Sit!
Guardian Block
When this defends a Brute attack, this gets +3{d}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.162.164878334
Average Defense Value: Β
2.662.661895616
Hero
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
New
Lyath Goldmane
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Lyath Goldmane that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
Equipment
Nullrune Gloves
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Craterhoof
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Craterhoof that play both.
Blade Beckoner Boots
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
Helm of Isen's Peak
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Helm of Isen's Peak that play both.
Crown of Providence
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Crown of Providence that play both.
Arcane Lantern
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Hoarding of Denial
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Hoarding of Denial that play both.
Balance of Justice
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Balance of Justice that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Earthlore Bounty
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Earthlore Bounty that play both.
Aurum Aegis
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Crown of Dominion
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Bastion of Duty
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Bastion of Duty that play both.
Deep Blue
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Deep Blue that play both.
Rotten Old Buckler
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Rotten Old Buckler that play both.
Gauntlet of Boulderhold
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Gauntlet of Boulderhold that play both.
Stonewall Impasse
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Stonewall Impasse that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Titan's Fist that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
2.852.846153846
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Tear Asunder that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
2.882.875000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Imposing Visage that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Buckle that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Midas Touch that play both.
Embolden (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714285714
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Embolden (Blue) that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Trot Along that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Money Where Ya Mouth Is (Red) that play both.
Premeditate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Premeditate that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Blessing of Deliverance (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Blessing of Deliverance (Red) that play both.
Emerging Power (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Emerging Power (Blue) that play both.
Emerging Power (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Emerging Power (Yellow) that play both.
Stonewall Confidence (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Stonewall Confidence (Yellow) that play both.
Blessing of Patience (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Blessing of Patience (Red) that play both.
Healing Balm (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Healing Balm (Red) that play both.
Roiling Fissure
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Roiling Fissure that play both.
Stamp Authority
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Stamp Authority that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Leave a Dent that play both.
Towering Titan (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Towering Titan (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.882.875000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Boulder Drop
Avg. played: Β
2.862.857142857
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Boulder Drop that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.752.750000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Thump (Blue) that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Autumn's Touch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Autumn's Touch (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Command and Conquer that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Cranial Crush that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Felling of the Crown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Felling of the Crown that play both.
Fruits of the Forest (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Fruits of the Forest (Blue) that play both.
Glacial Footsteps (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Glacial Footsteps (Blue) that play both.
Oaken Old
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Oaken Old that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Spinal Crush that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Coax a Commotion
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Coax a Commotion that play both.
Give and Take
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Give and Take that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Performance Bonus (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Performance Bonus (Blue) that play both.
Performance Bonus (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Performance Bonus (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Snatch (Yellow) that play both.
Strike Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Strike Gold (Red) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Brothers in Arms (Yellow) that play both.
Feisty Locals (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Feisty Locals (Blue) that play both.
Feisty Locals (Red)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Feisty Locals (Red) that play both.
Brothers in Arms (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Brothers in Arms (Blue) that play both.
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Little Big Foot (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Crash Down the Gates (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Crash Down the Gates (Blue) that play both.
Crash Down the Gates (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Crash Down the Gates (Yellow) that play both.
Grind Them Down (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Grind Them Down (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Crush Confidence (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Crush Confidence (Blue) that play both.
Crush the Weak (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Crush the Weak (Blue) that play both.
Overload (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Overload (Red) that play both.
Pursuit of Knowledge
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Pursuit of Knowledge that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Razor Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Lunging Press
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Lunging Press that play both.
Defense Reaction
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Rootbound Carapace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Rootbound Carapace (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Blessing of Serenity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Blessing of Serenity (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Arcane Polarity (Yellow) that play both.
Blizzard
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Blizzard that play both.
Peace of Mind (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Peace of Mind (Red) that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Arcane Polarity (Blue) that play both.
Poison the Well
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Poison the Well that play both.
Blessing of Serenity (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Blessing of Serenity (Yellow) that play both.
Battered Not Broken
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Battered Not Broken that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Calming Breeze that play both.
Steadfast (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Steadfast (Red) that play both.
Withstand (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Withstand (Red) that play both.
Withstand (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Withstand (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Oasis Respite (Yellow) that play both.
Steadfast (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Steadfast (Blue) that play both.
Steadfast (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Steadfast (Yellow) that play both.
Brush Off (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Brush Off (Red) that play both.
Resource
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sit! and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.