Sigil of Conductivity
Generic Instant - Aura
Arcane Shelter 1 (If you would be dealt arcane damage, destroy this to prevent 1 of that damage.)
When this leaves the arena, create an Embodiment of Lightning token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.102.098224363
Average Defense Value:
2.532.528247514
Hero
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Oscilio
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Oscilio that play both.
Aurora, Shooting Star
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Aurora, Shooting Star that play both.
Equipment
Lightning Greaves
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Flash of Brilliance
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Shock Charmers
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Shock Charmers that play both.
Crown of Providence
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blossom of Spring
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Nullrune Hood
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Metacarpus Node
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Storm Striders
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Storm Striders that play both.
Balance of Justice
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Balance of Justice that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Grasp of the Arknight
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Grasp of the Arknight that play both.
Ink-lined Cloak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Ink-lined Cloak that play both.
Dyadic Carapace
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Dyadic Carapace that play both.
Mark of Lightning
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Mark of Lightning that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Weapon
Action
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played:
2.862.862414102
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
Mind Warp
Avg. played:
2.872.871987694
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Mind Warp that play both.
Comet Storm - Shock
Avg. played:
2.782.780995174
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Comet Storm - Shock that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.641691843
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Glyph Overlay (Red) that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played:
2.652.650762094
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Aether Spindle (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.726337449
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Aether Spindle (Red) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.662.664779162
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Etchings of Arcana (Yellow) that play both.
Scour
Avg. played:
2.552.552216749
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Scour that play both.
Flash (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Flash (Red) that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Etchings of Arcana (Blue) that play both.
Burn Up - Shock
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Burn Up - Shock that play both.
Swell Tidings
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Swell Tidings that play both.
Arc Lightning
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Arc Lightning that play both.
Sizzle (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Sizzle (Red) that play both.
Eternal Inferno
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Eternal Inferno that play both.
Channel Thunder Steppe
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Channel Thunder Steppe that play both.
Pop the Bubble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Pop the Bubble (Red) that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Trailblazing Aether (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Gone in a Flash
Avg. played:
2.862.860310100
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Gone in a Flash that play both.
Flittering Charge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.842683632
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Flittering Charge (Red) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.839455158
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Current Funnel
Avg. played:
2.852.847829787
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Current Funnel that play both.
Eclectic Magnetism
Avg. played:
2.822.818821293
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Eclectic Magnetism that play both.
Fry (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.748626374
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Fry (Red) that play both.
Entwine Lightning (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.821539256
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Entwine Lightning (Red) that play both.
Lightning Surge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.775263952
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Lightning Surge (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.722.720000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Second Strike (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.733527132
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Second Strike (Red) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.682.679474216
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Blast to Oblivion (Yellow) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.700057241
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Lightning Form (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Lightning Form (Red) that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Blast to Oblivion (Blue) that play both.
Arcanic Shockwave (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Arcanic Shockwave (Red) that play both.
Static Shock (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Static Shock (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
2.562.557228916
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played:
2.842.835406573
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played:
2.862.858810294
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Channel Lightning Valley
Avg. played:
2.852.854216507
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Channel Lightning Valley that play both.
Blink
Avg. played:
2.852.850111857
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Blink that play both.
Electromagnetic Somersault (Red)
Avg. played:
2.812.809413580
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Electromagnetic Somersault (Red) that play both.
Electrostatic Discharge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.832.827238551
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Electrostatic Discharge (Red) that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played:
2.662.658022690
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Calming Breeze that play both.
High Voltage
Avg. played:
2.712.713574786
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and High Voltage that play both.
Lightning Press (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.588753563
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Lightning Press (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.802.797034945
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Aether
Avg. played:
2.592.587595212
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Sigil of Aether that play both.
Snag
Avg. played:
2.462.461126005
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Snag that play both.
Sigil of Forethought
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Sigil of Forethought that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Kindle that play both.
Sigil of Temporal Manipulation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Sigil of Temporal Manipulation that play both.
Resource
Will of Arcana
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Conductivity and Will of Arcana that play both.