banner
Cut Through (Red)
7673 decks (1.154%)
Price History
Cut Through (Red)
Assassin,ninja Attack Action - Attack
If you've hit with a dagger this combat chain, this gets +1{p} and go again.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.972.969860652
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.522.515996162
Hero
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Equipment
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Flick Knives that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Tide Flippers that play both.
Pouncing Paws
Pouncing Paws
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
Tiger Stripe Shuko
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
Dragonscaler Flight Path
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
Spell Fray Leggings
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Weapon
Claw of Vynserakai
Claw of Vynserakai
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
Harmonized Kodachi
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Kunai of Retribution
Kunai of Retribution
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Kunai of Retribution that play both.
Action
Dual Threat
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Dual Threat that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.836559940
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.783127572
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and The Weakest Link that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Blue) that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Aspect of Tiger: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Aspect of Tiger: Mind that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Yellow)
Up Sticks and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Up Sticks and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Prowess of Agility
Prowess of Agility
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Prowess of Agility that play both.
Gravekeeping (Red)
Gravekeeping (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Gravekeeping (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.867491166
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
Censor
Censor
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Censor that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Torrent of Tempo (Red)
Torrent of Tempo (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Torrent of Tempo (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Sound the Alarm
Sound the Alarm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Sound the Alarm that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Stab Wound
Stab Wound
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Stab Wound that play both.
Wrath of Retribution
Wrath of Retribution
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Wrath of Retribution that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Display Loyalty
Display Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Display Loyalty that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Ignite
Ignite
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Ignite that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.756497948
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Rushing River (Blue)
Rushing River (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Rushing River (Blue) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Hot on Their Heels
Hot on Their Heels
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Hot on Their Heels that play both.
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red) that play both.
Crane Dance (Blue)
Crane Dance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Crane Dance (Blue) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Burning Blade Dance
Burning Blade Dance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Burning Blade Dance that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Art of the Dragon: Blood that play both.
Take the Tempo
Take the Tempo
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Take the Tempo that play both.
Rising Knee Thrust (Blue)
Rising Knee Thrust (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Rising Knee Thrust (Blue) that play both.
Demonstrate Devotion
Demonstrate Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.741579914
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Demonstrate Devotion that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Double Strike
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Double Strike that play both.
Back Heel Kick (Blue)
Back Heel Kick (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Back Heel Kick (Blue) that play both.
Blood Runs Deep
Blood Runs Deep
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.668292683
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Blood Runs Deep that play both.
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Sirens of Safe Harbor (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Blue)
Pick Up the Point (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Pick Up the Point (Blue) that play both.
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Scar for a Scar (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Scar for a Scar (Red) that play both.
Rotten Remains
Rotten Remains
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Rotten Remains that play both.
Mauling Qi
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Mauling Qi that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Lava Burst
Lava Burst
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.546986390
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Lava Burst that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
One-Two Punch (Blue)
One-Two Punch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and One-Two Punch (Blue) that play both.
Nimby (Red)
Nimby (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Nimby (Red) that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.628547579
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Flex Claws (Red)
Flex Claws (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Flex Claws (Red) that play both.
Jack Be Nimble
Jack Be Nimble
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Jack Be Nimble that play both.
Spreading Flames
Spreading Flames
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Spreading Flames that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Fire
Art of the Dragon: Fire
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.640625000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Art of the Dragon: Fire that play both.
Poisoned Blade (Red)
Poisoned Blade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Poisoned Blade (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Nasty Surprise
Nasty Surprise
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Nasty Surprise that play both.
Whirling Mist Blossom
Whirling Mist Blossom
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Whirling Mist Blossom that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow) that play both.
Bleed Out (Red)
Bleed Out (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Bleed Out (Red) that play both.
Recoil (Blue)
Recoil (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Recoil (Blue) that play both.
Salt the Wound
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.517119244
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Salt the Wound that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Breaking Point
Breaking Point
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Breaking Point that play both.
Dragon Power (Blue)
Dragon Power (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Dragon Power (Blue) that play both.
Find Center
Find Center
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Find Center that play both.
Tenacity
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Tenacity that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Attack Reaction
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Throw Dagger that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.835516179
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.772787318
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Concealed Blade that play both.
Knives Out
Knives Out
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Knives Out that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.922504026
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Wax On (Red)
Wax On (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Wax On (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Wax Off
Wax Off
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Wax Off that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and That All You Got? that play both.
Instant
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Snag
Snag
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Snag that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Cut Through (Red) and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.