banner
Persuasive Prognosis
17009 decks (3.308%)
Price History
Persuasive Prognosis
Assassin Attack Action - Attack
Stealth When this hits a hero, banish the top card of their deck. Then look at their hand and banish a card with the same color as the banished card. Whenever this banishes an action card, gain 1{g}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.692.694610447
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.852.847439532
Hero
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
90% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Arakni, Huntsman
Arakni, Huntsman
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, Huntsman that play both.
Nuu
Nuu
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nuu that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arousing Wave that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Flick Knives that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Redback Shroud that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Traverse the Universe
Traverse the Universe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Traverse the Universe that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
81% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spider's Bite that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Scale Peeler that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Orbitoclast that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Graven Call that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.799300648
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Codex of Frailty that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.702635600
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and The Weakest Link that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Attack Action
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.800752599
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.837193598
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.783914790
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.862826143
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Command and Conquer that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.782352941
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.818930041
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.867278798
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.836628938
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.722531577
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.685937274
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.662006699
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.600510937
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.753513514
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Eradicate that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.732177264
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Already Dead that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.537370554
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.512992638
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.594000517
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.841.838169935
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shake Down that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.387732342
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infect (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Hurl (Red)
Hurl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hurl (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.407339450
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infiltrate that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.595536960
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Attraction (Red) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Erase Face that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Attack Reaction
New
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.758200812
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Just a Nick that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.834172260
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.739435146
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Siren's Call
Siren's Call
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.748640204
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Siren's Call that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.602.602444444
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.675590551
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.412.414083741
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
1.981.976815709
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spreading Plague that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.312.307881773
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.542.536314526
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Red) that play both.
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Cut to the Chase (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Cut to the Chase (Red) that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Intimate Inducement (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Intimate Inducement (Blue) that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.502.503355705
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Concealed Blade
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Concealed Blade that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Venomous Bite (Blue)
Venomous Bite (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Venomous Bite (Blue) that play both.
Intimate Inducement (Red)
Intimate Inducement (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Intimate Inducement (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.835785801
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.687794324
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Inertia Trap that play both.
Instant
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pass Over that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Stir the Pot that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.372.365301205
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
banned - Classic Constructed
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Count Your Blessings (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Count Your Blessings (Blue) that play both.
A Drop in the Ocean
A Drop in the Ocean
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and A Drop in the Ocean that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.