Energetic Impact
Brute Attack Action - Attack
When this defends together with a card with 6 or more {p}, create a Vigor token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:
5.135.130542909
Average Defense Value:
2.322.317355595
Hero
New
Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Kayo
39% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Kayo that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Equipment
Scowling Flesh Bag
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Skullhorn
87% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Skullhorn that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
72% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Savage Sash
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Savage Sash that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Beaten Trackers
43% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Nullrune Boots
30% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Crown of Providence
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Crown of Providence that play both.
Nullrune Hood
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Quickdodge Flexors
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Quickdodge Flexors that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Mandible Claw that play both.
Rok
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Rok that play both.
living legend - Blitz
Romping Club
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Romping Club that play both.
Action
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played:
2.802.798933740
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
15% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
Tear Limb from Limb
Avg. played:
2.072.067204301
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Tear Limb from Limb that play both.
Argh... Smash!
Avg. played:
2.002.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Argh... Smash! that play both.
Cast Bones
Avg. played:
2.492.492711370
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Cast Bones that play both.
Battlefront Bastion (Yellow)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Battlefront Bastion (Yellow) that play both.
Smashback Alehorn
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Smashback Alehorn that play both.
Attack Action
Swing Big
Avg. played:
2.812.811203320
57% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Swing Big that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.882.882215289
54% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Beast Within
Avg. played:
2.802.802948022
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Beast Within that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played:
2.802.803968254
49% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.802.802439024
48% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
Run Roughshod
Avg. played:
2.792.789426523
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Run Roughshod that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played:
2.772.766269478
40% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
Send Packing
Avg. played:
2.742.743229689
36% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Send Packing that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.742.737270876
35% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Avg. played:
2.782.781699346
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Command and Conquer that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played:
2.762.757485030
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played:
2.582.583815029
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Pulping (Red) that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played:
2.632.630012937
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.402.398823529
23% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Thick Hide Hunter
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Thick Hide Hunter that play both.
Fearless Confrontation
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Fearless Confrontation that play both.
Erase Face
Avg. played:
2.612.607629428
11% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Erase Face that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.602.600000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
Massacre
Avg. played:
1.001.000000000
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Massacre that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played:
2.602.598540146
8% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Sea Legs
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Sea Legs that play both.
Bam Bam
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Bam Bam that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reckless Swing
Avg. played:
1.371.370870871
20% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Reckless Swing that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
6% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played:
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Instant
