Mark of the Beast
Shadow Brute Attack Action - Attack
If Mark of the Beast would be put into your graveyard from anywhere, instead banish it.
Blood Debt (At the beginning of your end phase, if Mark of the Beast is in your banished zone, lose 1[Life].)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
4.894.891624185
Average Defense Value:
2.392.385188663
Hero
Equipment
Scowling Flesh Bag
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Carrion Husk
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Carrion Husk that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Savage Sash
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Savage Sash that play both.
Spoiled Skull
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Spoiled Skull that play both.
Grasp of Darkness
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Grasp of Darkness that play both.
Hooves of the Shadowbeast
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hooves of the Shadowbeast that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Skullhorn
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Skullhorn that play both.
Cloak of Darkness
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Cloak of Darkness that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Crown of Providence that play both.
Arcane Lantern
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Dance of Darkness
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dance of Darkness that play both.
Base of the Mountain
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Base of the Mountain that play both.
Sunkwater Lookout
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Sunkwater Lookout that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Ebon Fold
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ebon Fold that play both.
Hide Tanner
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hide Tanner that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Mandible Claw that play both.
Hexagore, the Death Hydra
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hexagore, the Death Hydra that play both.
Ravenous Meataxe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ravenous Meataxe that play both.
Hell Hammer
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hell Hammer that play both.
Ball Breaker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ball Breaker that play both.
Action
Shadowrealm Horror
Avg. played:
2.822.819013394
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shadowrealm Horror that play both.
Call to the Grave
Avg. played:
2.812.812642369
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Call to the Grave that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:
2.802.799002751
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Howl from Beyond (Red)
Avg. played:
1.181.182875098
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Howl from Beyond (Red) that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played:
2.512.506532203
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.589861751
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.152.154702131
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue) that play both.
Tear Limb from Limb
Avg. played:
2.052.051703878
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Tear Limb from Limb that play both.
Unworldly Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.582.577378678
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Unworldly Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played:
2.512.508896797
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Blood Dripping Frenzy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Blood Dripping Frenzy that play both.
Attack Action
Soul Harvest
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Soul Harvest that play both.
Dread Screamer (Red)
Avg. played:
2.802.797597184
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Rumbler (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.802.796975216
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Deadwood Rumbler (Blue) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.802.801706267
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Boneyard Marauder (Red)
Avg. played:
2.802.796013129
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Boneyard Marauder (Red) that play both.
Endless Maw (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.791513532
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Endless Maw (Red) that play both.
Dread Screamer (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.793868350
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Blue) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played:
2.792.786903138
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Beast Within that play both.
Graveling Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.692.694742740
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Graveling Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
2.742.737479475
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Swing Big that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played:
2.522.516934046
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Sea Legs that play both.
Call for Backup
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Call for Backup that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.582.576986383
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Deep Rooted Evil
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Deep Rooted Evil that play both.
Slithering Shadowpede
Avg. played:
2.712.710347814
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Slithering Shadowpede that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.432.425382744
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:
2.362.359412232
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.636140483
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Graveling Growl (Red)
Avg. played:
2.282.277886224
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Graveling Growl (Red) that play both.
Writhing Beast Hulk (Red)
Avg. played:
2.082.078554958
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Writhing Beast Hulk (Red) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played:
2.192.189416998
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Send Packing that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.412.413800562
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Command and Conquer that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.595409541
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red) that play both.
Diabolic Offering
Avg. played:
2.102.099070161
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Diabolic Offering that play both.
Shadow of Blasmophet
Avg. played:
1.651.647058824
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shadow of Blasmophet that play both.
Shaden Death Hydra
Avg. played:
1.871.870325983
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shaden Death Hydra that play both.
Clash of Agility (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Clash of Agility (Blue) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.558291651
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Smashing Performance
Avg. played:
2.352.346468401
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Smashing Performance that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played:
2.122.123287671
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Dread Screamer (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.602.596500000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Yellow) that play both.
Ram Raider (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ram Raider (Red) that play both.
Hungering Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hungering Demigon (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:
1.471.472460839
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Reckless Swing that play both.
Guardian of the Shadowrealm
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Guardian of the Shadowrealm that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Instant
Doomsday
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Doomsday that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played:
2.772.774037003
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Art of War that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Eye of Ophidia that play both.