Cut Through (Red)
Assassin,ninja Attack Action - Attack
If you've hit with a dagger this combat chain, this gets +1{p} and go again.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.033.028389809
Average Defense Value:
2.512.505414001
Hero
Equipment
Mask of Momentum
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Flick Knives
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Tide Flippers
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Pouncing Paws
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Base of the Mountain
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Robe of Autumn's Fall
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Robe of Autumn's Fall that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Iris of the Blossom
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Iris of the Blossom that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Arcane Lantern
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
Nullrune Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Okana Scar Wraps
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Okana Scar Wraps that play both.
Weapon
Claw of Vynserakai
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Kunai of Retribution
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Kunai of Retribution that play both.
Action
Dual Threat
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Dual Threat that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
2.832.834749246
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.712.706749672
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Blue) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.862.863079019
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Censor
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Censor that play both.
Wrath of Retribution
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Wrath of Retribution that play both.
Torrent of Tempo (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Torrent of Tempo (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Display Loyalty
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Display Loyalty that play both.
Ignite
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Ignite that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Hot on Their Heels
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Hot on Their Heels that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Call for Backup
Avg. played:
2.302.300000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Call for Backup that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Art of the Dragon: Blood that play both.
Stab Wound
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Stab Wound that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.647875354
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Rushing River (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Rushing River (Blue) that play both.
Demonstrate Devotion
Avg. played:
2.692.693435521
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Demonstrate Devotion that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
2.782.783105023
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Burning Blade Dance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Burning Blade Dance that play both.
Seek Vengeance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Seek Vengeance that play both.
Crane Dance (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Crane Dance (Blue) that play both.
Blood Runs Deep
Avg. played:
2.542.536430834
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Blood Runs Deep that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played:
2.432.433295325
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Lava Burst that play both.
Take the Tempo
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Take the Tempo that play both.
Rising Knee Thrust (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Rising Knee Thrust (Blue) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Blue) that play both.
Whirling Mist Blossom
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Whirling Mist Blossom that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played:
2.482.480000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Double Strike that play both.
Back Heel Kick (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Back Heel Kick (Blue) that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Fire
Avg. played:
2.512.514090909
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Art of the Dragon: Fire that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Breaking Point
Avg. played:
2.342.344764238
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Breaking Point that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Tenacity that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Salt the Wound
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Salt the Wound that play both.
Rotten Remains
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Rotten Remains that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Mauling Qi that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Spreading Flames
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Spreading Flames that play both.
One-Two Punch (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and One-Two Punch (Blue) that play both.
Flex Claws (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Flex Claws (Red) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow) that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played:
2.442.444210526
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Poisoned Blade (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Poisoned Blade (Red) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Rally the Coast Guard (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Nasty Surprise
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Nasty Surprise that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Bleed Out (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Bleed Out (Red) that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Attack Reaction
Throw Dagger
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Throw Dagger that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played:
2.852.850618459
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Legacy of Ikaru
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Legacy of Ikaru that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
2.722.724786325
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Knives Out
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Knives Out that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.922.919015596
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Wax On (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Wax On (Red) that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Wax Off
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Wax Off that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Instant
Even Bigger Than That! (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Even Bigger Than That! (Red) that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Snag
Avg. played:
2.402.402767662
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Snag that play both.