banner
New
Energetic Impact
59 decks (0.008377%)
Price History
Energetic Impact
Brute Attack Action - Attack
When this defends together with a card with 6 or more {p}, create a Vigor token.
Average Card Type Distribution
Average Attack Value:Β 
5.225.222405654
Average Defense Value: Β 
2.292.294904948
Hero
Kayo
Kayo
50% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Kayo that play both.
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
Kayo, Armed and Dangerous
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Kayo, Armed and Dangerous that play both.
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
Rhinar, Reckless Rampage
9% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Rhinar, Reckless Rampage that play both.
Equipment
Scowling Flesh Bag
Scowling Flesh Bag
97% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Scowling Flesh Bag that play both.
Scabskin Leathers
Scabskin Leathers
95% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Scabskin Leathers that play both.
Skullhorn
Skullhorn
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Skullhorn that play both.
Savage Sash
Savage Sash
92% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Savage Sash that play both.
New
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Gauntlets of Tyrannical Rex that play both.
Nullrune Gloves
Nullrune Gloves
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Nullrune Gloves that play both.
Apex Bonebreaker
Apex Bonebreaker
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Apex Bonebreaker that play both.
Nullrune Boots
Nullrune Boots
42% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Nullrune Boots that play both.
Beaten Trackers
Beaten Trackers
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Beaten Trackers that play both.
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
Fyendal's Spring Tunic
27% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Fyendal's Spring Tunic that play both.
Nullrune Hood
Nullrune Hood
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Nullrune Hood that play both.
Crown of Providence
Crown of Providence
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Crown of Providence that play both.
Spell Fray Leggings
Spell Fray Leggings
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Spell Fray Leggings that play both.
Gambler's Gloves
Gambler's Gloves
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Gambler's Gloves that play both.
Weapon
Mandible Claw
Mandible Claw
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Mandible Claw that play both.
Action
Bloodrush Bellow
Bloodrush Bellow
Avg. played: Β 
2.952.945454545
88% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Bloodrush Bellow that play both.
Tear Limb from Limb
Tear Limb from Limb
Avg. played: Β 
1.911.913043478
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Tear Limb from Limb that play both.
Cast Bones
Cast Bones
Avg. played: Β 
2.342.344827586
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Cast Bones that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Barraging Beatdown (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Barraging Beatdown (Blue) that play both.
New
Song of Sinew
Song of Sinew
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Song of Sinew that play both.
Sand Sketched Plan
Sand Sketched Plan
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Sand Sketched Plan that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Barraging Beatdown (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Barraging Beatdown (Red) that play both.
The Weakest Link
The Weakest Link
Avg. played: Β 
2.432.428571429
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and The Weakest Link that play both.
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Barraging Beatdown (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Barraging Beatdown (Yellow) that play both.
Attack Action
Swing Big
Swing Big
Avg. played: Β 
2.952.948275862
93% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Swing Big that play both.
Wild Ride (Red)
Wild Ride (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.942.942307692
83% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Wild Ride (Red) that play both.
New
Show of Strength
Show of Strength
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.921568627
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Show of Strength that play both.
Beast Within
Beast Within
Avg. played: Β 
2.942.940000000
80% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Beast Within that play both.
Run Roughshod
Run Roughshod
Avg. played: Β 
2.942.938775510
78% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Run Roughshod that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Vigorous Smashup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.932.934782609
73% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Vigorous Smashup (Blue) that play both.
Agile Windup (Blue)
Agile Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.932.930232558
68% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Agile Windup (Blue) that play both.
New
Smashing Ground
Smashing Ground
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.847826087
66% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Smashing Ground that play both.
New
Reckless Stampede
Reckless Stampede
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.883720930
64% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Reckless Stampede that play both.
Pulping (Red)
Pulping (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.860465116
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Pulping (Red) that play both.
New
Buckwild (Red)
Buckwild (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.922.925000000
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Buckwild (Red) that play both.
Bare Fangs (Red)
Bare Fangs (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.862.860465116
63% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Bare Fangs (Red) that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Blue)
Strongest Survive (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.882.878048780
61% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Strongest Survive (Blue) that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Red)
Strongest Survive (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.902.897435897
59% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Strongest Survive (Red) that play both.
