Mark of the Beast
Shadow Brute Attack Action - Attack
If Mark of the Beast would be put into your graveyard from anywhere, instead banish it.
Blood Debt (At the beginning of your end phase, if Mark of the Beast is in your banished zone, lose 1[Life].)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
4.894.889162132
Average Defense Value:
2.392.386251419
Hero
Equipment
Scowling Flesh Bag
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Carrion Husk
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Carrion Husk that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Savage Sash
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Savage Sash that play both.
Spoiled Skull
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Spoiled Skull that play both.
Hooves of the Shadowbeast
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hooves of the Shadowbeast that play both.
Grasp of Darkness
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Grasp of Darkness that play both.
Skullhorn
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Skullhorn that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Cloak of Darkness
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Cloak of Darkness that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Crown of Providence that play both.
Arcane Lantern
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Dance of Darkness
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dance of Darkness that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Ebon Fold
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ebon Fold that play both.
Hide Tanner
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hide Tanner that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Mandible Claw that play both.
Hexagore, the Death Hydra
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hexagore, the Death Hydra that play both.
Ravenous Meataxe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ravenous Meataxe that play both.
Hell Hammer
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hell Hammer that play both.
Ball Breaker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ball Breaker that play both.
Action
Shadowrealm Horror
Avg. played:
2.822.824352800
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shadowrealm Horror that play both.
Call to the Grave
Avg. played:
2.812.812801626
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Call to the Grave that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:
2.802.801287873
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Howl from Beyond (Red)
Avg. played:
1.181.176330303
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Howl from Beyond (Red) that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played:
2.522.521387529
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.585951607
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.142.136147129
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue) that play both.
Tear Limb from Limb
Avg. played:
2.092.086449103
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Tear Limb from Limb that play both.
Unworldly Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.587713068
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Unworldly Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Blood Dripping Frenzy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Blood Dripping Frenzy that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played:
2.512.506108202
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Attack Action
Soul Harvest
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Soul Harvest that play both.
Dread Screamer (Red)
Avg. played:
2.802.800794468
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Rumbler (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.802.800547695
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Deadwood Rumbler (Blue) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.802.804539529
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Boneyard Marauder (Red)
Avg. played:
2.802.798984147
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Boneyard Marauder (Red) that play both.
Endless Maw (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.794235710
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Endless Maw (Red) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played:
2.792.790958976
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Beast Within that play both.
Dread Screamer (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.792210081
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Blue) that play both.
Graveling Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.702.698817840
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Graveling Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
2.742.741579673
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Swing Big that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.572.565761711
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Deep Rooted Evil
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Deep Rooted Evil that play both.
Slithering Shadowpede
Avg. played:
2.712.710726049
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Slithering Shadowpede that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played:
2.622.621087315
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Sea Legs that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.422.417752443
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.360759494
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.635950563
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Graveling Growl (Red)
Avg. played:
2.262.255442085
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Graveling Growl (Red) that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Writhing Beast Hulk (Red)
Avg. played:
2.052.048848878
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Writhing Beast Hulk (Red) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played:
2.192.191802536
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Send Packing that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.412.410847747
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Command and Conquer that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.596971721
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red) that play both.
Diabolic Offering
Avg. played:
2.102.096409247
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Diabolic Offering that play both.
Shadow of Blasmophet
Avg. played:
1.651.652141434
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shadow of Blasmophet that play both.
Shaden Death Hydra
Avg. played:
1.871.868049010
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shaden Death Hydra that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.557082856
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Clash of Agility (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Clash of Agility (Blue) that play both.
Smashing Performance
Avg. played:
2.352.349299926
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Smashing Performance that play both.
Dread Screamer (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.602.597718254
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Yellow) that play both.
Ram Raider (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ram Raider (Red) that play both.
Hungering Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hungering Demigon (Red) that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:
1.471.469088670
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Reckless Swing that play both.
Guardian of the Shadowrealm
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Guardian of the Shadowrealm that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Instant
Doomsday
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Doomsday that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played:
2.772.774007876
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Art of War that play both.
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Eye of Ophidia that play both.
