banner
Blood Runs Deep
12876 decks (1.695%)
Price History
Blood Runs Deep
Draconic Ninja Attack Action - Attack
This costs {r} less to play for each Draconic chain link you control. When this attacks a hero, each dagger you control deals 1 damage to them. If damage is dealt this way, the dagger has hit. Destroy the daggers. Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.153.149575115
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.452.448109163
Hero
Cindra
Cindra
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Cindra that play both.
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Equipment
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Flick Knives that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
Dragonscaler Flight Path
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Tide Flippers that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
Spell Fray Leggings
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Base of the Mountain
Base of the Mountain
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Weapon
Kunai of Retribution
Kunai of Retribution
97% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Kunai of Retribution that play both.
Claw of Vynserakai
Claw of Vynserakai
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Action
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.748856359
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Prowess of Agility
Prowess of Agility
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Prowess of Agility that play both.
Attack Action
New
Enflame the Firebrand
Enflame the Firebrand
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.900000000
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Enflame the Firebrand that play both.
Display Loyalty
Display Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.918074672
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Display Loyalty that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.917899959
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Wrath of Retribution
Wrath of Retribution
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Wrath of Retribution that play both.
Ignite
Ignite
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.909974205
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Ignite that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.912675287
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Hot on Their Heels
Hot on Their Heels
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.905982127
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Hot on Their Heels that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.910963393
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Burning Blade Dance
Burning Blade Dance
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.866854151
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Burning Blade Dance that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.902306498
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.806560049
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Art of the Dragon: Blood that play both.
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.890772353
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red) that play both.
Demonstrate Devotion
Demonstrate Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.593695778
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Demonstrate Devotion that play both.
Lava Burst
Lava Burst
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.594284522
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Lava Burst that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.613506077
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Fire
Art of the Dragon: Fire
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.608726583
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Art of the Dragon: Fire that play both.
Spreading Flames
Spreading Flames
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.797363281
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Spreading Flames that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.858718269
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.262.264452645
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Overcrowded that play both.
Breaking Point
Breaking Point
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.319099591
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Breaking Point that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.830698623
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Lava Vein Loyalty (Red) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.568350810
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow) that play both.
Dragon Power (Blue)
Dragon Power (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.762769231
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Dragon Power (Blue) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.509621915
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.765993842
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Scale
Art of the Dragon: Scale
Avg. played: Β 
2.112.109952013
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Art of the Dragon: Scale that play both.
Tenacity
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Tenacity that play both.
Stab Wound
Stab Wound
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Stab Wound that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
2.001.999012248
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Salt the Wound
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β 
1.751.748682824
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Salt the Wound that play both.
Devotion Never Dies
Devotion Never Dies
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500513171
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Devotion Never Dies that play both.
Poisoned Blade (Red)
Poisoned Blade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Poisoned Blade (Red) that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue) that play both.
Mark with Magma
Mark with Magma
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Mark with Magma that play both.
Poisoned Blade (Blue)
Poisoned Blade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Poisoned Blade (Blue) that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Dragon Power (Red)
Dragon Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Dragon Power (Red) that play both.
Look Tuff
Look Tuff
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Look Tuff that play both.
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Rally the Coast Guard (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Command and Conquer that play both.
Take the Tempo
Take the Tempo
Avg. played: Β 
1.491.488148148
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Take the Tempo that play both.
Attack Reaction
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.900450064
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Throw Dagger that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.717155801
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.619495900
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Concealed Blade that play both.
Knives Out
Knives Out
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Knives Out that play both.
Defense Reaction
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.883602108
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.842693044
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.816670175
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Wax On (Red)
Wax On (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Wax On (Red) that play both.
Instant
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Parched Terrain
Parched Terrain
Avg. played: Β 
1.481.479289941
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Parched Terrain that play both.
Resource
Authority of Ataya
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Authority of Ataya that play both.