banner
Tome of Imperial Flame
10137 decks (1.540%)
Price History
Tome of Imperial Flame
Draconic Generic Action
Draw a card. If you are Royal, instead draw 2 cards. You may pitch 2 red cards. If you don't, banish your hand. (You gain resource points from pitching this way.) Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.001.999046710
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.472.466982931
Hero
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
Emperor, Dracai of Aesir
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Emperor, Dracai of Aesir that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Dromai, Ash Artist
Dromai, Ash Artist
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dromai, Ash Artist that play both.
Dromai
Dromai
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dromai that play both.
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
Equipment
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Crown of Dominion
Crown of Dominion
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
Dragonscaler Flight Path
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Crown of Providence that play both.
Silken Form
Silken Form
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Silken Form that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Balance of Justice that play both.
Wave of Reality
Wave of Reality
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Wave of Reality that play both.
Seeker's Mitts
Seeker's Mitts
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Seeker's Mitts that play both.
Calming Gesture
Calming Gesture
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Calming Gesture that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
Storm Striders
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Storm Striders that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Ghostly Touch
Ghostly Touch
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ghostly Touch that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Mage Master Boots
Mage Master Boots
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Mage Master Boots that play both.
Metacarpus Node
Metacarpus Node
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Stonewall Gauntlet
Stonewall Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Stonewall Gauntlet that play both.
Ironsong Versus
Ironsong Versus
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ironsong Versus that play both.
Ironrot Gauntlet
Ironrot Gauntlet
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ironrot Gauntlet that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
Tiger Stripe Shuko
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Weapon
Claw of Vynserakai
Claw of Vynserakai
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Storm of Sandikai
Storm of Sandikai
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Storm of Sandikai that play both.
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Waning Moon
Waning Moon
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Waning Moon that play both.
Kunai of Retribution
Kunai of Retribution
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Kunai of Retribution that play both.
Jubeel, Spellbane
Jubeel, Spellbane
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Jubeel, Spellbane that play both.
Action
Invoke Cromai
Invoke Cromai
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.777445110
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Cromai that play both.
Invoke Miragai
Invoke Miragai
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.779229481
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Miragai that play both.
Invoke Kyloria
Invoke Kyloria
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.777405858
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Kyloria that play both.
Invoke Azvolai
Invoke Azvolai
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.776510067
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Azvolai that play both.
Rake the Embers (Red)
Rake the Embers (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.775647494
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Rake the Embers (Red) that play both.
Invoke Yendurai
Invoke Yendurai
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.790172166
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Yendurai that play both.
Invoke Tomeltai
Invoke Tomeltai
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Tomeltai that play both.
Invoke Dominia
Invoke Dominia
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Dominia that play both.
Passing Mirage
Passing Mirage
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.782442748
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Passing Mirage that play both.
Burn Them All
Burn Them All
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.559458985
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Burn Them All that play both.
Invoke Themai
Invoke Themai
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.622533976
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Themai that play both.
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Dust from the Chrome Caverns
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dust from the Chrome Caverns that play both.
Invoke Ouvia
Invoke Ouvia
Avg. played: Β 
2.182.182444444
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Ouvia that play both.
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Emeritus Scolding (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Emeritus Scolding (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Aether Quickening (Red)
Aether Quickening (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Aether Quickening (Red) that play both.
Swell Tidings
Swell Tidings
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Swell Tidings that play both.
Scalding Rain (Red)
Scalding Rain (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Scalding Rain (Red) that play both.
Invoke Nekria
Invoke Nekria
Avg. played: Β 
2.332.329927007
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Nekria that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Voltic Bolt (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Voltic Bolt (Red) that play both.
Aether Dart (Red)
Aether Dart (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Aether Dart (Red) that play both.
Lost in Thought
Lost in Thought
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.336573512
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Lost in Thought that play both.
Photon Splicing (Red)
Photon Splicing (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Photon Splicing (Red) that play both.
