Persuasive Prognosis
Assassin Attack Action - Attack
Stealth
When this hits a hero, banish the top card of their deck. Then look at their hand and banish a card with the same color as the banished card.
Whenever this banishes an action card, gain 1{g}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.462.459786276
Average Defense Value:
2.822.816128063
Hero
living legend - Classic Constructed
Nuu, Alluring Desire
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Arakni, Marionette
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Flick Knives
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Flick Knives that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Mask of Deceit
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Arcane Lantern
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Arousing Wave
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arousing Wave that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Mask of Perdition
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Crown of Providence
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Crown of Providence that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Redback Shroud
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Redback Shroud that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Balance of Justice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Weapon
Hunter's Klaive
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Spider's Bite
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spider's Bite that play both.
Scale Peeler
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Scale Peeler that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Beckoning Mistblade
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Orbitoclast that play both.
Mark of the Huntsman
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Graven Call
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Graven Call that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
2.862.862341252
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Kiss of Death
Avg. played:
2.902.899515928
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Kiss of Death that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played:
2.872.873460125
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.821208518
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
2.822.823313882
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
2.632.628788840
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and The Weakest Link that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Midas Touch
Avg. played:
1.551.545454545
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Midas Touch that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue) that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Attack Action
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played:
2.852.851092152
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
2.842.843899156
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.892.886532301
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Command and Conquer that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
2.862.862106047
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.832.831991566
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played:
2.812.814277251
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played:
2.812.812176613
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.842.835080363
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played:
2.762.756002134
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.842.835980036
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Undercover Acquisition
Avg. played:
2.622.620879121
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Undercover Acquisition that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
2.722.718319360
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.632595773
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.662.662492992
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.682.679275440
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
2.702.704508671
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infect (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.707629225
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Infiltrate
Avg. played:
2.702.702760943
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infiltrate that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
1.681.681742508
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played:
2.222.217027216
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.572.572795525
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Shake Down
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shake Down that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Eradicate that play both.
Mark the Prey (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark the Prey (Red) that play both.
Already Dead
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Already Dead that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played:
2.572.568521739
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Erase Face that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Attraction (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Attack Reaction
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
2.792.794533837
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Just a Nick that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played:
2.852.846227316
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played:
2.862.857586658
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played:
2.852.850964828
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played:
2.852.853264857
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Siren's Call
Avg. played:
2.782.783021183
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Siren's Call that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.712.708502334
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.682.678126644
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
2.662.664545617
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played:
2.582.578753616
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Spreading Plague
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spreading Plague that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.572.568033144
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Two Sides to the Blade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Two Sides to the Blade that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Red) that play both.
Throw Dagger
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Throw Dagger that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.862.864639355
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
2.792.789033836
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.702.697715759
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played:
2.072.070085167
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
2.432.430624655
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Frailty Trap that play both.
Den of the Spider
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Den of the Spider that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played:
1.581.579097283
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Inertia Trap that play both.
Instant
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pass Over that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Stir the Pot that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arcane Compliance that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
2.392.387931034
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.