Sigil of Cycles
Generic Action - Aura
Go again
At the beginning of your action phase, destroy this.
When this leaves the arena, discard a card then draw a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
3.913.911558305
Average Defense Value:
2.552.553127438
Hero
Ira, Scarlet Revenger
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Ira, Scarlet Revenger that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Levia, Shadowborn Abomination
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Levia, Shadowborn Abomination that play both.
Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter that play both.
Equipment
Scowling Flesh Bag
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Savage Sash
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Savage Sash that play both.
Skullhorn
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Skullhorn that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Spoiled Skull
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Spoiled Skull that play both.
Carrion Husk
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Carrion Husk that play both.
Hooves of the Shadowbeast
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Hooves of the Shadowbeast that play both.
Arcane Lantern
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Grasp of Darkness
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Grasp of Darkness that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Beaten Trackers
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Cloak of Darkness
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Cloak of Darkness that play both.
Aether Bindings of the Third Age
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Aether Bindings of the Third Age that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Compass of Sunken Depths
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Compass of Sunken Depths that play both.
Crown of Providence
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Crown of Providence that play both.
Dance of Darkness
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Dance of Darkness that play both.
Gold-Baited Hook
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Gold-Baited Hook that play both.
banned - Blitz
Storm Striders
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Storm Striders that play both.
Nullrune Hood
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Hide Tanner
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Hide Tanner that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Mandible Claw that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Romping Club
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Romping Club that play both.
Volzar, the Lightning Rod
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Volzar, the Lightning Rod that play both.
Ball Breaker
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Ball Breaker that play both.
Action
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Draw a Crowd
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Draw a Crowd that play both.
Leave a Dent
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Leave a Dent that play both.
Promising Terrain
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Promising Terrain that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.862.862092862
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
Shadowrealm Horror
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Shadowrealm Horror that play both.
Call to the Grave
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Call to the Grave that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played:
2.622.624407583
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Sand Sketched Plan
Avg. played:
2.732.729957806
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Sand Sketched Plan that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Howl from Beyond (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Howl from Beyond (Red) that play both.
High Roller (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and High Roller (Blue) that play both.
Trot Along
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Trot Along that play both.
Dig Up Dinner
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Dig Up Dinner that play both.
Talk a Big Game
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Talk a Big Game that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and The Weakest Link that play both.
Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Bonebreaker Bellow (Blue) that play both.
Portside Exchange
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Portside Exchange that play both.
Clearing Bellow
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Clearing Bellow that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Tear Limb from Limb
Avg. played:
2.482.475352113
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Tear Limb from Limb that play both.
Riggermortis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Riggermortis that play both.
Attack Action
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Beast Within that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.882.878904110
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played:
2.742.735955056
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Sea Legs that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Swing Big that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Hostile Encroachment
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Hostile Encroachment that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played:
2.852.849069607
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Send Packing that play both.
Splatter Skull
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Splatter Skull that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
2.882.877625571
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.872.870577281
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Command and Conquer that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:
2.812.810526316
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Soul Harvest
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Soul Harvest that play both.
Dread Screamer (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Dread Screamer (Red) that play both.
Deadwood Rumbler (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Deadwood Rumbler (Blue) that play both.
Boneyard Marauder (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Boneyard Marauder (Red) that play both.
Show No Mercy
Avg. played:
2.822.815492958
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Show No Mercy that play both.
Pack Hunt (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Pack Hunt (Red) that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played:
2.232.233404711
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Endless Maw (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Endless Maw (Red) that play both.
Graveling Growl (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Graveling Growl (Yellow) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Mighty Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Deep Rooted Evil
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Deep Rooted Evil that play both.
Bam Bam
Avg. played:
2.642.639344262
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Bam Bam that play both.
Alpha Rampage
Avg. played:
2.282.277005348
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Alpha Rampage that play both.
Massacre
Avg. played:
2.732.725694444
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Massacre that play both.
Dread Screamer (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Dread Screamer (Blue) that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Yellow) that play both.
Mark of the Beast
Avg. played:
2.642.636851521
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Mark of the Beast that play both.
Run Roughshod
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Run Roughshod that play both.
Skull Crack
Avg. played:
2.602.603448276
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Skull Crack that play both.
Ghostly Visit (Red)
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Ghostly Visit (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.582.577011494
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Erase Face that play both.
Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Hungering Slaughterbeast (Red) that play both.
Rawhide Rumble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Rawhide Rumble (Red) that play both.
Savage Beatdown
Avg. played:
2.502.498694517
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Savage Beatdown that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Agile Windup (Red) that play both.
Golden Tipple (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Golden Tipple (Blue) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Strength Rules All
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Strength Rules All that play both.
Assault and Battery (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Assault and Battery (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:
1.821.817757009
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Reckless Swing that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.842.840484048
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
2.752.745689655
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Guardian of the Shadowrealm
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Guardian of the Shadowrealm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Instant
Doomsday
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Doomsday that play both.
Snag
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Snag that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Remembrance that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Resource
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Sigil of Cycles and Eye of Ophidia that play both.