banner
Persuasive Prognosis
42727 decks (5.965%)
Price History
Persuasive Prognosis
Assassin Attack Action - Attack
Stealth When this hits a hero, banish the top card of their deck. Then look at their hand and banish a card with the same color as the banished card. Whenever this banishes an action card, gain 1{g}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.452.445412515
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.812.806767289
Hero
living legend - Classic Constructed
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Flick Knives that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arousing Wave that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Crown of Providence that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Redback Shroud that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Starting Point
Starting Point
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Starting Point that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Weapon
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spider's Bite that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Scale Peeler that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Orbitoclast that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Graven Call that play both.
Mark of the Huntsman
Mark of the Huntsman
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.874408220
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
2.912.909548564
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Kiss of Death that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.856756194
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.872026568
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.827887805
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue) that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.626466276
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and The Weakest Link that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Attack Action
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.855799611
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.850966882
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.887533697
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Command and Conquer that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.863989212
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.811806935
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.828029255
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.768981117
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.799636929
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.832449726
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.809201446
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.703095120
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.579708626
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
1.551.549132948
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Overcrowded that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.743095134
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infect (Red) that play both.
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Undercover Acquisition
Undercover Acquisition
Avg. played: Β 
2.242.243720930
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Undercover Acquisition that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.707787988
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.714805195
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infiltrate that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.676292111
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.631.627755860
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.700552486
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.625859873
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shake Down that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Eradicate that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.589881593
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Under the Trap-Door
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played: Β 
2.092.093160547
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Already Dead that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Mark the Prey (Red)
Mark the Prey (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark the Prey (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Attraction (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Erase Face that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
Regicide
Regicide
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Regicide that play both.
Attack Reaction
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.783407092
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Just a Nick that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.868909900
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.850604174
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.846932577
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.711319016
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Siren's Call
Siren's Call
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.780625403
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Siren's Call that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.655098216
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.704603774
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.593499197
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.574323144
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spreading Plague that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Concealed Blade that play both.
Two Sides to the Blade
Two Sides to the Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Two Sides to the Blade that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
New
Hunter or Hunted?
Hunter or Hunted?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hunter or Hunted? that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.869487064
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.805081772
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.701561362
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
1.961.957313899
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Den of the Spider that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.427274285
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Frailty Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.511.514398354
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Inertia Trap that play both.
Block
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Fiddler's Green (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Fiddler's Green (Red) that play both.
Instant
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pass Over that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Stir the Pot that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.393136009
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Resource
New
Authority of Ataya
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Authority of Ataya that play both.