banner
New
Buckwild (Red)
3735 decks (0.4965%)
Price History
Buckwild (Red)
Brute Attack Action - Attack
If there is a card with 6 or more {p} in your pitch zone, this gets go again.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
5.355.350070029
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.222.215390410
Hero
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Kayo
Kayo
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Kayo that play both.
New
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster that play both.
Equipment
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
94% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Savage Sash
Savage Sash
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Savage Sash that play both.
Skullhorn
Skullhorn
86% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Skullhorn that play both.
New
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
82% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Beaten Trackers
Beaten Trackers
60% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
56% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Crown of Providence that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Nullrune Hood that play both.
New
Boots to the Boards
Boots to the Boards
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Boots to the Boards that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
Mandible Claw
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Mandible Claw that play both.
Rok
Rok
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Rok that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Romping Club
Romping Club
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Romping Club that play both.
Action
Bloodrush Bellow
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.837542875
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Tear Limb from Limb
Tear Limb from Limb
Avg. played: Β 
1.861.858816964
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Tear Limb from Limb that play both.
Cast Bones
Cast Bones
Avg. played: Β 
2.292.291960508
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Cast Bones that play both.
New
Song of Sinew
Song of Sinew
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Song of Sinew that play both.
Attack Action
Swing Big
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.826670831
71% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Swing Big that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.826717076
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Beast Within
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.829353709
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Beast Within that play both.
New
Show of Strength
Show of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.821722609
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Show of Strength that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.842.842763158
69% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Vigorous Smashup (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.822333333
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
New
Buckwild (Blue)
Buckwild (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.825455773
65% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Buckwild (Blue) that play both.
Run Roughshod
Run Roughshod
Avg. played: Β 
2.822.816297857
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Run Roughshod that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.797783934
62% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
New
Reckless Stampede
Reckless Stampede
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.789709945
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Reckless Stampede that play both.
New
Smashing Ground
Smashing Ground
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.799275362
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Smashing Ground that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.785993740
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Red)
Strongest Survive (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.752.750754148
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Strongest Survive (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.512.509963400
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Blue)
Strongest Survive (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.764859228
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Strongest Survive (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.785261946
37% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Command and Conquer that play both.
New
Buckwild (Yellow)
Buckwild (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.782.777576854
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Buckwild (Yellow) that play both.
New
Energetic Impact
Energetic Impact
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.676640420
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Energetic Impact that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.633316905
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.845895020
34% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Send Packing
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.680466472
31% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Send Packing that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.802.798555957
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Vigorous Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
New
Unexpected Backhand (Blue)
Unexpected Backhand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Unexpected Backhand (Blue) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.492289442
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.632.632065776
16% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.662.663905325
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.682.681318681
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
2.622.618556701
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Erase Face that play both.
New
Wind Up the Crowd
Wind Up the Crowd
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Wind Up the Crowd that play both.
New
Jaws of Victory
Jaws of Victory
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Jaws of Victory that play both.
New
Good Natured Brutality
Good Natured Brutality
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Good Natured Brutality that play both.
New
Crowd Goes Wild
Crowd Goes Wild
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Crowd Goes Wild that play both.
New
High Pitched Howl (Red)
High Pitched Howl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and High Pitched Howl (Red) that play both.
New
Tough Smashup (Yellow)
Tough Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Tough Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Bare Fangs (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Bare Fangs (Yellow) that play both.
New
No Hero Stands Alone
No Hero Stands Alone
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and No Hero Stands Alone that play both.
Massacre
Massacre
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Massacre that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
New
Challenge the Alpha
Challenge the Alpha
Avg. played: Β 
2.492.493392070
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Challenge the Alpha that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Yellow)
Strongest Survive (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Strongest Survive (Yellow) that play both.
New
Dig In (Yellow)
Dig In (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Dig In (Yellow) that play both.
New
Tough Smashup (Blue)
Tough Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Tough Smashup (Blue) that play both.
New
Disarm
Disarm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Disarm that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reckless Swing
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β 
1.391.393652937
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Reckless Swing that play both.
Instant
No Fear
No Fear
Avg. played: Β 
1.681.683957733
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and No Fear that play both.
Resource
New
Authority of Ataya
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Buckwild (Red) and Authority of Ataya that play both.