Reverberate (Red)
Reverberate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Reverberate (Red) that play both.
Arcane Twining (Red)
Arcane Twining (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Arcane Twining (Red) that play both.
Prognosticate (Red)
Prognosticate (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Prognosticate (Red) that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Sap (Red)
Sap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sap (Red) that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Red)
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Timesnap Potion
Timesnap Potion
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Timesnap Potion that play both.
Zap (Red)
Zap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Zap (Red) that play both.
Invoke Vynserakai
Invoke Vynserakai
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Vynserakai that play both.
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Invoke Dracona Optimai
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Invoke Dracona Optimai that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and The Weakest Link that play both.
Attack Action
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.551155959
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Red)
Dustup (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.757650637
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dustup (Red) that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.624911536
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.542252541
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Command and Conquer that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.476370246
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.452329193
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Billowing Mirage (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.635521236
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Billowing Mirage (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.480521739
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.212.213259020
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
For the Dracai
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.758426966
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and For the Dracai that play both.
Standing Order
Standing Order
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Standing Order that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.508845288
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Wrath of Retribution
Wrath of Retribution
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Wrath of Retribution that play both.
Life for a Life (Red)
Life for a Life (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Life for a Life (Red) that play both.
Ignite
Ignite
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Ignite that play both.
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Sweeping Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.510116732
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sweeping Blow (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Display Loyalty
Display Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Display Loyalty that play both.
Nourishing Emptiness
Nourishing Emptiness
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.557855127
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Nourishing Emptiness that play both.
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
Burning Blade Dance
Burning Blade Dance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Burning Blade Dance that play both.
Miraging Metamorph
Miraging Metamorph
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.503673095
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Miraging Metamorph that play both.
Blood Runs Deep
Blood Runs Deep
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Blood Runs Deep that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Give and Take
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Give and Take that play both.
Hot on Their Heels
Hot on Their Heels
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Hot on Their Heels that play both.
March of Loyalty
March of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and March of Loyalty that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Art of the Dragon: Blood that play both.
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Cadaverous Contraband (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.506458192
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Cadaverous Contraband (Red) that play both.
Demonstrate Devotion
Demonstrate Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Demonstrate Devotion that play both.
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Dustup (Blue)
Dustup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Dustup (Blue) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Fire
Art of the Dragon: Fire
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Art of the Dragon: Fire that play both.
Attack Reaction
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.826719577
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Affirm Loyalty
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.824797844
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Searing Gaze
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.827586207
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Searing Gaze that play both.
Hunt's End
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Hunt's End that play both.
Blistering Blade
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.768807339
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Blistering Blade that play both.
Endear Devotion
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Endear Devotion that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Imperial Intent
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Imperial Intent that play both.
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Jagged Edge that play both.
Perforate
Perforate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Perforate that play both.
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Throw Dagger that play both.
Sisters of Fire
Sisters of Fire
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sisters of Fire that play both.
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Provoke that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Blade Flurry that play both.
Stabbing Pain
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Stabbing Pain that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.584219639
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.588289113
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.516247476
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.563275434
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Smoke Out
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Smoke Out that play both.
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Den of the Spider that play both.
Instant
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.389473684
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Sand Cover (Red)
Sand Cover (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.062.057451404
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Sand Cover (Red) that play both.
Pledge Fealty
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750392465
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Tooth of the Dragon
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.703987730
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.651.648972603
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Remembrance that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.981.981372887
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Kindle
Kindle
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Kindle that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.524934383
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Proclaim Vengeance
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.597972973
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
Slap-Happy
Slap-Happy
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Slap-Happy that play both.
Take it on the Chin
Take it on the Chin
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Take it on the Chin that play both.
Eirina's Prayer (Red)
Eirina's Prayer (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Eirina's Prayer (Red) that play both.
Resource
Blood of the Dracai
Blood of the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Tome of Imperial Flame and Blood of the Dracai that play both.