Blood Runs Deep
Draconic Ninja Attack Action - Attack
This costs {r} less to play for each Draconic chain link you control.
When this attacks a hero, each dagger you control deals 1 damage to them. If damage is dealt this way, the dagger has hit. Destroy the daggers.
Go again
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.063.063724338
Average Defense Value:
2.482.483270957
Hero
Equipment
Flick Knives
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Flick Knives that play both.
Mask of Momentum
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Tide Flippers
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Tide Flippers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Arcane Lantern that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Weapon
Action
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.832.833774484
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Attack Action
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played:
2.892.886961286
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.892.885950103
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played:
2.872.866266507
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played:
2.782.781130268
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Lava Burst that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played:
2.852.851553166
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Spreading Flames
Avg. played:
2.882.879814551
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Spreading Flames that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Avg. played:
2.852.854681648
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Lava Vein Loyalty (Red) that play both.
Breaking Point
Avg. played:
2.692.690765692
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Breaking Point that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.572.573913043
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.812.809793814
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Stab Wound
Avg. played:
2.822.822807018
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Stab Wound that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played:
2.312.307098765
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Salt the Wound that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue) that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Take the Tempo
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Take the Tempo that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Command and Conquer that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Tenacity that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played:
2.542.538151599
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.772.774701412
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Concealed Blade that play both.
Knives Out
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Knives Out that play both.
Defense Reaction
Wax On (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Wax On (Red) that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Blood Runs Deep and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
