Beast Within
Brute Attack Action - Attack
If Beast Within is put into a graveyard from anywhere other than the combat chain, banish the top card of your deck and lose 1[Life]. If it has 6 or more [Power], put it into your hand, otherwise repeat this process.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
4.754.747097494
Average Defense Value:
2.472.472920112
Hero
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Levia, Shadowborn Abomination that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Rhinar
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Rhinar that play both.
Levia
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Levia that play both.
Equipment
Scowling Flesh Bag
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Savage Sash
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Savage Sash that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Skullhorn
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Skullhorn that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Carrion Husk
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Carrion Husk that play both.
Beaten Trackers
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Spoiled Skull
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Spoiled Skull that play both.
Grasp of Darkness
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Grasp of Darkness that play both.
Crown of Providence
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Crown of Providence that play both.
Hooves of the Shadowbeast
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Hooves of the Shadowbeast that play both.
Barkbone Strapping
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Barkbone Strapping that play both.
Cloak of Darkness
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Cloak of Darkness that play both.
Goliath Gauntlet
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Goliath Gauntlet that play both.
Skull Crushers
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Skull Crushers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Arcane Lantern
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Arcane Lantern that play both.
banned - Blitz
Heartened Cross Strap
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Heartened Cross Strap that play both.
Hide Tanner
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Hide Tanner that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Mandible Claw that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Romping Club
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Romping Club that play both.
Ball Breaker
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Ball Breaker that play both.
Ravenous Meataxe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Ravenous Meataxe that play both.
Action
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:
2.762.761066179
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Shadowrealm Horror
Avg. played:
2.832.833309770
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Shadowrealm Horror that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.672.668046624
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Call to the Grave
Avg. played:
2.812.811066800
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Call to the Grave that play both.
Cast Bones
Avg. played:
2.672.666536889
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Cast Bones that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.612.614050118
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and The Weakest Link that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played:
2.572.567076743
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played:
2.592.589440000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
Sand Sketched Plan
Avg. played:
2.602.601162271
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Sand Sketched Plan that play both.
Howl from Beyond (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Howl from Beyond (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Cycles
Avg. played:
2.682.682940516
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Sigil of Cycles that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.562.558947970
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Tear Limb from Limb
Avg. played:
2.092.089929052
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Tear Limb from Limb that play both.
High Roller (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.582.578781380
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and High Roller (Blue) that play both.
Dig Up Dinner
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Dig Up Dinner that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Trot Along that play both.
Argh... Smash!
Avg. played:
1.581.579980689
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Argh... Smash! that play both.
Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.492.494640339
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Convulsions from the Bellows of Hell (Blue) that play both.
Berserk
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Berserk that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.762.762684845
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played:
2.752.754334194
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Sea Legs that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
2.742.744397840
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Swing Big that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.692.689425797
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played:
2.732.727150538
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Send Packing that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played:
2.462.463414634
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.640252954
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.685910241
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.772.771828508
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Command and Conquer that play both.
Run Roughshod
Avg. played:
2.752.750757645
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Run Roughshod that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.802.796206353
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played:
2.642.641416832
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Splatter Skull
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Splatter Skull that play both.
Soul Harvest
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Soul Harvest that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.812.811614269
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played:
2.692.685812782
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.714494790
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Dread Screamer (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.816583254
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Dread Screamer (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Rumbler (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.822.816601118
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Deadwood Rumbler (Blue) that play both.
Boneyard Marauder (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.816134287
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Boneyard Marauder (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.752.749319048
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played:
2.282.279474432
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Endless Maw (Red)
Avg. played:
2.812.809878708
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Endless Maw (Red) that play both.
Rally the Coast Guard (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.782.778718259
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Rally the Coast Guard (Blue) that play both.
Dread Screamer (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Dread Screamer (Blue) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Skull Crack
Avg. played:
2.622.616529149
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Skull Crack that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played:
2.702.704253434
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Runner Runner that play both.
Graveling Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.712.714534450
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Graveling Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Clash of Agility (Red)
Avg. played:
2.742.735098537
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Clash of Agility (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Slithering Shadowpede
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Slithering Shadowpede that play both.
Massacre
Avg. played:
2.462.463746959
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Massacre that play both.
Alpha Rampage
Avg. played:
2.472.465695104
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Alpha Rampage that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.602.598692088
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Deep Rooted Evil
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Deep Rooted Evil that play both.
Show No Mercy
Avg. played:
2.692.690322581
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Show No Mercy that play both.
Savage Beatdown
Avg. played:
2.082.079695635
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Savage Beatdown that play both.
Riled Up (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Riled Up (Blue) that play both.
Mark of the Beast
Avg. played:
2.562.555721840
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Mark of the Beast that play both.
Smashing Performance
Avg. played:
2.362.361593625
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Smashing Performance that play both.
Bam Bam
Avg. played:
2.652.646464646
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Bam Bam that play both.
Pack Call (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Pack Call (Blue) that play both.
Call for Backup
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Call for Backup that play both.
Strength Rules All
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Strength Rules All that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.632.631449986
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow) that play both.
Reincarnate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.602.603719814
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Reincarnate (Yellow) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.612.614938253
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Erase Face that play both.
Reincarnate (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Reincarnate (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Graveling Growl (Red)
Avg. played:
2.482.478788787
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Graveling Growl (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Writhing Beast Hulk (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Writhing Beast Hulk (Red) that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Bare Fangs (Yellow) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Assault and Battery (Red) that play both.
Pack Call (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Pack Call (Yellow) that play both.
Pulping (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Pulping (Yellow) that play both.
Pound Town (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Pound Town (Blue) that play both.
Savage Swing (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Savage Swing (Yellow) that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Assault and Battery (Yellow) that play both.
Diabolic Offering
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Diabolic Offering that play both.
Rawhide Rumble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Rawhide Rumble (Red) that play both.
Captain of the Guard
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Captain of the Guard that play both.
Shadow of Blasmophet
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Shadow of Blasmophet that play both.
Barraging Big Horn (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Barraging Big Horn (Yellow) that play both.
Shaden Death Hydra
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Shaden Death Hydra that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:
1.881.875565793
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Reckless Swing that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Guardian of the Shadowrealm
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Guardian of the Shadowrealm that play both.
Instant
Doomsday
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Doomsday that play both.
Art of War
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Art of War that play both.
No Fear
Avg. played:
2.362.363202463
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and No Fear that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Remembrance that play both.
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Beast Within and Eye of Ophidia that play both.