banner
New
Old Leather and Vim
317 decks (0.04404%)
Price History
Old Leather and Vim
Brute Attack Action - Attack
If you control a Toughness or Vigor token, this gets +1{p}. When this hits a hero, create a Toughness and a Vigor token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
5.385.380458900
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.452.445738475
Hero
New
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster that play both.
Equipment
New
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex that play both.
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
79% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Skullhorn
Skullhorn
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Skullhorn that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Nullrune Boots that play both.
New
Boots to the Boards
Boots to the Boards
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Boots to the Boards that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Savage Sash
Savage Sash
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Savage Sash that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
Quickdodge Flexors
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Nullrune Hood that play both.
New
Helm of the Adored
Helm of the Adored
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Helm of the Adored that play both.
Nullrune Robe
Nullrune Robe
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Nullrune Robe that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Crown of Providence that play both.
Weapon
Rok
Rok
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Rok that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Romping Club
Romping Club
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Romping Club that play both.
Ravenous Meataxe
Ravenous Meataxe
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Ravenous Meataxe that play both.
Mandible Claw
Mandible Claw
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Mandible Claw that play both.
Action
New
Song of Sinew
Song of Sinew
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.896739130
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Song of Sinew that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.835051546
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Battlefront Bastion (Yellow) that play both.
New
Heroic Grit
Heroic Grit
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
18% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Heroic Grit that play both.
New
Humble Entrance
Humble Entrance
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.757142857
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Humble Entrance that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Bloodrush Bellow
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
New
Cheers!
Cheers!
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Cheers! that play both.
Argh... Smash!
Argh... Smash!
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Argh... Smash! that play both.
New
Vigorous Roar
Vigorous Roar
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Vigorous Roar that play both.
Dig Up Dinner
Dig Up Dinner
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Dig Up Dinner that play both.
Attack Action
New
Wind Up the Crowd
Wind Up the Crowd
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Wind Up the Crowd that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
New
Jaws of Victory
Jaws of Victory
Avg. played: Β 
2.942.936619718
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Jaws of Victory that play both.
New
Crowd Goes Wild
Crowd Goes Wild
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
84% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Crowd Goes Wild that play both.
New
Good Natured Brutality
Good Natured Brutality
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.915129151
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Good Natured Brutality that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.942.939163498
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Vigorous Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
New
Tough Smashup (Yellow)
Tough Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
67% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Tough Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
New
Buckwild (Yellow)
Buckwild (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.932.925233645
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Buckwild (Yellow) that play both.
New
No Hero Stands Alone
No Hero Stands Alone
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.863436123
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and No Hero Stands Alone that play both.
New
Disarm
Disarm
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.915000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Disarm that play both.
New
Dig In (Yellow)
Dig In (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
55% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Dig In (Yellow) that play both.
Send Packing
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Send Packing that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
2.872.869047619
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
45% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Vigorous Smashup (Blue) that play both.
New
Escalate Order
Escalate Order
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Escalate Order that play both.
New
Show of Strength
Show of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.882352941
38% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Show of Strength that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.864000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Swing Big
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Swing Big that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Yellow)
Strongest Survive (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.852459016
33% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Strongest Survive (Yellow) that play both.
New
Energetic Impact
Energetic Impact
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Energetic Impact that play both.
New
Comeback Kid (Yellow)
Comeback Kid (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Comeback Kid (Yellow) that play both.
New
Tough Smashup (Blue)
Tough Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Tough Smashup (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Command and Conquer that play both.
New
Reckless Stampede
Reckless Stampede
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.797872340
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Reckless Stampede that play both.
New
Dig In (Blue)
Dig In (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Dig In (Blue) that play both.
Bam Bam
Bam Bam
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.802325581
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Bam Bam that play both.
New
Buckwild (Red)
Buckwild (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.772.767441860
21% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Buckwild (Red) that play both.
New
Old Favorite
Old Favorite
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Old Favorite that play both.
New
Disperse
Disperse
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Disperse that play both.
New
Buckwild (Blue)
Buckwild (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.732394366
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Buckwild (Blue) that play both.
Pack Call (Yellow)
Pack Call (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Pack Call (Yellow) that play both.
New
Unexpected Backhand (Yellow)
Unexpected Backhand (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Unexpected Backhand (Yellow) that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Red)
Strongest Survive (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Strongest Survive (Red) that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Red)
Vigorous Smashup (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Vigorous Smashup (Red) that play both.
New
High Pitched Howl (Red)
High Pitched Howl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and High Pitched Howl (Red) that play both.
Beast Within
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Beast Within that play both.
New
Rapturous Applause (Yellow)
Rapturous Applause (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Rapturous Applause (Yellow) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Pulping (Red) that play both.
New
Smashing Ground
Smashing Ground
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Smashing Ground that play both.
New
Overcrowded
Overcrowded
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Overcrowded that play both.
New
Tough Smashup (Red)
Tough Smashup (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Tough Smashup (Red) that play both.
New
Empowering Ruckus
Empowering Ruckus
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Empowering Ruckus that play both.
New
Smash with Big Rock
Smash with Big Rock
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Smash with Big Rock that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reckless Swing
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Reckless Swing that play both.
Block
New
Never Give Up
Never Give Up
Avg. played: Β 
2.282.277777778
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Never Give Up that play both.
Instant
New
Numbskull Charm
Numbskull Charm
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.705882353
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Numbskull Charm that play both.
New
Visit the Boneyard
Visit the Boneyard
Avg. played: Β 
2.712.705882353
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Old Leather and Vim and Visit the Boneyard that play both.