Salt the Wound
Ninja Attack Action - Attack
Salt the Wound gains +1 [Power] for each attack that has hit this combat chain.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.532.533671439
Average Defense Value: Β
2.392.391329867
Hero
Benji, the Piercing Wind
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Benji, the Piercing Wind that play both.
Fai, Rising Rebellion
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Fai, Rising Rebellion that play both.
New
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Equipment
Mask of Momentum
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Tide Flippers
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tide Flippers that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Pouncing Paws
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Breaking Scales
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Breaking Scales that play both.
Traverse the Universe
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Arcane Lantern
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Nullrune Robe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Blazen Yoroi
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Blazen Yoroi that play both.
Flick Knives
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Flick Knives that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
Blossom of Spring
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Blood Scent
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Blood Scent that play both.
Mask of Three Tails
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Mask of Three Tails that play both.
Spell Fray Cloak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Spell Fray Cloak that play both.
Tearing Shuko
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tearing Shuko that play both.
Nullrune Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Weapon
Harmonized Kodachi
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Searing Emberblade
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Searing Emberblade that play both.
Tiger Taming Khakkara
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Zephyr Needle
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Action
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.822.817459080
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.721256039
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played: Β
2.652.645847287
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Wind Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Biting Breeze (Red) that play both.
Predatory Streak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.592.585046729
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Predatory Streak (Red) that play both.
Rise from the Ashes (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.522791133
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Rise from the Ashes (Red) that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Breed Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Breed Anger (Red) that play both.
Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tiger Form Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tiger Form Incantation (Red) that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Energy Potion that play both.
Minnowism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Minnowism (Blue) that play both.
Untamed (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Untamed (Red) that play both.
Predatory Streak (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Predatory Streak (Yellow) that play both.
Mindstate of Tiger
Avg. played: Β
2.522.515838874
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Mindstate of Tiger that play both.
Biting Breeze (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Biting Breeze (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.831582514
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β
2.832.828657866
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.826939717
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played: Β
2.792.794711952
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Lava Burst that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.792.787427988
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.814459323
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.822.816155989
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.827382439
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.795133992
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.799729486
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue) that play both.
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
2.852.847771836
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Chase the Tail that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.684283848
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.682.684403670
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Command and Conquer that play both.
Spreading Flames
Avg. played: Β
2.752.747544522
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Spreading Flames that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β
1.471.474547188
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tenacity that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.552.547068796
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Double Strike that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played: Β
2.692.688323220
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.655890649
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.772.771868132
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played: Β
1.911.911441833
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played: Β
2.602.601685860
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.702.701754386
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Lava Vein Loyalty (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β
2.742.740413980
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Winds of Eternity that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Harmony of the Hunt (Red) that play both.
Dishonor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Dishonor that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Stab Wound
Avg. played: Β
2.642.644416562
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Stab Wound that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Harmony of the Hunt (Blue) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.661459404
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Rising Resentment (Blue) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Growl (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Growl (Red) that play both.
Head Leads the Tail
Avg. played: Β
2.632.630145662
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Head Leads the Tail that play both.
Tooth and Claw
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tooth and Claw that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Spring Tidings
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Spring Tidings that play both.
Flex Claws (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Flex Claws (Red) that play both.
Soaring Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.579804560
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Soaring Strike (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.522.516559050
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Snatch (Blue) that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Pouncing Qi (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow) that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β
2.512.514433434
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Mauling Qi that play both.
Take the Tempo
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Take the Tempo that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.581924577
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Surging Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Surging Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Descendent Gustwave (Yellow) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Bonds of Ancestry (Blue) that play both.
Breaking Point
Avg. played: Β
2.532.532046332
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Breaking Point that play both.
Lord of Wind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Lord of Wind that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Belittle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Belittle (Red) that play both.
Cinderskin Devotion (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Cinderskin Devotion (Blue) that play both.
Wander With Purpose
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Wander With Purpose that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.527068127
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Soulbead Strike (Red) that play both.
Ride the Tailwind (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Ride the Tailwind (Yellow) that play both.
Nasty Surprise
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Nasty Surprise that play both.
Mischievous Meeps
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Mischievous Meeps that play both.
Vipox
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Vipox that play both.
Gustwave of the Second Wind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Gustwave of the Second Wind that play both.
Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Head Jab (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Head Jab (Blue) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.507697691
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Hundred Winds (Yellow) that play both.
Head Jab (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Head Jab (Yellow) that play both.
Ride the Tailwind (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Ride the Tailwind (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β
2.622.621882338
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.122.115639150
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Maul
Avg. played: Β
2.562.558775287
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Maul that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.582.577990431
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Concealed Blade that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.804826546
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.742.744684685
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Block
Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tiger Eye Reflex (Yellow) that play both.
Instant
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
2.812.812250966
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Art of War that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Stir the Pot that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Pass Over that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Path Well Traveled that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.663811116
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Reinforce the Line (Red) that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.
