Sense Weakness
Guardian Action
Your next Guardian attack this turn gets +1{p}, dominate, and "When this hits a hero, deal damage to all allies they control equal to the damage dealt this way."
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
1.381.376462715
Average Defense Value: Β
2.742.736583765
Hero
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Rampart of the Ram's Head
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Rampart of the Ram's Head that play both.
Attention Grabbers
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Attention Grabbers that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Arcane Lantern
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Quelling Slippers
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Quelling Slippers that play both.
Craterhoof
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Craterhoof that play both.
Seasoned Saviour
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Seasoned Saviour that play both.
Tectonic Plating
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Tectonic Plating that play both.
Civic Steps
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Civic Steps that play both.
Balance of Justice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Balance of Justice that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Good Time Chapeau
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Good Time Chapeau that play both.
Weapon
Action
Tear Asunder
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Tear Asunder that play both.
Booze!
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Booze! that play both.
Cruel Ambition
Avg. played: Β
2.922.916666667
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Cruel Ambition that play both.
Imposing Visage
Avg. played: Β
2.852.850000000
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Imposing Visage that play both.
Two Steps Ahead
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Two Steps Ahead that play both.
Nimblism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Nimblism (Red) that play both.
Minnowism (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Minnowism (Red) that play both.
Villainous Pose (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.412.411764706
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Villainous Pose (Red) that play both.
Buckle
Avg. played: Β
2.212.214285714
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Buckle that play both.
Sadistic Scowl
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Sadistic Scowl that play both.
Revolting Gesture
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714285714
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Revolting Gesture that play both.
Visit Anvilheim
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Visit Anvilheim that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Midas Touch that play both.
Cheap Shot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Cheap Shot that play both.
Embolden (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Embolden (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Short Shrift
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Short Shrift that play both.
Escalate Violence
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Escalate Violence that play both.
Mocking Blow (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Mocking Blow (Red) that play both.
Battered, Beaten, and Broken
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Battered, Beaten, and Broken that play both.
Power Play (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Power Play (Blue) that play both.
Goon Beatdown
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Goon Beatdown that play both.
Cut a Long Story Short
Avg. played: Β
2.622.619047619
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Cut a Long Story Short that play both.
Spew Obscenities
Avg. played: Β
2.582.583333333
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Spew Obscenities that play both.
Overturn the Results
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Overturn the Results that play both.
Thunk (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Thunk (Blue) that play both.
Fix the Match
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Fix the Match that play both.
Bully Tactics
Avg. played: Β
2.092.090909091
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Bully Tactics that play both.
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β
1.751.750000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Overcrowded that play both.
Wee Wrecking Ball
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Wee Wrecking Ball that play both.
Thump (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Thump (Blue) that play both.
No Tall Tales
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and No Tall Tales that play both.
Full of Bravado (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Full of Bravado (Blue) that play both.
Spinal Crush
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Spinal Crush that play both.
Little Big Foot (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Little Big Foot (Blue) that play both.
Concuss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Concuss (Blue) that play both.
Bet Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Bet Big that play both.
Drink 'Em Under the Table
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Drink 'Em Under the Table that play both.
Wage Gold (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Wage Gold (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.612.611111111
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.572.571428571
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Truth or Trickery
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Truth or Trickery that play both.
Instant
Leave Them Hanging
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Leave Them Hanging that play both.
Edge of Their Seats (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.857142857
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Edge of Their Seats (Red) that play both.
Concealed Object
Avg. played: Β
2.572.571428571
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Concealed Object that play both.
In the Palm of Your Hand
Avg. played: Β
2.252.250000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and In the Palm of Your Hand that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.302.300000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Peace of Mind (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Peace of Mind (Red) that play both.
Calming Breeze
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Calming Breeze that play both.
Tension in the Air (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.666666667
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Tension in the Air (Red) that play both.
Act of Glory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Act of Glory (Blue) that play both.
Liar's Charm
Avg. played: Β
1.501.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Liar's Charm that play both.
Act of Glory (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Act of Glory (Red) that play both.
Edge of Their Seats (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Edge of Their Seats (Blue) that play both.
Steadfast (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Steadfast (Red) that play both.
Resource
Heart of Fyendal
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Heart of Fyendal that play both.
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Authority of Ataya that play both.
Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sense Weakness and Riches of TrΕpal-Dhani that play both.