Blood Runs Deep
Draconic Ninja Attack Action - Attack
This costs {r} less to play for each Draconic chain link you control.
When this attacks a hero, each dagger you control deals 1 damage to them. If damage is dealt this way, the dagger has hit. Destroy the daggers.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.043.035275301
Average Defense Value:
2.492.485720829
Hero
Equipment
Flick Knives
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Flick Knives that play both.
Mask of Momentum
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Tide Flippers
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Tide Flippers that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Weapon
Action
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.872.865719819
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Attack Action
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played:
2.912.913496613
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.912.910010650
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played:
2.902.900806169
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played:
2.832.829083391
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Lava Burst that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.882.881793478
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Spreading Flames
Avg. played:
2.892.893875643
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Spreading Flames that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Lava Vein Loyalty (Red) that play both.
Breaking Point
Avg. played:
2.732.733397038
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Breaking Point that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.842.844173442
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Stab Wound
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Stab Wound that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.592.585221143
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played:
2.322.323308271
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Salt the Wound that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Command and Conquer that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Tenacity that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Take the Tempo
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Take the Tempo that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Attack Reaction
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played:
2.542.543016760
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.802.802584350
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Concealed Blade that play both.
Knives Out
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Knives Out that play both.
Defense Reaction
Wax On (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Wax On (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
