banner
New
Old Leather and Vim
465 decks (0.06382%)
Price History
Old Leather and Vim
Brute Attack Action - Attack
If you control a Toughness or Vigor token, this gets +1{p}. When this hits a hero, create a Toughness and a Vigor token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
5.435.425125981
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.452.445337624
Hero
New
Tuffnut
Tuffnut
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Tuffnut that play both.
New
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster that play both.
Equipment
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
New
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
77% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Skullhorn
Skullhorn
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Skullhorn that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Nullrune Boots that play both.
New
Boots to the Boards
Boots to the Boards
41% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Boots to the Boards that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Savage Sash
Savage Sash
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Savage Sash that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
New
Helm of the Adored
Helm of the Adored
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Helm of the Adored that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Crown of Providence that play both.
Weapon
Rok
Rok
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Rok that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Romping Club
Romping Club
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Romping Club that play both.
Ravenous Meataxe
Ravenous Meataxe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Ravenous Meataxe that play both.
Mandible Claw
Mandible Claw
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Mandible Claw that play both.
Action
New
Song of Sinew
Song of Sinew
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.867158672
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Song of Sinew that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Battlefront Bastion (Yellow) that play both.
New
Heroic Grit
Heroic Grit
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Heroic Grit that play both.
New
Humble Entrance
Humble Entrance
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Humble Entrance that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
New
Cheers!
Cheers!
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Cheers! that play both.
Argh... Smash!
Argh... Smash!
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Argh... Smash! that play both.
New
Vigorous Roar
Vigorous Roar
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Vigorous Roar that play both.
Attack Action
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.942.937788018
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
New
Wind Up the Crowd
Wind Up the Crowd
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Wind Up the Crowd that play both.
New
Crowd Goes Wild
Crowd Goes Wild
Avg. played: Β 
2.942.941176471
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Crowd Goes Wild that play both.
New
Jaws of Victory
Jaws of Victory
Avg. played: Β 
2.932.927184466
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Jaws of Victory that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.923857868
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Vigorous Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
New
Good Natured Brutality
Good Natured Brutality
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.902313625
75% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Good Natured Brutality that play both.
New
Tough Smashup (Yellow)
Tough Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.916167665
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Tough Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
New
No Hero Stands Alone
No Hero Stands Alone
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.870967742
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and No Hero Stands Alone that play both.
New
Buckwild (Yellow)
Buckwild (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Buckwild (Yellow) that play both.
New
Disarm
Disarm
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.903914591
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Disarm that play both.
New
Dig In (Yellow)
Dig In (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Dig In (Yellow) that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Vigorous Smashup (Blue) that play both.
Send Packing
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
47% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Send Packing that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.832653061
44% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
New
Show of Strength
Show of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Show of Strength that play both.
New
Escalate Order
Escalate Order
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Escalate Order that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Yellow)
Strongest Survive (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Strongest Survive (Yellow) that play both.
Swing Big
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Swing Big that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.851063830
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
New
Tough Smashup (Blue)
Tough Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Tough Smashup (Blue) that play both.
New
Comeback Kid (Yellow)
Comeback Kid (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Comeback Kid (Yellow) that play both.
New
Energetic Impact
Energetic Impact
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Energetic Impact that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Command and Conquer that play both.
New
Reckless Stampede
Reckless Stampede
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.761904762
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Reckless Stampede that play both.
New
Buckwild (Red)
Buckwild (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.748201439
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Buckwild (Red) that play both.
Bam Bam
Bam Bam
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.801652893
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Bam Bam that play both.
New
Dig In (Blue)
Dig In (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Dig In (Blue) that play both.
New
Disperse
Disperse
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Disperse that play both.
New
Old Favorite
Old Favorite
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Old Favorite that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Red)
Strongest Survive (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Strongest Survive (Red) that play both.
New
Buckwild (Blue)
Buckwild (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.742.741935484
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Buckwild (Blue) that play both.
New
Unexpected Backhand (Yellow)
Unexpected Backhand (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Unexpected Backhand (Yellow) that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Red)
Vigorous Smashup (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Vigorous Smashup (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Pack Call (Yellow)
Pack Call (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Pack Call (Yellow) that play both.
New
High Pitched Howl (Red)
High Pitched Howl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and High Pitched Howl (Red) that play both.
New
Rapturous Applause (Yellow)
Rapturous Applause (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Rapturous Applause (Yellow) that play both.
Beast Within
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Beast Within that play both.
New
Tough Smashup (Red)
Tough Smashup (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Tough Smashup (Red) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
New
Smashing Ground
Smashing Ground
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Smashing Ground that play both.
New
Smash with Big Rock
Smash with Big Rock
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Smash with Big Rock that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reckless Swing
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Reckless Swing that play both.
Block
New
Never Give Up
Never Give Up
Avg. played: Β 
2.552.550000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Never Give Up that play both.
Instant
New
Numbskull Charm
Numbskull Charm
Avg. played: Β 
2.642.640000000
28% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Numbskull Charm that play both.
New
Visit the Boneyard
Visit the Boneyard
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.645833333
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Visit the Boneyard that play both.