banner
Hot on Their Heels
14093 decks (1.955%)
Price History
Hot on Their Heels
Draconic Ninja Attack Action - Attack
If you control 2 or more Draconic chain links, this gets go again and "When this hits a hero, mark them."
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
3.133.128244515
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.442.440065674
Hero
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Cindra
Cindra
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Cindra that play both.
Fai, Rising Rebellion
Fai, Rising Rebellion
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Fai, Rising Rebellion that play both.
Equipment
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Flick Knives that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
Dragonscaler Flight Path
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Tide Flippers that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
Spell Fray Leggings
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
Tiger Stripe Shuko
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Base of the Mountain
Base of the Mountain
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Danger Digits
Danger Digits
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Danger Digits that play both.
Weapon
Claw of Vynserakai
Claw of Vynserakai
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Kunai of Retribution
Kunai of Retribution
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Kunai of Retribution that play both.
Searing Emberblade
Searing Emberblade
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Searing Emberblade that play both.
Action
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.775912245
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Battlefront Bastion (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Battlefront Bastion (Red) that play both.
Prowess of Agility
Prowess of Agility
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Prowess of Agility that play both.
Attack Action
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.906328367
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.895402129
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Display Loyalty
Display Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.911977674
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Display Loyalty that play both.
Wrath of Retribution
Wrath of Retribution
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Wrath of Retribution that play both.
Ignite
Ignite
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.915121715
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Ignite that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.897736525
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.882216057
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Burning Blade Dance
Burning Blade Dance
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.815648148
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Burning Blade Dance that play both.
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.858808544
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red) that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.825900429
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Art of the Dragon: Blood that play both.
Lava Burst
Lava Burst
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.625271739
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Lava Burst that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.642922467
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Fire
Art of the Dragon: Fire
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.624904004
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Art of the Dragon: Fire that play both.
Demonstrate Devotion
Demonstrate Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.536713957
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Demonstrate Devotion that play both.
Spreading Flames
Spreading Flames
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.791067247
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Spreading Flames that play both.
Blood Runs Deep
Blood Runs Deep
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.355295567
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Blood Runs Deep that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.408527038
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow) that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.744921805
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Lava Vein Loyalty (Red) that play both.
Breaking Point
Breaking Point
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.340505714
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Breaking Point that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.279761905
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Overcrowded that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Dragon Power (Blue)
Dragon Power (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.795609387
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Dragon Power (Blue) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.765496639
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Tenacity
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β 
1.231.225530567
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Tenacity that play both.
Salt the Wound
Salt the Wound
Avg. played: Β 
1.591.585666023
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Salt the Wound that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.521650419
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Scale
Art of the Dragon: Scale
Avg. played: Β 
2.062.059093757
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Art of the Dragon: Scale that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
1.821.819031789
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue) that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Devotion Never Dies
Devotion Never Dies
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.461036134
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Devotion Never Dies that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Dragon Power (Red)
Dragon Power (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Dragon Power (Red) that play both.
Stab Wound
Stab Wound
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Stab Wound that play both.
Mark with Magma
Mark with Magma
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Mark with Magma that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Rally the Coast Guard (Red) that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Take the Tempo
Take the Tempo
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Take the Tempo that play both.
Poisoned Blade (Red)
Poisoned Blade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Poisoned Blade (Red) that play both.
Compounding Anger
Compounding Anger
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Compounding Anger that play both.
Attack Reaction
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.894710703
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Throw Dagger that play both.
Ancestral Empowerment
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.701838529
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.553223960
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Concealed Blade that play both.
Defense Reaction
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.870989761
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.882651538
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.803405266
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Wax On (Red)
Wax On (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Wax On (Red) that play both.
Instant
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
New
Parched Terrain
Parched Terrain
Avg. played: Β 
1.501.504587156
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Parched Terrain that play both.
Resource
New
Authority of Ataya
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Hot on Their Heels and Authority of Ataya that play both.