Mark of the Beast
Shadow Brute Attack Action - Attack
If Mark of the Beast would be put into your graveyard from anywhere, instead banish it.
Blood Debt (At the beginning of your end phase, if Mark of the Beast is in your banished zone, lose 1[Life].)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
4.874.872899753
Average Defense Value:
2.412.405359265
Hero
Equipment
Carrion Husk
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Carrion Husk that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Spoiled Skull
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Spoiled Skull that play both.
Grasp of Darkness
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Grasp of Darkness that play both.
Hooves of the Shadowbeast
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hooves of the Shadowbeast that play both.
Skullhorn
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Skullhorn that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Crown of Providence that play both.
Cloak of Darkness
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Cloak of Darkness that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Robe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Arcane Lantern
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Ebon Fold
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ebon Fold that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Nullrune Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Skull Crushers
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Skull Crushers that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Mandible Claw that play both.
Hexagore, the Death Hydra
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hexagore, the Death Hydra that play both.
Ravenous Meataxe
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ravenous Meataxe that play both.
Hell Hammer
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hell Hammer that play both.
Action
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:
2.772.773282176
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played:
2.502.495798319
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Howl from Beyond (Red)
Avg. played:
1.251.254865035
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Howl from Beyond (Red) that play both.
Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.432.428315412
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.702.701514592
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Tear Limb from Limb
Avg. played:
2.452.445645646
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Tear Limb from Limb that play both.
Unworldly Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.592.587278107
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Unworldly Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Blood Dripping Frenzy
Avg. played:
2.582.584886128
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Blood Dripping Frenzy that play both.
Unworldly Bellow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.542.543859649
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Unworldly Bellow (Red) that play both.
Argh... Smash!
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Argh... Smash! that play both.
Shadow Puppetry
Avg. played:
2.512.514905149
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shadow Puppetry that play both.
Attack Action
Soul Harvest
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Soul Harvest that play both.
Dread Screamer (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.772440708
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Red) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.776938808
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Deadwood Rumbler (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.772.773477157
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Deadwood Rumbler (Blue) that play both.
Boneyard Marauder (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.771210677
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Boneyard Marauder (Red) that play both.
Endless Maw (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.771271271
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Endless Maw (Red) that play both.
Dread Screamer (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.787942517
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Blue) that play both.
Slithering Shadowpede
Avg. played:
2.712.707981419
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Slithering Shadowpede that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
2.752.751823417
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Swing Big that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played:
2.752.749005493
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Beast Within that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.572.574445046
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Graveling Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.652.647963259
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Graveling Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Deep Rooted Evil
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Deep Rooted Evil that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.782.783703704
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Command and Conquer that play both.
Writhing Beast Hulk (Red)
Avg. played:
2.302.304042179
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Writhing Beast Hulk (Red) that play both.
Graveling Growl (Red)
Avg. played:
2.412.406654813
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Graveling Growl (Red) that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.574351978
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:
2.342.338705196
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.612.609056604
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow) that play both.
Smashing Performance
Avg. played:
2.222.223185265
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Smashing Performance that play both.
Shadow of Blasmophet
Avg. played:
1.721.716020368
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shadow of Blasmophet that play both.
Diabolic Offering
Avg. played:
2.572.574588769
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Diabolic Offering that play both.
Shaden Death Hydra
Avg. played:
2.001.996995493
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shaden Death Hydra that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played:
2.562.561036373
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played:
2.022.023783784
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Send Packing that play both.
Dread Screamer (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.592.594610778
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Yellow) that play both.
Ram Raider (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.608030593
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ram Raider (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
2.512.509062254
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Endless Maw (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Endless Maw (Blue) that play both.
Shaden Swing (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shaden Swing (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:
1.701.697041890
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Reckless Swing that play both.
Guardian of the Shadowrealm
Avg. played:
1.211.208868145
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Guardian of the Shadowrealm that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.652.653946227
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hold the Line that play both.
Expendable Limbs
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Expendable Limbs that play both.
Instant
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Eye of Ophidia that play both.