Tome of Imperial Flame
Draconic Generic Action
Draw a card. If you are Royal, instead draw 2 cards.
You may pitch 2 red cards. If you don't, banish your hand. (You gain resource points from pitching this way.)
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.961.964038504
Average Defense Value:
2.472.473092774
Hero
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
Dromai, Ash Artist
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dromai, Ash Artist that play both.
Dromai
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dromai that play both.
New
Fang, Dracai of Blades
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
New
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Equipment
Flamescale Furnace
98% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Crown of Dominion
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Calming Gesture
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Calming Gesture that play both.
Balance of Justice
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Balance of Justice that play both.
Crown of Providence
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Crown of Providence that play both.
Silken Form
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Silken Form that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Wave of Reality
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Wave of Reality that play both.
Storm Striders
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Storm Striders that play both.
Ghostly Touch
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Mage Master Boots
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Metacarpus Node
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Ironsong Versus
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Silent Stilettos
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Silent Stilettos that play both.
Weapon
Storm of Sandikai
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Waning Moon
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Waning Moon that play both.
Jubeel, Spellbane
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Jubeel, Spellbane that play both.
Action
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
2.822.822709924
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
2.822.824908707
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
2.822.823439001
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
2.822.821222607
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.819668976
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
2.832.828373420
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.822.823963792
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Passing Mirage that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
2.582.580645161
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Burn Them All that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played:
2.662.656328164
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Themai that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played:
2.212.206904995
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Swell Tidings
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Swell Tidings that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played:
2.072.073029046
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Voltic Bolt (Red) that play both.
Aether Dart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Aether Dart (Red) that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:
2.342.341025641
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Lost in Thought that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and The Weakest Link that play both.
Reverberate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Reverberate (Red) that play both.
Prognosticate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Prognosticate (Red) that play both.
Trailblazing Aether (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Trailblazing Aether (Red) that play both.
Eternal Inferno
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Eternal Inferno that play both.
Overflow the Aetherwell (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Overflow the Aetherwell (Red) that play both.
Sap (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sap (Red) that play both.
Zap (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Zap (Red) that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Skittering Sands (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Skittering Sands (Red) that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Plunder Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Plunder Run (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.559471366
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.792271563
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.562.559193173
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.462.455715757
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.442.435236004
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.667773351
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.492.489402330
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.202.204034392
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Standing Order that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played:
2.512.506110712
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.526789734
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
2.572.570197669
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
2.522.522328149
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Give and Take that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.510771369
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dustup (Blue) that play both.
Embermaw Cenipai (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Embermaw Cenipai (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.590488395
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.522.521126761
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.394382022
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sand Cover (Red)
Avg. played:
2.052.048851979
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sand Cover (Red) that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Kindle that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.661.656947444
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Remembrance that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
1.971.968397291
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Slap-Happy
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Slap-Happy that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Eirina's Prayer (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Eirina's Prayer (Red) that play both.