Sigil of Cycles
Generic Action - Aura
Go again
At the beginning of your action phase, destroy this.
When this leaves the arena, discard a card then draw a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β
3.413.409347145
Average Defense Value: Β
2.622.615526641
Hero
Jarl VetreiΔi
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Jarl VetreiΔi that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Oscilio, Constella Intelligence
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Oscilio, Constella Intelligence that play both.
Equipment
Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Gauntlets of the Boreal Domain that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Skullhorn
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Skullhorn that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Root-Bound Trunks
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Root-Bound Trunks that play both.
Savage Sash
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Savage Sash that play both.
Heavy Industry Gear Shift
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Heavy Industry Gear Shift that play both.
Heavy Industry Power Plant
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Heavy Industry Power Plant that play both.
Heavy Industry Ram Stop
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Heavy Industry Ram Stop that play both.
Heavy Industry Surveillance
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Heavy Industry Surveillance that play both.
Beaten Trackers
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Storm Striders
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Storm Striders that play both.
Crown of Providence
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Crown of Providence that play both.
Arcane Lantern
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Alluvion Constellas
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Alluvion Constellas that play both.
Metacarpus Node
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Metacarpus Node that play both.
Nullrune Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Flash of Brilliance
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Flash of Brilliance that play both.
Lightning Greaves
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Lightning Greaves that play both.
Monstrous Veil
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Monstrous Veil that play both.
Weapon
Summit, the Unforgiving
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Summit, the Unforgiving that play both.
Mandible Claw
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Mandible Claw that play both.
Romping Club
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Romping Club that play both.
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
Ball Breaker
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Ball Breaker that play both.
Action
Channel Mount Isen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Channel Mount Isen that play both.
Crumble to Eternity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Crumble to Eternity that play both.
Frozen to Death
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Frozen to Death that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
Cerebellum Processor
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Cerebellum Processor that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played: Β
2.682.677304965
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
High Roller (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and High Roller (Blue) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β
2.692.694063927
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and The Weakest Link that play both.
Sand Sketched Plan
Avg. played: Β
2.332.334507042
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Sand Sketched Plan that play both.
Dig Up Dinner
Avg. played: Β
2.642.637168142
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Dig Up Dinner that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Talk a Big Game
Avg. played: Β
2.582.583815029
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Talk a Big Game that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Glyph Overlay (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Glyph Overlay (Red) that play both.
Clearing Bellow
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Clearing Bellow that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Etchings of Arcana (Red) that play both.
Destructive Aethertide
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Destructive Aethertide that play both.
Gorganian Tome
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Gorganian Tome that play both.
Argh... Smash!
Avg. played: Β
1.491.492063492
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Argh... Smash! that play both.
Etchings of Arcana (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Etchings of Arcana (Blue) that play both.
Tear Limb from Limb
Avg. played: Β
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Tear Limb from Limb that play both.
Attack Action
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Beast Within that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Swing Big that play both.
Splatter Skull
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Splatter Skull that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Send Packing that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Command and Conquer that play both.
Show No Mercy
Avg. played: Β
2.882.879818594
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Show No Mercy that play both.
Fast and Furious
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Fast and Furious that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Alpha Rampage
Avg. played: Β
2.692.694300518
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Alpha Rampage that play both.
Massacre
Avg. played: Β
2.752.749262537
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Massacre that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β
2.692.691919192
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Erase Face that play both.
Rawhide Rumble (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Rawhide Rumble (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Skull Crack
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Skull Crack that play both.
Savage Beatdown
Avg. played: Β
2.572.571428571
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Savage Beatdown that play both.
Run Roughshod
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Run Roughshod that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Assault and Battery (Yellow) that play both.
Strength Rules All
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Strength Rules All that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Runner Runner
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Runner Runner that play both.
Blast to Oblivion (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Blast to Oblivion (Red) that play both.
Clash of Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Clash of Agility (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β
2.032.027522936
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Reckless Swing that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Remembrance that play both.
Sigil of Brilliance
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Sigil of Brilliance that play both.
Sigil of Aether
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Sigil of Aether that play both.
Sigil of Lightning
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Sigil of Lightning that play both.
Sigil of Temporal Manipulation
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Sigil of Temporal Manipulation that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Kindle
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Kindle that play both.
Sigil of Forethought
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Sigil of Forethought that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Sigil of Conductivity
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Sigil of Conductivity that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Will of Arcana
Avg. played: Β
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Will of Arcana that play both.