banner
Persuasive Prognosis
25934 decks (4.537%)
Price History
Persuasive Prognosis
Assassin Attack Action - Attack
Stealth When this hits a hero, banish the top card of their deck. Then look at their hand and banish a card with the same color as the banished card. Whenever this banishes an action card, gain 1{g}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.542.536625892
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.832.828292062
Hero
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
91% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
New
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
New
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Nuu
Nuu
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nuu that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Flick Knives that play both.
New
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arousing Wave that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
New
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Redback Shroud that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Hood that play both.
New
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spider's Bite that play both.
New
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Scale Peeler that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Orbitoclast that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Graven Call that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.845229845
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Codex of Frailty that play both.
New
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.913624679
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Kiss of Death that play both.
New
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.870136071
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
New
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.833095578
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
New
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.790394225
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.667882657
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and The Weakest Link that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
New
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue) that play both.
New
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Up Sticks and Run (Blue) that play both.
Attack Action
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.832579754
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.830709994
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.857242827
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.875736228
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Command and Conquer that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.918059593
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
New
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.804872911
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
New
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.863605672
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.830178426
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.716114180
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.844623401
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.727145321
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
New
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.826915597
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
New
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.662333545
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.680428135
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.676137056
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
New
Under the Trap-Door
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.606153846
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.684759576
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
New
Mark the Prey (Red)
Mark the Prey (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark the Prey (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.619217751
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infect (Red) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Eradicate that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.551687764
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infect (Blue) that play both.
New
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Already Dead that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.821.819488818
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shake Down that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.562020837
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
New
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.579377233
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infiltrate that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Erase Face that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Attraction (Red) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hurl (Red) that play both.
New
Rotten Remains
Rotten Remains
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Rotten Remains that play both.
Attack Reaction
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.794497222
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Just a Nick that play both.
New
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.872418388
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
New
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.847660312
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.845190262
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hiss (Red) that play both.
New
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.848673066
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.728125276
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Siren's Call
Siren's Call
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.769751908
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Siren's Call that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.670700456
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.594305047
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
New
Two Sides to the Blade
Two Sides to the Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Two Sides to the Blade that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.505062778
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
1.631.631268437
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spreading Plague that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.554225879
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Blue) that play both.
New
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Throw Dagger that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.852191082
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
New
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.813452329
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.693135189
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Fate Foreseen that play both.
New
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.431739130
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.452.452276708
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Frailty Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Inertia Trap that play both.
New
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Den of the Spider that play both.
Instant
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pass Over that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Stir the Pot that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.378907970
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Plague Hive
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Plague Hive that play both.