banner
Cut Through (Red)
12060 decks (1.684%)
Price History
Cut Through (Red)
Assassin,ninja Attack Action - Attack
If you've hit with a dagger this combat chain, this gets +1{p} and go again.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.053.053119620
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.502.497191331
Hero
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Equipment
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Pouncing Paws
Pouncing Paws
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
Dragonscaler Flight Path
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
Tiger Stripe Shuko
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Robe of Autumn's Fall
Robe of Autumn's Fall
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Robe of Autumn's Fall that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Iris of the Blossom
Iris of the Blossom
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Iris of the Blossom that play both.
Base of the Mountain
Base of the Mountain
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
Spell Fray Leggings
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Weapon
Claw of Vynserakai
Claw of Vynserakai
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Kunai of Retribution
Kunai of Retribution
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Kunai of Retribution that play both.
Action
Dual Threat
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Dual Threat that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.812927577
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.698402556
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Blue) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Yellow)
Up Sticks and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Wrath of Retribution
Wrath of Retribution
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Wrath of Retribution that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Display Loyalty
Display Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Display Loyalty that play both.
Ignite
Ignite
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Ignite that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.862023939
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Hot on Their Heels
Hot on Their Heels
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Hot on Their Heels that play both.
Censor
Censor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Censor that play both.
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red) that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.321266968
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Overcrowded that play both.
Torrent of Tempo (Red)
Torrent of Tempo (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Torrent of Tempo (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Art of the Dragon: Blood that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Demonstrate Devotion
Demonstrate Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.694479141
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Demonstrate Devotion that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.631155085
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Burning Blade Dance
Burning Blade Dance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Burning Blade Dance that play both.
Stab Wound
Stab Wound
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Stab Wound that play both.
Rushing River (Blue)
Rushing River (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Rushing River (Blue) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.767628791
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Lava Burst
Lava Burst
Avg. played: Β 
2.442.435222672
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Lava Burst that play both.
Blood Runs Deep
Blood Runs Deep
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.517071759
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Blood Runs Deep that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.487334138
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Fire
Art of the Dragon: Fire
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.446362098
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Art of the Dragon: Fire that play both.
Crane Dance (Blue)
Crane Dance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Crane Dance (Blue) that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Take the Tempo
Take the Tempo
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Take the Tempo that play both.
Breaking Point
Breaking Point
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.383804302
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Breaking Point that play both.
Whirling Mist Blossom
Whirling Mist Blossom
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Whirling Mist Blossom that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Rising Knee Thrust (Blue)
Rising Knee Thrust (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Rising Knee Thrust (Blue) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Blue)
Pick Up the Point (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Blue) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Double Strike
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Double Strike that play both.
Back Heel Kick (Blue)
Back Heel Kick (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Back Heel Kick (Blue) that play both.
Tenacity
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Tenacity that play both.
Seek Vengeance
Seek Vengeance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Seek Vengeance that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Salt the Wound that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.596998332
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.431514477
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Mauling Qi
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Mauling Qi that play both.
Rotten Remains
Rotten Remains
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Rotten Remains that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Scale
Art of the Dragon: Scale
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.407960199
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Art of the Dragon: Scale that play both.
Spreading Flames
Spreading Flames
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Spreading Flames that play both.
New
Tempest Palm Gustwave
Tempest Palm Gustwave
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Tempest Palm Gustwave that play both.
One-Two Punch (Blue)
One-Two Punch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and One-Two Punch (Blue) that play both.
Flex Claws (Red)
Flex Claws (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Flex Claws (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Humble (Red) that play both.
Poisoned Blade (Red)
Poisoned Blade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Poisoned Blade (Red) that play both.
Nasty Surprise
Nasty Surprise
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Nasty Surprise that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Lava Vein Loyalty (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Rally the Coast Guard (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Throw Dagger that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.870539104
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.718781053
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Knives Out
Knives Out
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Knives Out that play both.
Legacy of Ikaru
Legacy of Ikaru
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Legacy of Ikaru that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.911591356
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Wax On (Red)
Wax On (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Wax On (Red) that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Wax Off
Wax Off
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Wax Off that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Instant
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Even Bigger Than That! (Red)
Even Bigger Than That! (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Even Bigger Than That! (Red) that play both.
Snag
Snag
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Snag that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Resource
New
Authority of Ataya
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Authority of Ataya that play both.