Nourishing Emptiness
Generic Attack Action - Attack
While there are no attack action cards in your graveyard, Nourishing Emptiness has dominate and "If this hits, your hero gains +1 [Intellect] until end of turn."
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.001.000894372
Average Defense Value:
2.742.744412803
Hero
Kassai of the Golden Sand
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Kassai of the Golden Sand that play both.
Dorinthea
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Dorinthea that play both.
Dorinthea Ironsong
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Dorinthea Ironsong that play both.
Kano, Dracai of Aether
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Kano, Dracai of Aether that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Dromai, Ash Artist
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Dromai, Ash Artist that play both.
Olympia, Prized Fighter
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Olympia, Prized Fighter that play both.
Verdance, Thorn of the Rose
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Verdance, Thorn of the Rose that play both.
Equipment
Grains of Bloodspill
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Crown of Providence
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Hood
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Balance of Justice
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Balance of Justice that play both.
Refraction Bolters
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Crown of Dominion
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Courage of Bladehold
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Courage of Bladehold that play both.
Metacarpus Node
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Metacarpus Node that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Storm Striders that play both.
Ironsong Versus
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Old Knocker
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Old Knocker that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Barkskin of the Millennium Tree
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Barkskin of the Millennium Tree that play both.
Ragamuffin's Hat
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Ragamuffin's Hat that play both.
Spellfire Cloak
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Spellfire Cloak that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Prized Galea
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Prized Galea that play both.
Silken Form
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Silken Form that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Weapon
Hot Streak
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Hot Streak that play both.
Dawnblade
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Dawnblade that play both.
Waning Moon
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Waning Moon that play both.
Cintari Saber
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Cintari Saber that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Storm of Sandikai
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Crucible of Aetherweave
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Crucible of Aetherweave that play both.
Decimator Great Axe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Decimator Great Axe that play both.
Hatchet of Body
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Hatchet of Body that play both.
Hatchet of Mind
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Hatchet of Mind that play both.
Action
Unsheathed
Avg. played:
2.852.845447121
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Unsheathed that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played:
2.852.850267380
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Trot Along that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.698985405
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Spoils of War
Avg. played:
2.712.707891042
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Spoils of War that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played:
2.852.851201479
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Blood on Her Hands
Avg. played:
2.692.685450927
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Blood on Her Hands that play both.
Slice and Dice (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.665915378
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Slice and Dice (Red) that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.732408660
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Outland Skirmish (Red) that play both.
Raise an Army
Avg. played:
2.512.512054138
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Raise an Army that play both.
Steelblade Supremacy
Avg. played:
2.622.622343117
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Steelblade Supremacy that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.678013007
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Warrior's Valor (Red) that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Ring of Roses
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Ring of Roses that play both.
Precision Press (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.552.553398058
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Precision Press (Blue) that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Goblet of Bloodrun Wine
Avg. played:
2.562.558344058
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Goblet of Bloodrun Wine that play both.
Warrior's Valor (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.662.655307175
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Warrior's Valor (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Determination
Avg. played:
2.482.479104689
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Ironsong Determination that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played:
2.572.573885848
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Energy Potion that play both.
Slice and Dice (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.652.647218699
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Slice and Dice (Yellow) that play both.
Sharpen Steel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.576581028
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Sharpen Steel (Red) that play both.
Hit and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.572.571615221
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Hit and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Aether Arc
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Aether Arc that play both.
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Glistening Steelblade
Avg. played:
2.582.576991465
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Glistening Steelblade that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Commanding Performance
Avg. played:
2.562.557501459
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Commanding Performance that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Heartbeat of Candlehold
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Heartbeat of Candlehold that play both.
Channel the Millennium Tree
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Channel the Millennium Tree that play both.
Cash In
Avg. played:
2.622.622325394
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Cash In that play both.
Blazing Aether
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Blazing Aether that play both.
Gaze the Ages
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Gaze the Ages that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Burn Them All that play both.