New
Buckwild (Blue)
Buckwild (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.852.850000000
58% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Buckwild (Blue) that play both.
Command and Conquer
Command and Conquer
Avg. played: Β 
2.892.885714286
53% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Command and Conquer that play both.
Send Packing
Send Packing
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.810810811
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Send Packing that play both.
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Wild Ride (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.832.833333333
51% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Wild Ride (Yellow) that play both.
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Wrecker Romp (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
46% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Wrecker Romp (Blue) that play both.
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Mighty Windup (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.732.727272727
32% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Mighty Windup (Blue) that play both.
Erase Face
Erase Face
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
29% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Erase Face that play both.
Sea Legs
Sea Legs
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Sea Legs that play both.
Savage Feast (Red)
Savage Feast (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
24% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Savage Feast (Red) that play both.
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Agile Windup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.762.764705882
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Agile Windup (Yellow) that play both.
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Smash Instinct (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.812.812500000
22% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Smash Instinct (Blue) that play both.
New
Unexpected Backhand (Blue)
Unexpected Backhand (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Unexpected Backhand (Blue) that play both.
New
Flex Speed (Red)
Flex Speed (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.792.785714286
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Flex Speed (Red) that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Vigorous Smashup (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.652.647058824
19% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Vigorous Smashup (Yellow) that play both.
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Assault and Battery (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
17% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Assault and Battery (Blue) that play both.
Splatter Skull
Splatter Skull
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
14% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Splatter Skull that play both.
Bam Bam
Bam Bam
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Bam Bam that play both.
New
Challenge the Alpha
Challenge the Alpha
Avg. played: Β 
2.402.400000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Challenge the Alpha that play both.
New
Strongest Survive (Yellow)
Strongest Survive (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Strongest Survive (Yellow) that play both.
New
Buckwild (Yellow)
Buckwild (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.672.666666667
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Buckwild (Yellow) that play both.
New
Vigorous Smashup (Red)
Vigorous Smashup (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Vigorous Smashup (Red) that play both.
Clash of Agility (Red)
Clash of Agility (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Clash of Agility (Red) that play both.
Humble (Red)
Humble (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Humble (Red) that play both.
New
High Pitched Howl (Red)
High Pitched Howl (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
2.572.571428571
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and High Pitched Howl (Red) that play both.
Skull Crack
Skull Crack
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Skull Crack that play both.
Pulping (Yellow)
Pulping (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Pulping (Yellow) that play both.
Alpha Rampage
Alpha Rampage
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Alpha Rampage that play both.
Smashing Performance
Smashing Performance
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Smashing Performance that play both.
Savage Beatdown
Savage Beatdown
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Savage Beatdown that play both.
Clash of Might (Yellow)
Clash of Might (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Clash of Might (Yellow) that play both.
Clash of Might (Red)
Clash of Might (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Clash of Might (Red) that play both.
Massacre
Massacre
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Massacre that play both.
Attack Reaction
Pummel (Blue)
Pummel (Blue)
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Pummel (Blue) that play both.
Pummel (Yellow)
Pummel (Yellow)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Pummel (Yellow) that play both.
Defense Reaction
Reckless Swing
Reckless Swing
Avg. played: Β 
1.461.464285714
25% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Reckless Swing that play both.
Sink Below (Red)
Sink Below (Red)
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
12% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Sink Below (Red) that play both.
Shelter from the Storm
Shelter from the Storm
Avg. played: Β 
3.003.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Shelter from the Storm that play both.
Instant
No Fear
No Fear
Avg. played: Β 
1.601.600000000
10% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and No Fear that play both.
Remembrance
Remembrance
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
7% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Remembrance that play both.
New
Visit the Boneyard
Visit the Boneyard
Avg. played: Β 
2.002.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Visit the Boneyard that play both.
Resource
New
Authority of Ataya
Authority of Ataya
Avg. played: Β 
1.001.000000000
5% of decksPercentage of decks that could play both Energetic Impact and Authority of Ataya that play both.