Predatory Plating
Brute Equipment - Chest
Instant - Destroy this: Gain {r}. Activate this only if you control a card with 6 or more {p}.
Guardwell
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
4.624.624776136
Average Defense Value:
2.332.334842649
Hero
Equipment
Scowling Flesh Bag
100% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Skullhorn
96% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Skullhorn that play both.
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Nullrune Boots
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Boots to the Boards
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Boots to the Boards that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Crown of Providence
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Crown of Providence that play both.
Weapon
Rok
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Rok that play both.
Mandible Claw
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Mandible Claw that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Romping Club
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Romping Club that play both.
Action
Song of Sinew
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Song of Sinew that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.732.727272727
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Battlefront Bastion (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Buckwild (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Buckwild (Yellow) that play both.
Jaws of Victory
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Jaws of Victory that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Wind Up the Crowd
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Wind Up the Crowd that play both.
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Vigorous Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
Crowd Goes Wild
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Crowd Goes Wild that play both.
Buckwild (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Buckwild (Red) that play both.
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
70% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Vigorous Smashup (Blue) that play both.
Good Natured Brutality
Avg. played:
2.782.777777778
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Good Natured Brutality that play both.
Show of Strength
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Show of Strength that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.712.705882353
52% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
No Hero Stands Alone
Avg. played:
2.352.352941176
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and No Hero Stands Alone that play both.
Swing Big
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Swing Big that play both.
Back Alley Breakline (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Back Alley Breakline (Blue) that play both.
Strongest Survive (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Strongest Survive (Yellow) that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played:
2.302.300000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Buckwild (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Buckwild (Blue) that play both.
Tough Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Tough Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played:
2.702.700000000
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Send Packing that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Command and Conquer that play both.
Reckless Stampede
Avg. played:
2.752.750000000
26% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Reckless Stampede that play both.
Bare Destruction
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Bare Destruction that play both.
Bam Bam
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Bam Bam that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Erase Face that play both.
Tough Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.332.333333333
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Tough Smashup (Blue) that play both.
Big Bully
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Big Bully that play both.
Looking for a Scrap (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Looking for a Scrap (Red) that play both.
Mocking Blow (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Mocking Blow (Yellow) that play both.
Outside Interference
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Outside Interference that play both.
Overcrowded
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Overcrowded that play both.
Strongest Survive (Red)
Avg. played:
2.502.500000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Strongest Survive (Red) that play both.
Old Leather and Vim
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Old Leather and Vim that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Clash of Agility (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Clash of Agility (Blue) that play both.
Fix the Match
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Fix the Match that play both.
Mocking Blow (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Mocking Blow (Blue) that play both.
Mocking Blow (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Mocking Blow (Red) that play both.
Rotten Remains
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Rotten Remains that play both.
Comeback Kid (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Comeback Kid (Yellow) that play both.
Energetic Impact
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Energetic Impact that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Smash Instinct (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Red)
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Pummel (Red) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Reckless Swing that play both.
Block
Steal Victory
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Steal Victory that play both.
Instant
Visit the Boneyard
Avg. played:
2.152.153846154
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Visit the Boneyard that play both.
Sigil of Solace (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
13% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Predatory Plating and Sigil of Solace (Red) that play both.