banner
New
For the Realm
256 decks (0.04169%)
Price History
For the Realm
Draconic Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this attacks a marked hero, create a Fealty token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.552.551451516
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.672.669598295
Hero
New
Fang, Dracai of Blades
Fang, Dracai of Blades
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Fang, Dracai of Blades that play both.
New
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
Cindra, Dracai of Retribution
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Cindra, Dracai of Retribution that play both.
New
Cindra
Cindra
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Cindra that play both.
New
Fang
Fang
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Fang that play both.
Equipment
Braveforge Bracers
Braveforge Bracers
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
Valiant Dynamo
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
New
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Crown of Providence that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
Grains of Bloodspill
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Nullrune Hood that play both.
New
Dragonscaler Flight Path
Dragonscaler Flight Path
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Gallantry Gold
Gallantry Gold
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Refraction Bolters
Refraction Bolters
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Refraction Bolters that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Helm
Blade Beckoner Helm
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
Flamescale Furnace
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
New
Coat of Allegiance
Coat of Allegiance
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Coat of Allegiance that play both.
New
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Flick Knives that play both.
Mask of Momentum
Mask of Momentum
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Mask of Momentum that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Tide Flippers
Tide Flippers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Tide Flippers that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Sash of Sandikai
Sash of Sandikai
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Sash of Sandikai that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Boots
Blade Beckoner Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Blade Beckoner Boots that play both.
New
Blade Beckoner Plating
Blade Beckoner Plating
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Blade Beckoner Plating that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
Arcanite Skullcap
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
New
Danger Digits
Danger Digits
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Danger Digits that play both.
New
Vow of Vengeance
Vow of Vengeance
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Vow of Vengeance that play both.
New
Red Alert Gloves
Red Alert Gloves
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Red Alert Gloves that play both.
New
Red Alert Visor
Red Alert Visor
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Red Alert Visor that play both.
Weapon
New
Obsidian Fire Vein
Obsidian Fire Vein
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
New
Kunai of Retribution
Kunai of Retribution
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Kunai of Retribution that play both.
Quicksilver Dagger
Quicksilver Dagger
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Quicksilver Dagger that play both.
Action
New
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.811594203
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
New
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.777777778
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
New
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.445945946
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
New
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.381818182
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Sworn Vengeance (Blue) that play both.
New
Public Bounty (Red)
Public Bounty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.395833333
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Public Bounty (Red) that play both.
New
Imperial Seal of Command
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
New
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Hunt a Killer (Blue) that play both.
New
Hunt a Killer (Red)
Hunt a Killer (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.394736842
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Hunt a Killer (Red) that play both.
New
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
New
Cut Deep (Red)
Cut Deep (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Cut Deep (Red) that play both.
New
Point of Engagement (Blue)
Point of Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Point of Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
New
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
New
Sharpened Senses
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Sharpened Senses that play both.
New
Cut Deep (Blue)
Cut Deep (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Cut Deep (Blue) that play both.
New
Public Bounty (Blue)
Public Bounty (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Public Bounty (Blue) that play both.
New
Twist and Turn (Red)
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
New
Sworn Vengeance (Yellow)
Sworn Vengeance (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Sworn Vengeance (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
New
For the Dracai
For the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.345000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and For the Dracai that play both.
New
Oath of Loyalty
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.840909091
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
New
Hunt the Hunter
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.232558140
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.492187500
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Blaze Headlong that play both.
New
For the Emperor
For the Emperor
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.288888889
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and For the Emperor that play both.
New
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.686274510
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
New
March of Loyalty
March of Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.611111111
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and March of Loyalty that play both.
New
Tip-Off (Blue)
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.428571429
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
New
Wrath of Retribution
Wrath of Retribution
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Wrath of Retribution that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Command and Conquer that play both.
New
Display Loyalty
Display Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Display Loyalty that play both.
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Lava Vein Loyalty (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Lava Vein Loyalty (Red) that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.580645161
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Brand with Cinderclaw (Red) that play both.
New
Hot on Their Heels
Hot on Their Heels
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.485714286
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Hot on Their Heels that play both.
New
Burning Blade Dance
Burning Blade Dance
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.533333333
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Burning Blade Dance that play both.
Lava Burst
Lava Burst
Avg. played: Β 
2.482.481481481
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Lava Burst that play both.
New
Ignite
Ignite
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Ignite that play both.
New
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Avg. played: Β 
2.522.518518519
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion that play both.
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Brand with Cinderclaw (Blue) that play both.
New
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Art of the Dragon: Blood
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Art of the Dragon: Blood that play both.
New
Blood Runs Deep
Blood Runs Deep
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Blood Runs Deep that play both.
New
Mark with Magma
Mark with Magma
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Mark with Magma that play both.
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Ronin Renegade (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Ronin Renegade (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
New
Affirm Loyalty
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.819672131
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
New
Fire and Brimstone
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
New
Long Whisker Loyalty
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.864864865
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
New
Searing Gaze
Searing Gaze
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.546666667
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Searing Gaze that play both.
New
Hunt's End
Hunt's End
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.816091954
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Hunt's End that play both.
New
Endear Devotion
Endear Devotion
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.795180723
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Endear Devotion that play both.
New
Blistering Blade
Blistering Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.500000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Blistering Blade that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.531531532
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
New
Stabbing Pain
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.309859155
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Stabbing Pain that play both.
New
Imperial Intent
Imperial Intent
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.368421053
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Imperial Intent that play both.
New
Jagged Edge
Jagged Edge
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Jagged Edge that play both.
New
Provoke
Provoke
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Provoke that play both.
New
Sisters of Fire
Sisters of Fire
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.393442623
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Sisters of Fire that play both.
New
Sizzling Steel
Sizzling Steel
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.370370370
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Sizzling Steel that play both.
New
Dynastic Dedication
Dynastic Dedication
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.346938776
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Dynastic Dedication that play both.
New
Brothers of Flame
Brothers of Flame
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.357142857
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Brothers of Flame that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Scar Tissue (Yellow) that play both.
Blade Flurry
Blade Flurry
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Blade Flurry that play both.
New
Scalding Iron
Scalding Iron
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.394736842
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Scalding Iron that play both.
New
Incision (Blue)
Incision (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Incision (Blue) that play both.
New
Perforate
Perforate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Perforate that play both.
New
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Scar Tissue (Blue) that play both.
New
Nip at the Heels
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Nip at the Heels that play both.
New
Exposed
Exposed
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Exposed that play both.
Defense Reaction
New
Smoke Out
Smoke Out
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.375796178
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Smoke Out that play both.
New
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.694444444
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.547619048
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
New
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.511627907
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Den of the Spider that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and That All You Got? that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
New
Drop of Dragon Blood
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
New
Pledge Fealty
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.510204082
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Pledge Fealty that play both.
New
Tooth of the Dragon
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.533333333
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
New
Proclaim Vengeance
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.507246377
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
New
Rake Over the Coals
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Arcane Polarity (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Arcane Polarity (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Blood of the Dracai
Blood of the Dracai
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Realm and Blood of the Dracai that play both.