banner
Blood Runs Deep
11684 decks (1.613%)
Price History
Blood Runs Deep
Draconic Ninja Attack Action - Attack
This costs {r} less to play for each Draconic chain link you control. When this attacks a hero, each dagger you control deals 1 damage to them. If damage is dealt this way, the dagger has hit. Destroy the daggers. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.143.140527458
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.452.448721673
Hero
Cindra
Cindra
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Cindra that play both.
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Equipment
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Flick Knives that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
Dragonscaler Flight Path
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Tide Flippers that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
Spell Fray Leggings
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Base of the Mountain
Base of the Mountain
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Weapon
Kunai of Retribution
Kunai of Retribution
97% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Kunai of Retribution that play both.
Claw of Vynserakai
Claw of Vynserakai
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Action
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.762473461
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Prowess of Agility
Prowess of Agility
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Prowess of Agility that play both.
Attack Action
Wrath of Retribution
Wrath of Retribution
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Wrath of Retribution that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.920763808
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Display Loyalty
Display Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.915907434
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Display Loyalty that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.916332117
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Ignite
Ignite
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.907555810
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Ignite that play both.
Hot on Their Heels
Hot on Their Heels
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.902852502
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Hot on Their Heels that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.908663392
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Burning Blade Dance
Burning Blade Dance
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.862501340
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Burning Blade Dance that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.819518717
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Art of the Dragon: Blood that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.899205561
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.888548602
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red) that play both.
Demonstrate Devotion
Demonstrate Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.578354242
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Demonstrate Devotion that play both.
Lava Burst
Lava Burst
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.590741168
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Lava Burst that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.635962702
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Fire
Art of the Dragon: Fire
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.621709702
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Art of the Dragon: Fire that play both.
Spreading Flames
Spreading Flames
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.792643923
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Spreading Flames that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.302.301470588
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Overcrowded that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.851166329
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.572307119
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow) that play both.
Breaking Point
Breaking Point
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.310579196
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Breaking Point that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Lava Vein Loyalty (Red) that play both.
Dragon Power (Blue)
Dragon Power (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.787705744
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Dragon Power (Blue) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.767598518
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Scale
Art of the Dragon: Scale
Avg. played: Β 
2.052.049855491
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Art of the Dragon: Scale that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.503976670
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Tenacity
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Tenacity that play both.
Stab Wound
Stab Wound
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Stab Wound that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
1.881.875272463
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Salt the Wound
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β 
1.491.485284500
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Salt the Wound that play both.
Devotion Never Dies
Devotion Never Dies
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.503917379
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Devotion Never Dies that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Poisoned Blade (Red)
Poisoned Blade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Poisoned Blade (Red) that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue) that play both.
Mark with Magma
Mark with Magma
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Mark with Magma that play both.
Poisoned Blade (Blue)
Poisoned Blade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Poisoned Blade (Blue) that play both.
Dragon Power (Red)
Dragon Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Dragon Power (Red) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Rally the Coast Guard (Red) that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Take the Tempo
Take the Tempo
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Take the Tempo that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Command and Conquer that play both.
Attack Reaction
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.897672163
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Throw Dagger that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.693155516
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.617938079
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Concealed Blade that play both.
Knives Out
Knives Out
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Knives Out that play both.
Defense Reaction
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.879206518
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.843026248
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.809672762
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Wax On (Red)
Wax On (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Wax On (Red) that play both.
Instant
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
New
Parched Terrain
Parched Terrain
Avg. played: Β 
1.421.424242424
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Parched Terrain that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Resource
New
Authority of Ataya
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Authority of Ataya that play both.