banner
Mark of the Beast
14272 decks (1.879%)
Price History
Mark of the Beast
Shadow Brute Attack Action - Attack
If Mark of the Beast would be put into your graveyard from anywhere, instead banish it. Blood Debt (At the beginning of your end phase, if Mark of the Beast is in your banished zone, lose 1[Life].)
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value: 
4.894.888767042
Average Defense Value:  
2.392.385639312
Hero
Levia
Levia
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Levia that play both.
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Levia, Shadowborn Abomination that play both.
Equipment
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Carrion Husk
Carrion Husk
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Carrion Husk that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Savage Sash
Savage Sash
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Savage Sash that play both.
Spoiled Skull
Spoiled Skull
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Spoiled Skull that play both.
Hooves of the Shadowbeast
Hooves of the Shadowbeast
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hooves of the Shadowbeast that play both.
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex that play both.
Grasp of Darkness
Grasp of Darkness
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Grasp of Darkness that play both.
Skullhorn
Skullhorn
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Skullhorn that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
Gambler's Gloves
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Cloak of Darkness
Cloak of Darkness
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Cloak of Darkness that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Crown of Providence that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
New
Embraforged Gauntlet
Embraforged Gauntlet
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Embraforged Gauntlet that play both.
Dance of Darkness
Dance of Darkness
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dance of Darkness that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
Goliath Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Ebon Fold
Ebon Fold
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ebon Fold that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
Barkbone Strapping
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Hide Tanner
Hide Tanner
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hide Tanner that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
Mandible Claw
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Mandible Claw that play both.
Hexagore, the Death Hydra
Hexagore, the Death Hydra
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hexagore, the Death Hydra that play both.
Ravenous Meataxe
Ravenous Meataxe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ravenous Meataxe that play both.
Hell Hammer
Hell Hammer
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hell Hammer that play both.
Ball Breaker
Ball Breaker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ball Breaker that play both.
Action
Shadowrealm Horror
Shadowrealm Horror
Avg. played:  
2.832.833356751
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shadowrealm Horror that play both.
New
Pound of Flesh
Pound of Flesh
Avg. played:  
2.892.890410959
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Pound of Flesh that play both.
Call to the Grave
Call to the Grave
Avg. played:  
2.812.812979763
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Call to the Grave that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:  
2.812.805313275
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Howl from Beyond (Red)
Howl from Beyond (Red)
Avg. played:  
1.171.171574904
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Howl from Beyond (Red) that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played:  
2.532.529817444
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.582.584791146
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue)
Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.122.123637779
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue) that play both.
Tear Limb from Limb
Tear Limb from Limb
Avg. played:  
2.102.102788520
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Tear Limb from Limb that play both.
Unworldly Bellow (Blue)
Unworldly Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.592.589055065
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Unworldly Bellow (Blue) that play both.
New
Fasting Carcass (Blue)
Fasting Carcass (Blue)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Fasting Carcass (Blue) that play both.
Blood Dripping Frenzy
Blood Dripping Frenzy
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Blood Dripping Frenzy that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played:  
2.512.507718696
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Attack Action
Soul Harvest
Soul Harvest
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Soul Harvest that play both.
Dread Screamer (Red)
Dread Screamer (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.812.806238454
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Rumbler (Blue)
Deadwood Rumbler (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.812.806006315
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Deadwood Rumbler (Blue) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.812.810042213
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Boneyard Marauder (Red)
Boneyard Marauder (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.802.804178128
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Boneyard Marauder (Red) that play both.
Endless Maw (Red)
Endless Maw (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.802.798215671
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Endless Maw (Red) that play both.
Beast Within
Beast Within
Avg. played:  
2.802.796739770
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Beast Within that play both.
Dread Screamer (Blue)
Dread Screamer (Blue)
Avg. played:  
2.792.791634458
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Blue) that play both.
New
Rockyard Rodeo
Rockyard Rodeo
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Rockyard Rodeo that play both.
Graveling Growl (Yellow)
Graveling Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.702.704690464
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Graveling Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Swing Big
Swing Big
Avg. played:  
2.752.746590367
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Swing Big that play both.
Show of Strength
Show of Strength
Avg. played:  
2.792.794908062
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Show of Strength that play both.
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.852.845614035
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Vigorous Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
Deep Rooted Evil
Deep Rooted Evil
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Deep Rooted Evil that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.572.566068078
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Slithering Shadowpede
Slithering Shadowpede
Avg. played:  
2.712.711362032
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Slithering Shadowpede that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow)
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.412.414627798
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow) that play both.
Sea Legs
Sea Legs
Avg. played:  
2.642.635977337
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Sea Legs that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.642.642943933
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.362.364462393
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Graveling Growl (Red)
Graveling Growl (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.242.242064010
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Graveling Growl (Red) that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Writhing Beast Hulk (Red)
Writhing Beast Hulk (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.032.031953002
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Writhing Beast Hulk (Red) that play both.
Send Packing
Send Packing
Avg. played:  
2.202.198815010
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Send Packing that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red)
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.602.596195890
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:  
2.412.407290350
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Command and Conquer that play both.
New
Depths of Despair (Yellow)
Depths of Despair (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Depths of Despair (Yellow) that play both.
Diabolic Offering
Diabolic Offering
Avg. played:  
2.102.098627111
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Diabolic Offering that play both.
Shadow of Blasmophet
Shadow of Blasmophet
Avg. played:  
1.661.658542530
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shadow of Blasmophet that play both.
Shaden Death Hydra
Shaden Death Hydra
Avg. played:  
1.861.861911294
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Shaden Death Hydra that play both.
Reckless Stampede
Reckless Stampede
Avg. played:  
2.432.425742574
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Reckless Stampede that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played:  
2.562.559334845
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Clash of Agility (Blue)
Clash of Agility (Blue)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Clash of Agility (Blue) that play both.
Smashing Performance
Smashing Performance
Avg. played:  
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Smashing Performance that play both.
Dread Screamer (Yellow)
Dread Screamer (Yellow)
Avg. played:  
2.602.601173021
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Dread Screamer (Yellow) that play both.
Bare Destruction
Bare Destruction
Avg. played:  
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Bare Destruction that play both.
Hungering Demigon (Red)
Hungering Demigon (Red)
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Hungering Demigon (Red) that play both.
Ram Raider (Red)
Ram Raider (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Ram Raider (Red) that play both.
Strongest Survive (Red)
Strongest Survive (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Strongest Survive (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
New
Engulfing Shadows
Engulfing Shadows
Avg. played:  
2.922.916666667
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Engulfing Shadows that play both.
Reckless Swing
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:  
1.471.465001207
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Reckless Swing that play both.
Guardian of the Shadowrealm
Guardian of the Shadowrealm
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Guardian of the Shadowrealm that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:  
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Instant
Doomsday
Doomsday
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Doomsday that play both.
Art of War
Art of War
Avg. played:  
2.772.773905137
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Art of War that play both.
Visit the Boneyard
Visit the Boneyard
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Visit the Boneyard that play both.
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played:  
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Mark of the Beast and Eye of Ophidia that play both.