Tome of Imperial Flame
Draconic Generic Action
Draw a card. If you are Royal, instead draw 2 cards.
You may pitch 2 red cards. If you don't, banish your hand. (You gain resource points from pitching this way.)
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.991.994302729
Average Defense Value:
2.472.467800875
Hero
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
Dromai, Ash Artist
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dromai, Ash Artist that play both.
Dromai
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dromai that play both.
New
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
New
Fang, Dracai of Blades
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Equipment
Flamescale Furnace
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Crown of Dominion
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Crown of Providence that play both.
Silken Form
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Silken Form that play both.
Balance of Justice
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Balance of Justice that play both.
Wave of Reality
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Wave of Reality that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Calming Gesture
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Calming Gesture that play both.
Storm Striders
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Storm Striders that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Ghostly Touch
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Mage Master Boots
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Metacarpus Node
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Ironsong Versus
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Mask of Momentum
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Weapon
Storm of Sandikai
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Waning Moon
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Waning Moon that play both.
Jubeel, Spellbane
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Jubeel, Spellbane that play both.
Action
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
2.782.782364934
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
2.782.784394251
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
2.782.782735043
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
2.782.781335616
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.780144280
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
2.802.795529498
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.792.788153913
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Passing Mirage that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
2.562.561882522
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Burn Them All that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played:
2.632.627130045
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Themai that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played:
2.192.185268866
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Swell Tidings
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Swell Tidings that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played:
2.332.330383481
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Voltic Bolt (Red) that play both.
Aether Dart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Aether Dart (Red) that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:
2.342.337622549
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Lost in Thought that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Reverberate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Reverberate (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Prognosticate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Prognosticate (Red) that play both.
Sap (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sap (Red) that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Zap (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Zap (Red) that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and The Weakest Link that play both.
Attack Action
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.550937989
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.761029412
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.542.544978784
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Command and Conquer that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.472.471327459
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.452.452065594
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.639305446
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.480704846
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.212.211141060
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Standing Order that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played:
2.512.506544503
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.510765550
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
2.562.559160305
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
2.502.504890545
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Give and Take that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.507828455
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dustup (Blue) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Blade Flurry that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.584184639
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.522.517254174
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.387606112
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sand Cover (Red)
Avg. played:
2.052.052875083
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sand Cover (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.651.651588398
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Remembrance that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
1.981.978812088
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Kindle that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Slap-Happy
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Slap-Happy that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Eirina's Prayer (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Eirina's Prayer (Red) that play both.
Resource
Blood of the Dracai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Blood of the Dracai that play both.