Beast Within
Brute Attack Action - Attack
If Beast Within is put into a graveyard from anywhere other than the combat chain, banish the top card of your deck and lose 1[Life]. If it has 6 or more [Power], put it into your hand, otherwise repeat this process.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
4.784.783112810
Average Defense Value:
2.462.456136376
Hero
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Levia, Shadowborn Abomination that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Rhinar
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Rhinar that play both.
Levia
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Levia that play both.
Equipment
Scowling Flesh Bag
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Savage Sash
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Savage Sash that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Skullhorn
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Skullhorn that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Beaten Trackers
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Carrion Husk
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Carrion Husk that play both.
Spoiled Skull
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Spoiled Skull that play both.
Crown of Providence
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Crown of Providence that play both.
Grasp of Darkness
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Grasp of Darkness that play both.
Hooves of the Shadowbeast
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Hooves of the Shadowbeast that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Cloak of Darkness
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Cloak of Darkness that play both.
Nullrune Boots
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Skull Crushers
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Skull Crushers that play both.
Arcane Lantern
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Arcane Lantern that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Hide Tanner
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Hide Tanner that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Mandible Claw that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Romping Club
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Romping Club that play both.
Ball Breaker
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Ball Breaker that play both.
Ravenous Meataxe
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Ravenous Meataxe that play both.
Action
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:
2.772.766130113
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.668733911
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Shadowrealm Horror
Avg. played:
2.842.836421725
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Shadowrealm Horror that play both.
Call to the Grave
Avg. played:
2.812.808230985
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Call to the Grave that play both.
Cast Bones
Avg. played:
2.652.648562864
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Cast Bones that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played:
2.572.572951187
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.590015848
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.602.599263201
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and The Weakest Link that play both.
Sand Sketched Plan
Avg. played:
2.612.610341564
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Sand Sketched Plan that play both.
Howl from Beyond (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Howl from Beyond (Red) that play both.
Tear Limb from Limb
Avg. played:
2.072.072664619
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Tear Limb from Limb that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.562.562140196
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
High Roller (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.582.580282394
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and High Roller (Blue) that play both.
Dig Up Dinner
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Dig Up Dinner that play both.
Argh... Smash!
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Argh... Smash! that play both.
Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.492.494204720
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue) that play both.
Berserk
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Berserk that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.772.766423358
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
2.752.750520413
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Swing Big that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played:
2.722.721767656
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Send Packing that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.692.685132559
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.697865646
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.640023176
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.772.769765452
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Command and Conquer that play both.
Run Roughshod
Avg. played:
2.762.757905574
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Run Roughshod that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.802.796052632
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played:
2.732.729698376
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Sea Legs that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.637276036
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Soul Harvest
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Soul Harvest that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.721228264
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.802.801437626
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Splatter Skull
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Splatter Skull that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.682.684705137
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.742.735421500
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Dread Screamer (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.818901184
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Dread Screamer (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Rumbler (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.822.819081967
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Deadwood Rumbler (Blue) that play both.
Boneyard Marauder (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Boneyard Marauder (Red) that play both.
Endless Maw (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Endless Maw (Red) that play both.
Dread Screamer (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Dread Screamer (Blue) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.772.768481874
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Skull Crack
Avg. played:
2.612.612496666
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Skull Crack that play both.
Graveling Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.722.717944676
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Graveling Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played:
2.702.703288158
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Runner Runner that play both.
Clash of Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
2.732.733740568
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Clash of Agility (Red) that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played:
2.282.283235102
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Slithering Shadowpede
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Slithering Shadowpede that play both.
Massacre
Avg. played:
2.462.461237837
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Massacre that play both.
Alpha Rampage
Avg. played:
2.472.465302491
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Alpha Rampage that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.602.598825473
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Deep Rooted Evil
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Deep Rooted Evil that play both.
Show No Mercy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Show No Mercy that play both.
Savage Beatdown
Avg. played:
2.072.070919207
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Savage Beatdown that play both.
Mark of the Beast
Avg. played:
2.552.547619048
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Mark of the Beast that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Riled Up (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Riled Up (Blue) that play both.
Smashing Performance
Avg. played:
2.362.362033685
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Smashing Performance that play both.
Pack Call (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Pack Call (Blue) that play both.
Bam Bam
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Bam Bam that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.612.611568090
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Erase Face that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.622.615519332
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow) that play both.
Reincarnate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.602.604480956
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Reincarnate (Yellow) that play both.
Strength Rules All
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Strength Rules All that play both.
Reincarnate (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Reincarnate (Blue) that play both.
Graveling Growl (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.475185563
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Graveling Growl (Red) that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Writhing Beast Hulk (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Writhing Beast Hulk (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Bare Fangs (Yellow) that play both.
Pack Call (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Pack Call (Yellow) that play both.
Pulping (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Pulping (Yellow) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Savage Swing (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Savage Swing (Yellow) that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red) that play both.
Diabolic Offering
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Diabolic Offering that play both.
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Assault and Battery (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:
1.861.857436548
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Reckless Swing that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Guardian of the Shadowrealm
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Guardian of the Shadowrealm that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Instant
Doomsday
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Doomsday that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Art of War that play both.
No Fear
Avg. played:
2.342.339412502
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and No Fear that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Eye of Ophidia that play both.