Tome of Imperial Flame
Draconic Generic Action
Draw a card. If you are Royal, instead draw 2 cards.
You may pitch 2 red cards. If you don't, banish your hand. (You gain resource points from pitching this way.)
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
1.991.992505906
Average Defense Value:
2.472.470089727
Hero
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Dromai, Ash Artist
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dromai, Ash Artist that play both.
Dromai
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dromai that play both.
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Fang, Dracai of Blades
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Equipment
Flamescale Furnace
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Crown of Dominion
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Crown of Providence that play both.
Silken Form
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Silken Form that play both.
Calming Gesture
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Calming Gesture that play both.
Balance of Justice
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Balance of Justice that play both.
Wave of Reality
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Wave of Reality that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Storm Striders that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Ghostly Touch
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Mage Master Boots
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Metacarpus Node
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Base of the Mountain
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Ironsong Versus
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Mask of Momentum
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Weapon
living legend - Classic Constructed
Storm of Sandikai
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Claw of Vynserakai
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Obsidian Fire Vein
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Waning Moon
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Waning Moon that play both.
Kunai of Retribution
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Kunai of Retribution that play both.
Action
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played:
2.772.765290520
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played:
2.772.766861719
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played:
2.772.765113060
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played:
2.762.764152399
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played:
2.762.763923267
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played:
2.782.776918011
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Passing Mirage
Avg. played:
2.752.746721472
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Passing Mirage that play both.
Burn Them All
Avg. played:
2.562.560142464
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Burn Them All that play both.
Invoke Themai
Avg. played:
2.622.619372990
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Themai that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played:
2.192.193871297
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Swell Tidings
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Swell Tidings that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played:
2.332.331910858
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Voltic Bolt (Red) that play both.
Lost in Thought
Avg. played:
2.342.343362832
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Lost in Thought that play both.
Aether Dart (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Aether Dart (Red) that play both.
Reverberate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Reverberate (Red) that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Prognosticate (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Prognosticate (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Sap (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sap (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and The Weakest Link that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Flying High (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Flying High (Red) that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
Zap (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Zap (Red) that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Essence of Ancestry: Body
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Essence of Ancestry: Body that play both.
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.552.552990431
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played:
2.622.622164948
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.748427673
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.542.544464848
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Command and Conquer that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.492.486302251
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
2.462.458566794
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played:
2.622.624886302
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.472.474706868
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
2.212.214606742
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Standing Order
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Standing Order that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played:
2.512.507467330
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
For the Dracai
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and For the Dracai that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.505510654
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Wrath of Retribution
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Wrath of Retribution that play both.
Ignite
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ignite that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played:
2.562.556985294
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Display Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Display Loyalty that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played:
2.492.493309545
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
Burning Blade Dance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Burning Blade Dance that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Give and Take that play both.
Hot on Their Heels
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Hot on Their Heels that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Art of the Dragon: Blood that play both.
Blood Runs Deep
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Blood Runs Deep that play both.
March of Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and March of Loyalty that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.506405934
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Demonstrate Devotion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Demonstrate Devotion that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dustup (Blue) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played:
2.812.809169765
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Searing Gaze
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Searing Gaze that play both.
Hunt's End
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Hunt's End that play both.
Blistering Blade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Blistering Blade that play both.
Endear Devotion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Endear Devotion that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Imperial Intent
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Imperial Intent that play both.
Throw Dagger
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Throw Dagger that play both.
Perforate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Perforate that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Jagged Edge that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.584172162
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played:
2.622.624413146
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.522.520760642
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
2.512.506561680
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Smoke Out
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Smoke Out that play both.
Instant
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.402.402077842
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sand Cover (Red)
Avg. played:
2.062.061966236
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sand Cover (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.621.615681234
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Remembrance that play both.
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played:
2.762.756484150
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
1.761.760638298
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played:
2.692.690253672
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Kindle that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played:
2.532.530655391
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Slap-Happy
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Slap-Happy that play both.
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
Resource
Blood of the Dracai
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Blood of the Dracai that play both.
