Salt the Wound
Ninja Attack Action - Attack
Salt the Wound gains +1 [Power] for each attack that has hit this combat chain.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
2.562.564881549
Average Defense Value: Β
2.402.395054099
Hero
Benji, the Piercing Wind
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Benji, the Piercing Wind that play both.
Fai, Rising Rebellion
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Fai, Rising Rebellion that play both.
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
Katsu, the Wanderer
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Katsu, the Wanderer that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Zen, Tamer of Purpose
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Zen, Tamer of Purpose that play both.
Equipment
Tide Flippers
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tide Flippers that play both.
Mask of Momentum
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Tiger Stripe Shuko
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tiger Stripe Shuko that play both.
banned - Blitz
Mask of the Pouncing Lynx
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Mask of the Pouncing Lynx that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Pouncing Paws
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Pouncing Paws that play both.
Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Twelve Petal KΔαΉ£Δya that play both.
Breaking Scales
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Breaking Scales that play both.
Stride of Reprisal
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Stride of Reprisal that play both.
Arcane Lantern
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Flick Knives
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Flick Knives that play both.
Nullrune Robe
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Breeze Rider Boots
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Breeze Rider Boots that play both.
Traverse the Universe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Vest of the First Fist
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Vest of the First Fist that play both.
Blazen Yoroi
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Blazen Yoroi that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Blossom of Spring
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Blood Scent
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Blood Scent that play both.
Spell Fray Cloak
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Spell Fray Cloak that play both.
Tearing Shuko
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tearing Shuko that play both.
Mask of Three Tails
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Mask of Three Tails that play both.
Nullrune Hood
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Weapon
Claw of Vynserakai
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Harmonized Kodachi
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Harmonized Kodachi that play both.
Kunai of Retribution
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Kunai of Retribution that play both.
Searing Emberblade
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Searing Emberblade that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Tiger Taming Khakkara
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tiger Taming Khakkara that play both.
Zephyr Needle
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Zephyr Needle that play both.
Action
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
2.812.811886513
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Prowess of Agility
Avg. played: Β
2.762.763157895
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Prowess of Agility that play both.
Ancestral Harmony
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Ancestral Harmony that play both.
Roar of the Tiger
Avg. played: Β
2.642.641953277
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Roar of the Tiger that play both.
Biting Breeze (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.712.708640903
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Biting Breeze (Blue) that play both.
Biting Breeze (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Biting Breeze (Red) that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Rise from the Ashes (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.532.526379994
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Rise from the Ashes (Red) that play both.
Predatory Streak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.582386364
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Predatory Streak (Red) that play both.
Wind Chakra (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Wind Chakra (Blue) that play both.
Rowdy Locals
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Rowdy Locals that play both.
Energy Potion
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Energy Potion that play both.
Dual Threat
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Dual Threat that play both.
Breed Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Breed Anger (Red) that play both.
Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Shifting Winds of the Mystic Beast that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tiger Form Incantation (Blue) that play both.
Minnowism (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Minnowism (Blue) that play both.
Tiger Form Incantation (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tiger Form Incantation (Red) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Predatory Streak (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Predatory Streak (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Display Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Display Loyalty that play both.
Ignite
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Ignite that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.852.848358579
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β
2.852.845206183
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Rising Resentment (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.842.843277311
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Rising Resentment (Red) that play both.
Wrath of Retribution
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Wrath of Retribution that play both.
Lava Burst
Avg. played: Β
2.782.780439362
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Lava Burst that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.830388921
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Hot on Their Heels
Avg. played: Β
2.852.853775088
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Hot on Their Heels that play both.
Dragon Power (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.882.877104980
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Dragon Power (Blue) that play both.
Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.862.857294995
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Fire Tenet: Strike First (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.782.778788915
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Snatch (Red) that play both.
Mounting Anger (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.832.834078379
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Mounting Anger (Red) that play both.
Burning Blade Dance
Avg. played: Β
2.852.845177665
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Burning Blade Dance that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.803405221
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.822.816629661
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β
2.692.693941287
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.812.805963010
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Lava Vein Loyalty (Blue) that play both.
Spreading Flames
Avg. played: Β
2.772.774042627
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Spreading Flames that play both.
Aspect of Tiger: Body
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Aspect of Tiger: Body that play both.
Tenacity
Avg. played: Β
1.431.428276999
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tenacity that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Avg. played: Β
2.752.745741056
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Art of the Dragon: Blood that play both.
Demonstrate Devotion
Avg. played: Β
2.652.646210721
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Demonstrate Devotion that play both.
