banner
Persuasive Prognosis
38146 decks (5.627%)
Price History
Persuasive Prognosis
Assassin Attack Action - Attack
Stealth When this hits a hero, banish the top card of their deck. Then look at their hand and banish a card with the same color as the banished card. Whenever this banishes an action card, gain 1{g}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.452.451352391
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.812.813931851
Hero
living legend - Classic Constructed
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
89% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Flick Knives that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arousing Wave that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Crown of Providence that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Redback Shroud that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Starting Point
Starting Point
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Starting Point that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Weapon
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spider's Bite that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Scale Peeler that play both.
living legend - Classic Constructed
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Orbitoclast that play both.
Mark of the Huntsman
Mark of the Huntsman
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Graven Call that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.865954851
74% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.903567597
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Kiss of Death that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.836946863
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.870007607
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.824550450
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.626383300
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and The Weakest Link that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue) that play both.
Midas Touch
Midas Touch
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Midas Touch that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Attack Action
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.855338983
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.847006526
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.886297267
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Command and Conquer that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.860326000
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.820057073
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.820101907
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.805152799
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.763734777
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.828674778
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Undercover Acquisition
Undercover Acquisition
Avg. played: Β 
2.352.345013477
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Undercover Acquisition that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.826761474
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.807406063
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.678362083
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.612.608927569
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.716260008
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.727717826
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infect (Red) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.677535465
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.706209344
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infiltrate that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.702572347
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.661.661355622
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Under the Trap-Door
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played: Β 
2.172.173452769
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shake Down that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.576608858
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Eradicate that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.592.590684762
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Already Dead that play both.
Mark the Prey (Red)
Mark the Prey (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark the Prey (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Erase Face that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Attraction (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.793047342
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Just a Nick that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.856021300
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.856981345
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.848984599
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.859788360
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Siren's Call
Siren's Call
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.781652273
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Siren's Call that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.706837411
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.692.691640818
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.658448442
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.582.583265919
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spreading Plague that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.567527519
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Two Sides to the Blade
Two Sides to the Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Two Sides to the Blade that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.867279991
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.803600939
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.699697885
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.052.046864900
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.428802880
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Frailty Trap that play both.
Den of the Spider
Den of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Den of the Spider that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.571.573002755
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Inertia Trap that play both.
Instant
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pass Over that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Stir the Pot that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.392.387586207
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Arcane Compliance
Arcane Compliance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arcane Compliance that play both.