Descend into Madness
Generic Attack Reaction
Banish a random card from the defending hero's hand, then they draw a card.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
2.312.311624300
Average Defense Value:
2.732.729803504
Hero
Equipment
Flick Knives
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Flick Knives that play both.
Stalker's Steps
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Stalker's Steps that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Mask of Deceit
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Mask of Deceit that play both.
Blacktek Whisperers
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Blacktek Whisperers that play both.
Prey Spotters
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Prey Spotters that play both.
Snapdragon Scalers
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Snapdragon Scalers that play both.
Blood Splattered Vest
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Blood Splattered Vest that play both.
Widow Veil Respirator
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Widow Veil Respirator that play both.
Balance of Justice
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Balance of Justice that play both.
Inverter's Nightcowl
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Inverter's Nightcowl that play both.
Crown of Providence
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Crown of Providence that play both.
Redback Shroud
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Redback Shroud that play both.
Widow Back Abdomen
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Widow Back Abdomen that play both.
Mask of Perdition
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Mask of Perdition that play both.
Weapon
Hunter's Klaive
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Hunter's Klaive that play both.
Orbitoclast
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Orbitoclast that play both.
Graven Call
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Graven Call that play both.
Mark of the Huntsman
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Mark of the Huntsman that play both.
Action
Codex of Frailty
Avg. played:
2.802.800000000
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Codex of Frailty that play both.
Kiss of Death
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Kiss of Death that play both.
Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red)
Avg. played:
2.832.833333333
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Orb-Weaver Spinneret (Red) that play both.
Savor Bloodshed
Avg. played:
2.832.833333333
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Savor Bloodshed that play both.
Codex of Inertia
Avg. played:
2.832.833333333
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Codex of Inertia that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Cut from the Same Cloth (Red) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Up Sticks and Run (Red) that play both.
Spur Locked
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Spur Locked that play both.
Riddle with Regret
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Riddle with Regret that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Cut from the Same Cloth (Yellow) that play both.
Relentless Pursuit
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Relentless Pursuit that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Up Sticks and Run (Yellow) that play both.
Toxicity (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Toxicity (Yellow) that play both.
Amulet of Echoes
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Amulet of Echoes that play both.
Cut from the Same Cloth (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Cut from the Same Cloth (Blue) that play both.
Up Sticks and Run (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Up Sticks and Run (Blue) that play both.
The Weakest Link
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and The Weakest Link that play both.
Attack Action
Meet Madness
Avg. played:
2.932.933333333
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Meet Madness that play both.
Leave No Witnesses
Avg. played:
2.932.928571429
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Leave No Witnesses that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Red)
Avg. played:
2.922.916666667
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Mark of the Black Widow (Red) that play both.
Persuasive Prognosis
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Persuasive Prognosis that play both.
Art of Desire: Body
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Art of Desire: Body that play both.
Pain in the Backside
Avg. played:
2.892.888888889
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Pain in the Backside that play both.
Infect (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Infect (Red) that play both.
Infiltrate
Avg. played:
2.832.833333333
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Infiltrate that play both.
Surgical Extraction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Surgical Extraction that play both.
Pick Up the Point (Red)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Pick Up the Point (Red) that play both.
Horrors of the Past
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Horrors of the Past that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Command and Conquer that play both.
Death Touch (Red)
Avg. played:
1.251.250000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Death Touch (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Double Trouble (Red) that play both.
Undercover Acquisition
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Undercover Acquisition that play both.
Prowl (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Prowl (Red) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Mark of the Black Widow (Blue) that play both.
Creep
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Creep that play both.
Enlightened Strike
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Enlightened Strike that play both.
Art of Desire: Mind
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Art of Desire: Mind that play both.
Regicide
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Regicide that play both.
Under the Trap-Door
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Under the Trap-Door that play both.
Ravenous Rabble (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Ravenous Rabble (Red) that play both.
Look Tuff
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Look Tuff that play both.
Reaper's Call (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Reaper's Call (Blue) that play both.
Mark of the Black Widow (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Mark of the Black Widow (Yellow) that play both.
Wither (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Wither (Red) that play both.
Infect (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Infect (Blue) that play both.
Annihilate the Armed (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Annihilate the Armed (Red) that play both.
Double Trouble (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Double Trouble (Blue) that play both.
Eradicate
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Eradicate that play both.
Plunder the Poor (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Plunder the Poor (Red) that play both.
Rob the Rich (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Rob the Rich (Red) that play both.
Cut Through (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Cut Through (Red) that play both.
Bonds of Attraction (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Bonds of Attraction (Blue) that play both.
Overcrowded
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Overcrowded that play both.
Prowl (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Prowl (Blue) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Tarantula Toxin
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Tarantula Toxin that play both.
Razor's Edge (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Razor's Edge (Red) that play both.
Take Up the Mantle
Avg. played:
2.882.875000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Take Up the Mantle that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Red)
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Stains of the Redback (Red) that play both.
Night's Embrace
Avg. played:
2.562.555555556
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Night's Embrace that play both.
Scar Tissue (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Scar Tissue (Red) that play both.
Spike with Bloodrot
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Spike with Bloodrot that play both.
Just a Nick
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Just a Nick that play both.
Shred (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Shred (Blue) that play both.
To the Point (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and To the Point (Red) that play both.
Concealed Blade
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Concealed Blade that play both.
Razor's Edge (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Razor's Edge (Yellow) that play both.
Shred (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Shred (Yellow) that play both.
Stains of the Redback (Blue)
Avg. played:
1.501.500000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Stains of the Redback (Blue) that play both.
Coercive Tendency
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Coercive Tendency that play both.
Razor Reflex (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Razor Reflex (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
2.832.833333333
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Frailty Trap
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Frailty Trap that play both.
Lair of the Spider
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Lair of the Spider that play both.
Inertia Trap
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Inertia Trap that play both.
Fate Foreseen
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Fate Foreseen that play both.
Den of the Spider
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Den of the Spider that play both.
Instant
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
2.672.666666667
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.
Remembrance
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Remembrance that play both.
Oasis Respite (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Oasis Respite (Red) that play both.
Resource
Plague Hive
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Plague Hive that play both.
Eye of Ophidia
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Descend into Madness and Eye of Ophidia that play both.