Mark of the Beast
Shadow Brute Attack Action - Attack
If Mark of the Beast would be put into your graveyard from anywhere, instead banish it.
Blood Debt (At the beginning of your end phase, if Mark of the Beast is in your banished zone, lose 1[Life].)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
4.904.900555263
Average Defense Value:
2.392.386619412
Hero
Equipment
Carrion Husk
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Carrion Husk that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Savage Sash
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Savage Sash that play both.
Spoiled Skull
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Spoiled Skull that play both.
Grasp of Darkness
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Grasp of Darkness that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Hooves of the Shadowbeast
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hooves of the Shadowbeast that play both.
Skullhorn
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Skullhorn that play both.
Cloak of Darkness
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Cloak of Darkness that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcane Lantern
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Robe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Ebon Fold
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ebon Fold that play both.
Dance of Darkness
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dance of Darkness that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Nullrune Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Hide Tanner
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hide Tanner that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Mandible Claw that play both.
Hexagore, the Death Hydra
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hexagore, the Death Hydra that play both.
Ravenous Meataxe
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ravenous Meataxe that play both.
Hell Hammer
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hell Hammer that play both.
Ball Breaker
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ball Breaker that play both.
Mini Meataxe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Mini Meataxe that play both.
Action
Call to the Grave
Avg. played:
2.852.847918437
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Call to the Grave that play both.
Shadowrealm Horror
Avg. played:
2.812.809102402
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shadowrealm Horror that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:
2.792.791553749
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Howl from Beyond (Red)
Avg. played:
1.191.193432961
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Howl from Beyond (Red) that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played:
2.502.504319333
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.642.635527247
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.252.254585705
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue) that play both.
Tear Limb from Limb
Avg. played:
2.042.037763466
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Tear Limb from Limb that play both.
Unworldly Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.602.597039474
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Unworldly Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Blood Dripping Frenzy
Avg. played:
2.592.590381426
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Blood Dripping Frenzy that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.482.484693878
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and The Weakest Link that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Unworldly Bellow (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Unworldly Bellow (Red) that play both.
Attack Action
Soul Harvest
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Soul Harvest that play both.
Dread Screamer (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.789034565
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Red) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.794385747
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Deadwood Rumbler (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.792.788885439
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Deadwood Rumbler (Blue) that play both.
Boneyard Marauder (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.787970395
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Boneyard Marauder (Red) that play both.
Endless Maw (Red)
Avg. played:
2.792.788448988
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Endless Maw (Red) that play both.
Dread Screamer (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.802.802123773
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Blue) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played:
2.772.773603200
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Beast Within that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
2.732.730586371
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Swing Big that play both.
Graveling Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.672.670206121
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Graveling Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Slithering Shadowpede
Avg. played:
2.712.707075399
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Slithering Shadowpede that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.432.434541009
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Deep Rooted Evil
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Deep Rooted Evil that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:
2.322.315080476
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Graveling Growl (Red)
Avg. played:
2.292.293218085
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Graveling Growl (Red) that play both.
Writhing Beast Hulk (Red)
Avg. played:
2.122.122577172
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Writhing Beast Hulk (Red) that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.372.368613139
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.432.432533733
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Command and Conquer that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.580208627
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
2.612.613341382
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Diabolic Offering
Avg. played:
2.162.161599626
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Diabolic Offering that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Shaden Death Hydra
Avg. played:
1.901.898513436
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shaden Death Hydra that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played:
2.122.121002907
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Send Packing that play both.
Shadow of Blasmophet
Avg. played:
1.651.645364536
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shadow of Blasmophet that play both.
Smashing Performance
Avg. played:
2.352.349639134
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Smashing Performance that play both.
Clash of Agility (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Clash of Agility (Blue) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played:
2.232.233393178
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Dread Screamer (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.592.594860580
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Yellow) that play both.
Ram Raider (Red)
Avg. played:
2.602.598166539
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ram Raider (Red) that play both.
Hungering Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hungering Demigon (Red) that play both.
Endless Maw (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Endless Maw (Blue) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:
1.501.498213453
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Reckless Swing that play both.
Guardian of the Shadowrealm
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Guardian of the Shadowrealm that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Hold the Line
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hold the Line that play both.
Instant
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Eye of Ophidia that play both.