Blood Runs Deep
Draconic Ninja Attack Action - Attack
This costs {r} less to play for each Draconic chain link you control.
When this attacks a hero, each dagger you control deals 1 damage to them. If damage is dealt this way, the dagger has hit. Destroy the daggers.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.892.886078234
Average Defense Value:
2.482.480427893
Hero
Equipment
Flick Knives
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Flick Knives that play both.
Mask of Momentum
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Tide Flippers
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Tide Flippers that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Weapon
Action
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Attack Action
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played:
2.932.929502370
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.932.926283988
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Spreading Flames
Avg. played:
2.932.926937738
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Spreading Flames that play both.
Stab Wound
Avg. played:
2.892.894503546
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Stab Wound that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played:
2.812.813370474
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Lava Burst that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.882.884297521
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played:
2.142.139465875
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Salt the Wound that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue) that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Lava Vein Loyalty (Red) that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Breaking Point
Avg. played:
2.742.735159817
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Breaking Point that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Command and Conquer that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.301.295454545
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Tenacity that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Cinderskin Devotion (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Cinderskin Devotion (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.842.844613918
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Concealed Blade that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played:
2.862.861305361
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Knives Out
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Knives Out that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and That All You Got? that play both.
Wax On (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Wax On (Red) that play both.
Instant
Snag
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Snag that play both.