Outland Skirmish (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Outland Skirmish (Yellow) that play both.
Hit and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.514182568
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Hit and Run (Red) that play both.
Lesson in Lava
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Lesson in Lava that play both.
Aether Wildfire
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Aether Wildfire that play both.
Aether Spindle (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Aether Spindle (Red) that play both.
Aether Flare (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Aether Flare (Blue) that play both.
Draw Swords (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Draw Swords (Red) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Prognosticate (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Prognosticate (Blue) that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Passing Mirage that play both.
Emboldened Blade
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Emboldened Blade that play both.
Aether Flare (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Aether Flare (Red) that play both.
Tome of Aetherwind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Tome of Aetherwind that play both.
Aether Quickening (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Aether Quickening (Blue) that play both.
Aether Dart (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Aether Dart (Blue) that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Overflow the Aetherwell (Red) that play both.
Tome of Fyendal
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Tome of Fyendal that play both.
Sonic Boom
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Sonic Boom that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Emeritus Scolding (Blue) that play both.
Burn Bare
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Burn Bare that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Invoke Themai that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Overflow the Aetherwell (Blue) that play both.
Ruby Amulet
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Ruby Amulet that play both.
Spill Blood
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Spill Blood that play both.
Open the Flood Gates (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Open the Flood Gates (Blue) that play both.
Edge Ahead (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Edge Ahead (Red) that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Draw Swords (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Draw Swords (Yellow) that play both.
Hold 'em (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Hold 'em (Red) that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Arcane Twining (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Arcane Twining (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.722.715623227
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Plow Under
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Plow Under that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Attack Reaction
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:
2.832.825765247
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Blade Flurry that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played:
2.722.715877575
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played:
2.742.738805970
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Provoke that play both.
Blade Runner (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.757103496
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Blade Runner (Blue) that play both.
Blade Runner (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.748709423
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Blade Runner (Red) that play both.
Blade Runner (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.732.730346657
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Blade Runner (Yellow) that play both.
Run Through
Avg. played:
2.602.604156399
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Run Through that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played:
2.672.666470242
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Jagged Edge that play both.
In the Swing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.598808723
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and In the Swing (Red) that play both.
Rout
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Rout that play both.
Overpower (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.582.575589459
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Overpower (Blue) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Red)
Avg. played:
2.522.519017433
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Ironsong Response (Red) that play both.
Singing Steelblade
Avg. played:
2.622.620484319
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Singing Steelblade that play both.
Shift the Tide of Battle
Avg. played:
2.542.543924825
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Shift the Tide of Battle that play both.
Stroke of Foresight (Red)
Avg. played:
2.402.397017707
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Stroke of Foresight (Red) that play both.
Twinning Blade
Avg. played:
2.612.609208744
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Twinning Blade that play both.
Puncture (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.499573452
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Puncture (Red) that play both.
Out for Blood (Red)
Avg. played:
2.442.436197917
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Out for Blood (Red) that play both.
Ironsong Response (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.552.553984064
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Ironsong Response (Blue) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Overpower (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Overpower (Red) that play both.
Up the Ante
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Up the Ante that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.733868772
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
2.752.754853445
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.632.629245197
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Steelblade Shunt (Red) that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
2.562.559043062
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and That All You Got? that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Rootbound Carapace (Yellow) that play both.
Steelblade Shunt (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.452.452161588
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Steelblade Shunt (Blue) that play both.
Block
Mental Block
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Mental Block that play both.
Instant
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
2.482.475356588
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.352.354198295
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.543079316
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Rampant Growth - Life
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Rampant Growth - Life that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Remembrance that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played:
2.552.552301255
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Kindle that play both.
Seeds of Tomorrow
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Seeds of Tomorrow that play both.
Sand Cover (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Sand Cover (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of Trōpal-Dhani
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Riches of Trōpal-Dhani that play both.
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Eye of Ophidia that play both.
Will of Arcana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Will of Arcana that play both.
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Nourishing Emptiness and Heart of Fyendal that play both.