banner
Persuasive Prognosis
32627 decks (5.167%)
Price History
Persuasive Prognosis
Assassin Attack Action - Attack
Stealth When this hits a hero, banish the top card of their deck. Then look at their hand and banish a card with the same color as the banished card. Whenever this banishes an action card, gain 1{g}.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
2.492.486258885
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.822.820677846
Hero
Nuu, Alluring Desire
Nuu, Alluring Desire
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nuu, Alluring Desire that play both.
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X that play both.
Uzuri, Switchblade
Uzuri, Switchblade
85% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Uzuri, Switchblade that play both.
Arakni, Marionette
Arakni, Marionette
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, Marionette that play both.
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
Arakni, Solitary Confinement
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arakni, Solitary Confinement that play both.
Nuu
Nuu
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nuu that play both.
Equipment
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Flick Knives
Flick Knives
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Flick Knives that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
Widow Veil Respirator
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Mask of Deceit
Mask of Deceit
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Widow Web Crawler
Widow Web Crawler
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Web Crawler that play both.
Arcane Lantern
Arcane Lantern
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arcane Lantern that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
Blacktek Whisperers
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
Mask of Recurring Nightmares
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mask of Recurring Nightmares that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
Widow Back Abdomen
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Undertow Stilettos
Undertow Stilettos
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Undertow Stilettos that play both.
Arousing Wave
Arousing Wave
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Arousing Wave that play both.
Widow Claw Tarsus
Widow Claw Tarsus
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Widow Claw Tarsus that play both.
Vambrace of Determination
Vambrace of Determination
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Vambrace of Determination that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
Snapdragon Scalers
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
Blood Splattered Vest
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Mask of Perdition
Mask of Perdition
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Crown of Providence that play both.
Redback Shroud
Redback Shroud
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Redback Shroud that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Balance of Justice
Balance of Justice
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Balance of Justice that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Weapon
Spider's Bite
Spider's Bite
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spider's Bite that play both.
Hunter's Klaive
Hunter's Klaive
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Scale Peeler
Scale Peeler
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Scale Peeler that play both.
Beckoning Mistblade
Beckoning Mistblade
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Beckoning Mistblade that play both.
Nerve Scalpel
Nerve Scalpel
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Nerve Scalpel that play both.
Orbitoclast
Orbitoclast
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Orbitoclast that play both.
Mark of the Huntsman
Mark of the Huntsman
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Graven Call
Graven Call
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Graven Call that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.853164832
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Kiss of Death
Kiss of Death
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.889238095
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Kiss of Death that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.856731165
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.790833333
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.812600969
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.631783952
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and The Weakest Link that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Codex of Bloodrot
Codex of Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Codex of Bloodrot that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue)
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Blue) that play both.
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Warmonger's Diplomacy
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Warmonger's Diplomacy that play both.
Attack Action
Bonds of Agony
Bonds of Agony
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.842045944
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Agony that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.836013293
76% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.859739130
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.881615035
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Command and Conquer that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.864641796
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.809472292
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.809448628
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.843805370
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.744463373
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.835636017
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Levels of Enlightenment
Levels of Enlightenment
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Levels of Enlightenment that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.630279759
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.722.720174829
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.800252525
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.660315843
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Pick to Pieces (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.679904772
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pick to Pieces (Blue) that play both.
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Pick to Pieces (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.710003747
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pick to Pieces (Red) that play both.
Infect (Red)
Infect (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.681420484
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infect (Red) that play both.
Under the Trap-Door
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.560245399
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
Infiltrate
Infiltrate
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.682949168
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infiltrate that play both.
Isolate (Blue)
Isolate (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Isolate (Blue) that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
1.711.710746361
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Mark the Prey (Red)
Mark the Prey (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark the Prey (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.562402739
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Eradicate
Eradicate
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Eradicate that play both.
Shake Down
Shake Down
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shake Down that play both.
Already Dead
Already Dead
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Already Dead that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.561103100
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Funnel Web (Red) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Desires of Flesh (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Desires of Flesh (Blue) that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Erase Face that play both.
Isolate (Yellow)
Isolate (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Isolate (Yellow) that play both.
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Mark of the Funnel Web (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Bonds of Memory (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Memory (Blue) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Bonds of Attraction (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Bonds of Attraction (Red) that play both.
Cosmic Awakening
Cosmic Awakening
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Cosmic Awakening that play both.
Attack Reaction
Just a Nick
Just a Nick
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.794811406
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Just a Nick that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.857128916
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Tarantula Toxin
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.827472314
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Hiss (Red)
Hiss (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.848820007
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hiss (Red) that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.836944745
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Siren's Call
Siren's Call
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.780125063
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Siren's Call that play both.
Venomous Bite (Red)
Venomous Bite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.710582302
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Venomous Bite (Red) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.682736092
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.642631683
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.568835956
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Hiss (Blue)
Hiss (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Hiss (Blue) that play both.
Spreading Plague
Spreading Plague
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Spreading Plague that play both.
Two Sides to the Blade
Two Sides to the Blade
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Two Sides to the Blade that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.562.559699795
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Blue) that play both.
Shred (Red)
Shred (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shred (Red) that play both.
Throw Dagger
Throw Dagger
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Throw Dagger that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.860999826
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.780394575
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played: Β 
2.702.697311525
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Lair of the Spider
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played: Β 
2.142.143834105
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Frailty Trap
Frailty Trap
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.433236715
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Frailty Trap that play both.
Inertia Trap
Inertia Trap
Avg. played: Β 
1.611.611834320
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Inertia Trap that play both.
That All You Got?
That All You Got?
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and That All You Got? that play both.
Instant
Path Well Traveled
Path Well Traveled
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Path Well Traveled that play both.
Pass Over
Pass Over
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Pass Over that play both.
Homage to Ancestors
Homage to Ancestors
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Homage to Ancestors that play both.
The Grain that Tips the Scale
The Grain that Tips the Scale
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and The Grain that Tips the Scale that play both.
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sacred Art: Undercurrent Desires that play both.
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Rising Sun, Setting Moon
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Rising Sun, Setting Moon that play both.
Preserve Tradition
Preserve Tradition
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Preserve Tradition that play both.
Stir the Pot
Stir the Pot
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Stir the Pot that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Count Your Blessings (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Count Your Blessings (Red) that play both.
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Count Your Blessings (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Count Your Blessings (Yellow) that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.382.382230545
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Persuasive Prognosis and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.