banner
Mark of the Beast
11895 decks (1.932%)
Price History
Mark of the Beast
Shadow Brute Attack Action - Attack
If Mark of the Beast would be put into your graveyard from anywhere, instead banish it. Blood Debt (At the beginning of your end phase, if Mark of the Beast is in your banished zone, lose 1[Life].)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value: 
4.894.891726935
Average Defense Value:  
2.382.384186325
Hero
Levia
Levia
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Levia that play both.
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Levia, Shadowborn Abomination that play both.
Equipment
Carrion Husk
Carrion Husk
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Carrion Husk that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Savage Sash
Savage Sash
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Savage Sash that play both.
Spoiled Skull
Spoiled Skull
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Spoiled Skull that play both.
Grasp of Darkness
Grasp of Darkness
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Grasp of Darkness that play both.
Hooves of the Shadowbeast
Hooves of the Shadowbeast
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hooves of the Shadowbeast that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
Gambler's Gloves
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Skullhorn
Skullhorn
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Skullhorn that play both.
Cloak of Darkness
Cloak of Darkness
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Cloak of Darkness that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Crown of Providence that play both.
New
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Dance of Darkness
Dance of Darkness
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dance of Darkness that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Ebon Fold
Ebon Fold
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ebon Fold that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
Barkbone Strapping
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Hide Tanner
Hide Tanner
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hide Tanner that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
Mandible Claw
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Mandible Claw that play both.
Hexagore, the Death Hydra
Hexagore, the Death Hydra
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hexagore, the Death Hydra that play both.
Ravenous Meataxe
Ravenous Meataxe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ravenous Meataxe that play both.
Hell Hammer
Hell Hammer
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hell Hammer that play both.
Ball Breaker
Ball Breaker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ball Breaker that play both.
Mini Meataxe
Mini Meataxe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Mini Meataxe that play both.
Action
Shadowrealm Horror
Shadowrealm Horror
Avg. played:  
2.802.797011208
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shadowrealm Horror that play both.
Call to the Grave
Call to the Grave
Avg. played:  
2.792.790167866
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Call to the Grave that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:  
2.792.787336413
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Howl from Beyond (Red)
Howl from Beyond (Red)
Avg. played:  
1.191.190686188
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Howl from Beyond (Red) that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played:  
2.502.498141264
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.612.609514170
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue)
Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.212.208935417
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue) that play both.
Tear Limb from Limb
Tear Limb from Limb
Avg. played:  
2.042.036166843
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Tear Limb from Limb that play both.
Unworldly Bellow (Blue)
Unworldly Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.602.596439169
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Unworldly Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Blood Dripping Frenzy
Blood Dripping Frenzy
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Blood Dripping Frenzy that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played:  
2.562.559766764
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Attack Action
Soul Harvest
Soul Harvest
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Soul Harvest that play both.
Dread Screamer (Red)
Dread Screamer (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.792.786730261
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Red) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.792.790809084
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Deadwood Rumbler (Blue)
Deadwood Rumbler (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.792.786175197
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Deadwood Rumbler (Blue) that play both.
Boneyard Marauder (Red)
Boneyard Marauder (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.782.783935743
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Boneyard Marauder (Red) that play both.
Endless Maw (Red)
Endless Maw (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.782.784169992
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Endless Maw (Red) that play both.
Dread Screamer (Blue)
Dread Screamer (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.792.789295325
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Blue) that play both.
Beast Within
Beast Within
Avg. played:  
2.772.773197990
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Beast Within that play both.
Graveling Growl (Yellow)
Graveling Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.682.678729224
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Graveling Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Swing Big
Swing Big
Avg. played:  
2.732.730135104
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Swing Big that play both.
Slithering Shadowpede
Slithering Shadowpede
Avg. played:  
2.712.707461801
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Slithering Shadowpede that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.572.568311874
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Deep Rooted Evil
Deep Rooted Evil
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Deep Rooted Evil that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow)
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.402.404450895
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.342.338224285
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Graveling Growl (Red)
Graveling Growl (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.292.285393930
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Graveling Growl (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.632.629504505
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Writhing Beast Hulk (Red)
Writhing Beast Hulk (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.102.104245829
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Writhing Beast Hulk (Red) that play both.
New
Thick Hide Hunter
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played:  
2.092.093023256
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:  
2.432.425779432
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Command and Conquer that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red)
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.592.585562847
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red) that play both.
Send Packing
Send Packing
Avg. played:  
2.162.157118548
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Send Packing that play both.
Diabolic Offering
Diabolic Offering
Avg. played:  
2.132.126781981
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Diabolic Offering that play both.
Shadow of Blasmophet
Shadow of Blasmophet
Avg. played:  
1.641.641704155
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shadow of Blasmophet that play both.
Shaden Death Hydra
Shaden Death Hydra
Avg. played:  
1.891.891321143
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shaden Death Hydra that play both.
Clash of Agility (Blue)
Clash of Agility (Blue)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Clash of Agility (Blue) that play both.
Smashing Performance
Smashing Performance
Avg. played:  
2.352.348531685
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Smashing Performance that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.542.536947967
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Dread Screamer (Yellow)
Dread Screamer (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.592.593621399
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Yellow) that play both.
Ram Raider (Red)
Ram Raider (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.612.614590502
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ram Raider (Red) that play both.
Hungering Demigon (Red)
Hungering Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hungering Demigon (Red) that play both.
Endless Maw (Blue)
Endless Maw (Blue)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Endless Maw (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reckless Swing
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:  
1.481.477572922
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Reckless Swing that play both.
Guardian of the Shadowrealm
Guardian of the Shadowrealm
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Guardian of the Shadowrealm that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:  
2.672.666666667
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Hold the Line
Hold the Line
Avg. played:  
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hold the Line that play both.
Instant
Doomsday
Doomsday
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Doomsday that play both.
Art of War
Art of War
Avg. played:  
2.772.773246081
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Art of War that play both.
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Eye of Ophidia that play both.