Blood Runs Deep
Avg. played: Β
2.712.714585960
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Blood Runs Deep that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.682.680231076
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Soulbead Strike (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
2.672.667720963
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Command and Conquer that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Fire
Avg. played: Β
2.642.644765659
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Art of the Dragon: Fire that play both.
Hundred Winds (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Hundred Winds (Red) that play both.
Double Strike
Avg. played: Β
2.552.551507431
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Double Strike that play both.
Chase the Tail
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Chase the Tail that play both.
Phoenix Flame
Avg. played: Β
1.851.849438944
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Phoenix Flame that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.722.715363512
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Brand with Cinderclaw (Yellow) that play both.
Tiger Swipe
Avg. played: Β
2.692.688642580
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tiger Swipe that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.692.689783282
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Lava Vein Loyalty (Red) that play both.
Bittering Thorns (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.672.668925653
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Bittering Thorns (Red) that play both.
Flamecall Awakening
Avg. played: Β
2.562.557171674
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Flamecall Awakening that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Descendent Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Winds of Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Winds of Eternity that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Bonds of Ancestry (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Bonds of Ancestry (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Devotion Never Dies
Avg. played: Β
2.532.526440879
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Devotion Never Dies that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Poisoned Blade (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Poisoned Blade (Red) that play both.
Be Like Water (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Be Like Water (Red) that play both.
Dishonor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Dishonor that play both.
Stab Wound
Avg. played: Β
2.652.647406733
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Stab Wound that play both.
Fluster Fist (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Fluster Fist (Blue) that play both.
Surging Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Surging Strike (Red) that play both.
Rising Resentment (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.662731208
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Rising Resentment (Blue) that play both.
Spinning Wheel Kick (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Spinning Wheel Kick (Red) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Whelming Gustwave (Red) that play both.
Hundred Winds (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Hundred Winds (Blue) that play both.
Whelming Gustwave (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Whelming Gustwave (Blue) that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Harmony of the Hunt (Red) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Rally the Coast Guard (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Growl (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Growl (Red) that play both.
Fluster Fist (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Fluster Fist (Red) that play both.
Spring Tidings
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Spring Tidings that play both.
Head Leads the Tail
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Head Leads the Tail that play both.
Harmony of the Hunt (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Harmony of the Hunt (Blue) that play both.
Flex Claws (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Flex Claws (Red) that play both.
Poisoned Blade (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Poisoned Blade (Blue) that play both.
Breaking Point
Avg. played: Β
2.512.513497301
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Breaking Point that play both.
Soaring Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.582.580359173
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Soaring Strike (Red) that play both.
Snatch (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
2.512.510672901
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Snatch (Blue) that play both.
Compounding Anger
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Compounding Anger that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Pouncing Qi (Blue) that play both.
Surging Strike (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Surging Strike (Yellow) that play both.
Take the Tempo
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Take the Tempo that play both.
Cinderskin Devotion (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Cinderskin Devotion (Blue) that play both.
Pouncing Qi (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Pouncing Qi (Red) that play both.
Lord of Wind
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Lord of Wind that play both.
Mauling Qi
Avg. played: Β
2.532.527272727
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Mauling Qi that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Bonds of Ancestry (Yellow) that play both.
Tooth and Claw
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Tooth and Claw that play both.
Descendent Gustwave (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Descendent Gustwave (Yellow) that play both.
banned - Blitzbanned - Classic Constructed
Belittle (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Belittle (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Ancestry (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Bonds of Ancestry (Blue) that play both.
Wander With Purpose
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Wander With Purpose that play both.
Soulbead Strike (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Soulbead Strike (Red) that play both.
Art of the Dragon: Scale
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Art of the Dragon: Scale that play both.
Ride the Tailwind (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Ride the Tailwind (Yellow) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Mark with Magma
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Mark with Magma that play both.
Attack Reaction
Ancestral Empowerment
Avg. played: Β
2.632.626892655
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Ancestral Empowerment that play both.
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Throw Dagger that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.142.137396243
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Maul
Avg. played: Β
2.552.547583458
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Maul that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β
2.552.547732068
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Concealed Blade that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.802.803376761
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β
2.872.870272181
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Flic Flak (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Flic Flak (Red) that play both.
Instant
Art of War
Avg. played: Β
2.812.812347298
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Art of War that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Sacred Art: Jade Tiger Domain that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Stir the Pot that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Pass Over that play both.
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Reinforce the Line (Red)
Avg. played: Β
2.662.664111065
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Reinforce the Line (Red) that play both.
Orihon of Mystic Tenets
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Salt the Wound and Orihon of Mystic Tenets that play both.