banner
Meet Madness
143 decks (0.01883%)
Price History
Meet Madness
Assassin Attack Action - Attack
Stealth When this hits a hero, choose 1 at random; - They choose a card in their hand. Banish it. - They choose a card in their arsenal. Banish it. - Banish the top card of their deck.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.302.301484686
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.702.697083275
Hero
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Equipment
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Flick Knives that play both.
Stalker's Steps
Stalker's Steps
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Stalker's Steps that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Prey Spotters
Prey Spotters
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Prey Spotters that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Balance of Justice that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Inverter's Nightcowl
Inverter's Nightcowl
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Inverter's Nightcowl that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Rage Baiters
Rage Baiters
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Rage Baiters that play both.
Weapon
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Orbitoclast that play both.
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Spider's Bite that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Scale Peeler that play both.
Action
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Kiss of Death that play both.
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
New
Tome of Pandemonium
Tome of Pandemonium
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.793103448
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Tome of Pandemonium that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Codex of Inertia
Codex of Inertia
Avg. played: Β 
2.462.459016393
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Codex of Inertia that play both.
Amulet of Echoes
Amulet of Echoes
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Amulet of Echoes that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Attack Action
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.902173913
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Infect (Red) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Creep
Creep
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Creep that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.625000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Infiltrate that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.232.230000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
New
Concoct Disorder (Red)
Concoct Disorder (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.833333333
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Concoct Disorder (Red) that play both.
New
Hyper Inflation (Red)
Hyper Inflation (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.722222222
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Hyper Inflation (Red) that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Overcrowded that play both.
Horrors of the Past
Horrors of the Past
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Horrors of the Past that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Under the Trap-Door
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played: Β 
2.532.534883721
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.365853659
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.677419355
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.142.137254902
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Command and Conquer that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.692307692
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Look Tuff
Look Tuff
Avg. played: Β 
2.362.363636364
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Look Tuff that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.560000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Wither (Red)
Wither (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Wither (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Prowl (Red) that play both.
New
Knife Through (Red)
Knife Through (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.571428571
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Knife Through (Red) that play both.
New
Concoct Disorder (Blue)
Concoct Disorder (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Concoct Disorder (Blue) that play both.
Undercover Acquisition
Undercover Acquisition
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.550000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Undercover Acquisition that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.555555556
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Bonds of Attraction (Red) that play both.
Regicide
Regicide
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Regicide that play both.
New
Knife Through (Blue)
Knife Through (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Knife Through (Blue) that play both.
New
Excessive Bloodloss (Red)
Excessive Bloodloss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Excessive Bloodloss (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.845360825
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.800000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
To the Point (Red)
To the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and To the Point (Red) that play both.
New
Descend into Madness
Descend into Madness
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.785714286
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Descend into Madness that play both.
Night's Embrace
Night's Embrace
Avg. played: Β 
2.322.323076923
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Night's Embrace that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.638888889
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Blue)
Stains of the Redback (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.571.571428571
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Stains of the Redback (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
1.961.960784314
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.629629630
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Just a Nick that play both.
Incision (Red)
Incision (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Incision (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.881578947
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Frailty Trap that play both.
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
1.231.229166667
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.711.714285714
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Inertia Trap that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.625000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.594594595
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Den of the Spider that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.801.800000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Meet Madness and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.