Midas Touch
Generic Action
Destroy target ally. Its controller creates Gold tokens equal to its cost.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.872.873349058
Average Defense Value: Β
2.742.744473551
Hero
New
Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant that play both.
Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Victor Goldmane, High and Mighty that play both.
New
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster that play both.
Arakni, Huntsman
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Boots
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Arcane Lantern
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Crown of Providence that play both.
Balance of Justice
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Hood
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Quelling Slippers
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Quelling Slippers that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Skullhorn
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Skullhorn that play both.
Crown of Dominion
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Crown of Dominion that play both.
Gauntlets of Iron Will
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Gauntlets of Iron Will that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Flick Knives
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Flick Knives that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Aurum Aegis
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Aurum Aegis that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Tectonic Plating
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Craterhoof
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Craterhoof that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Mask of Perdition
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Stalagmite, Bastion of Isenloft that play both.
Weapon
Titan's Fist
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Titan's Fist that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Romping Club
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Romping Club that play both.
Spider's Bite
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Spider's Bite that play both.
Sledge of Anvilheim
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Sledge of Anvilheim that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Anothos
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Anothos that play both.
Scale Peeler
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Scale Peeler that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Miller's Grindstone
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Miller's Grindstone that play both.
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Tear Asunder that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Imposing Visage that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Visit Goldmane Estate
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Visit Goldmane Estate that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Buckle that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Trot Along that play both.
Channel Lake Frigid
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Channel Lake Frigid that play both.
Hit and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Hit and Run (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Command and Conquer that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Cranial Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Cranial Crush that play both.
Macho Grande (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Macho Grande (Blue) that play both.
Thunder Quake (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Thunder Quake (Blue) that play both.
Disable (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Disable (Blue) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Spinal Crush that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Chokeslam (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Chokeslam (Blue) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Debilitate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Debilitate (Blue) that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Chokeslam (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Chokeslam (Red) that play both.
The Golden Son
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and The Golden Son that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Send Packing that play both.
Crush the Weak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Crush the Weak (Red) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Swing Big that play both.
Ripple Away
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Ripple Away that play both.
Rouse the Ancients
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Rouse the Ancients that play both.
Zealous Belting (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Zealous Belting (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Buckling Blow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Buckling Blow (Blue) that play both.
Oaken Old
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Oaken Old that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Little Big Foot (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Bam Bam
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Bam Bam that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.632.630841121
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Just a Nick that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Provoke that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Pulse of Isenloft
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Pulse of Isenloft that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Test of Strength
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Test of Strength that play both.
Trounce
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Trounce that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.660377358
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.709090909
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.231.233261339
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Remembrance that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Calming Breeze that play both.
Peace of Mind (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Peace of Mind (Red) that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Heart of Fyendal that play both.
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Midas Touch and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.
