For the Emperor
Draconic Generic Attack Action - Attack
When this attacks a marked hero, create a Fealty token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.262.264408353
Average Defense Value:
2.712.706293908
Hero
Equipment
Robe of Autumn's Fall
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Robe of Autumn's Fall that play both.
Braveforge Bracers
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Braveforge Bracers that play both.
Valiant Dynamo
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Valiant Dynamo that play both.
Crown of Providence
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Crown of Providence that play both.
Grains of Bloodspill
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Grains of Bloodspill that play both.
Old Knocker
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Old Knocker that play both.
Kabuto of Imperial Authority
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Kabuto of Imperial Authority that play both.
Nullrune Hood
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Gallantry Gold
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Gallantry Gold that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Dragonscaler Flight Path
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Dragonscaler Flight Path that play both.
Balance of Justice
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Balance of Justice that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
Nullrune Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Flamescale Furnace
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Flamescale Furnace that play both.
Arcanite Skullcap
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Arcanite Skullcap that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Blade Beckoner Helm
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Blade Beckoner Helm that play both.
Refraction Bolters
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Refraction Bolters that play both.
Spell Fray Gloves
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Spell Fray Gloves that play both.
Arcanite Fortress
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Arcanite Fortress that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Coat of Allegiance
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Coat of Allegiance that play both.
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Blade Beckoner Gauntlets
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Blade Beckoner Gauntlets that play both.
Blossom of Spring
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Blossom of Spring that play both.
Weapon
Obsidian Fire Vein
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Obsidian Fire Vein that play both.
Claw of Vynserakai
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Claw of Vynserakai that play both.
Kunai of Retribution
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Kunai of Retribution that play both.
Quicksilver Dagger
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Quicksilver Dagger that play both.
Action
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played:
2.882.875000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played:
2.832.833759591
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Twist and Turn (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Twist and Turn (Yellow) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Twist and Turn (Red) that play both.
Imperial Seal of Command
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Imperial Seal of Command that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Red)
Avg. played:
2.532.534810127
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Sworn Vengeance (Red) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Cut from the Same Cloth (Yellow) that play both.
Sworn Vengeance (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.382.375000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Sworn Vengeance (Blue) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Public Bounty (Red)
Avg. played:
2.042.043824701
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Public Bounty (Red) that play both.
Cut Deep (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Cut Deep (Red) that play both.
Twist and Turn (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Twist and Turn (Blue) that play both.
Hunt a Killer (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Hunt a Killer (Blue) that play both.
Hunt a Killer (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Hunt a Killer (Red) that play both.
Sharpened Senses
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Sharpened Senses that play both.
Cut Deep (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Cut Deep (Blue) that play both.
Tome of Imperial Flame
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Tome of Imperial Flame that play both.
Power Stance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Power Stance that play both.
Point of Engagement (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Point of Engagement (Blue) that play both.
Flying High (Yellow)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Flying High (Yellow) that play both.
Diamond Amulet
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Diamond Amulet that play both.
Attack Action
Call for Backup
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Call for Backup that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
For the Dracai
Avg. played:
2.692.690607735
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and For the Dracai that play both.
Blaze Headlong
Avg. played:
2.592.586805556
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Blaze Headlong that play both.
Oath of Loyalty
Avg. played:
2.832.827763496
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Oath of Loyalty that play both.
Hunt the Hunter
Avg. played:
2.522.516411379
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Hunt the Hunter that play both.
Hunt to the Ends of Rathe
Avg. played:
2.672.671111111
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Hunt to the Ends of Rathe that play both.
Tip-Off (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.442.439613527
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Tip-Off (Blue) that play both.
March of Loyalty
Avg. played:
2.652.648809524
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and March of Loyalty that play both.
Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Pursue to the Edge of Oblivion that play both.
For the Realm
Avg. played:
2.462.460431655
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and For the Realm that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Command and Conquer that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Rally the Coast Guard (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Affirm Loyalty
Avg. played:
2.872.871012483
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Affirm Loyalty that play both.
Long Whisker Loyalty
Avg. played:
2.892.893430657
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Long Whisker Loyalty that play both.
Searing Gaze
Avg. played:
2.692.694835681
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Searing Gaze that play both.
Fire and Brimstone
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Fire and Brimstone that play both.
Hunt's End
Avg. played:
2.852.848585691
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Hunt's End that play both.
Blistering Blade
Avg. played:
2.672.668965517
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Blistering Blade that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.716981132
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Glint the Quicksilver
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Glint the Quicksilver that play both.
Imperial Intent
Avg. played:
2.592.591194969
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Imperial Intent that play both.
Endear Devotion
Avg. played:
2.762.760330579
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Endear Devotion that play both.
Perforate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Perforate that play both.
Jagged Edge
Avg. played:
2.822.823529412
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Jagged Edge that play both.
Scar Tissue (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.762.757785467
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Scar Tissue (Yellow) that play both.
Provoke
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Provoke that play both.
Blade Flurry
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Blade Flurry that play both.
Stabbing Pain
Avg. played:
2.362.357758621
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Stabbing Pain that play both.
Sisters of Fire
Avg. played:
2.352.354838710
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Sisters of Fire that play both.
Dynastic Dedication
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Dynastic Dedication that play both.
Sizzling Steel
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Sizzling Steel that play both.
Scalding Iron
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Scalding Iron that play both.
Brothers of Flame
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Brothers of Flame that play both.
Incision (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Incision (Blue) that play both.
Nip at the Heels
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Nip at the Heels that play both.
Scar Tissue (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Scar Tissue (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.774122807
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Smoke Out
Avg. played:
2.312.309489051
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Smoke Out that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
That All You Got?
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and That All You Got? that play both.
Loyalty Beyond the Grave
Avg. played:
2.752.746478873
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Loyalty Beyond the Grave that play both.
Den of the Spider
Avg. played:
2.522.520737327
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Den of the Spider that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
On the Horizon (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and On the Horizon (Red) that play both.
Instant
Tooth of the Dragon
Avg. played:
2.672.667128988
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Tooth of the Dragon that play both.
Pledge Fealty
Avg. played:
2.472.466257669
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Pledge Fealty that play both.
Drop of Dragon Blood
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Drop of Dragon Blood that play both.
Proclaim Vengeance
Avg. played:
2.262.260061920
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Proclaim Vengeance that play both.
Rake Over the Coals
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Rake Over the Coals that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Escalate Bloodshed
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both For the Emperor and Escalate Bloodshed that play both.