.
Kassai
Kassai
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Kassai that play both.
Kano, Dracai of Aether
Kano, Dracai of Aether
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
Dorinthea Ironsong
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
Olympia, Prized Fighter
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Dromai, Ash Artist
Dromai, Ash Artist
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Dromai, Ash Artist that play both.
Enigma
Enigma
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Enigma that play both.
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Enigma, Ledger of Ancestry that play both.
Equipment
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Crown of Providence that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
Courage of Bladehold
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Warpath of Winged Grace
Warpath of Winged Grace
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Warpath of Winged Grace that play both.
Helm of Halo's Grace
Helm of Halo's Grace
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Helm of Halo's Grace that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Storm Striders that play both.
Metacarpus Node
Metacarpus Node
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
Alluvion Constellas
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Ragamuffin's Hat
Ragamuffin's Hat
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Ragamuffin's Hat that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
Seeker's Mitts
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Spellfire Cloak
Spellfire Cloak
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Spellfire Cloak that play both.
Meridian Pathway
Meridian Pathway
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Meridian Pathway that play both.
Prized Galea
Prized Galea
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Prized Galea that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
Stonewall Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Silken Form
Silken Form
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Silken Form that play both.
Traverse the Universe
Traverse the Universe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Weapon
Hot Streak
Hot Streak
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Hot Streak that play both.
Dawnblade
Dawnblade
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Dawnblade that play both.
Cintari Saber
Cintari Saber
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Cintari Saber that play both.
Waning Moon
Waning Moon
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Waning Moon that play both.
Storm of Sandikai
Storm of Sandikai
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
Crucible of Aetherweave
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Cosmo, Scroll of Ancestral Tapestry that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
Decimator Great Axe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hatchet of Body
Hatchet of Body
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
Hatchet of Mind
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Action
New
Germinate
Germinate
Avg. played:  
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Germinate that play both.
Spoils of War
Spoils of War
Avg. played:  
2.672.668169803
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Spoils of War that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.662.656051940
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Raise an Army
Raise an Army
Avg. played:  
2.452.451785281
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Raise an Army that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.612.614024390
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.662.660079708
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:  
2.582.575697211
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.552.554743340
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
Blood on Her Hands
Blood on Her Hands
Avg. played:  
2.592.587306650
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Blood on Her Hands that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.652.649705410
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played:  
2.612.605294826
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Commanding Performance
Commanding Performance
Avg. played:  
2.562.563374806
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Commanding Performance that play both.
Cash In
Cash In
Avg. played:  
2.632.626916186
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Cash In that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.632.628606012
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Invoke Cromai
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Energy Potion
Energy Potion
Avg. played:  
2.552.553140097
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Energy Potion that play both.
Aether Arc
Aether Arc
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Aether Arc that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played:  
2.462.456432348
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Visit the Golden Anvil
Visit the Golden Anvil
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Visit the Golden Anvil that play both.
Burn Them All
Burn Them All
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Burn Them All that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.552.546655305
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played:  
2.592.588780604
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.662.661571467
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Passing Mirage
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Passing Mirage that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Blazing Aether
Blazing Aether
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Blazing Aether that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Prognosticate (Blue)
Prognosticate (Blue)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Prognosticate (Blue) that play both.
Aether Wildfire
Aether Wildfire
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Aether Wildfire that play both.
Aether Quickening (Blue)
Aether Quickening (Blue)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Aether Quickening (Blue) that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played:  
2.372.372501219
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.482.480614973
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Aether Spindle (Red)
Aether Spindle (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Aether Spindle (Red) that play both.
Aether Flare (Blue)
Aether Flare (Blue)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Aether Flare (Blue) that play both.
Aether Dart (Blue)
Aether Dart (Blue)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Aether Dart (Blue) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.512.506874427
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Aether Flare (Red)
Aether Flare (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Aether Flare (Red) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played:  
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Invoke Themai
Invoke Themai
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Invoke Themai that play both.
Sonic Boom
Sonic Boom
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Sonic Boom that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Restless Coalescence
Restless Coalescence
Avg. played:  
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Restless Coalescence that play both.
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Edge Ahead (Blue)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Edge Ahead (Blue) that play both.
Scalding Rain (Blue)
Scalding Rain (Blue)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Scalding Rain (Blue) that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Sap (Blue)
Sap (Blue)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Sap (Blue) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:  
2.482.483533717
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Spill Blood
Spill Blood
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Spill Blood that play both.
This Round's on Me
This Round's on Me
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and This Round's on Me that play both.
Slice and Dice (Blue)
Slice and Dice (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Slice and Dice (Blue) that play both.
Potion of Déjà Vu
Potion of Déjà Vu
Avg. played:  
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Potion of Déjà Vu that play both.
banned - Blitz
Snapback (Red)
Snapback (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Snapback (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Attack Action
New
Felling of the Crown
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:  
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:  
2.732.725117398
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Red)
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played:  
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Attack Reaction
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:  
2.832.829692500
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Blade Flurry that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played:  
2.672.670425350
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.712.707796194
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.712.706225434
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.692.692114316
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Run Through
Run Through
Avg. played:  
2.562.564877717
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Run Through that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.592.585326757
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Rout
Rout
Avg. played:  
1.241.235151711
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Rout that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.522.519360269
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played:  
2.282.284857962
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.582.576200116
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played:  
2.612.606658446
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.432.426229508
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.392.392825509
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.482.484868137
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Twinning Blade
Avg. played:  
2.622.620115957
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Twinning Blade that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.542.544591151
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Up the Ante
Up the Ante
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Up the Ante that play both.
Overpower (Red)
Overpower (Red)
Avg. played:  
1.431.434240000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Overpower (Red) that play both.
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Fatal Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:  
1.501.502419355
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Fatal Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Saving Grace
Saving Grace
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Saving Grace that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.732.734447253
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:  
2.642.643683946
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played:  
2.572.570693309
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and That All You Got? that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.472.469039785
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Instant
Kindle
Kindle
Avg. played:  
2.672.665859564
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Kindle that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:  
2.512.514605648
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.352.354705126
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Sacred Art: Immortal Lunar Shrine that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Pass Over that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Stir the Pot that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played:  
1.351.345295056
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Remembrance that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.512.513553267
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Path Well Traveled that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Sand Cover (Red)
Sand Cover (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Sand Cover (Red) that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
Manifestation of Miragai
Manifestation of Miragai
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Manifestation of Miragai that play both.
Waxing Specter (Red)
Waxing Specter (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Waxing Specter (Red) that play both.
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Waning Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Waning Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Pride
Ironsong Pride
Avg. played:  
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Ironsong Pride that play both.
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Eye of Ophidia that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Heart of Fyendal that play both.